19 research outputs found

    CD8+T-bet+ cells as a predominant biomarker for inclusion body myositis

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Myositis is a heterogeneous group of muscular auto-immune diseases with clinical and pathological criteria that allow the classification of patients into different sub-groups. Inclusion body myositis is the most frequent myositis above fifty years of age. Diagnosing inclusion body myositis requires expertise and is challenging. Little is known concerning the pathogenic mechanisms of this disease in which conventional suppressive-immune therapies are inefficacious.Objectives: Our aim was to deepen our understanding of the immune mechanisms involved in inclusion body myositis and identify specific biomarkers.Methods: Using a panel of thirty-six markers and mass cytometry, we performed deep immune profiling of peripheral blood cells from inclusion body myositis patients and healthy donors, divided into two cohorts: test and validation cohorts. Potential biomarkers were compared to myositis controls (anti-Jo1-, anti-3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase-, and anti-signal recognition particle-positive patients).Results: Unsupervised analyses revealed substantial changes only within CD8+ cells. We observed an increase in the frequency of CD8+ cells that expressed high levels of T-bet, and containing mainly both effector and terminally differentiated memory cells. The senescent marker CD57 was overexpressed in CD8+T-bet+ cells of inclusion body myositis patients. As expected, senescent CD8+T-bet+ CD57+ cells of both patients and healthy donors were CD28nullCD27nullCD127null. Surprisingly, non-senescent CD8+T-bet+ CD57- cells in inclusion body myositis patients expressed lower levels of CD28, CD27, and CD127, and expressed higher levels of CD38 and HLA-DR compared to healthy donors. Using classification and regression trees alongside receiver operating characteristics curves, we identified and validated a frequency of CD8+T-bet+ cells >51.5% as a diagnostic biomarker specific to inclusion body myositis, compared to myositis control patients, with a sensitivity of 94.4%, a specificity of 88.5%, and an area under the curve of 0.97.Conclusion: Using a panel of thirty-six markers by mass cytometry, we identify an activated cell population (CD8+T-bet+ CD57- CD28lowCD27lowCD127low CD38+ HLA-DR+) which could play a role in the physiopathology of inclusion body myositis, and identify CD8+T-bet+ cells as a predominant biomarker of this disease

    Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Levels Are Higher in Male Patients with Non-Classic Fabry Disease

    Get PDF
    International audienceFabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal disease in which defects in the alpha-galactosidase A enzyme activity lead to the ubiquitous accumulation of glycosphingolipids. Whereas the classic disease is characterized by neuropathic pain, progressive renal failure, white matter lesions, cerebral stroke, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the non-classic phenotype, also known as cardiac variant, is almost exclusively characterized by HCM. Circulating sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) has controversially been associated with the Fabry cardiomyopathy. We measured serum S1P levels in 41 patients of the FFABRY cohort. S1P levels were higher in patients with a non-classic phenotype compared to those with a classic phenotype (200.3 [189.6–227.9] vs. 169.4 ng/mL [121.1–203.3], p = 0.02). In a multivariate logistic regression model, elevated S1P concentration remained statistically associated with the non-classic phenotype (OR = 1.03; p < 0.02), and elevated lysoGb3 concentration with the classic phenotype (OR = 0.95; p < 0.03). S1P levels were correlated with interventricular septum thickness (r = 0.46; p = 0.02). In a logistic regression model including S1P serum levels, phenotype, and age, age remained the only variable significantly associated with the risk of HCM (OR = 1.25; p = 0.001). S1P alone was not associated with cardiac hypertrophy but with the cardiac variant. The significantly higher S1P levels in patients with the cardiac variant compared to those with classic Fabry suggest the involvement of distinct pathophysiological pathways in the two phenotypes. S1P dosage could allow the personalization of patient management

    Ultrasensitive Interferons quantification in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies serve as biomarkers of activity in dermatomyositis and anti-synthetase syndrome

    No full text
    Abstract Objectives Inflammatory idiopathic myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of disorders, ranging from a muscle-specific autoimmune disease to a systemic one that are difficult to assess. Recent insights into IIM pathogenesis highlighted the role of interferon (IFN) in the pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to test if IFN serum levels can a use as a biomarker of disease activity in IIM. Methods IFN type I and II were measured using an ultrasensitive detection technology and assess the potential of IFN. Results One hundred and fifty-two patients (dermatomyositis (DM); n=50, anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS); n=46, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM); n=32, inclusion body myositis (IBM); n=24) and 33 age-matched healthy donors were included. IFN-α levels were higher only in DM (0.07 pg/ml [0.03-0.23], p<0.005) and ASyS groups (0.07 [0.02-0.16], p<0.05) compared with controls (0.02 [0.01-0.05]). IFN-β was increased only in DM and IFN-γ among all IIM. IFN-α levels were correlated with disease activity in DM (r=0.76, p<0.0001). The predictive accuracy of IFN-α level to discriminate active and non-active disease was excellent as reflected by an area under the ROC-curve of 0.88. Using an IFN-α level cut-off above 0.11 pg/ml, the sensitivity was 75% and the specificity was 96% in DM patient. IFN-α and IFN-γ were correlated with disease activity in ASyS groups (r=0.55 and r=0.46 p<0.05)). Conclusions IFNs are promising biomarker for DM and ASyS disease activity

    Long-term exposure to Myozyme results in a decrease of anti-drug antibodies in late-onset Pompe disease patients

    No full text
    French Pompe Registry Study GroupInternational audienceImmunogenicity of recombinant human acid-alpha glucosidase (rhGAA) in enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is a safety and efficacy concern in the management of late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). However, long-term effects of ERT on humoral and cellular responses to rhGAA are still poorly understood. To better understand the impact of immunogenicity of rhGAA on the efficacy of ERT, clinical data and blood samples from LOPD patients undergoing ERT for >4 years (n = 28) or untreated (n = 10) were collected and analyzed. In treated LOPD patients, anti-rhGAA antibodies peaked within the first 1000 days of ERT, while long-term exposure to rhGAA resulted in clearance of antibodies with residual production of non-neutralizing IgG. Analysis of  T cell responses to rhGAA showed detectable T cell reactivity only after in vitro restimulation. Upregulation of several cytokines and chemokines was detectable in both treated and untreated LOPD subjects, while IL2 secretion was detectable only in subjects who received ERT. These results indicate that long-term ERT in LOPD patients results in a decrease in antibody titers and residual production of non-inhibitory IgGs. Immune responses to GAA following long-term ERT do not seem to affect efficacy of ERT and are consistent with an immunomodulatory effect possibly mediated by regulatory T cells

    Sirolimus for treatment of patients with inclusion body myositis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, phase 2b trial

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Inclusion body myositis is the most frequent myositis in patients older than 50 years. Classical immunosuppressants are ineffective in treating inclusion body myositis, and to date there are no recommendations for pharmacological approaches to treatment. When used after organ transplantation, sirolimus can block the proliferation of effector T cells, while preserving T regulatory cells, and induce autophagy, all of which are processes that are impaired in inclusion body myositis. In this pilot study, we aimed to test the efficacy of sirolimus in patients with inclusion body myositis.Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, phase 2b trial was done at a single hospital in Paris, France. The study included men and women (aged 45–80 years) who had a defined diagnosis of inclusion body myositis according to established criteria. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-daily oral sirolimus 2 mg or placebo. Centralised balanced block randomisation (blocks of four) was computer generated without stratification. The study comprised a 15-day screening period (days −15 to 0) and a 52-week treatment period (day 0 to month 12). The primary endpoint was the relative percentage change from baseline to month 12 in maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength. Secondary endpoints included the following assessments at months 6 and 12: 6-min walking distance, isometric muscle strength for hand grip (finger flexors), knee flexion and elbow flexion and extension, forced vital capacity, muscle replacement with fat measured by quantitative nuclear MRI, Inclusion Body Myositis Weakness Composite Index (IBMWCI), Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS), Health Assessment Questionnaire without Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and analyses of T-cell subpopulations by mass cytometry. The primary analysis was done on the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02481453.Findings: Between July 15, 2015, and May 13, 2016, we screened 285 patients, 44 of whom were randomly allocated to sirolimus (22 patients) or placebo (22 patients). We observed no difference in the primary outcome of relative percentage change from baseline to month 12 of the maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength (median difference 3·78, 95% CI −10·61 to 17·31; p=0·85). For secondary outcomes, differences between the groups were not significant for changes in strength of other muscle groups (grip, elbow flexion and extension, or knee flexion), IBMWCI, IBMFRS, and lower limb muscle fat fraction. However, we observed significant differences in favour of sirolimus between the study groups for HAQ-DI, forced vital capacity, thigh fat fraction, and 6-min walking distance. Ten (45%) of 22 patients in the sirolimus group had a serious adverse event compared with six (27%) of 22 patients in the placebo group. Four (18%) patients in the sirolimus group stopped their treatment because of adverse events (severe mouth ulcers, aseptic pneumonia, renal insufficiency, and peripheral lower limb oedema), which resolved after treatment discontinuation. Canker sores were the most frequent side-effect and were mainly mild or moderate in ten patients.Interpretation: We found no evidence for efficacy of sirolimus for treating inclusion body myositis based on maximal voluntary isometric knee extension strength and other muscle strength measures, and the side-effects of treatment were substantial for some patients. However, we believe there was enough evidence of benefit in certain secondary outcomes to pursue a multicentre phase 3 trial to further assess the safety and efficacy of sirolimus
    corecore