Irrigated-tip catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients late after surgery of congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate irrigated-tip catheter for ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardias late after surgical repair of congenital heart disease. BACKGROUND In congenital heart disease patients, the right atrium can be markedly enlarged with areas of low blood flow. Radiofrequency (RF) lesion creation may be hampered by insufficient electrode cooling at sites with low blood flow. METHODS Thirty-six consecutive patients with intraatrial reentrant tachycardia refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy from two centers were included in the study. Entrainment pacing and electroanatomic mapping (CARTO) were used to delineate reentrant circuits and critical isthmus sites. RF ablation was performed using an irrigated-tip catheter (Navistar Thermocool). RESULTS Fifty-two intraatrial reentrant tachycardia circuits were identified, and 48 were targeted with RF ablation. RF ablation was performed using a mean of 13 +/- 11 irrigated RF applications per tachycardia isthmus with a mean power of 36 +/- 8 W. In a historical control group of congenital heart disease patients managed with conventional catheter ablation, the number of lesions per isthmus was higher (23 +/- 11) and mean power was lower (27 +/- 14 W). Acute success was achieved in 45 intraatrial reentrant tachycardias (94% of targeted tachycardias and 87% of all tachycardias). After a mean follow-up of 17 +/- 7 months, 33 (92%) of 36 patients were free of recurrence. Five patients (14%) developed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS The combination of modern techniques including electroanatomic mapping and catheter irrigation allows safe and highly effective ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with surgically repaired congenital heart disease

The prognostic accuracy of different QT interval measures.

BACKGROUND: The QT intervals accuracy for predicting arrhythmic death varies between studies, possibly due to differences in the selection of the lead used for measurement of the QT interval. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic accuracy of all known ways to select the lead. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three institutions that used different methods for measuring QT intervals provided their QT databases. They included more than 3500 twelve-lead surface ECGs. The data represented low- and high-risk patients of the normal population (survivors vs dead from cardiovascular causes), acute myocardial infarction (survivors versus death from all causes) and remote myocardial infarction (with vs without a history of ventricular arrhythmia). The prognostic accuracy was defined as the area under the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC-area). The most accurate standard leads were I and aVL and the least accurate was AVR. The most accurate precordial lead was V4. The prognostic accuracy of the longest QT interval was higher than for any standard lead. The prognostic accuracy of the mean of the three longest QT intervals was equal to or slightly lower than for the longest QT interval. CONCLUSIONS: The highest prognostic accuracy is obtained with the longest QT interval. The accuracies of the lead selection methods are so different that it can explain a substantial part of the differences between otherwise similar studies in the literature. We recommend the use of the mean value of the three longest QT intervals