Non-Apis bees as model organisms in laboratory, semi-field and field experiments

Im Rahmen der Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln und ihren Wirkstoffen in der EU wurde das Risiko für Bienen bisher anhand der Westlichen Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L.) als Modellorganismus für alle Bienenarten bewertet. In den letzten Jahren wurde kontrovers diskutiert, ob Wildbienenarten in der Risikobewertung ebenfalls berücksichtigt werden sollten, um die bisherigen Daten­anforderungen für Honigbienen zu erweitern. Dies geht damit einher, etablierte, standardisierte Methoden für die Honigbiene an zusätzliche Wildbienenarten anzupassen und zu verstehen, wie diese Arten auf den verschiedenen Testebenen (Labor-, Halbfreiland- und Freilandtests) eingesetzt werden können. In diesem Artikel gehen wir zunächst auf die Bedeutung von Bienen als Testorganismen ein, diskutieren den derzeitigen Stand der Forschung, die für die Methodenentwicklung und das experimentelle Design für das Arbeiten mit Bienen wichtig ist, um abschließend einen Ausblick auf aktuelle Aktivitäten in der Standardisierung von Testmethoden zu geben.As part of the registration process of plant protection products (PPPs) and their active substances in the EU, the risk of PPPs for bees has been assessed so far by using the European honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) as a surrogate species. In the past few years other bee species have been discussed to augment data on honey bees. The addition of bee species in the registration process goes along with adapting test methodologies to new bee species and understand­ing how to use these species at different tiers (laboratory, semi-field and field levels). Here we first discuss the importance of bees as test organisms, outline the current state of research relevant to the methodology and design of experiments with bees and highlight recent activities in the standardization of test procedures

4.14 Developing methods for field experiments using commercially reared bumblebee colonies – initial colony strength and experimental duration as influential factors

Semi-field and field experiments with commercially used bumblebees (e.g. Bombus terrestris) gain more and more importance for both ecological studies and trials on potential side effects of plant protection products. However, standardized, replicable experimental methods are lacking so far and need further development. For example, initial strength of bumblebee colonies may vary across experiments but may be a key factor in successful colony development under field conditions. Trial duration and termination may impact results on total reproductive output (e.g. number of newly produced queens). In this study commercially reared bumblebee colonies of different initial strengths (number of worker bees) were placed along the field margin of each of six field sites. Each site was nested within one of two seasons and planted with one of two arable crops (Brassica napus and Phacelia tanacetifolia). Each colony was spaced approx. 50 m apart from the next colony, and its development was monitored once a week. While the development of half of the colonies was terminated at the first sighting of newly emerging queens within the nesting area, the other half of the colonies was left to develop further until the end of their natural colony cycle. Newly emerging queens were kept within the colonies using queen excluders. Colonies of different initial strengths showed very similar developmental patterns with medium and large colonies peaking slightly earlier than small colonies. Results may help to develop optimal parameters for standardized field tests.Semi-field and field experiments with commercially used bumblebees (e.g. Bombus terrestris) gain more and more importance for both ecological studies and trials on potential side effects of plant protection products. However, standardized, replicable experimental methods are lacking so far and need further development. For example, initial strength of bumblebee colonies may vary across experiments but may be a key factor in successful colony development under field conditions. Trial duration and termination may impact results on total reproductive output (e.g. number of newly produced queens). In this study commercially reared bumblebee colonies of different initial strengths (number of worker bees) were placed along the field margin of each of six field sites. Each site was nested within one of two seasons and planted with one of two arable crops (Brassica napus and Phacelia tanacetifolia). Each colony was spaced approx. 50 m apart from the next colony, and its development was monitored once a week. While the development of half of the colonies was terminated at the first sighting of newly emerging queens within the nesting area, the other half of the colonies was left to develop further until the end of their natural colony cycle. Newly emerging queens were kept within the colonies using queen excluders. Colonies of different initial strengths showed very similar developmental patterns with medium and large colonies peaking slightly earlier than small colonies. Results may help to develop optimal parameters for standardized field tests

Evaluating the feasibility of using the red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) in different experimental setups

Background: Evaluating hazards of pesticides to beneficial insects has become very important for the assessment and registration of pesticides. Test methods for honeybees are well established in the laboratory, under semi-field and field conditions. However, experiences in using other pollinators as model species are limited. Here we present results of various experiments on the red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.), a solitary, commercially used bee species. The aim was to compare methodologies, to assess test parameters, and to evaluate the feasibility of using O. bicornis in late season, when this bee species would have already finished its life cycle under natural conditions. Results: Hatching times and hatching rates varied depending on temperature and season. Provisioning and reproduction of O. bicornis were very variable, weather-dependent and not always reliably reproducible between seasons. They were higher in early than in late season in the field. In late season cardboard tubes showed greater cell production than wooden boards. Conclusion: O. bicornis is a good study system under semi-field and field conditions: cocoons are easy to handle, and to monitor. Since hatching rate and cell production decreased over time, experiments are most recommended in early to mid season. Cardboard tubes can be used as standardised, inexpensive nesting devices. However, they do not allow continuous observation and pollen sampling, and involve time-consuming handling in the laboratory. Our experiment on nest material was conducted in late season and may not mirror conditions in spring and early summer.Keywords: solitary bees, field experiments, semi-field experiments, reproduction, hatching, nestin

Neonicotinoids and bees: A large scale field study investigating residues and effects on honeybees, bumblebees and solitary bees in oilseed rape grown from clothianidin-treated seed

In 2013, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has highlighted several data gaps regarding the exposure and risk of pesticides to honeybees, bumblebees and solitary bees, including the risks from exposure to contaminated nectar and pollen. This study aims to contribute data, results and conclusions to obtain more information on exposure and risks of flowering oilseed rape seed treated with the neonicotinoid clothianidin, to pollinators. Semi-field and field trials were conducted at five different locations across Germany, using the Western honeybee (Apis mellifera L.), the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris L.) and the red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) as study organisms.Highest amounts of clothianidin residues were measured in single samples of mud cell walls (7.2 μg kg-1) and pollen (5.9 μg kg-1) from solitary bee nests. Residues in nectar from honey sacs, honeybee combs and bumblebee nests (2.2, 2.9, and 3.0 μg kg-1 respectively) showed no clear differences in the amount of residues, neither did residues in pollen (1.5, 1.8, and 1.3 μg kg-1 respectively). These results suggest differences in the risk profiles of those three bee species. Keywords: clothianidin, residues, honeybees, bumblebees, solitary bees, field, semi-fiel

The value of plantation forests for plant, invertebrate and bird diversity and the potential for cross-taxon surrogacy

As the area of plantation forest expands worldwide and natural, unmanaged forests decline there is much interest in the potential for planted forests to provide habitat for biodiversity. In regions where little semi-natural woodland remains, the biodiversity supported by forest plantations, typically non-native conifers, may be particularly important. Few studies provide detailed comparisons between the species diversity of native woodlands which are being depleted and non-native plantation forests, which are now expanding, based on data collected from multiple taxa in the same study sites. Here we compare the species diversity and community composition of plants, invertebrates and birds in Sitka spruce- (Picea sitchensis-) dominated and Norway spruce- (Picea abies-) dominated plantations, which have expanded significantly in recent decades in the study area in Ireland, with that of oak- and ash-dominated semi-natural woodlands in the same area. The results show that species richness in spruce plantations can be as high as semi-natural woodlands, but that the two forest types support different assemblages of species. In areas where non-native conifer plantations are the principle forest type, their role in the provision of habitat for biodiversity conservation should not be overlooked. Appropriate management should target the introduction of semi-natural woodland characteristics, and on the extension of existing semi-natural woodlands to maintain and enhance forest species diversity. Our data show that although some relatively easily surveyed groups, such as vascular plants and birds, were congruent with many of the other taxa when looking across all study sites, the similarities in response were not strong enough to warrant use of these taxa as surrogates of the others. In order to capture a wide range of biotic variation, assessments of forest biodiversity should either encompass several taxonomic groups, or rely on the use of indicators of diversity that are not species based

Impacts of the alien invasive Rhododendron ponticum L. on native plants, pollinators and their interaction

THESIS 8756This thesis addresses the impacts of an alien invasive plant. Rhododendron ponticum L., on pollination processes and population dynamics of native Irish plant and pollinator communities. Field studies were conducted in habitats in the West (Co. Galway) and East (Co. Wicklow and Co. Dublin)

Risk assessment requires several bee species to address species-specific sensitivity to insecticides at field-realistic concentrations

Abstract In the European registration process, pesticides are currently mainly tested on the honey bee. Since sensitivity data for other bee species are lacking for the majority of xenobiotics, it is unclear if and to which extent this model species can adequately serve as surrogate for all wild bees. Here, we investigated the effects of field-realistic contact exposure to a pyrethroid insecticide, containing lambda-cyhalothrin, on seven bee species (Andrena vaga, Bombus terrestris, Colletes cunicularius, Osmia bicornis, Osmia cornuta, Megachile rotundata, Apis mellifera) with different life history characteristics in a series of laboratory trials over two years. Our results on sensitivity showed significant species-specific responses to the pesticide at a field-realistic application rate (i.e., 7.5 g a.s./ha). Species did not group into distinct classes of high and low mortality. Bumble bee and mason bee survival was the least affected by the insecticide, and M. rotundata survival was the most affected with all individuals dead 48 h after application. Apis mellifera showed medium mortality compared to the other bee species. Most sublethal effects, i.e. behavioral abnormalities, were observed within the first hours after application. In some of the solitary species, for example O. bicornis and A. vaga, a higher percentage of individuals performed some abnormal behavior for longer until the end of the observation period. While individual bee weight explained some of the observed mortality patterns, differences are likely linked to additional ecological, phylogenetic or toxicogenomic parameters as well. Our results support the idea that honey bee data can be substitute for some bee species’ sensitivity and may justify the usage of safety factors. To adequately cover more sensitive species, a larger set of bee species should be considered for risk assessment

across Europe pollinator networks − Invasive plant integration into native plant References Subject collections Invasive plant integration into native plant -pollinator networks across Europe

The structure of plant -pollinator networks has been claimed to be resilient to changes in species composition due to the weak degree of dependence among mutualistic partners. However, detailed empirical investigations of the consequences of introducing an alien plant species into mutualistic networks are lacking. We present the first cross-European analysis by using a standardized protocol to assess the degree to which a particular alien plant species (i.e. Carpobrotus affine acinaciformis, Impatiens glandulifera, Opuntia stricta, Rhododendron ponticum and Solanum elaeagnifolium) becomes integrated into existing native plant-pollinator networks, and how this translates to changes in network structure. Alien species were visited by almost half of the pollinator species present, accounting on average for 42 per cent of the visits and 24 per cent of the network interactions. Furthermore, in general, pollinators depended upon alien plants more than on native plants. However, despite the fact that invaded communities received more visits than uninvaded communities, the dominant role of alien species over natives did not translate into overall changes in network connectance, plant linkage level and nestedness. Our results imply that although supergeneralist alien plants can play a central role in the networks, the structure of the networks appears to be very permeable and robust to the introduction of invasive alien species into the network

Invasive plant integration into native plant–pollinator networks across Europe

The structure of plant–pollinator networks has been claimed to be resilient to changes in species composition due to the weak degree of dependence among mutualistic partners. However, detailed empirical investigations of the consequences of introducing an alien plant species into mutualistic networks are lacking. We present the first cross-European analysis by using a standardized protocol to assess the degree to which a particular alien plant species (i.e. Carpobrotus affine acinaciformis, Impatiens glandulifera, Opuntia stricta, Rhododendron ponticum and Solanum elaeagnifolium) becomes integrated into existing native plant–pollinator networks, and how this translates to changes in network structure