PEGylated Red-Emitting Calcium Probe with Improved Sensing Properties for Neuroscience.

Monitoring calcium concentration in the cytosol is of main importance as this ion drives many biological cascades within the cell. To this end, molecular calcium probes are widely used. Most of them, especially the red emitting probes, suffer from nonspecific interactions with inner membranes due to the hydrophobic nature of their fluorophore. To circumvent this issue, calcium probes conjugated to dextran can be used to enhance the hydrophilicity and reduce the nonspecific interaction and compartmentalization. However, dextran conjugates also feature important drawbacks including lower affinity, lower dynamic range, and slow diffusion. Herein, we combined the advantage of molecular probes and dextran conjugate without their drawbacks by designing a new red emitting turn-on calcium probe based on PET quenching, Rhod-PEG, in which the rhodamine fluorophore bears four PEG4 units. This modification led to a high affinity calcium probe (Kd = 748 nM) with reduced nonspecific interactions, enhanced photostability, two-photon absorbance, and brightness compared to the commercially available Rhod-2. After spectral characterizations, we showed that Rhod-PEG quickly and efficiently diffused through the dendrites of pyramidal neurons with an enhanced sensitivity (ΔF/F0) at shorter time after patching compared to Rhod-2.journal article2017 Nov 222017 10 24imported"Supporting information" disponible sur le site de l'éditeur à l'adresse suivante : http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acssensors.7b0066

Predominant Functional Expression of Kv1.3 by Activated Microglia of the Hippocampus after Status epilepticus

BACKGROUND:Growing evidence indicates that the functional state of microglial cells differs according to the pathological conditions that trigger their activation. In particular, activated microglial cells can express sets of Kv subunits which sustain delayed rectifying potassium currents (Kdr) and modulate differently microglia proliferation and ability to release mediators. We recently reported that hippocampal microglia is in a particular activation state after a status epilepticus (SE) and the present study aimed at identifying which of the Kv channels are functionally expressed by microglia in this model. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:SE was induced by systemic injection of kainate in CX3CR1(eGFP/+) mice and whole cell recordings of fluorescent microglia were performed in acute hippocampal slices prepared 48 h after SE. Microglia expressed Kdr currents which were characterized by a potential of half-maximal activation near -25 mV, prominent steady-state and cumulative inactivations. Kdr currents were almost abolished by the broad spectrum antagonist 4-Aminopyridine (1 mM). In contrast, tetraethylammonium (TEA) at a concentration of 1 mM, known to block Kv3.1, Kv1.1 and 1.2 subunits, only weakly reduced Kdr currents. However, at a concentration of 5 mM which should also affect Kv1.3 and 1.6, TEA inhibited about 30% of the Kdr conductance. Alpha-dendrotoxin, which selectively inhibits Kv1.1, 1.2 and 1.6, reduced only weakly Kdr currents, indicating that channels formed by homomeric assemblies of these subunits are not important contributors of Kdr currents. Finally, agitoxin-2 and margatoxin strongly inhibited the current. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:These results indicate that Kv1.3 containing channels predominantly determined Kdr currents in activated microglia after SE

PIEZO1 expression at the glio-vascular unit adjusts to neuroinflammation in seizure conditions

Mechanosensors are emerging players responding to hemodynamic and physical inputs. Their significance in the central nervous system remains relatively uncharted. Using human-derived brain specimens or cells and a pre-clinical model of mesio-temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), we examined how the mRNA levels of the mechanosensitive channel PIEZO1 adjust to disease-associated pro-inflammatory trajectories. In brain tissue micro-punches obtained from 18 drug-resistant MTLE patients, PIEZO1 expression positively correlated with that of the pro-inflammatory biomarkers TNFα, IL-1β, and NF-kB in the epileptogenic hippocampus compared to the adjacent amygdala and temporal cortex. Using an experimental mouse model of MTLE, we found hippocampal Piezo1 and cytokine expression levels increased post-status epilepticus (SE) and during epileptogenesis. Piezo1 expression positively correlated with Tnfα, Il1β, and Nf-kb expression in the hippocampal foci. Next, by combining RNAscope with immunofluorescence, we identified Piezo1 in glio-vascular cells. Post-SE and during epileptogenesis, ameboid IBA1 microglia, hypertrophic GFAP astrocytes, and damaged NG2DsRed pericytes exhibited time-dependent patterns of increased Piezo1 expression. Digital droplet PCR analysis confirmed the Piezo1 trajectory in isolated hippocampal microvessels in the ipsi and contralateral hippocampi. The examinations performed in this model showed Piezo1 expression returning towards basal levels after the epileptogenesis-associated peak inflammation. From these associations, we next asked whether pro-inflammatory players directly regulate PIEZO1 expression. We used human-derived brain cells and confirmed that endothelium, astrocytes, and pericytes expressed PIEZO1. Exposure to human recombinant TNFα or IL1β upregulated NF-kB in all cells. Furthermore, TNFα induced PIEZO1 expression in a dose and time-dependent manner, primarily in astrocytes. This exploratory study describes a spatiotemporal dialogue between PIEZO1 neuro-mechanobiology and neuro-inflammatory cell remodeling. The precise cellular and functional mechanisms regulating this interplay in disease conditions warrant further investigation

Identification of sleep-promoting neurons in vitro

The neurons responsible for the onset of sleep are thought to be located in the preoptic area and more specifically, in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO). Here we identify sleep-promoting neurons in vitro and show that they represent an homogeneous population of cells that must be inhibited by systems of arousal during the waking state. We find that two-thirds of the VLPO neurons are multipolar triangular cells that show a low-threshold spike. This proportion matches that of cells active during sleep in the same region. We then show, using single-cell reverse transcriptase followed by polymerase chain reaction, that these neurons probably contain gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). We also show that these neurons are inhibited by noradrenaline and acetylcholine, both of which are transmitters of wakefulness. As most of these cells are also inhibited by serotonin but unaffected by histamine, their overall inhibition by transmitters of wakefulness is in agreement with their relative inactivity during waking with respect to sleep. We propose that the reciprocal inhibitory interaction of such VLPO neurons with the noradrenergic, serotoninergic and cholinergic waking systems to which they project is a key factor for promoting sleep

Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads

Microglial research has advanced considerably in recent decades yet has been constrained by a rolling series of dichotomies such as “resting versus activated” and “M1 versus M2.” This dualistic classification of good or bad microglia is inconsistent with the wide repertoire of microglial states and functions in development, plasticity, aging, and diseases that were elucidated in recent years. New designations continuously arising in an attempt to describe the different microglial states, notably defined using transcriptomics and proteomics, may easily lead to a misleading, although unintentional, coupling of categories and functions. To address these issues, we assembled a group of multidisciplinary experts to discuss our current understanding of microglial states as a dynamic concept and the importance of addressing microglial function. Here, we provide a conceptual framework and recommendations on the use of microglial nomenclature for researchers, reviewers, and editors, which will serve as the foundations for a future white paper

Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads.

Microglial research has advanced considerably in recent decades yet has been constrained by a rolling series of dichotomies such as "resting versus activated" and "M1 versus M2." This dualistic classification of good or bad microglia is inconsistent with the wide repertoire of microglial states and functions in development, plasticity, aging, and diseases that were elucidated in recent years. New designations continuously arising in an attempt to describe the different microglial states, notably defined using transcriptomics and proteomics, may easily lead to a misleading, although unintentional, coupling of categories and functions. To address these issues, we assembled a group of multidisciplinary experts to discuss our current understanding of microglial states as a dynamic concept and the importance of addressing microglial function. Here, we provide a conceptual framework and recommendations on the use of microglial nomenclature for researchers, reviewers, and editors, which will serve as the foundations for a future white paper

Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads.

Microglial research has advanced considerably in recent decades yet has been constrained by a rolling series of dichotomies such as "resting versus activated" and "M1 versus M2." This dualistic classification of good or bad microglia is inconsistent with the wide repertoire of microglial states and functions in development, plasticity, aging, and diseases that were elucidated in recent years. New designations continuously arising in an attempt to describe the different microglial states, notably defined using transcriptomics and proteomics, may easily lead to a misleading, although unintentional, coupling of categories and functions. To address these issues, we assembled a group of multidisciplinary experts to discuss our current understanding of microglial states as a dynamic concept and the importance of addressing microglial function. Here, we provide a conceptual framework and recommendations on the use of microglial nomenclature for researchers, reviewers, and editors, which will serve as the foundations for a future white paper