Does surgical site infection influence neurological outcome and survival in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression?

Purpose: Most of the literature on infection after surgery for spinal metastases focuses on incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI). To the best of our knowledge, there is no report on the influence of infection on neurological outcome and survival in patients undergoing emergent surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).Methods: Our aim was to establish if SSIs adversely affected the neurological outcome and survival in patients with MSCC. We reviewed 318 consecutive patients admitted for surgical intervention for MSCC from October 2005 to October 2012. Morbidity (neurological outcome, length of hospital stay and additional procedures) and survival rates were analysed.Results: During this study period, the incidence of infection was 29/318 (9.1%). The median length of stay in hospital in the infected group was 25 days compared to 13 days in the non-infected group (p = 0.001). Twenty out of the 29 (69%) infected patients underwent an additional procedure (29 procedures in total) compared to 9/289 (3%) non-infected patients (p = 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the two groups with regard to neurological outcome (p = 0.37) but the survival rate was statistically different between the two groups [infected group: median survival 131 days (19–1558) vs. non-infected group: 258 days (5–2696; p = 0.03)].Conclusion: Surgical site infection increased the morbidity with considerably longer hospital stay and requirement for additionalprocedures. Although there was no difference in neurological outcome, the infected group of patients had a significantlyshorter survival

Bone printing: New frontiers in the treatment of bone defects

Bone defects can be congenital or acquired resulting from trauma, infection, neoplasm and failed arthroplasty. The osseous reconstruction of these defects is challenging. Unfortunately, none of the current techniques for the repair of bone defects has proven to be fully satisfactory. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is the field of regenerative medicine (RM) that focuses on alternative treatment options for bone defects that will ideally address all the issues of the traditional techniques in treating large bone defects. However, current techniques of BTE is laborious and have their own shortcomings. More recently, 2D and 3D bone printing has been introduced to overcome most of the limitations of bone grafts and BTE. So far, results are extremely promising, setting new frontiers in the management of bone defects. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Does the CT improve inter-and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures?

Introduction: Distal radius fractures are very common upper limb injuries irrespective of the patient's age. The aim of our study is to evaluate the reliability of the three systems that are often used for their classification (AO-Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation, Fernandez and Universal) and to assess the need for computed tomography (CT) scan to improve inter-and intra-observer agreement. Materials and methods: Five orthopaedic surgeons and two hand surgeons classified radiographs and CT scans of 26 patients using the Fernandez, AO and Universal systems. All data were recorded using MS Excel and Kappa statistics were performed to determine inter-and intra-observer agreement and to evaluate the role of CT scan. Results: Fair-to-moderate inter-observer agreement was noted with the use of X-rays for all classification systems. Intra-observer reproducibility did not improve with the addition of CT scans, especially for the senior hand surgeons. Conclusions: The agreement rates observed in the present study show that currently there is no classification system that is fully reproducible. Adequate experience is required for the assessment and treatment of these injuries. CT scan should be requested only by experienced hand surgeons in order to help guide treatment, as it does not significantly improve inter-and intra-observer agreement for all classification systems. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved