Acupuncture Treatment for Bortezomib-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Case Report

Peripheral neuropathy is a common and severe dose-limiting side effect of the chemotherapy agent, bortezomib, in multiple myeloma patients. Treatment with narcotics, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants has limited response and potential significant side effects. Acupuncture has been reported to be effective in treating diabetic neuropathy and chemo-induced peripheral neuropathy. There has not been report on the effect of acupuncture in treating bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy specifically. Here, we report a successful case of using acupuncture to relieve bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms

Pharmacokinetics and safety of elotuzumab combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma and various levels of renal impairment: Results of a phase Ib study

AbstractIntroductionThe present study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of elotuzumab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody against signaling lymphocyte activation molecule-F7, combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and renal impairment.Patients and MethodsPatients with MM and normal renal function (NRF) (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 90 mL/min), severe renal impairment (SRI) (CrCl < 30 mL/min, not requiring dialysis), or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (requiring dialysis) were enrolled in this open-label, phase Ib study. Elotuzumab (10 mg/kg), lenalidomide (5-25 mg), and dexamethasone (40 mg) were administered in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity developed. The primary endpoint was single-dose elotuzumab pharmacokinetics.ResultsA total of 26 patients (median age, 63 years) were treated (NRF, n = 8; SRI, n = 9; ESRD, n = 9). The median baseline CrCl was 105 mL/min (range, 84-146 mL/min) for those with NRF and 26 mL/min (range, 15-33 mL/min) for those with SRI. Twenty-three patients (89%) had received previous therapy (median, 2 regimens; range, 1-7). Treatment was discontinued in 6 patients with NRF, 4 with SRI, and 5 with ESRD, primarily because of disease progression. The mean elotuzumab serum concentrations were comparable across groups (n = 23). No statistically significant differences were observed in the maximum observed serum concentration, area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable serum concentration, or area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity when the SRI and ESRD groups were compared with the NRF group (P > .05). All patients had ≥ 1 adverse event (AE). Of the 8 patients with NRF, 9 with SRI, and 9 with ESRD, 7, 8, and 7 experienced grade 3 to 4 AEs. The overall response rates were 75% in the NRF, 67% in the SRI, and 56% in the ESRD groups.ConclusionThe results of the present study support the use of elotuzumab for the treatment of patients with MM and renal dysfunction without dose adjustment

Integrated safety profile of single-agent carfilzomib: experience from 526 patients enrolled in 4 phase II clinical studies

Carfilzomib, a selective proteasome inhibitor, was approved in 2012 for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Safety data for single-agent carfilzomib have been analyzed for 526 patients with advanced multiple myeloma who took part in one of 4 phase II studies (PX-171-003-A0, PX-171-003-A1, PX-171-004, and PX-171-005). Overall analyses of adverse events and treatment modifications are presented, as well as specific analyses of adverse events by organ system. Overall, the most common adverse events of any grade included fatigue (55.5%), anemia (46.8%), and nausea (44.9%). In the grouped analyses, any grade adverse events were reported in 22.1% for any cardiac (7.2% cardiac failure), 69.0% for any respiratory (42.2% dyspnea), and 33.1% for any grouped renal impairment adverse event (24.1% increased serum creatinine). The most common non-hematologic adverse events were generally Grade 1 or 2 in severity, while Grade 3/4 adverse events were primarily hematologic and mostly reversible. There was no evidence of cumulative bone marrow suppression, either neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia occurred infrequently (1.1%). Notably, the incidence of peripheral neuropathy was low overall (13.9%), including patients with baseline peripheral neuropathy (12.7%). Additionally, the incidence of discontinuations or dose reductions attributable to adverse events was low. These data demonstrate that single-agent carfilzomib has an acceptable safety profile in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The tolerable safety profile allows for administration of full-dose carfilzomib, both for extended periods and in a wide spectrum of patients with advanced multiple myeloma, including those with pre-existing comorbidities

Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) has a consistently ominous prognosis, even after progress in the last decades. PCL deserves a prompt identification to start the most effective treatment for this ultra-high-risk disease. The aim of this position paper is to revisit the diagnosis of PCL according to the presence of circulating plasma cells in patients otherwise meeting diagnostic criteria of multiple myeloma. We could identify two retrospective series where the question about what number of circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood should be used for defining PCL. The presence of ?5% circulating plasma cells in patients with MM had a similar adverse prognostic impact as the previously defined PCL. Therefore, PCL should be defined by the presence of 5% or more circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears in patients otherwise diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma.Funding: This work has been supported in part by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Health (FIS PI19/00669), Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) and 2017SGR00792 (AGAUR; Generalitat de Catalunya)

A Phase II Trial of AZD6244 (Selumetinib, ARRY-142886), an Oral MEK1/2 Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

AZD6244 is a MEK1/2 inhibitor with significant preclinical activity in multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This phase 2 study used a two-stage Simon design to determine the AZD6244 response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory MM

The Role of Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy. The treatment of this disease has changed considerably over the last two decades with the introduction to the clinical practice of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. Basic research efforts towards better understanding of normal and missing immune surveillence in myeloma have led to development of new strategies and therapies that require the engagement of the immune system. Many of these treatments are under clinical development and have already started providing encouraging results. We, for the second time in the last two decades, are about to witness another shift of the paradigm in the management of this ailment. This review will summarize the major approaches in myeloma immunotherapies

ABO mismatch may affect engraftment in multiple myeloma patients receiving nonmyeloablative conditioning.

BACKGROUND: Blood group incompatibility does not appear to affect the overall outcome in patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic BMT. Data on ABO-mismatched transplantation in the nonmyeloablative setting are limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the effects of ABO mismatches in multiple myeloma patients who received a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen was conducted. RESULTS: Three of 27 patients received a minor ABO-mismatched graft, all with evidence of hemolysis before converting to donor ABO group on Days 10, 15, and 6. Six patients received a major ABO-mismatched graft; of these, three developed GVHD of more than grade 2 and subsequently converted to the ABO blood group of the donor on Days 38, 33, and 43. Of the three patients without GVHD, one rejected the allograft and had autologous reconstitution. One remained a mixed chimera to Day 100 despite three donor lymphocyte infusions, and one developed pure RBC aplasia. None of the ABO-matched patients rejected the graft, whether they developed GVHD or not. RBC transfusions were significantly higher in the major and minor ABO-mismatched patients than in the ABO-matched patients, with medians of 12 units (range, 2-35), 13 units (range, 5-18), and 4 units (range, 2-15), respectively (p = 0.02). ABO-matched patients had a similar incidence of GVHD, with 5 of 9 ABO-mismatched patients (56%) having more than grade 2 versus 10 of 18 (56%). Four of 9 ABO-mismatched patients (44%) were mixed chimeras up to Day 100 versus 2 of 18 ABO-matched patients (11%), and the difference was significant (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with ABO mismatch had problems with engraftment, including graft rejection, pure RBC aplasia, and mixed-lineage chimerism. RBC transfusions were significantly higher in the ABO-mismatched recipients. GVHD may play a role in engraftment, possibly by facilitating the disappearance of native ABO antibodies via graft-versus-plasma cell effect. A prospective study to evaluate the effects of ABO mismatch on engraftment in the nonmyeloablative setting is needed