24 research outputs found

    Implementing physiotherapy Huntington's Disease guidelines in clinical practice

    Get PDF
    Background:The recently published clinical practice guideline for physiotherapy practice for Huntington’s disease (HD) should be integrated into practice to develop interventions that enable people with HD to achieve personalised goals. The European Huntington’s Disease Network Physiotherapy Working Group aims to support and enable the use of best evidence in physiotherapy for the HD community. Successful implementation of the clinical practice guidelines requires an understanding of facilitators and barriers to therapist implementation. Objective:To explore facilitators and barriers to implementing recently published clinical recommendations that guide physiotherapy practice for HD. Methods:An online survey was distributed globally through HD networks. Data collected included demographic information and agreement/disagreement with a series of named facilitators and barriers to implementation of each of the six physiotherapy guideline recommendations. A consensus level of≥70% agreement was set as indicative of agreement/disagreement. Results:Thirty-two physiotherapists working in a range of settings responded. Support from colleagues (81–91% agreement), an individualised physiotherapy plan (72–88% agreement) and physiotherapist’s expertise in HD (81–91% agreement) were reported as facilitators. The main barriers were behavioural (72–81% agreement) and cognitive (75–81% agreement) impairments and low motivation (72–78% agreement) in persons with HD. Conclusion:Physiotherapists agree that their expertise in HD and support from colleagues facilitate the development of individualised treatment plans. Further work needs to develop creative ways in which barriers specific to the cognitive and behavioural aspects of HD can be managed to enable treatment plans to be implemented

    The Impact of Different Types of Assistive Devices on Gait Measures and Safety in Huntington's Disease

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Gait and balance impairments lead to frequent falls and injuries in individuals with Huntington's disease (HD). Assistive devices (ADs) such as canes and walkers are often prescribed to prevent falls, but their efficacy is unknown. We systematically examined the effects of different types of ADs on quantitative gait measures during walking in a straight path and around obstacles. METHODS: Spatial and temporal gait parameters were measured in 21 subjects with HD as they walked across a GAITRite walkway under 7 conditions (i.e., using no AD and 6 commonly prescribed ADs: a cane, a weighted cane, a standard walker, and a 2, 3 or 4 wheeled walker). Subjects also were timed and observed for number of stumbles and falls while walking around two obstacles in a figure-of-eight pattern. RESULTS: Gait measure variability (i.e., coefficient of variation), an indicator of fall risk, was consistently better when using the 4WW compared to other ADs. Subjects also walked the fastest and had the fewest number of stumbles and falls when using the 4WW in the figure-of-eight course. Subjects walked significantly slower using ADs compared to no AD both across the GAITRite and in the figure-of-eight. Measures reflecting gait stability and safety improved with the 4WW but were made worse by some other ADs

    Monitoring the referral system through benchmarking in rural Niger: an evaluation of the functional relation between health centres and the district hospital

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study is to establish a benchmark for referral rates in rural Niger so as to allow interpretation of routine referral data to assess the performance of the referral system in Niger. METHODS: Strict and controlled application of existing clinical decision trees in a sample of rural health centres allowed the estimation of the corresponding need for and characteristics of curative referrals in rural Niger. Compliance of referral was monitored as well. Need was matched against actual referral in 11 rural districts. The referral patterns were registered so as to get an idea on the types of pathology referred. RESULTS: The referral rate benchmark was set at 2.5 % of patients consulting at the health centre for curative reasons. Niger's rural districts have a referral rate of less than half this benchmark. Acceptability of referrals is low for the population and is adding to the deficient referral system in Niger. Mortality because of under-referral is highest among young children. CONCLUSION: Referral patterns show that the present programme approach to deliver health care leaves a large amount of unmet need for which only comprehensive first and second line health services can provide a proper answer. On the other hand, the benchmark suggests that well functioning health centres can take care of the vast majority of problems patients present with

    Design and baseline characteristics of the finerenone in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in diabetic kidney disease trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Among people with diabetes, those with kidney disease have exceptionally high rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and progression of their underlying kidney disease. Finerenone is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has shown to reduce albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) while revealing only a low risk of hyperkalemia. However, the effect of finerenone on CV and renal outcomes has not yet been investigated in long-term trials. Patients and Methods: The Finerenone in Reducing CV Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD) trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of finerenone compared to placebo at reducing clinically important CV and renal outcomes in T2D patients with CKD. FIGARO-DKD is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, event-driven trial running in 47 countries with an expected duration of approximately 6 years. FIGARO-DKD randomized 7,437 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >= 25 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and albuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio >= 30 to <= 5,000 mg/g). The study has at least 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the risk of the primary outcome (overall two-sided significance level alpha = 0.05), the composite of time to first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure. Conclusions: FIGARO-DKD will determine whether an optimally treated cohort of T2D patients with CKD at high risk of CV and renal events will experience cardiorenal benefits with the addition of finerenone to their treatment regimen. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2015-000950-39; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02545049

    Coefficient of Variation of Gait measures across all walking conditions: mean, (standard deviation).

    No full text
    <p>Abbreviations: no AD, no assistive device; StW, standard walker; 2WW, two wheeled walker; 3WW, three wheeled walker; 4WW, four wheeled walker; CV, Coefficient of Variation;</p><p>*significantly different than no AD at p<.05;</p>†<p>significantly different than cane at p<.05;</p>#<p>significantly different than StW at p<.05;</p>∞<p>significantly different than 3WW at p<.05;</p><p>significantly different from 4WW at p<.05;</p><p>significantly different from 2WW and 3WW at p<.05;</p>‡<p>significantly different from 2WW, 3WW, 4WW at p<.05;</p>§<p>significantly different than 2WW, 4WW at p<.05;</p>Ψ<p>significantly different than cane and 4WW at p<.05.</p

    The Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Validation and reliability in a neurological disorder.

    No full text
    BackgroundIndividuals with neurological disorders often have difficulty negotiating stairs that can lead to injurious falls. Clinicians lack a clinical tool to identify impairments in stair negotiation and to assist their decision making regarding treatment plans to improve stair performance and safety. We developed a new tool called the Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) that is designed to assess stair performance and safety in neurological populations.ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine interrater and intrarater reliability of STEPS and its concurrent content validity to various clinical balance and mobility measures using individuals with Huntington's disease (HD) as the first test population.MethodsForty individuals with HD (mean age 50.35) participated. Three observers rated live performances of the STEPS (interrater reliability) and seven observers rated videotaped performances twice (intrarater reliability). STEPS scores correlated with clinical mobility and balance test scores.ResultsExcellent inter- and intrarater reliability (ICCs = 0.91 and 0.89 respectively) and good internal consistency (α = 0.83) were found. Better STEPS performance correlated with better performance on co-administered motor and mobility measures and Stair Self-Efficacy scores. Per multivariable regression analysis, the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale modified motor score and descent time were significant predictors of STEPS performance.ConclusionsThe STEPS tool is easy to administer, requires no special devices and can be completed in less than five minutes. In the HD test population, it shows high reliability and validity making it a potentially useful tool for assessing maneuverability and safety on stairs in HD. The results suggest that the STEPS tool warrants further study to determine STEPS cut-off values for fall prediction in HD and may prove useful as an assessment tool for other neurological disorders

    Footfall Patterns.

    No full text
    <p>Footfall pattern recordings in one individual with HD under five conditions (A) no assistive device and using a (B) cane, (C) standard walker, (D) two-wheeled walker or (E) four-wheeled walker. The four-wheeled walker (E) produced a gait pattern with the least variability.</p

    Gait measures across all walking conditions: mean, (standard deviation).

    No full text
    <p>Abbreviations: no AD, no assistive device; StW, standard walker; 2WW, two wheeled walker; 3WW, three wheeled walker; 4WW, four wheeled walker; CV, Coefficient of Variation;</p><p>*significantly different than no AD at p<.05;</p><p>**significantly different than all other conditions at p<.05;</p>†<p>significantly different than cane at p<.05;</p>#<p>significantly different than StW at p<.05;</p>∞<p>significantly different than 3WW at p<.05;</p>‡<p>significantly different from 2WW, 3WW, 4WW at p<.05;</p>§<p>significantly different than 2WW, 4WW at p<.05.</p
    corecore