24 research outputs found

    EVALUATION OF INTRODUCED STRAWBERRY VARIETIES FOR BREEDING AND PRACTICAL USE

    Get PDF
    The results of years of researching 85 strawberry varieties in the North-West of Russia are presented. Evaluation of introduced varieties was made as compared with the local commercial cultivars, and the sources of major biological and agronomic traits interesting for breeding and and practice were identified

    Development of a teaching aid on the discipline "professional foreign language" for students of universities of technical directions

    Get PDF
    ЦСлью Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ исслСдования являСтся Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ° эффСктивного Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΌΠ° написания ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π° ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π±Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎ дисциплинС "ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ иностранный язык" для студСнтов тСхничСских Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² использовании прСподаватСлями английского языка, Π½Π΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈ спСциализированных Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² тСхничСском Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ учащихся.The purpose of this study is to develop an effective algorithm for writing a set of training materials for the discipline β€œProfessional foreign language” for students of technical field, applicable to ESP teachers who do not have specialized knowledge in the technical sphere

    ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ° ослоТнСний колпроктэктомии с Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ J-ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅Ρ€Π²ΡƒΠ°Ρ€Π°

    Get PDF
    On the basis of the literature the article analyzes the methodological aspects of preoperative planning and surgical techniques for the prevention intra- and postoperative complications for colproctectomy with J-pouch reservoir. Knowledge of these features can reduce the number of complications and improve the functional results of surgical treatment.Π’ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ Π½Π° основании обобщСния Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‹ мСтодологичСскиС аспСкты ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ планирования ΠΈ тСхничСскиС хирургичСскиС ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌΡ‹ для прСдупрСТдСния ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°- ΠΈ послСопСрационных ослоТнСний ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ колпроктэктомии с Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ‚Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅Ρ€Π²ΡƒΠ°Ρ€Π°. Π—Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… особСнностСй позволяСт ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ количСство ослоТнСний ΠΈ ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ хирургичСского лСчСния

    Complete mesocolic excision for colonic cancer : Society for Translational Medicine expert consensus statement

    Get PDF
    Total mesorectal excision (TME), a revolutionary change and a milestone in the history of surgical treatment for rectal cancer, has been widely recognized as the gold standard and is now a routine procedure. The concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) was proposed based on the similar philosophy as TME, aimed to achieve better surgical quality and improve the oncological outcomes of colon cancer. In recent years, many surgeons have increasingly adopted the principle and conducted clinical trials to verify the effect of CME; however, whether CME should be used as the standard surgical technique is still controversial. In this article, we reviewed and updated the literature. Experts in this field from nine countries were invited to complete a questionnaire concerning CME, with the aim to illustrate the embryological and anatomical basis and reach a consensus of the current situation and future of CME

    Dual-Energy Semiconductor Detector of X-rays and Gamma Radiation

    No full text

    Dual-Energy Semiconductor Detector of X-Rays and Gamma Radiation

    No full text

    Alonopsis elongata Sars 1861

    No full text
    <i>Alonopsis elongata (</i> Sars, 1861) <p> Leydig, 1860: 219–221, Pl. 9: figs 66–67 (<i>Lynceus macrourus</i>); Sars, 1861: 161 (<i>Alona</i>); Schoedler, 1863: 33 (<i>Acroperus intermedius</i>); Müller, 1867: 170–171, Pl. 4: fig. 28 (<i>elongata</i>); Lilljeborg, 1901: 434–440, Pl. 65: figs 5–20; Smirnov, 1966: 114–134, figs 1–10 (<i>Acroperus</i>); 1971: 413–415, figs 500–510 (<i>Acroperus</i>); Flössner, 1972: 335–339, fig. 124 (<i>Acroperus</i>); Negrea, 1983: 304–306, fig. 124; Flössner, 2000: 335–339, fig. 124.</p> <p> <b>Type locality.</b> Lake Sognsvand (now Songsvann), the vicinity of Oslo, Norway.</p> <p> <b>Possible type material.</b> Tube GOS F12424; slide GOS F9045 (locality is not specified, both labelled just as “ Norway ”, which is typical for material studied by Sars at this time), Zoological Museum of Oslo University, Norway.</p> <p> <b>Material studied:</b> several specimens from the type locality, 0 9.2003, coll. A.Y. Sinev; over 100 parthenogenetic females, numerous ephippial females and males from Russia, Murmansk Area, Khibiny Mountains, Lake Malyi Vud'yavr, 11.08.2000, coll. A.Y. Sinev; over 50 parthenogenetic females from Russia, Karelia Republic, vicinity of Moscow State University White Sea Biological Station, lake Krugloe, 16.07.2008, coll. A.Y. Sinev; over 50 parthenogenetic females from Russia, Yaroslavl Area, Uglich Reservoir, 23.07.1962, coll. N. N. Smirnov, personal collection of A.A. Kotov (Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Moscow, Russia), AAK-1999-090; 12 females from Russia, Tomsk Area, Lake Bol'shoe Purul'do, near locality Kharsk, coll. A. A. Kotov, personal collection of A.A. Kotov (Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Moscow, Russia), AAK 2005-279.</p> <p> <b>Description. Parthenogenetic female.</b> Body (Fig. 1 A–D, 2A, C) height-length ratio 0.61–0.65. Valves (Fig. 1 E, 2D), as for genus. Head typical of the genus, head shield (Fig. 3 C) with broadly rounded anterior margin, with no defined rostrum. Head pores as for genus (Fig. 2 B, 3C), IP/PP ratio about 1.3–2.0 in adult. Labrum (Fig. 4 A), thorax, abdomen and postabdomen (Fig. 3 A–B, E–G) as for genus.</p> <p>Antennule (Fig. 4 B), antenna (Fig. 4 C) and limb I (Fig. 4 E–G) as for genus. Limb II (Fig. 4 H–I) as for genus, with scraper 7 significantly larger than scraper 8, armed with 7–9 very robust, massive denticles. Limbs III (Fig. 4 J–K), VI (Fig. 4 L–N), and V (Fig. 4 O) as for genus; incursion between lobes of exopodite V as a right angle. Limb VI (Fig. 4 P) as for genus.</p> <p> <b>Ephippial female</b> (Fig. 1 F) with body slightly higher than in parthenogenetic female, ephippium dark yellowbrown, without prominent sculpture.</p> <p> <b>Male</b>. <i>General shape</i> of juvenile males of instar I (Fig. 1 G) and II (Fig. 1 H) similar to that of juvenile females of same instar; instar II males smaller than females of same instar. General shape of adult males (Fig. 1 I, 2J) similar to that of instar II juvenile females, body height/body length = 0.63–0.65. Ocellus and eye of same size as in female.</p> <p> <i>Postabdomen</i>. In juvenile instar I males, similar to that in juvenile females (Fig. 3 H), with sperm duct openings located before the middle of ventral margin. In instar II juvenile males (Fig 3 I), shorter than that in female. Gonopores located close to the end of postabdomen. Armament of postabdomen and postabdominal claw same as in female in both juvenile instars. In adult male, postabdomen (Fig. 2 K, 3J) narrower than in female, narrowing distally and not curved. Postanal angle not defined, preanal angle obtuse. Distal part of postabdomen 4 times longer than preanal. Sperm duct openings at the end of postabdomen above the base of postabdominal claws. Clusters of short setules in place of marginal denticles, lateral fascicles of setules same as in female. Postabdominal claw two times shorter than that of female, curved, without basal spine, with pecten of about 10 long spines, exceeding the distalmost the width of claw base.</p> <p> <i>Antennule</i>. In instar I male, same as in female. In instar II male antennule (Fig. 5 B) broader than in female, with an anlage of male seta, aesthetascs same as in female. In adult male antennule shorter than in female (Fig. 5 D), with 10 terminal and 2 lateral aesthetascs. Male seta arising at 1/4 length from tip, reaching to the end of antennule.</p> <p> <i>Thoracic limb I</i>. In instar I male with a short anlage of copulatory hook, IDL same as in female (Fig. 5 A). In instar II male, copulatory hook curved (Fig. 5 C). Ventral face of limb with anlage of copulatory brush seta and a row of about 8 short setules below it. IDL with anlage of male seta, and other setae same as in female. In adult male, limb I stouter than that of female (Fig. 5 E–F), with V-shaped copulatory hook. Copulatory brush present; about 30 irregularly spaced long setules on ventral face of limb below them, following by 20 much shorter setules in regular row. IDL seta 1 present, setae 2 and 3 subequal in length, much thinner than in female; male seta thick, about half as long as seta 3.</p> <p> <b>Size.</b> In studied material, length of females of juvenile instar I— 0.43–0.47 mm; juvenile instar II— 0.49–0.57 mm; adult female— 0.59–0.91 mm (according to literature—up to 1.1 mm). Length of male of juvenile instar I— 0.44–0.46 mm; instar II— 0.47–0.51 mm; adult male— 0.54–0.57 mm (according to literature, up to 0.6 mm).</p>Published as part of <i>Sinev, Artem Y. & Atroschenko, Margarita M., 2011, Revision of the genus Alonopsis Sars, 1862 and its position within Aloninae (Cladocera: Anomopoda: Chydoridae), pp. 1-17 in Zootaxa 2800</i> on pages 12-13, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/203597">10.5281/zenodo.203597</a&gt
    corecore