10 research outputs found

    Hepatitis E virus-induced severe myositis

    Get PDF

    Comparison between a novel helical and a posterior ankle–foot orthosis on gait in people with unilateral foot drop: a randomised crossover trial

    No full text
    Abstract Background Neuromuscular disease and peripheral neuropathy may cause drop foot with or without evertor weakness. We developed a helical-shaped, non-articulated ankle–foot orthosis (AFO) to provide medial–lateral stability while allowing mobility, to improve gait capacity. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of the helical AFO (hAFO) on functional gait capacity (6-min walk test) in people with peripheral neuropathy or neuromuscular disease (NMD) causing unilateral drop foot and compare with a posterior leaf spring AFO (plsAFO). Secondary aims were to compare functional mobility, 3D kinematic and kinetic gait variables and satisfaction between the AFOs. Methods Single centre, randomised crossover trial from January to July 2017 in 20 individuals (14 with peripheral neuropathy and 6 with NMD, 12 females, mean age 55.6 years, SD 15.3); 10 wore the hAFO for the first week and 10 wore the plsAFO before switching for the second week. The 6-min walk test (6MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and 3D gait analysis were evaluated with the hAFO, the plsAFO and shoes only (noAFO) at inclusion and 1 week after wearing each orthosis. Satisfaction was evaluated with the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Results Median [interquartile range] 6MWT distance was greater with the hAFO (444 m [79]) than the plsAFO (389 m [135], P < 0.001, Hedge’s g = 0.6) and noAFO (337 m [91], P < 0.001, g = 0.88). TUG time was shorter with the hAFO (8.1 s [2.8]) than the plsAFO (9.5 s [2.6], P < 0.001, g = − 0.5) and noAFO (10.0 s [2.6]), P < 0.001, g = − 0.6). The plsAFO limited plantarflexion during the loading response (plsAFO − 7.5 deg [6.0] vs. noAFO -13.0 deg [10.0], P = 0.0007, g = − 1.0) but the hAFO did not (− 11.0 deg [5.1] vs. noAFO, P = 0.05, g = − 0.5). Quasi-stiffness was lower for the hAFO than plsAFO (P = 0.009, g = − 0.7). The dimensionless eversion moment was higher (though not significantly) with the hAFO than noAFO. Neither orthosis reduced ankle power (P = 0.34). Median total QUEST score was higher for the hAFO (4.7 [0.7]) than the plsAFO (3.6 [0.8]) (P < 0.001, g = 1.9). Conclusions The helical orthosis significantly and considerably improved functional gait performance, did not limit ankle mobility, increased lateral stability, though not significantly, and was associated with greater patient satisfaction than the posterior leaf spring orthosis. Trial registration The trial began before registration was mandator

    Striking phenotypic variability in two familial cases of myosin storage myopathy with a MYH7 Leu1793pro mutation.

    No full text
    International audienceMyosin Storage Myopathies (MSM) have emerged as a new group of inherited myopathies with heterogenous clinical severity and age of onset. We have identified in a woman and her daughter, a pLeu1793Pro mutation in MYH7. This mutation has already been reported to be associated with MSM presenting as neonatal hypotony. Our index case complained of proximal muscle weakness at age 30. Her daughter presented at birth with a cardiomyopathy without any skeletal muscle involvement. This report underlines the clinical variability of MSM even with a given mutation or in a same family

    Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 2 Caused by Mitofusin 2 Mutations

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Mutations in the gene encoding mito- fusin 2 (MFN2) cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 (CMT2), with heterogeneity concerning severity and associated clinical features. Objective: To describe MFN2 mutations and associ- ated phenotypes in patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN). Design: Direct sequencing of the MFN2 gene and clini- cal investigations of patients with MFN2 mutations. Setting: Molecular genetics laboratory of a university hospital and the LimogesNational Referral Center for Rare Peripheral Neuropathies. Patients: One hundred fifty index patients with HMSN and amedianmotor nerve conduction velocity of 25m/s or greater and without mutations in the genes encoding connexin 32 and myelin protein zero. Main Outcome Measures: Results of genetic analy- ses and phenotypic observations. Results: Twenty different missense mutations were identified in 20 index patients. Mutation frequency was 19 of 107 (17.8%) in patients with CMT2 and 1 of 43 (2.3%) in patients with a median motor nerve conduc- tion velocity less than 38 m/s. Four patients had proven de novo mutations, 8 families had autosomal dominant inheritance, and 3 had autosomal recessive inheritance. The remaining 5 patients were sporadic cases with het- erozygous mutations. Phenotypes varied from mild forms to early-onset severe forms. Additional features were encountered in 8 patients (32%). Six patients un- derwent sural nerve biopsy: electronic microscopy showed prominent mitochondrial abnormalities on longitudinal sections. Conclusions: MFN2 mutations are a frequent cause of CMT2, with variable severity and either dominant or recessive inheritance. MFN2 gene testing must be a first-line analysis in axonal HMSN irrespective of the mode of inheritance or the severity of the peripheral neuropathy

    Detection of TRIM32 deletions in LGMD patients analyzed by a combined strategy of CGH array and massively parallel sequencing

    No full text
    International audienceDefects in TRIM32 were reported in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2H (LGMD2H), sarcotubular myopathies (STM) and in Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Few cases have been described to date in LGMD2H/STM, but this gene is not systematically analysed because of the absence of specific signs and difficulties in protein analysis. By using high-throughput variants screening techniques, we identified variants in TRIM32 in two patients presenting nonspecific LGMD. We report the first case of total inactivation by homozygous deletion of the entire TRIM32 gene. Of interest, the deletion removes part of the ASTN2 gene, a large gene in which TRIM32 is nested. Despite the total TRIM32 gene inactivation, the patient does not present a more severe phenotype. However, he developed a mild progressive cognitive impairment that may be related to the loss of function of ASTN2 because association between ASTN2 heterozygous deletions and neurobehavioral disorders was previously reported. Regarding genomic characteristics at breakpoint of the deleted regions of TRIM32, we found a high density of repeated elements, suggesting a possible hotspot. These observations illustrate the importance of high-throughput technologies for identifying molecular defects in LGMD, confirm that total loss of function of TRIM32 is not associated with a specific phenotype and that TRIM32/ASTN2 inactivation could be associated with cognitive impairment
    corecore