Change of initial oral antidiabetic therapy in type 2 diabetic patients

Objective To explore the 'real-life' therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Methods From the PHARMO Record Linkage System comprising linked drug dispensing and clinical laboratory data from approximately 2.5 million individuals in the Netherlands, among others, new users of OADs were identified in the period 1999-2004. New users, aged 30 years and older, without insulin use before cohort entry date and with at least one year follow-up were included. We determined per initial therapy patient characteristics and first therapy change. Results Overall 35,514 patients were included. Metformin and sulfonylureas (SU) were the most frequent initial therapy. Patients on thiazolidinedione (TZD) monotherapy had lower percentages baseline HbA1c ≥ 7% compared to patients on metformin and SU. The proportion of patients still on initial therapy after one year ranged from 46% (TZDs) to around 60% (SU). Among patients starting on monotherapy, add-on (15-20%) and discontinuation (16-25%) of therapy occurred most frequently. In patients starting on combination therapy, a switch occurred in 30% of the patients. Conclusion In more than 40% of the patients a change in initial OAD-therapy is already observed in the first year of therapy. Maintaining patients on initial therapy remains a challenge

Risk of hypoglycaemia in people aged ≥65 years receiving linagliptin: pooled data from 1489 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aims: To investigate the risk of hypoglycaemia in people aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with linagliptin, in the largest pooled analysis performed to date. Materials and methods: One thousand four hundred and eighty-nine patients aged ≥65 years with T2DM were pooled from 11 randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trials evaluating linagliptin 5 mg alone, or in addition to various background therapies. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of investigator-defined hypoglycaemia. Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of hypoglycaemia between linagliptin and placebo in the all-patient population at 24 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84, 1.36; P = 0.5943)—despite significant (P < 0.0001) improvements in glycaemic control—and 1 year (HR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.27; P = 0.8803). Similar findings were observed for linagliptin vs placebo in subgroup analyses by background medication (eg, sulphonylureas (SUs) and/or insulin vs no such drugs), age, baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), ethnicity, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥7.5% had significantly higher odds of achieving HbA1c <7.5% without hypoglycaemia in the linagliptin group compared with placebo at 24 weeks (34.1% vs 13.7%; 95% CI: 2.04, 4.12; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This pooled analysis indicates that linagliptin was effective in treating older people with T2DM towards their HbA1c targets with a favourable safety and tolerability profile and low risk of hypoglycaemia. The safety profile was maintained even on background therapies with known risk of hypoglycaemia, such as insulin and SU