21 research outputs found

    Primary Hyperparathyroidism Patients with Positive Preoperative Sestamibi Scan and Negative Ultrasound Are More Likely to Have Posteriorly Located Upper Gland Adenomas (PLUGs)

    Get PDF
    BackgroundStandard preoperative imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism usually includes sestamibi scanning (MIBI) and ultrasound (US). In a subset of patients with a positive MIBI and a negative US, we hypothesize that the parathyroid adenomas are more likely to be located posteriorly in the neck, where anatomically they are more difficult to detect by US.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 661 patients treated for primary hyperparathyroidism between 2004 and 2009 at a tertiary referral center. We included patients who for their first operation had a MIBI that localized a single lesion in the neck and an US that found no parathyroid adenoma. We excluded patients with persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism, and patients with MIBIs that were negative, that had more than one positive focus, or that had foci outside of the neck. Sixty-six cases were included in the final analysis.ResultsA total of 54 patients (83%) had a single adenoma, 4 (6%) had double adenomas, and 7 (11%) had hyperplasia. Thirty-three patients (51%) had a single upper gland adenoma; 19 of these (58%) were posteriorly located upper gland adenomas (PLUGs). PLUGs occurred more often on the right side than on the left (P = 0.048, Fisher's test). PLUGs were also larger than other single adenomas (mean 1.85 vs. 1.48 cm, P = 0.021, t-test). Seventy-six percent of patients successfully underwent a unilateral or focused exploration. Six patients (9%) had persistent disease, which is double our group's overall average (4-5%).ConclusionsPrimary hyperparathyroid patients with preoperative positive MIBI and negative US are more likely to have PLUGs

    Adipocyte browning and higher mitochondrial function in peri-adrenal but not subcutaneous fat in pheochromocytoma

    Get PDF
    Context: Patients with pheochromocytoma (pheo) show presence of multilocular adipocytes that express uncoupling protein (UCP) 1 within periadrenal (pADR) and omental (OME) fat depots. It has been hypothesized that this is due to adrenergic stimulation by catecholamines produced by the pheo tumors. Objective: To characterize the prevalence and respiratory activity of brown-like adipocytes within pADR, OME and subcutaneous (SC) fat depots in human adult pheo patients. Design: This was an observational cohort study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: We studied 46 patients who underwent surgery for benign adrenal tumors (21pheos and 25 controls with adrenocortical adenomas). Main outcome measure: We characterized adipocyte browning in pADR, SC, and OME fat depots for histological and immunohistological features, mitochondrial respiration rate, and gene expression. We also determined circulating levels of catecholamines and other browning-related hormones. Results: 11 of 21 pheo pADR adipose samples, but only 1 of 25 pADR samples from control patients, exhibited multilocular adipocytes. The pADR browning phenotype was associated with higher plasma catecholamines and raised UCP1. Mitochondria from multilocular pADR fat of pheo patients exhibited increased rates of coupled and uncoupled respiration. Global gene expression analysis in pADR fat revealed enrichment in β-oxidation genes in pheo patients with multilocular adipocytes. No SC or OME fat depots exhibited aspects of browning. Conclusion: Browning of the pADR depot occurred in half of pheo patients and was associated with increased catecholamines and mitochondrial activity. No browning was detected in other fat depots, suggesting that other factors are required to promote browning in these depots

    Risk of Advanced Papillary Thyroid Cancer in Obese Patients

    No full text
    Objective: To determine if increasing body mass index (BMI) is associated with more aggressive disease and adverse surgical outcomes in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).Design: Retrospective review of a prospective database. Setting: Single academic tertiary care center.Patients: A total of 443 patients over age 18 who underwent total thyroidectomy for PTC from January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2011 were included in the analysis. Patients were organized into four BMI groups: normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), obese (30-39.9 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (¡Ý40 kg/m2). Main Outcome Measures: Disease stage at presentation; histological subtype; duration of anesthetic induction and extubation; duration of surgery; surgical complications; length of hospital stay, and American Society of Anesthesiology Classification (ASA).Results: Ages ranged from 18-89. Greater BMI was associated with more advanced disease stage at presentation (p<0.0001) and with more aggressive PTC histopathology (p=0.027). Morbidly obese patients presented more frequently with stage III or stage IV disease (OR 3.67, p<0.0001). Greater BMI was also associated with longer duration of anesthetic induction (p<0.01), increased length of stay (p<0.001), and higher ASA classification (p<0.001). Duration of surgery was not associated with BMI. There was a trend towards larger tumors with increasing BMI (p=0.06). Obese BMI was associated with more preoperative vocal cord paralysis due to local invasion (OR 9.21, p=0.001). Conclusions: Obese patients present with more advanced stage and more aggressive forms of papillary thyroid cancer. This suggests that obese patients should be screened for thyroid cancer

    Risk-Based Ultrasound Screening for Thyroid Cancer in Obese Patients is Cost-Effective

    No full text
    BackgroundA higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with more advanced stages of thyroid cancer. Screening obese patients for thyroid cancer has been proposed but has yet to be examined for cost-effectiveness. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound (US) screening of obese patients for thyroid cancer.MethodsA decision-tree model compared cost savings for the following: (i) base case scenario of an obese patient with thyroid nodule found by palpation, (ii) universal US screening of all obese patients, and (iii) risk-based US screening in obese patients. Risk-based screening consisted of patients who had at least one of four major identified risk factors for thyroid cancer (family history of thyroid cancer, radiation exposure, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and/or elevated thyrotropin). Patients with nodules underwent established treatment and management guidelines. The model accounted for recurrence, complications, and long-term treatment/follow-up for five years. Outcome probabilities were identified from a literature review. Costs were estimated using a third-party payer perspective. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the impact of risk factor prevalence and US cost on the model.ResultsThe resulted costs per patient were 210.73inthebasecasescenario,210.73 in the base case scenario, 434.10 in the universal US screening arm, and 166.72intheriskbasedscreeningarm.Riskbasedscreeningremainedcosteffectiveuntilmorethan14166.72 in the risk-based screening arm. Risk-based screening remained cost-effective until more than 14% of obese patients had risk factors and with a wide variation of US costs (0-$1113).ConclusionRisk-based US screening in selected obese patients with risk factors for thyroid cancer is cost-effective. Recommendations for screening this subgroup will result in cost savings and a likely decreased morbidity and mortality in this subpopulation with more aggressive disease

    Risk-Based Ultrasound Screening for Thyroid Cancer in Obese Patients is Cost-Effective

    No full text
    Background: A higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with more advanced stages of thyroid cancer. Screening obese patients for thyroid cancer has been proposed but has yet to be examined for cost-effectiveness. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound (US) screening of obese patients for thyroid cancer. Methods: A decision-tree model compared cost savings for the following: (i) base case scenario of an obese patient with thyroid nodule found by palpation, (ii) universal US screening of all obese patients, and (iii) risk-based US screening in obese patients. Risk-based screening consisted of patients who had at least one of four major identified risk factors for thyroid cancer (family history of thyroid cancer, radiation exposure, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and/or elevated thyrotropin). Patients with nodules underwent established treatment and management guidelines. The model accounted for recurrence, complications, and long-term treatment/follow-up for five years. Outcome probabilities were identified from a literature review. Costs were estimated using a third-party payer perspective. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the impact of risk factor prevalence and US cost on the model. Results: The resulted costs per patient were 210.73inthebasecasescenario,210.73 in the base case scenario, 434.10 in the universal US screening arm, and 166.72intheriskbasedscreeningarm.Riskbasedscreeningremainedcosteffectiveuntilmorethan14166.72 in the risk-based screening arm. Risk-based screening remained cost-effective until more than 14% of obese patients had risk factors and with a wide variation of US costs (0–$1113). Conclusion: Risk-based US screening in selected obese patients with risk factors for thyroid cancer is cost-effective. Recommendations for screening this subgroup will result in cost savings and a likely decreased morbidity and mortality in this subpopulation with more aggressive disease
    corecore