Spatial and temporal evolution of distal 10q deletion, a prognostically unfavorable event in diffuse low-grade gliomas

Peer reviewe

Richtlijn 'Hersenmetastasen' (revisie)

Improved survival of cancer patients results in an increase in the incidence of brain metastases. In addition, asymptomatic brain metastases are more often detected as a consequence of active screening. In patients with cancer and new neurological symptoms, MRI of the brain is indicated to assess the presence and number of brain metastases. Decisions concerning treatment of brain metastases should take place within a multidisciplinary team. Treatment is in the first instance focused on improvement or preservation of neurological functioning. The main treatment options for patients with brain metastases are whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and neurosurgical resection. The choice of treatment depends on the number and the location of the brain metastases, the general and neurological condition of the patient, the extent of extracranial tumour activity, and the expected results of treatment. The revised guideline supports the policy of whole brain radiotherapy not being the standard treatment following stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy. In the case of complete resection, confirmed using early postoperative MRI, whole brain radiotherapy does not add to survival benefit, while patients may suffer from radiation-induced toxicity

Practice guideline 'Brain metastases' (revision)

Improved survival of cancer patients results in an increase in the incidence of brain metastases. In addition, asymptomatic brain metastases are more often detected as a consequence of active screening. In patients with cancer and new neurological symptoms, MRI of the brain is indicated to assess the presence and number of brain metastases. Decisions concerning treatment of brain metastases should take place within a multidisciplinary team. Treatment is in the first instance focused on improvement or preservation of neurological functioning. The main treatment options for patients with brain metastases are whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and neurosurgical resection. The choice of treatment depends on the number and the location of the brain metastases, the general and neurological condition of the patient, the extent of extracranial tumour activity, and the expected results of treatment. The revised guideline supports the policy of whole brain radiotherapy not being the standard treatment following stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy. In the case of complete resection, confirmed using early postoperative MRI, whole brain radiotherapy does not add to survival benefit, while patients may suffer from radiation-induced toxicity.</p

Practice guideline 'Brain metastases' (revision)

Improved survival of cancer patients results in an increase in the incidence of brain metastases. In addition, asymptomatic brain metastases are more often detected as a consequence of active screening. In patients with cancer and new neurological symptoms, MRI of the brain is indicated to assess the presence and number of brain metastases. Decisions concerning treatment of brain metastases should take place within a multidisciplinary team. Treatment is in the first instance focused on improvement or preservation of neurological functioning. The main treatment options for patients with brain metastases are whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy, and neurosurgical resection. The choice of treatment depends on the number and the location of the brain metastases, the general and neurological condition of the patient, the extent of extracranial tumour activity, and the expected results of treatment. The revised guideline supports the policy of whole brain radiotherapy not being the standard treatment following stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy. In the case of complete resection, confirmed using early postoperative MRI, whole brain radiotherapy does not add to survival benefit, while patients may suffer from radiation-induced toxicity.</p

Head-To-Head Comparison of PET and Perfusion Weighted MRI Techniques to Distinguish Treatment Related Abnormalities from Tumor Progression in Glioma

The post-treatment imaging surveillance of gliomas is challenged by distinguishing tumor progression (TP) from treatment-related abnormalities (TRA). Sophisticated imaging techniques, such as perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI PWI) and positron-emission tomography (PET) with a variety of radiotracers, have been suggested as being more reliable than standard imaging for distinguishing TP from TRA. However, it remains unclear if any technique holds diagnostic superiority. This meta-analysis provides a head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the aforementioned imaging techniques. Systematic literature searches on the use of PWI and PET imaging techniques were carried out in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and the reference lists of relevant papers. After the extraction of data on imaging technique specifications and diagnostic accuracy, a meta-analysis was carried out. The quality of the included papers was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. Nineteen articles, totaling 697 treated patients with glioma (431 males; mean age ± standard deviation 50.5 ± 5.1 years) were included. The investigated PWI techniques included dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) and arterial spin labeling (ASL). The PET-tracers studied concerned [S-methyl-11C]methionine, 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG), O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) and 6-[18F]-fluoro-3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine ([18F]FDOPA). The meta-analysis of all data showed no diagnostic superior imaging technique. The included literature showed a low risk of bias. As no technique was found to be diagnostically superior, the local level of expertise is hypothesized to be the most important factor for diagnostically accurate results in post-treatment glioma patients regarding the distinction of TRA from TP

Health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning in longterm anaplastic oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma survivors

Overall survival of patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors has been improved due to the addition of procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT), especially in 1p/19q-codeleted tumors. With improved survival, quality of survival becomes pivotal. We evaluated cognitive functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a cohort of long-term anaplastic oligodendroglioma survivors. Thirty-two out of 37 long-term survivors included in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 26951 in the Netherlands and France participated. Cognition was assessed using neuropsychological tests for 6 domains, and HRQOL with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Brain Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20). Fatigue and mood were evaluated. Results were compared to healthy controls and to patients' own HRQOL 2.5 years following initial treatment. At the time of assessment, median survival for the patients was 147 months, 27 were still progression- free since initial treatment. Of progression-free patients, 26 % were not, and 30 % were severely cognitively impaired; 41 % were employed and 81 % could live independently. Patients' HRQOL was worse compared to controls, but similar to 2.5 years after initial treatment. Initial treatment (RT versus RT + PCV) was not correlated with cognition or HRQOL. In conclusion, cognitive functioning in long-term anaplastic oligodendroglioma survivors is variable. However, most patients function independently. In progression-free patients, HRQOL is relatively stable during the disease course. In this small sample, no effect of the addition of PCV on cognition or HRQOL was identified

Interim results from the CATNON trial (EORTC study 26053-22054) of treatment with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma: a phase 3, randomised, open-label intergroup study.

BACKGROUND The role of temozolomide chemotherapy in newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas, which are associated with lower sensitivity to chemotherapy and worse prognosis than 1p/19q co-deleted tumours, is unclear. We assessed the use of radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in adults with non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas. METHODS This was a phase 3, randomised, open-label study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma with WHO performance status scores of 0-2. The randomisation schedule was generated with the electronic EORTC web-based ORTA system. Patients were assigned in equal numbers (1:1:1:1), using the minimisation technique, to receive radiotherapy (59·4 Gy in 33 fractions of 1·8 Gy) alone or with adjuvant temozolomide (12 4-week cycles of 150-200 mg/m2 temozolomide given on days 1-5); or to receive radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide 75 mg/m2 per day, with or without adjuvant temozolomide. The primary endpoint was overall survival adjusted for performance status score, age, 1p loss of heterozygosity, presence of oligodendroglial elements, and MGMT promoter methylation status, analysed by intention to treat. We did a planned interim analysis after 219 (41%) deaths had occurred to test the null hypothesis of no efficacy (threshold for rejection p<0·0084). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00626990. FINDINGS At the time of the interim analysis, 745 (99%) of the planned 748 patients had been enrolled. The hazard ratio for overall survival with use of adjuvant temozolomide was 0·65 (99·145% CI 0·45-0·93). Overall survival at 5 years was 55·9% (95% CI 47·2-63·8) with and 44·1% (36·3-51·6) without adjuvant temozolomide. Grade 3-4 adverse events were seen in 8-12% of 549 patients assigned temozolomide, and were mainly haematological and reversible. INTERPRETATION Adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma. Further analysis of the role of concurrent temozolomide treatment and molecular factors is needed. FUNDING Schering Plough and MSD

Significance of complete 1p/19q co-deletion, IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas: use with caution

Item does not contain fulltextThe histopathological diagnosis of diffuse gliomas often lacks the precision that is needed for tailored treatment of individual patients. Assessment of the molecular aberrations will probably allow more robust and prognostically relevant classification of these tumors. Markers that have gained a lot of interest in this respect are co-deletion of complete chromosome arms 1p and 19q, (hyper)methylation of the MGMT promoter and IDH1 mutations. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of complete 1p/19q co-deletion, MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutations in patients suffering from diffuse gliomas. The presence of these molecular aberrations was investigated in a series of 561 diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors (low grade n=110, anaplastic n=118 and glioblastoma n=333) and correlated with age at diagnosis and overall survival. Complete 1p/19q co-deletion, MGMT promoter methylation and/or IDH1 mutation generally signified a better prognosis for patients with a diffuse glioma including glioblastoma. However, in all 10 patients with a histopathological diagnosis of glioblastoma included in this study complete 1p/19q co-deletion was not associated with improved survival. Furthermore, in glioblastoma patients >50 years of age the favorable prognostic significance of IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation was absent. In conclusion, molecular diagnostics is a powerful tool to obtain prognostically relevant information for glioma patients. However, for individual patients the molecular information should be interpreted with caution and weighed in the context of parameters such as age and histopathological diagnosis