Precise measurement of RudsR_{\text{uds}} and RR between 1.84 and 3.72 GeV at the KEDR detector

The present work continues a series of the KEDR measurements of the $R$ value that started in 2010 at the VEPP-4M $e^+e^-$ collider. By combining new data with our previous results in this energy range we measured the values of $R_{\text{uds}}$ and $R$ at nine center-of-mass energies between 3.08 and 3.72 GeV. The total accuracy is about or better than $2.6\%$ at most of energy points with a systematic uncertainty of about $1.9\%$. Together with the previous precise $R$ measurement at KEDR in the energy range 1.84-3.05 GeV, it constitutes the most detailed high-precision $R$ measurement near the charmonium production threshold.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1610.02827 and substantial text overlap with arXiv:1510.0266

The beam energy measurement system for the Beijing electron-positron collider

The beam energy measurement system (BEMS) for the upgraded Beijing electron-positron collider BEPC-II is described. The system is based on measuring the energies of Compton back-scattered photons. The relative systematic uncertainty of the electron and positron beam energy determination is estimated as 2 \cdot 10^{-5}. The relative uncertainty of the beam's energy spread is about 6 %

Measurement of the branching fraction of J/ψ→ρπJ/\psi\rightarrow\rho\pi at KEDR

We present the study of the decay $J/\psi \rightarrow \rho \pi$. The results are based on of 5.2 million $J/\psi$ events collected by the KEDR detector at VEPP-4M collider. The branching fraction is measured to be $\mathcal{B}(J/\psi\rightarrow\rho\pi) = \big(2.072\pm 0.017 \pm 0.056 \big)\cdot 10^{-2}$ where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second one is systematic. This is the most precise single measurement of this quantity at the moment

Status of NSLS-II booster

The National Synchrotron Light Source II is a third generation light source under construction at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The project includes a highly optimized 3 GeV electron storage ring, linac pre-injector and full-energy booster-synchrotron. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics builds booster for NSLS-II. The booster should accelerate the electron beam continuously and reliably from minimal 170 MeV injection energy to maximal energy of 3.15 GeV and average beam current of 20 mA. The booster shall be capable of multi-bunch and single bunch operation. This paper summarizes the status of NSLS-II booster.Национальный источник синхротронного излучения II является синхротроном третьего поколения, созданным в Брукхевенской национальной лаборатории. Проект включает: высокооптимизированное накопительное кольцо на 3 ГэВ, линейный ускоритель и бустерный синхротрон на полную энергию. Институт ядерной физики им. Г.И. Будкера создает бустер для NSLS-II. Бустер должен надежно и непрерывно ускорять пучок электронов от минимальной энергии инжекции 170 МэВ до максимальной энергии 3,15 ГэВ с током пучка 20 мА. Бустер должен быть способен работать в односгустковом и многосгустковом режимах. Эта статья суммирует состояние дел по бустеру для NSLS-II.Національне джерело синхротронного випромінювання II є синхротроном третього покоління, створеним у Брукхевенській національній лабораторії. Проект включає: високооптимізоване накопичувальне кільце на 3 ГеВ, лінійний прискорювач і бустерний синхротрон на повну енергію. Інститут ядерної фізики ім. Г.І. Будкера створює бустер для NSLS-II. Бустер повинен надійно і безперервно прискорювати пучок електронів від мінімальної енергії інжекції 170 МеВ до максимальної енергії 3,15 ГеВ зі струмом пучка 20 мА. Бустер повинен бути здатний працювати в односгустковому і багатосгустковому режимах. Ця стаття підсумовує стан справ по бустеру для NSLS-II

Cross-platform mobile software development : technology overview and a practical example

The vast diversity of portable devices has increased the need for an easy and unified approach to build mobile software. The purpose of this work is to give an overview of technologies widely used to deliver cross-platform software solutions. This was achieved by studying two of the most common cross-platform frameworks – Xamarin.Forms and Cordova. The first part of the work introduces the problem of mobile software development. The second part describes the underlying technology of the cross-platform solutions and compares them to the native application development in terms of benefits and drawbacks. The third part provides a practical example of building an app using the two cross-platform solutions, demonstrating the workflow of development and a toolset used