3 research outputs found
Integration as an essentially contested concept : questioning the assumptions behind the national Roma integration strategies of Italy and Spain
Integration is a term that can fittingly be included in what W. B. Gallie labelled âessentially contested conceptsâ, since it has become a key term in both academia and policy-making and yet can be used â as it is â for a variety of meanings. While usually understood to address the situation of migrants, it has also recently been applied to Roma minorities in Europe, the vast majority of whom are European citizens and a minority of whom have left their country of origin. This chapter builds upon a discourse analysis of the National Roma Integration Strategies in Italy and Spain and on interviews with the policy-makers in charge of them, in a bid to understand what the term âintegrationâ means for Roma minorities according to the authorities. Through this analysis, I show how the politics of (dis)integration can affect not only migrants but also ethnic minorities who are represented and treated as similarly âforeignâ to the mainstreamâs imagined community. In this sense, Roma-specific integration policies do not challenge wider structures of inequality. Even if they are well intended, they can contribute to the normalisation of a hegemonic narrative that sees a certain section of society â namely a national middle-class white society â as the bar for normality
Italy. Four Emerging Traditions in Immigrant Education Studies
This book chapter present the Italian case, within a comparative analysis of 25 national cases included in the Palgrave Handbook. Compared with other national contexts with a longer history of immigration, social scientists in Italy have only recently turned their attention to ethnic inequalities in education. In the past two decades, however, the number of
studies has grown substantially in parallel with the increased presence of children with immigrant background in Italian schools. In this chapter, a systematic overview of the empirical literature on ethnicity and educational inequality in Italy is provided. The chapter present a systematic review including over one hundred studies coming from different disciplines (chiefly sociology) that have been published between 1990 and early 2017. The reviewed studies cover almost all educational levels, with the partial exception of tertiary education, where the presence of immigrant-origin students is still limited.
These studies have been classified into four research traditions: school inclusion and intercultural practices; political arithmetic; educational outcomes; and interethnic relationships. These traditions reflect the temporal
evolution of the empirical studies on the topic in Italy and are characterized by distinct focuses, research designs, data and methods. For each of the four traditions, the main findings are summarized and the substantial contributions to the understanding of ethnic inequalities in education are critically appraised. In the conclusions, we provide a comparative look at the main contributions of each tradition as well as the points of weakness, and we make
suggestions regarding how ethnic educational inequality research could be further developed in the country