47 research outputs found

    PP23ā€…Evaluation of pre-hospital use of a valsalva assist device (VAD) in the Emergency treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) [EVADE]. A randomised controlled feasibility trial.

    Get PDF
    Background Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a common heart rhythm disorder. The Valsalva Manoeuvre (VM) is a safe, internationally recommended, initial treatment, but has a low success rate in normal practice. Recent studies have shown much better cardioversion rates, approaching 50%, can be achieved using a postural modification (the modified VM) and a manometer controlled 40 mmHg strain. Successful cardioversion could avoid hospital conveyance and unpleasant treatments, such as adenosine. Routine use of a manometer is not practical out of hospital. Blowing on an empty syringe has been suggested as an alternative but is unreliable in providing correct and consistent pressures. A Valsalva Assist Device (VAD), designed to provide a 40 mmHg strain resistance has been developed. It is small, portable, can be packaged with instructions for the modified VM and if successful, may be left with the patient. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, randomised controlled feasibility trial, comparing VAD versus standard practice delivered VMs. All other aspects of care were according to SWASFT guidelines. Participants were followed up to ask their views on trial procedures. Interim results (month 5 of 6) 23 volunteer Station Leads recruited 22 Study Clinicians from 27 ambulance stations. 29 patients were enrolled over 5 months, 19 in the last 2 months (the first 3 months included steady recruitment and setup). The later enrolment rate extrapolates to a presentation rate of approximately 220 eligible patients to SWASFT each year. Complete data sets were available in 100% of participants. When followed up, participants reported verbal consent to be widely acceptable, although SVT symptoms were substantially distracting for many during this process. Conclusion Our experience of recruitment and data collection suggest a definitive trial, using similar methodology, is possible, but the low occurrence rate may challenge feasibility. Consent taking methods may require refinement for a larger trial

    Procedural sedation of elderly patients by emergency physicians: a safety analysis of 740 patients

    Get PDF
    The elderly are perceived as a high-risk group for procedural sedation. Concern exists regarding the safety of sedation of this patient group by emergency physicians, particularly when using propofol.We analysed prospectively collected data on patients aged 75 yr or older undergoing sedation between October 2006 and March 2017 in the emergency department of a single centre. We used the World Society of Intravenous Anaesthesia International Sedation Task Force adverse event tool, stratifying identified adverse events according to consensus agreement.Accepted manuscript - 12 month embarg

    Diagnostic accuracy of the T-MACS decision aid with a contemporary point-of-care troponin assay.

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: The rapid turnaround time of point-of-care (POC) cardiac troponin (cTn) assays is highly attractive for crowded emergency departments (EDs). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid with a POC cTn assay. METHODS: In a prospective diagnostic accuracy study at eight EDs, we included patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Blood drawn on arrival and 3ā€‰hours later was analysed for POC cTnI (i-Stat, Abbott Point of Care). The primary outcome was a diagnosis of ACS, which included both an adjudicated diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on serial laboratory cTn testing and major adverse cardiac events (death, AMI or coronary revascularisation) within 30 days. RESULTS: Of 716 patients included, 105 (14.7%) had ACS. Using serial POC cTnI concentrations over 3ā€‰hours could have 'ruled out' ACS in 198 (31.2%) patients with a sensitivity of 99.0% (95% CI 94.4% to 100.0%) and negative predictive value 99.5% (95% CI 96.5% to 99.9%). No AMIs were missed. T-MACS 'ruled in' ACS for 65 (10.4%) patients with a positive predictive value of 91.2% (95% CI 82.1% to 95.9%) and specificity 98.9% (97.6% to 99.6%). CONCLUSION: With a POC cTnI assay, T-MACS could 'rule out' ACS for approximately one-third of patients within 3ā€‰hours while 'ruling in' ACS for another 10%. The rapid turnaround time and portability of the POC assay make this an attractive pathway for use in crowded EDs or urgent care centres. Future work should also evaluate use in the prehospital environment

    Novel use of tranexamic acid to reduce the need for Nasal Packing in Epistaxis (NoPac) randomised controlled trial: research protocol.

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with epistaxis uncontrolled by subsequent simple first aid measures or application of topical vasoconstrictors will typically undergo anterior nasal packing. Packing is effective, but can be extremely painful and unpleasant and patients usually need hospital admission. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a cheap, safe, readily available antifibrinolytic agent known to be beneficial in a variety of clinical settings where uncontrolled bleeding may be a problem. Anecdotal evidence suggests that topical TXA may be of value in persistent epistaxis; however, further evaluation is required. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, double-blind, parallel group, randomised, controlled trial comparing the use of topical intranasal TXA with indistinguishable placebo in adults presenting to UK EDs with persistent atraumatic epistaxis. Follow-up is at 1ā€‰week by structured telephone review. The primary outcome measure is the subsequent need for anterior nasal packing in the ED. Key secondary outcomes include the need for hospital admission, blood transfusion and/or further treatment for epistaxis during the index ED attendance. Recruiting 450 patients will provide 90% power to demonstrate an absolute reduction in packing rate from 95% to 85%. An improvement of this magnitude would be of significant benefit to patients and healthcare providers and justify a change to standard practice. Given the low cost of TXA and its short administration time, a full economic evaluation is not being undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the South West-Bristol Research Ethics Committee (reference 17/SW/0010). We aim to publish the findings in a high impact, international peer-reviewed journal. Results will also be shared with the Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia foundation and telangiectasia UK for dissemination through appropriate related forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN34153772 and EudraCT No: 2016-001530-10

    Randomised Evaluation of Modified Valsalva Effectiveness in Re-Entrant Tachycardias (REVERT)

    Get PDF
    Conference posterThe Valsalva manoeuvre is an internationally recommended physical emergency treatment for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), an abnormal fast heart rhythm. However in normal practice, the manoeuvre only works in 5ā€“20% of cases and intravenous treatment with adenosine is required. This drug causes a pause in heart activity which patients often find very distressing. A simple posture modification to the Valsalva manoeuvre could improve its effectiveness and we carried out a randomised controlled trial to assess whether it could increase the rate of cardioversion and reduce use of adenosine.REVERT is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) through its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme: Grant Reference Number PB-PG-0211-24145. The study has been approved by the South West Exeter Research Ethics Committee, is registered with Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN67937027) and has been adopted by the NIHR Clinical Research Network
    corecore