Estudio IDEA (International Day for Evaluation of Abdominal Obesity): prevalencia de obesidad abdominal y factores de riesgo asociados en atención primaria en Colombia

Introduction. Obesity is frequently associated with risk factors for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Central obesity is a marker of increased intra-abdominal adiposity and a known risk factor for atherosclerosis and diabetes; it is also a good predictor of risk for coronary events, cardiovascular mortality, diabetes and metabolic syndrome. A less predictive alternate measurement is known as the body mass index (BMI).Objective. Obesity prevalence was estimated first by BMI and then by abdominal obesity (measuredby waist circumference, WC) in primary care patients.Materials and methods. As part of an international study, primary care physicians recruited consecutive patients aged 18 to 80 years who consulted for any reason on two pre-specified half-days. Age, gender, smoking status and history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes were recorded. Height, weight and WC were measured using standard methods. Pregnant women and subjects unwilling to participate were excluded.Results. A total of 3,795 patients from 105 primary care centers located throughout Colombia were evaluated. The mean age was 45 years (69% females). Of these, 60.7% of males and 53.9% of females were overweight or obese according to their BMI; 24.6% of males and 44.6% of females had abdominal obesity when National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines were used, but numbers changed to62.5% and 67.0% when the International Diabetes Federation guidelines were used. Obesity, either determined by BMI or by WC, was associated with higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia.Conclusions. Increased waist circumference is a practical and useful marker for cardiovascular and metabolic conditions. The prevalence of abdominal obesity in Colombian primary care patients is highand more frequent in females. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v32i4.799Introducción. La obesidad está asociada con factores de riesgo para enfermedades cardiovasculares y metabólicas. La obesidad central, marcador de adiposidad intraabdominal aumentada, es mejor factor de riesgo para aterosclerosis y diabetes que el índice de masa corporal (IMC), y buen predictor de riesgo de morbimortalidad cardiovascular, síndrome metabólico y diabetes.Objetivo. Estimar prevalencias de obesidad por IMC y de obesidad abdominal por circunferencia abdominal en pacientes de atención primaria en Colombia.Materiales y métodos. Como parte de un estudio internacional, 105 médicos de atención primaria elegidos al azar reclutaron consecutivamente a pacientes de 18 a 80 años, que consultaran por cualquier razón, en dos medios días especificados previamente. Se registraron edad, sexo, tabaquismo, antecedentes cardiovasculares, diabetes, altura, peso y circunferencia abdominal mediante métodos estandarizados. Se excluyeron mujeres embarazadas y quienes no quisieran participar.Resultados. Se evaluaron 3.795 pacientes, con edad promedio de 45 años (69 % mujeres). El 60,7% de los hombres y el 53,9 % de las mujeres tenían sobrepeso u obesidad según el IMC. El 24,6 % de los hombres y el 44,6 % de las mujeres tenían obesidad abdominal (según las guías del National Cholesterol Education Program), pero las cifras cambiaban a 62,5 % y 67,0 %, respectivamente, si se consideraban las guías de la International Diabetes Federation. La obesidad, determinada por el IMC o por la circunferencia abdominal, se asoció con mayor prevalencia de diabetes, hipertensión y dislipidemia.Conclusiones. El aumento de la circunferencia abdominal es un marcador práctico y útil para enfermedades cardiovasculares y metabólicas. La prevalencia de obesidad abdominal en pacientes de atención primaria en Colombia fue alta, y más frecuente en mujeres. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v32i4.799

Estudio IDEA (International Day for Evaluation of Abdominal Obesity) : prevalencia de obesidad abdominal y factores de riesgo asociados en atención primaria en Colombia

Introducción. La obesidad está asociada con factores de riesgo para enfermedades cardiovasculares y metabólicas. La obesidad central, marcador de adiposidad intraabdominal aumentada, es mejor factor de riesgo para aterosclerosis y diabetes que el índice de masa corporal (IMC), y buen predictor de riesgo de morbimortalidad cardiovascular, síndrome metabólico y diabetes. Objetivo. Estimar prevalencias de obesidad por IMC y de obesidad abdominal por circunferencia abdominal en pacientes de atención primaria en Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Como parte de un estudio internacional, 105 médicos de atención primaria elegidos al azar reclutaron consecutivamente a pacientes de 18 a 80 años, que consultaran por cualquier razón, en dos medios días especificados previamente. Se registraron edad, sexo, tabaquismo, antecedentes cardiovasculares, diabetes, altura, peso y circunferencia abdominal mediante métodos estandarizados. Se excluyeron mujeres embarazadas y quienes no quisieran participar. Resultados. Se evaluaron 3.795 pacientes, con edad promedio de 45 años (69 % mujeres). El 60,7% de los hombres y el 53,9 % de las mujeres tenían sobrepeso u obesidad según el IMC. El 24,6 % de los hombres y el 44,6 % de las mujeres tenían obesidad abdominal (según las guías del National Cholesterol Education Program), pero las cifras cambiaban a 62,5 % y 67,0 %, respectivamente, si se consideraban las guías de la International Diabetes Federation. La obesidad, determinada por el IMC o por la circunferencia abdominal, se asoció con mayor prevalencia de diabetes, hipertensión y dislipidemia. Conclusiones. El aumento de la circunferencia abdominal es un marcador práctico y útil para enfermedades cardiovasculares y metabólicas. La prevalencia de obesidad abdominal en pacientes de atención primaria en Colombia fue alta, y más frecuente en mujeres.Q3Artículo original610-616Introduction. Obesity is frequently associated with risk factors for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Central obesity is a marker of increased intra-abdominal adiposity and a known risk factor for atherosclerosis and diabetes; it is also a good predictor of risk for coronary events, cardiovascular mortality, diabetes and metabolic syndrome. A less predictive alternate measurement is known as the body mass index (BMI). Objective. Obesity prevalence was estimated first by BMI and then by abdominal obesity (measured by waist circumference, WC) in primary care patients. Materials and methods. As part of an international study, primary care physicians recruited consecutive patients aged 18 to 80 years who consulted for any reason on two pre-specified half-days. Age, gender, smoking status and history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes were recorded. Height, weight and WC were measured using standard methods. Pregnant women and subjects unwilling to participate were excluded. Results. A total of 3,795 patients from 105 primary care centers located throughout Colombia were evaluated. The mean age was 45 years (69% females). Of these, 60.7% of males and 53.9% of females were overweight or obese according to their BMI; 24.6% of males and 44.6% of females had abdominal obesity when National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines were used, but numbers changed to 62.5% and 67.0% when the International Diabetes Federation guidelines were used. Obesity, either determined by BMI or by WC, was associated with higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Conclusions. Increased waist circumference is a practical and useful marker for cardiovascular and metabolic conditions. The prevalence of abdominal obesity in Colombian primary care patients is high and more frequent in females

The role for saxagliptin within the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: an update from the 2010 European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) 46th annual meeting and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 70th scientific session

Saxagliptin is a potent, selective DPP4 inhibitor. Highlights from abstracts presented at the 2010 meetings of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association include studies and analyses that shed light on the promising role for saxagliptin within the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Data show that saxagliptin combination therapy improves HbA1c levels compared with placebo, particularly in patients with high HbA1c at baseline, long duration of disease, low baseline creatinine clearance, and low homeostasis model assessment 2 β-cell function at baseline. These efficacy benefits are achieved without any increase in hypoglycemia or other adverse events. The study results also show that the saxagliptin plus metformin combination is a good candidate for initial therapy in drug-naïve patients treated for as long as 72 weeks. Survey data presented confirm that hypoglycemia (and fear of hypoglycemia) is a barrier to patients' acceptance of diabetes treatment, limiting its efficacy. Therefore, therapies such as saxagliptin that have a low risk of hypoglycemia may be more acceptable to patients in helping them to achieve glycemic control and to optimize their quality of life. In patients with renal impairment, for whom metformin is contraindicated, saxagliptin monotherapy is a promising option for antidiabetic management as, when given at a reduced dose, it is well-tolerated with a safety profile similar to that of placebo

Comparison of the pulmonary function of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin injections versus that of patients treated with oral hypoglucemic agents

Introducción: la potencial asociación entre el tipo de tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) y alteración de la función pulmonar es algo poco estudiado hasta ahora. Objetivos: comparar la función pulmonar de pacientes con DM2 que reciben tratamiento con insulina inyectable versus hipoglicemiantes orceles (HO). Determinar si niveles de marcadores de inflamación en pacientes con tratamiento basado en insulina son diferentes a los de los tratados con HO. Métodos: estudio observational analítico de corte transversal a partir de una muestra de conveniencia de 369 pacientes con diagnóstico de DM2, y tratamiento con insulina o HO. Se realizaron espirometrías, y se obtuvieron valores residuales promedios para VEF1, CVF y relación VEF1/CVF. Mediante regresión lineal múltiple, se ajustó por diferencias en determinantes conocidos de la función pulmonar, así como por control de la diabetes y tiempo desde el diagnóstico. Adicionalmente, se midieron niveles de marcadores inflamatorios sanguíneos para cada grupo de tratamiento. Resultados: 63 pacientes (17%) recibían tratamiento con insulina y 306 (83%) con HO. La diferencia en residuales faxoreció a los tratados con HO. Para VEF1, CVF y VEF1/CVF la diferencia fue 57.6 mL (IC95% 32.45-82.74; P 0.0047), 45.6 mL (IC95% 20.84-70.39; P 0.0231) y 0.017, (IC95% 0.01-0.02, PcO.0001), respectivamente. No hubo cambios estadísticamente significativos en marcadores de inflamación. Conclusiones: los pacientes en tratamiento con HO presentaron mejor función pulmonar que los tratados con insulina. Este hallazgo de diferencias en función pulmonar pudiera tener implicación clínica en el manejo de los pacientes diabéticos, pero debe confirmarse en estudios prospectivos.Artículo original113-118Introduction: the potential association between the type of treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and impaired lung function is something rarely studied so far. Objectives: to compare the lung function of patients with DM2 who are treated with injectable insulin versus HO. To determine whether levels of inflammatory markers in patients with insulin-based treatment are different from those treated with HO. Methods: an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study from a convenience sample of 369 patients diagnosed with DM2 and treated with insulin or HO. Spirometry was performed, and residual values were averaged for FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC ratios. Multiple linear regression results were adjusted by differences in known determinants of lung function, as well as control of diabetes and time since diagnosis. Additionally, we measured blood levels of inflammatory markers for each treatment group. Results: 63 patients (17%) were treated with insulin and 306 (83%) with OH. The difference in residual favored those treated with HO. For FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC the difference was 57.6 mL (95% CI 32.45 to 82.74, P 0.0047), 45.6 mL (95% CI 20.84 to 70.39, P 0.0231) and 0.017 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.02, P <0.0001), respectively. There were no statistically significant changes in inflammation markers. Conclusions: patients treated with HO showed better lung function than those treated with insulin. This finding of differences in lung function may have clinical implications in the management of diabetic patients, but needs to be confirmed in prospective studies

Diabetes mellitus type 2 and deterioration of pulmonary function

Introducción: un aspecto poco estudiado de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM 2), es su posible asociación con alteraciones de la función pulmonar. Estudios recientes han mostrado niveles mayores de marcadores de inflamación sistémica de bajo nivel en pacientes con DM 2, lo que también podría afectar la función pulmonar. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si la función pulmonar de personas con DM 2 es diferente de la función pulmonar de un grupo control sin DM. Población y método: se realizó un estudio observacional transversal, comunitario, en diabéticos y en controles sanos, apareados por estratos de edad y sexo. Los controles fueron vecinos de cada diabético, del mismo sexo y grupo de edad, sin DM. La muestra de diabéticos se seleccionó de la población de pacientes que consultan a la Asociación Colombiana de Diabetes (ACD) en Bogotá. Se comprobó el estatus de diabético y de control sano mediante las pruebas de glucemia en ayunas y glucemia poscarga de glucosa. Se realizaron curvas de flujo volumen tanto para los diabéticos como para los controles, y de acuerdo con los valores de referencia obtenido por Hankinson para mexicoamericanos se obtuvieron valores residuales promedios (observado – esperado) para VEF1, CVF y relación VEF1/CVF. Mediante regresión lineal múltiple se ajustó por diferencias en determinantes conocidos de la función pulmonar (edad, sexo, talla, tabaquismo, exposición a humo de leña). Resultados: se estudiaron 262 diabéticos y 262 sujetos sanos. En los diabéticos así como en los controles sanos, la proporción de mujeres fue 51% y el promedio de edad fue de 50 años. Después de ajustar por determinantes conocidos de la función pulmonar, los casos de DM2 tuvieron menor VEF1 (-91 mL, IC95%: -115, -74; P<0.0001), CVF (-212 mL, IC95%: -225, -199; P<0,0001), y mayor relación VEF1/CVF (0.030%, IC95%: 0.027 a 0.034, P<0.0001) que los controles sin DM. Conclusiones: los pacientes con DM2 presentaron menor CVF y VEF1 que personas sin diabetes mellitus, aún después de ajustar por determinantes conocidos de la función pulmonar incluyendo factores de riesgo. Estos hallazgos pueden estar dados por mayores niveles de marcadores de inflamación aguda y crónica de baja intensidad vistos en pacientes con DM2, y por alteraciones de los músculos respiratorios.Artículo original105-110Introduction: potential impairment of lung function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) patients has been insufficiently studied. Recent studies have shown increased levels of low intensity inflammatory markers in diabetic patients, which may affect pulmonary function. The objective of this study was to determine if lung function of patients with DM2 is different from that of patients without DM. Patients and method: this was a community based observational cross-sectional study in adult patients with DM2, and in age and sex-matched controls without DM2. The base source from which diabetics were selected was that of the Asociacion Colombiana de Diabetes in Bogotá. In all subjects, blood samples were taken for fasting blood glucose and glycosilated hemoglobin levels, and pulmonary function tests were performed. Mean residual values were obtained for FEV1, FVC and VEF1/CVF relation, both for diabetics and for controls, and multiple least squares regression was used to adjust for differences in known determinants of lung function (age, sex, height, smoking history, and wood smoke exposure). Results: data were obtained from 262 diabetics and 262 controls. The proportion of women was 51% and average age was 50 years, both for diabetics and controls. After adjustments with linear regression, diabetics had lower VEF1 (-91 mL, IC95%: -115, -74; P<0.0001), CVF (-212 mL, IC95%: -225, -199; P<0,0001), y higher VEF1/CVF relation (0.030%, IC95%: 0.027 a 0.034, P<0.0001). Conclusions: subjects with DM2 had lower forced vital capacity (FVC) and lower forced expiratory volume in one second (VEF1) than those without DM2, even after adjustment by known determinants of lung function, including risk factors. These findings may be associated with higher levels of inflammation mediators in DM2 patients

Gaps and barriers in the control of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes

Background: Glycaemic control is suboptimal in a large proportion of people with type 2 diabetes who are consequently at an increased and avoidable risk of potentially severe complications. We sought to explore attitudes and practices among healthcare professionals that may contribute to suboptimal glycaemic control through a review of recent relevant publications in the scientific literature. Methods: An electronic search of the PubMed database was performed to identify relevant publications from January 2011 to July 2015. The electronic search was complemented by a manual search of abstracts from key diabetes conferences in 2014/2015 available online. Results: Recently published data indicate that glycaemic control is suboptimal in a substantial proportion (typically 40%-60%) of people with diabetes. This is the case across geographic regions and in both low- and higher-income countries. Therapeutic inertia appears to be an important contributor to poor glycaemic control in up to half of people with type 2 diabetes. In particular, prescribers are often willing to tolerate extended periods of 'mild' hyperglycaemia as well as having low expectations for their patients. There are often delays of 3 years or longer in initiating or intensifying glucose-lowering therapy when needed. Conclusion: Many people with type 2 diabetes are failed by current management, with approximately half not achieving or maintaining appropriate target blood glucose levels, leaving these patients at increased and avoidable risk of serious complications. Review criteria: The methodology of this review article is detailed in the 'Methods' section

Visceral, subcutaneous abdominal adiposity and liver fat content distribution in normal glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance

Q1Q1Objectives: To examine the specific distribution of liver fat content, visceral and subcutaneous adiposity in normal glucose tolerance (NGT/NGT), isolated impaired fasting glucose (iIFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (iIGT) and combined conditions (IFG+IGT), as well as with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (nT2D). Design: Multicenter, international observational study: cross-sectional analysis. Subjects: Two thousand five hundred and fifteen patients (50.0% women, 54.5% non-Caucasian) without previously known diabetes were recruited from 29 countries. Abdominal fat distribution was measured by computed tomography (CT). Liver fat was estimated using the CT-liver mean attenuation. Results: Compared with NGT/NGT patients, increased visceral adiposity was found in iIFG, iIGT, IFG+IGT and nT2D; estimated liver fat progressively increased across these conditions. A one-s.d. increase in visceral adiposity was associated with an increased risk of having iIFG (men: odds ratio (OR) 1.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.74), women: OR 1.62 (1.29–2.04)), iIGT (men: OR 1.59 (1.15–2.01), women: OR 1.30 (0.96–1.76)), IFG+IGT (men: OR 1.64 (1.27–2.13), women: OR 1.83 (1.36–2.48)) and nT2D (men: OR 1.80 (1.35–2.42), women: OR 1.73 (1.25–2.41)). A one-s.d. increase in estimated liver fat was associated with iIGT (men: OR 1.46 (1.12–1.90), women: OR 1.81 (1.41–2.35)), IFG+IGT (men: OR 1.42 (1.14–1.77), women: OR 1.74 (1.35–2.26)) and nT2D (men: OR 1.77 (1.40–2.27), women: OR 2.38 (1.81–3.18)). Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue showed an inverse relationship with nT2D in women (OR 0.63 (0.45–0.88)). Conclusions: Liver fat was associated with iIGT but not with iIFG, whereas visceral adiposity was associated with both. Liver fat and visceral adiposity were associated with nT2D, whereas subcutaneous adiposity showed an inverse relationship with nT2D in women

Inadequate glucose control in type 2 diabetes is associated with impaired lung function and systemic inflammation: a cross-sectional study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Inadequate glucose control may be simultaneously associated with inflammation and decreased lung function in type 2 diabetes. We evaluated if lung function is worse in patients with inadequate glucose control, and if inflammatory markers are simultaneously increased in these subjects.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Subjects were selected at the Colombian Diabetes Association Center in Bogotá. Pulmonary function tests were performed and mean residual values were obtained for forced expiratory volume (FEV₁₎, forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV₁/FVC, with predicted values based on those derived by Hankinson et al. for Mexican-Americans. Multiple least-squares regression was used to adjust for differences in known determinants of lung function. We measured blood levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA_1c), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), fibrinogen, ferritin, and C-reactive protein (C-RP).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>495 diabetic patients were studied, out of which 352 had inadequate control (HBA_1c> 7%). After adjusting for known determinants of lung function, those with inadequate control had lower FEV₁(-75.4 mL, IC95%: -92, -59; P < 0.0001) and FVC (-121 mL, IC95%: -134, -108; P < 0,0001) mean residuals, and higher FEV₁/FVC (0.013%, IC95%: 0.009, 0.018, P < 0.0001) residuals than those with adequate control, as well as increased levels of all inflammatory markers (P < 0.05), with the exception of IL-6.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Subjects with type 2 diabetes and inadequate control had lower FVC and FEV₁than predicted and than those of subjects with adequate control. It is postulated that poorer pulmonary function may be associated with increased levels of inflammatory mediators.</p

Guía de práctica clínica para la prevención, detección temprana, diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento de las dislipidemias en la población mayor de 18 años

La Guía de práctica clínica para la prevención, detección temprana, diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento de las dislipidemias en la población mayor de 18 años está dirigida a los adultos en riesgo para el desarrollo de dislipidemia o con diagnóstico establecido de dislipidemia, como también, para todo el personal de salud encargado de su atención en los diferentes niveles de complejidad del sistema de salud colombiano. Permitirá brindar parámetros de práctica clínica, basados en la mejor evidencia disponible para la atención en salud y el uso racional de recursos en esta patología. Se introducen cambios en el proceso de atención, que buscan disminuir la variabilidad injustificada en el abordaje de este grupo de pacientes generando procesos eficientes, sencillos y ajustados a la población colombiana; la guía es el resultado de un arduo proceso en el que se contó con la participación de expertos temáticos y expertos metodológicos, así como representantes de los pacientes y de las sociedades científicas y las universidades involucradas, y del Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. En la siguiente sección se presentarán de forma resumida las recomendaciones y los puntos de buena práctica clínica para cada una de las preguntas formuladas, información que se amplía posteriormente en el capítulo respectivo.Guía de práctica clínica1-6