37 research outputs found

    Evaluation of potential risk factors for overall survival after diagnosis of extra-CNS metastases (OS<sub>M+</sub>) using Kaplan Meier method and log rank test.

    No full text
    <p>n: number of patients, OS<sub>M+</sub>: overall survival after the diagnosis of metastasis, SE: standard error (months), p: p-value, log-rank test, CI: confidence interval (months), ID: initial diagnosis, GBM: glioblastoma multiforme, GS: gliosarcoma, DoM: diagnosis of metastasis.</p><p>Evaluation of potential risk factors for overall survival after diagnosis of extra-CNS metastases (OS<sub>M+</sub>) using Kaplan Meier method and log rank test.</p

    An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis on Characteristics, Treatments and Outcomes of Glioblastoma/ Gliosarcoma Patients with Metastases Outside of the Central Nervous System

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Purpose</p><p>To determine the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) or gliosarcoma (GS) and metastases outside of the central nervous system (CNS).</p><p>Methods</p><p>PubMed and Web of Science searches for peer-reviewed articles pertaining to GBM/ GS patients with metastatic dissemination were conducted using the keywords gliosarcoma, glioblastoma, GBM, metastasis, metastases and metastatic. Additionally, we performed hand search following the references from the selected papers. Cases with metastases to the CNS were excluded and evaluated in a separate study.</p><p>Results</p><p>109 articles published between 1928 and 2013 were eligible. They reported on 150 patients. We observed a remarkable increase in the number of cases per decade over time. Median overall survival from diagnosis of metastasis (OS<sub>M+</sub>) was 6.0 ± 0.8 months and median overall survival from initial diagnosis (OS<sub>ID</sub>) 13 ± 2.4 months. On univariate analyses, gender, age, the histological subtype, the time interval between initial diagnosis and diagnosis of metastasis and pulmonary involvement did not influence OS<sub>M+</sub>. We did not observe any substantial treatment progress. A comparison of the present cohort with 84 GBM/ GS patients with exclusive CNS dissemination suggests that metastases outside the CNS are related to a slightly more favorable outcome.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The occurrence of extra-CNS metastasis from GBM/ GS is associated with a dismal prognosis, however it seems to compare slightly favorable to CNS dissemination. Crucial treatment progress has not been achieved over recent decades. A central registry should be considered to consecutively gain more information about the ideal therapeutic approach.</p></div

    Comparison of OS<sub>M+</sub> of the present cohort (42 patients) with OS<sub>M+</sub> of a cohort of GBM/ GS patients with exclusive CNS dissemination (84 patients).

    No full text
    <p>Detailed information on characteristics and treatments of these 84 patients and on data collection has been reported previously [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0121592#pone.0121592.ref009" target="_blank">9</a>].</p

    An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis on Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with Papillary Glioneuronal Tumor, Rosette Glioneuronal Tumor with Neuropil-Like Islands and Rosette Forming Glioneuronal Tumor of the Fourth Ventricle

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Background and Purpose</p><p>In 2007, the WHO classification of brain tumors was extended by three new entities of glioneuronal tumors: papillary glioneuronal tumor (PGNT), rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor of the fourth ventricle (RGNT) and glioneuronal tumor with neuropil-like islands (GNTNI). Focusing on clinical characteristics and outcome, the authors performed a comprehensive individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of the cases reported in literature until December 2012.</p><p>Methods</p><p>PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed articles reporting on PGNT, RGNT, and GNTNI using predefined keywords.</p><p>Results</p><p>95 publications reported on 182 patients (PGNT, 71; GNTNI, 26; RGNT, 85). Median age at diagnosis was 23 years (range 4–75) for PGNT, 27 years (range 6–79) for RGNT, and 40 years (range 2–65) for GNTNI. Ninety-seven percent of PGNT and 69% of GNTNI were located in the supratentorial region, 23% of GNTNI were in the spinal cord, and 80% of RGNT were localized in the posterior fossa. Complete resection was reported in 52 PGNT (73%), 36 RGNT (42%), and 7 GNTNI (27%) patients. Eight PGNT, 3 RGNT, and 12 GNTNI patients were treated with chemo- and/or radiotherapy as the primary postoperative treatment. Follow-up data were available for 132 cases. After a median follow-up time of 1.5 years (range 0.2–25) across all patients, 1.5-year progression-free survival rates were 52±12% for GNTNI, 86±5% for PGNT, and 100% for RGNT. The 1.5-year overall-survival were 95±5%, 98±2%, and 100%, respectively.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The clinical understanding of the three new entities of glioneuronal tumors, PGNT, RGNT and GNTNI, is currently emerging. The present meta-analysis will hopefully contribute to a delineation of their diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic profiles. However, the available data do not provide a solid basis to define the optimum treatment approach. Hence, a central register should be established.</p></div

    Clinical characteristics and treatments after diagnosis of extra-CNS metastasis of 150 GBM/ GS patients reported in literature until April 2013.

    No full text
    <p>GBM: Glioblastoma multiforme (including one glioblastoma multiforme with an oligodendroglial component), GS: Gliosarcoma.</p><p>Clinical characteristics and treatments after diagnosis of extra-CNS metastasis of 150 GBM/ GS patients reported in literature until April 2013.</p
    corecore