History of Wildlife Toxicology and the Interpretation of Contaminant Concentrations in Tissues

The detection and interpretation of contaminants in tissues of wildlife belongs to the field of toxicology, a scientific discipline with a long, intriguing, and illustrious history (reviewed by Hayes 1991, Gallo 2001, Gilbert and Hayes 2006, Wax 2006). We review its history briefly, to provide a context for understanding the use of tissue residues in toxicology, and to explain how their use has developed over time. Because so much work has been conducted on mercury, and dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), separate case histories are included that describe the evolution of the use of tissue concentrations to assess exposure and effects of these two groups of contaminants in wildlife. The roots of toxicology date back to early man, who used plant and animal extracts as poisons for hunting and warfare. The Ebers papyrus (Egypt -1550 BC) contains formulations for hemlock, aconite (arrow poison), opium, and various metals used as poisons. Hippocrates (-400 BC) is sometimes credited with proposing the treatment of poisoning by decreasing absorption and using antidotes (Lane and Borzelleca 2007). Chanakya (350-283 BC), Indian advisor of the Maurya Emperor Chandragupta (340-293 BC), urged the use of food tasters as a precaution against poisoning, and the Roman emperor Claudius may have even been poisoned by his taster Halotus in 54 AD. Moses ben Maimon (1135-1204), author of a treatise on poisoning, noted that dairy products could delay absorption of some poisons. Paracelsus (1493-1541) shaped the field of toxicology with his corollaries that experimentation is essential to examining the response, that therapeutic properties should be distinguished from toxic properties, that chemicals have specific modes of action, and that the dose makes the poison. The art of concocting and using poisons reached its zenith during the Italian Renaissance, eventually culminating in its commercialization by Catherine Deshayes (a.k.a., La Voisine, 1640-1680) in France. One of the first to suggest a chemical method for the detection of a poison in modern times was Herman Boerhaave (1668-1738), a physician and botanist, who, according to Jurgen Thorwald (The Century of the Detective), placed the suspected poison on red-hot coals, and tested for odors. The Spanish physician Orfila (1787-1853) served in the French court, and was the first toxicologist to systematically use autopsy and chemical analysis to prove poisoning. He has been credited with developing and refining techniques to detect arsenic poisoning. Other historic accounts include extraction of alkaloids from postmortem specimens (Jean Servais Stas ~1851) as evidence in a nicotine poisoning case (Levine 2003). The chemical analysis of organs and tissues became the basis for establishing poisoning. Much of the early history of toxicology addressed whether someone had been poisoned and how to treat poisoning

Derivation of screening benchmarks for dietary methylmercury exposure for the common loon ( Gavia immer ): Rationale for use in ecological risk assessment

The current understanding of methylmercury (MeHg) toxicity to avian species has improved considerably in recent years and indicates that exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of MeHg through the diet can adversely affect various aspects of avian health, reproduction, and survival. Because fish‐eating birds are at particular risk for elevated MeHg exposure, the authors surveyed the available primary and secondary literature to summarize the effects of dietary MeHg on the common loon ( Gavia immer ) and to derive ecologically relevant toxic thresholds for dietary exposure to MeHg in fish prey. After considering the available data, the authors propose three screening benchmarks of 0.1, 0.18, and 0.4 µg g −1 wet weight MeHg in prey fish. The lowest benchmark (0.1 µg g −1 wet wt) is the threshold for adverse behavioral impacts in adult loons and is close to the empirically determined no observed adverse effects level for subclinical effects observed in captive loon chicks. The remaining benchmarks (0.18 and 0.4 µg g −1 wet wt) correspond to MeHg levels in prey fish associated with significant reproductive impairment and reproductive failure in wild adult loons. Overall, these benchmarks incorporate recent findings and reviews of MeHg toxicity in aquatic fish‐eating birds and provide the basis for a national ecological risk assessment for Hg and loons in Canada. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012; 31: 2399–2407. © 2012 SETACPeer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93756/1/1971_ftp.pd

History of Wildlife Toxicology and the Interpretation of Contaminant Concentrations in Tissues

The detection and interpretation of contaminants in tissues of wildlife belongs to the field of toxicology, a scientific discipline with a long, intriguing, and illustrious history (reviewed by Hayes 1991, Gallo 2001, Gilbert and Hayes 2006, Wax 2006). We review its history briefly, to provide a context for understanding the use of tissue residues in toxicology, and to explain how their use has developed over time. Because so much work has been conducted on mercury, and dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), separate case histories are included that describe the evolution of the use of tissue concentrations to assess exposure and effects of these two groups of contaminants in wildlife. The roots of toxicology date back to early man, who used plant and animal extracts as poisons for hunting and warfare. The Ebers papyrus (Egypt -1550 BC) contains formulations for hemlock, aconite (arrow poison), opium, and various metals used as poisons. Hippocrates (-400 BC) is sometimes credited with proposing the treatment of poisoning by decreasing absorption and using antidotes (Lane and Borzelleca 2007). Chanakya (350-283 BC), Indian advisor of the Maurya Emperor Chandragupta (340-293 BC), urged the use of food tasters as a precaution against poisoning, and the Roman emperor Claudius may have even been poisoned by his taster Halotus in 54 AD. Moses ben Maimon (1135-1204), author of a treatise on poisoning, noted that dairy products could delay absorption of some poisons. Paracelsus (1493-1541) shaped the field of toxicology with his corollaries that experimentation is essential to examining the response, that therapeutic properties should be distinguished from toxic properties, that chemicals have specific modes of action, and that the dose makes the poison. The art of concocting and using poisons reached its zenith during the Italian Renaissance, eventually culminating in its commercialization by Catherine Deshayes (a.k.a., La Voisine, 1640-1680) in France. One of the first to suggest a chemical method for the detection of a poison in modern times was Herman Boerhaave (1668-1738), a physician and botanist, who, according to Jurgen Thorwald (The Century of the Detective), placed the suspected poison on red-hot coals, and tested for odors. The Spanish physician Orfila (1787-1853) served in the French court, and was the first toxicologist to systematically use autopsy and chemical analysis to prove poisoning. He has been credited with developing and refining techniques to detect arsenic poisoning. Other historic accounts include extraction of alkaloids from postmortem specimens (Jean Servais Stas ~1851) as evidence in a nicotine poisoning case (Levine 2003). The chemical analysis of organs and tissues became the basis for establishing poisoning. Much of the early history of toxicology addressed whether someone had been poisoned and how to treat poisoning

Cross-Seasonal Association Between Winter Trophic Status and Breeding Ground Selenium Levels in Boreal White-Winged Scoters

The effect of cross-seasonal interactions on reproduction and fitness in migratory species is of increasing interest to ecologists, particularly because of the conservation implications of habitat change. Variation in contaminant levels that can affect reproduction in migratory species may reflect differing exposure across seasons. We examined the relationship between concentrations of liver selenium, a known teratogen, and winter trophic level in breeding White-winged Scoters (Melanitta fusca) using claw δ15N values as an index of winter trophic level. Claw δ15N was a significant predictor of variation in breeding ground selenium levels (r = 0.32), and liver selenium increased by approximately 12 ± 5 SE μgâg-1 with one trophic level increase in δ15N (Î"3). This relationship demonstrates that contaminant exposure from wintering or staging areas can result in higher levels in birds on breeding grounds, where some contaminants are more likely to have impacts

Evidence for sex differences in mercury dynamics in double-crested cormorants

Aquatic fish-eating birds can demethylate methylmercury in their livers. In this study, we determined whether a previously documented male bias in mercury concentration in double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) was due entirely to the depuration of mercury into eggs or might also in part be related to sex differences in methylmercury demethylation or biliary excretion capability in the liver. We found egg depuration accounted for less than a fifth of the mercury concentration difference between males and females, hence not entirely explaining the sex difference. Females had a significantly steeper slope for the negative relationship between percent methylmercury (i.e., percentage of total mercury that is methylmercury) and total mercury concentration than did males. This suggests that females have a greater capacity to demethylate methylmercury, which might be reducing the amount of methylmercury available for depuration to eggs. We also found a significant negative relationship between methylmercury concentration and liver mass for females only; thus females might also have a greater capability to excrete methylmercury compared to males. Therefore, we conclude that the male bias in mercury concentration might also result from females having a greater capability to excrete mercury compared to males

(Table 2) Mercury and selenium concentration in the brain stem of wild polar bears (Ursus maritimus), east Greenland

Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) are exposed to high concentrations of mercury because they are apex predators in the Arctic ecosystem. Although mercury is a potent neurotoxic heavy metal, it is not known whether current exposures are of neurotoxicological concern to polar bears. We tested the hypotheses that polar bears accumulate levels of mercury in their brains that exceed the estimated lowest observable adverse effect level (20 µg/g dry wt) for mammalian wildlife and that such exposures are associated with subtle neurological damage, as determined by measuring neurochemical biomarkers previously shown to be disrupted by mercury in other high-trophic wildlife. Brain stem (medulla oblongata) tissues from 82 polar bears subsistence hunted in East Greenland were studied. Despite surprisingly low levels of mercury in the brain stem region (total mercury = 0.36 ± 0.12 µg/g dry wt), a significant negative correlation was measured between N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor levels and both total mercury (r = -0.34, p < 0.01) and methylmercury (r = -0.89, p < 0.05). No relationships were observed among mercury, selenium, and several other neurochemical biomarkers (dopamine-2, gamma-aminobutyric acid type A, muscarinic cholinergic, and nicotinic cholinergic receptors; cholinesterase and monoamine oxidase enzymes). These data show that East Greenland polar bears do not accumulate high levels of mercury in their brain stems. However, decreased levels of NMDA receptors could be one of the most sensitive indicators of mercury's subclinical and early effects

Effects of Methylmercury on Epigenetic Markers in Three Model Species: Mink, Chicken and Yellow Perch

We previously reported that methylmercury (MeHg) exposure is associated with DNA hypomethylation in the brain stem of male polar bears. Here, we conveniently use archived tissues obtained from controlled laboratory exposure studies to look for evidence that MeHg can disrupt DNA methylation across taxa. Brain (cerebrum) tissues from MeHg-exposed mink (Neovison vison), chicken (Gallus gallus) and yellowperch (Perca flavescens) were analyzed for total Hg levels and global DNA methylation. Tissues from chicken and mink, but not perch, were also analyzed for DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity. In mink we observed significant reductions in global DNA methylation in an environmentally-relevant dietary exposure group (1 ppm MeHg), but not in a higher group (2 ppm MeHg). DNMT activity was significantly reduced in all treatment groups. In chicken or yellow perch, no statistically significant effects of MeHg were observed. Dose-dependent trends were observed in the chicken data but the direction of the change was not consistent between the two endpoints. Our results suggest that MeHg can be epigenetically active in that it has the capacity to affect DNA methylation inmammals. The variability in results across species may suggest inter-taxa differences in epigenetic responses to MeHg, or may be related to differences among the exposure scenarios used as animalswere exposed to MeHg through different routes (dietary, egg injection), for different periods of time (19–89 days) and at different life stages (embryonic, juvenile, adult)

Mercury levels in birds and small rodents from Las Orquideas National Natural Park, Colombia

Mercury (Hg) is a heavy metal known as one of the most toxic elements on the planet. The importance of Hg on living organisms resides on its biomagnification ability. Artisanal gold extraction activities release substantial amounts of this metal, polluting the ecosystems. To assess the impact of gold mining in Las Orquideas National Natural Park (Colombia), total Hg (T-Hg) levels were evaluated from 37 bird and 8 small rodent species collected at two sites within the boundaries of the Natural Park (Abriaqui and Frontino municipalities) that have experienced some gold-extraction history. The mean concentration of T-Hg in bird feathers from both sites was 0.84 ± 0.05 µg/g fw. Differences between species were found according to diet. Total Hg levels were greater on insectivorous (1.00 ± 0.08 µg/g fw), followed by nectarivorous (0.73 ± 0.07 µg/g fw) and frugivorus (0.57 ± 0.09 µg/g fw) species. These Hg levels were greater than those found in feathers from a control sample belonging to the species Penelope perspicax (0.53 ± 0.03 µg/g fw), a frugivorous species living at the Otun Quimbaya Fauna and Flora Sanctuary, a forest without known gold mining. Mercury concentrations in the livers of small rodents were greater in specimens from Frontino (0.15 ± 0.01 µg/g fw) than those from Abriaqui (0.11 ± 0.01 µg/g fw), but levels were not different between species. These results indicate that Hg in birds depends mainly on their diet, but geographical location may affect Hg concentration in rodents. Moreover, Hg sources in natural parks of Colombia may not rely solely on gold mining, atmospheric deposition, among others factors, could be influencing its accumulation in biota. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature