Discovery and functional annotation of PRSS1 promoter variants in chronic pancreatitis

Recently, our resequencing of the promoter region of PRSS1 in French Caucasian individuals led to the identification of a functional variant (c.-204C > A) that is in perfect linkage disequilibrium with the “chronic pancreatitis (CP)-protective” PRSS1 c.-408C > T variant. Here, we extended the resequencing to 626 French Caucasians (242 idiopathic CP patients and 384 controls). We discovered three additional variants (c.-184G > A, c.-173C > T, and c.-147C > T), each being found only once in either patients or controls. We analyzed these three variants, together with a known PRSS1 promoter variant (c.-30_-28delTCC) long considered to be causative for CP, by luciferase promoter reporter assay in AR42J cells treated with dexamethasone. This analysis revealed that c.-30_-28delTCC resulted in reduced rather than increased PRSS1 gene expression, suggesting that it is not a CP risk factor as originally claimed. We provide evidence that c.-147C > T probably confers protection against CP by reducing the affinity of an ATF4 transcription factor binding site

In silico prioritization and further functional characterization of SPINK1 intronic variants

Background SPINK1 (serine protease inhibitor, kazal-type, 1), which encodes human pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor, is one of the most extensively studied genes underlying chronic pancreatitis. Recently, based upon data from qualitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses of transfected HEK293T cells, we concluded that 24 studied SPINK1 intronic variants were not of pathological significance, the sole exceptions being two canonical splice site variants (i.e., c.87 + 1G > A and c.194 + 2T > C). Herein, we employed the splicing prediction tools included within the Alamut software suite to prioritize the ‘non-pathological’ SPINK1 intronic variants for further quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Results Although our results demonstrated the utility of in silico prediction in classifying and prioritizing intronic variants, we made two observations worth noting. First, we established that most of the prediction tools employed ignored the general rule that GC is a weaker donor splice site than the canonical GT site. This finding is potentially important because for a given disease gene, a GC variant donor splice site may be associated with a milder clinical manifestation. Second, the non-pathological c.194 + 13T > G variant was consistently predicted by different programs to generate a new and viable donor splice site, the prediction scores being comparable to those for the physiological c.194 + 2T donor splice site and even higher than those for the physiological c.87 + 1G donor splice site. We do however provide convincing in vitro evidence that the predicted donor splice site was not entirely spurious. Conclusions Our findings, taken together, serve to emphasize the importance of functional analysis in helping to establish or refute the pathogenicity of specific intronic variants

Digging deeper into the intronic sequences of the SPINK1 gene [Letter]

We read with great interest the recent paper by Beer and Sahin-Tóth1 addressing the ‘missing heritability’ observed in approximately 60% of German cases of chronic pancreatitis.2 These authors opined that ‘discovery studies tend to focus on exons and exon–intron boundaries and may thus miss many intronic variants’.1 This premise seems eminently reasonable, given the generally much larger size of intronic sequences as compared with the coding sequences of protein-coding genes. However, there is a trade-off here. On the one hand, larger sequence size means larger target size for mutation, and hence the greater the number of mutations that could be missed if intronic sequences were not screened. On the other hand, to be of pathological significance, an intronic mutation must either create a new functional splicing donor or acceptor site or alternatively impact a functional sequence motif responsible for regulating splicing (eg, an intronic splicing enhancer), which depends upon many additional factors other than just sequence length. As yet, it is unclear what the ratio of pathological intronic:exonic variants will turn out to be, although intronic mutations are

Identification of a functional enhancer variant within the chronic pancreatitis-associated SPINK1 c.101A>G (p.Asn34Ser)-containing haplotype

The haplotype harboring the SPINK1 c.101A>G (p.Asn34Ser) variant (also known as rs17107315:T>C) represents the most important heritable risk factor for idiopathic chronic pancreatitis identified to date. The causal variant contained within this risk haplotype has however remained stubbornly elusive. Herein, we set out to resolve this enigma by employing a hypothesis-driven approach. First, we searched for variants in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs17107315:T>C using HaploReg v4.1. Second, we identified two candidate SNPs by visual inspection of sequences spanning all 25 SNPs found to be in LD with rs17107315:T>C, guided by prior knowledge of pancreas-specific transcription factors and their cognate binding sites. Third, employing a novel cis-regulatory module (CRM)-guided approach to further filter the two candidate SNPs yielded a solitary candidate causal variant. Finally, combining data from phylogenetic conservation and chromatin accessibility, cotransfection transactivation experiments, and population genetic studies, we suggest that rs142703147:C>A, which disrupts a PTF1L-binding site within an evolutionarily conserved HNF1A−PTF1L CRM located ∼4 kb upstream of the SPINK1 promoter, contributes to the aforementioned chronic pancreatitis risk haplotype. Further studies are required not only to improve the characterization of this functional SNP but also to identify other functional components that might contribute to this high-risk haplotype

No association between CEL-HYB hybrid allele and chronic pancreatitis in Asian populations

International audienceA hybrid allele between the carboxyl ester lipase gene (CEL) and its pseudogene, CELP (called CEL–HYB), generated by non-allelic homologous recombination between CEL intron 10 and CELP intron 10′, was found to increase susceptibility to chronic pancreatitis in a case–control study of patients of European ancestry. We attempted to replicate this finding in 3 independent cohorts from China, Japan, and India, but failed to detect the CEL–HYB allele in any of these populations. The CEL–HYB allele might therefore be an ethnic-specific risk factor for chronic pancreatitis. An alternative hybrid allele (CEL–HYB2) was identified in all 3 Asian populations (1.7% combined carrier frequency), but was not associated with chronic pancreatitis