222 research outputs found
Herbicide-resistant weeds : from research and knowledge to future needs
Synthetic herbicides have been used globally to control weeds in major field crops. This has imposed a strong selection for any trait that enables plant populations to survive and reproduce in the presence of the herbicide. Herbicide resistance in weeds must be minimized because it is a major limiting factor to food security in global agriculture. This represents a huge challenge that will require great research efforts to develop control strategies as alternatives to the dominant and almost exclusive practice of weed control by herbicides. Weed scientists, plant ecologists and evolutionary biologists should join forces and work towards an improved and more integrated understanding of resistance across all scales. This approach will likely facilitate the design of innovative solutions to the global herbicide resistance challenge
Efficient CuInSe 2 Solar Cells Fabricated by a Novel Ink Coating Approach
A novel technique is developed for the deposition of CuInSe 2 (CIS) thin films for solar cell applications. The technique uses an ink formulation that contains Cu-In metallic pigments. A precursor layer is first formed coating this ink onto the selected substrate. The precursor film is then reacted with Se to form the CIS compound. Solar cells were fabricated on CIS absorber layers prepared by this low cost ink coating approach and devices with a conversion efficiency of over 9.0% were demonstrated. © 1998 The Electrochemical Society. S1099-0062(98)08-063-8. All rights reserved. Manuscript submitted August 14, 1998; revised manuscript received September 9, 1998. Available electronically October 1, 1998. Group I-III-VI materials are considered to be highly promising as absorber layers in high-efficiency thin film solar cell structures. In fact, the highest efficiency thin film device to date was produced on a Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 (CIGS) absorber film grown by a vacuum evaporation technique. The demonstrated conversion efficiency of 17.7% confirmed the capability of this material to yield highly efficient active devices when employed in thin film solar cell structures. High-efficiency solar cells have commonly been fabricated on CuInSe 2 (CIS) or CIGS absorbers deposited by costly vacuum deposition techniques such as coevaporation 1 and two-stage processes utilizing evaporation or sputtering. 2 There is presently great interest in the development of new lower cost processing methods for the growth of high quality CIS-type absorbers for thin film solar cell applications. Slurry or ink deposition by large area nonvacuum coating methods such as screen printing, spraying, curtain coating, roll coating, or doctor blading are attractive low-cost approaches for the growth of thin film solar cell absorbers, provided that the precursor layers obtained by these deposition techniques can be converted into high quality semiconductor films that are required for solar cell fabrication. There have been several attempts to deposit CIS absorbers using the screen printing technique. For example, Arita et al. described a method that involved (i) mixing pure Cu, In, and Se powders in the compositional ratio of 1:1:2, (ii) milling these powders in a ball mill and forming a screen printable paste, (iii) screen printing the paste on a substrate, and (iv) sintering this precursor film to form the compound layer. As can be seen from the review of previous work, the nature of the ingredients in the formulation of a paste or an ink is very important for the formation of a precursor layer which can later be converted into a high quality CIS-type compound film with properties that are desirable for solar cell applications. In this article we report a low-cost ink coating technique that was successfully employed for the deposition of CIS absorbers that could be used for the fabrication of over 9% efficient thin film solar cells. Experimental The general steps of the low-cost process used in this work for the growth of thin film CIS absorbers are schematically shown in The source of Cu and In in this work was a Cu-In alloy powder with a preselected and fixed Cu/In stoichiometric ratio. The Cu-In alloy powder was obtained by the melt atomization technique. To prepare the powder, 99.99% pure Cu and 99.99% pure In were melted under a hydrogen curtain at above 900°C. The Cu/In ratio of the melt corresponded to the targeted value range of 0.87-0.9. The melted alloy was transformed into powder in a gas atomizer employing Ar as the quenching gas. Quenched powder was collected at the bottom of the reactor and sieved to separate the particles that were smaller than 20 µm in size which were used in this work as the pigment. About 10 g of the Cu-In pigment was mixed with 23 g of water. A small amount (about 1.5 wt %) of a wetting agent and dispersant were added to this aqueous formulation. The mixture was milled in a ball mill for 42 h. The resulting metallic ink was water-thin. Particle size analysis was done on a sample of this ink using
Seedbank Persistence of Palmer Amaranth (\u3ci\u3eAmaranthus palmeri\u3c/i\u3e) and Waterhemp (\u3ci\u3eAmaranthus tuberculatus\u3c/i\u3e) across Diverse Geographical Regions in the United States
Knowledge of the effects of burial depth and burial duration on seed viability and, consequently, seedbank persistence of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) and waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer] ecotypes can be used for the development of efficient weed management programs. This is of particular interest, given the great fecundity of both species and, consequently, their high seedbank replenishment potential. Seeds of both species collected from five different locations across the United States were investigated in seven states (sites) with different soil and climatic conditions. Seeds were placed at two depths (0 and 15cm) for 3 yr. Each year, seeds were retrieved, and seed damage (shrunken, malformed, or broken) plus losses (deteriorated and futile germination) and viability were evaluated. Greater seed damage plus loss averaged across seed origin, burial depth, and year was recorded for lots tested at Illinois (51.3% and 51.8%) followed by Tennessee (40.5% and 45.1%) and Missouri (39.2% and 42%) for A. palmeri and A. tuberculatus, respectively. The site differences for seed persistence were probably due to higher volumetric water content at these sites. Rates of seed demise were directly proportional to burial depth (α=0.001), whereas the percentage of viable seeds recovered after 36 mo on the soil surface ranged from 4.1% to 4.3% compared with 5% to 5.3% at the 15-cm depth for A. palmeri and A. tuberculatus, respectively. Seed viability loss was greater in the seeds placed on the soil surface compared with the buried seeds. The greatest influences on seed viability were burial conditions and time and site-specific soil conditions, more so than geographical location. Thus, management of these weed species should focus on reducing seed shattering, enhancing seed removal from the soil surface, or adjusting tillage systems
Seed-shattering phenology at soybean harvest of economically important weeds in multiple regions of the United States. Part 3: Drivers of seed shatter
Seed retention, and ultimately seed shatter, are extremely important for the efficacy of harvest weed seed control (HWSC) and are likely influenced by various agroecological and environmental factors. Field studies investigated seed-shattering phenology of 22 weed species across three soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-producing regions in the United States. We further evaluated the potential drivers of seed shatter in terms of weather conditions, growing degree days, and plant biomass. Based on the results, weather conditions had no consistent impact on weed seed shatter. However, there was a positive correlation between individual weed plant biomass and delayed weed seed-shattering rates during harvest. This work demonstrates that HWSC can potentially reduce weed seedbank inputs of plants that have escaped early-season management practices and retained seed through harvest. However, smaller individuals of plants within the same population that shatter seed before harvest pose a risk of escaping early-season management and HWSC
Seed-shattering phenology at soybean harvest of economically important weeds in multiple regions of the United States. Part 1: Broadleaf species
Potential effectiveness of harvest weed seed control (HWSC) systems depends upon seed shatter of the target weed species at crop maturity, enabling its collection and processing at crop harvest. However, seed retention likely is influenced by agroecological and environmental factors. In 2016 and 2017, we assessed seed-shatter phenology in 13 economically important broadleaf weed species in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] from crop physiological maturity to 4 wk after physiological maturity at multiple sites spread across 14 states in the southern, northern, and mid-Atlantic United States. Greater proportions of seeds were retained by weeds in southern latitudes and shatter rate increased at northern latitudes. Amaranthus spp. seed shatter was low (0% to 2%), whereas shatter varied widely in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) (2% to 90%) over the weeks following soybean physiological maturity. Overall, the broadleaf species studied shattered less than 10% of their seeds by soybean harvest. Our results suggest that some of the broadleaf species with greater seed retention rates in the weeks following soybean physiological maturity may be good candidates for HWSC
Seed-shattering phenology at soybean harvest of economically important weeds in multiple regions of the United States. Part 2: Grass species
Seed shatter is an important weediness trait on which the efficacy of harvest weed seed control (HWSC) depends. The level of seed shatter in a species is likely influenced by agroecological and environmental factors. In 2016 and 2017, we assessed seed shatter of eight economically important grass weed species in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] from crop physiological maturity to 4 wk after maturity at multiple sites spread across 11 states in the southern, northern, and mid-Atlantic United States. From soybean maturity to 4 wk after maturity, cumulative percent seed shatter was lowest in the southern U.S. regions and increased moving north through the states. At soybean maturity, the percent of seed shatter ranged from 1% to 70%. That range had shifted to 5% to 100% (mean: 42%) by 25 d after soybean maturity. There were considerable differences in seed-shatter onset and rate of progression between sites and years in some species that could impact their susceptibility to HWSC. Our results suggest that many summer annual grass species are likely not ideal candidates for HWSC, although HWSC could substantially reduce their seed output during certain years
- …