Cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis (copaiba) oil in patients with peptic ulcer

Objetivos: Determinar la eficacia cicatrizante del aceite de copaiba obtenido de la corteza de Copaifera officinalis, comparado con omeprazol 20 mg, en pacientes con diagnóstico definitivo de úlcera péptica. Diseño: Estudio experimental, clínico comparativo, de fase II, aleatorio, doble ciego, grupo paralelo. Institución: Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. Participantes: Pacientes con diagnóstico definitivo de úlcera péptica. Intervenciones: El diagnóstico fue tanto por exploración física como complementaria, siendo la endoscopia la técnica de elección, con evaluación pre y postratamiento con aceite de copaiba, formulada en cápsulas de 80 mg y 120 mg. El ensayo clínico incluyó 60 pacientes que voluntariamente ingresaron al programa de estudio, previa firma del consentimiento informado aprobado por el Comité institucional de Ética en Investigación. Los pacientes fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en tres grupos, de 20 casos cada uno, según orden de llegada; los dos primeros grupos recibieron cápsulas de aceite de copaiba, en dosis de 80 y 120 mg, respectivamente; y un tercer grupo recibió omeprazol 20 mg. Los tratamientos fueron administrados en ayunas, una vez por la mañana, 30 minutos antes de la ingesta del primer alimento. Los datos fueron evaluados mediante técnicas multivariadas, considerando estadísticamente significativo p<0,05. Se tuvo en cuenta el consentimiento informado aprobado por el Comité de Bioética en Investigación del Centro Asistencial. Principales medidas de resultados: Porcentaje de cicatrización. Resultados: Se logró 65% y 75% de cicatrización de la úlcera péptica con aceite de copaiba, respectivamente, contra 100% en el grupo de omeprazol, sin efectos adversos significativos; dos presentaron náuseas y tres epigastralgia. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con úlcera péptica y con tratamiento de las cápsulas conteniendo aceite de copaiba mostraron cicatrización de la úlcera de 65 a 75% y sin efectos adversos significativos.Objectives: To determine the cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis’ stem bark copaiba oil compared with omeprazole 20 mg in patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Design: Experimental, comparative, phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Setting: Clinical Investigation Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Participants: Patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Interventions: Clinical diagnosis of peptic ulcer was done by endoscopy as well as pre and post treatment evaluation following administration of copaiba oil formulated capsules (80 mg and 120 mg). Sixty patients enrolled voluntarily to the study and signed informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patients were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 cases each according to arrival order; the first and second group received respectively copaiba oil 80 mg and 120 mg capsules, and the third group omeprazole 20 mg, fasting, once daily in the morning, half hour before breakfast. Data was evaluated through multivariate techniques, considering p<0.05 as statistically significant. Main outcome measures: Percentage of patients healing their ulcer. Results: Peptic ulcer cicatrized in 65% and 75% respectively versus 100% in the omeprazole group, without significant adverse effects. Two patients presented nausea and three epigastric pain. Conclusions: Patients with peptic ulcer treated with copaiba oil capsules showed ulcer scarring in 65% to 75% and without significant adverse effects

Preventive effect of Oenothera rosea on N-methyl-N-nitrosourea- (NMU) induced gastric cancer in rats

Background: Currently, gastric cancer (GC) is considered a public health problem worldwide. Using medicinal plants for the prevention of chronic diseases such as cancer constitutes new alternatives in traditional medicine. Oenothera rosea (OR) could be an option, but it needs to be evaluated. Aim: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of OR extract on N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU)-induced GC in rats. Methods: In total, 80 male Holtzman rats were randomized into five groups. Group A received the saline solution (5mL/kg), group B received NMU 500 μg/kg (cancer inductor) by oral administration for 16 weeks, and groups C, D, and E were treated with OR extract (100, 200, and 300 mg/kg, respectively) and NMU in order to evaluate the preventive effect on cancer induced by NMU for 16 weeks. Blood and histological samples of stomachs were collected to determine histopathological, biochemical, and hematological parameters between different experimental groups. Results: Groups C, D, and E presented less histopathological changes such as anaplastic and hyperplastic cells, compared with group B. Hematological and biochemical parameters were recorded, and superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde, and nitric oxide levels were statistically less than those of NMU group (P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.01). Conclusion: Considering the histopathological signs and the antioxidant activity in vivo as well as hematological and biochemical parameters of ethanolic extract of OR, we concluded that its administration in rats has a protective effect on GC, which is induced experimentally. This species could be studied in clinical trials for patients with GC in the future.Revisión por pare

Efecto cicatrizante del aceite de Copaifera officinalis (copaiba), en pacientes con úlcera péptica

Objectives: To determine the cicatrizing effect of Copaifera officinalis’ stem bark copaiba oil compared with omeprazole 20 mg in patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Design: Experimental, comparative, phase II, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Setting: Clinical Investigation Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Participants: Patients with diagnosis of peptic ulcer. Interventions: Clinical diagnosis of peptic ulcer was done by endoscopy as well as pre and post treatment evaluation following administration of copaiba oil formulated capsules (80 mg and 120 mg). Sixty patients enrolled voluntarily to the study and signed informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patients were randomly distributed in three groups of 20 cases each according to arrival order; the first and second group received respectively copaiba oil 80 mg and 120 mg capsules, and the third group omeprazole 20 mg, fasting, once daily in the morning, half hour before breakfast. Data was evaluated through multivariate techniques, considering p<0.05 as statistically significant. Main outcome measures: Percentage of patients healing their ulcer. Results: Peptic ulcer cicatrized in 65% and 75% respectively versus 100% in the omeprazole group, without significant adverse effects. Two patients presented nausea and three epigastric pain. Conclusions: Patients with peptic ulcer treated with copaiba oil capsules showed ulcer scarring in 65% to 75% and without significant adverse effects.Objetivos: Determinar la eficacia cicatrizante del aceite de copaiba obtenido de la corteza de Copaifera officinalis, comparado con omeprazol 20 mg, en pacientes con diagnóstico definitivo de úlcera péptica. Diseño: Estudio experimental, clínico comparativo, de fase II, aleatorio, doble ciego, grupo paralelo. Institución: Instituto de Investigaciones Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú. Participantes: Pacientes con diagnóstico definitivo de úlcera péptica. Intervenciones: El diagnóstico fue tanto por exploración física como complementaria, siendo la endoscopia la técnica de elección, con evaluación pre y postratamiento con aceite de copaiba, formulada en cápsulas de 80 mg y 120 mg. El ensayo clínico incluyó 60 pacientes que voluntariamente ingresaron al programa de estudio, previa firma del consentimiento informado aprobado por el Comité institucional de Ética en Investigación. Los pacientes fueron distribuidos aleatoriamente en tres grupos, de 20 casos cada uno, según orden de llegada; los dos primeros grupos recibieron cápsulas de aceite de copaiba, en dosis de 80 y 120 mg, respectivamente; y un tercer grupo recibió omeprazol 20 mg. Los tratamientos fueron administrados en ayunas, una vez por la mañana, 30 minutos antes de la ingesta del primer alimento. Los datos fueron evaluados mediante técnicas multivariadas, considerando estadísticamente significativo p<0,05. Se tuvo en cuenta el consentimiento informado aprobado por el Comité de Bioética en Investigación del Centro Asistencial. Principales medidas de resultados: Porcentaje de cicatrización. Resultados: Se logró 65% y 75% de cicatrización de la úlcera péptica con aceite de copaiba, respectivamente, contra 100% en el grupo de omeprazol, sin efectos adversos significativos; dos presentaron náuseas y tres epigastralgia. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con úlcera péptica y con tratamiento de las cápsulas conteniendo aceite de copaiba mostraron cicatrización de la úlcera de 65 a 75% y sin efectos adversos significativos

Preventive effect of <em>Oenothera rosea</em> on N-methyl-N-nitrosourea- (NMU) induced gastric cancer in rats

Background: Currently, gastric cancer (GC) is considered a public health problem worldwide. Using medicinal plants for the prevention of chronic diseases such as cancer constitutes new alternatives in traditional medicine. Oenothera rosea (OR) could be an option, but it needs to be evaluated. Aim: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of OR extract on N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU)-induced GC in rats. Methods: In total, 80 male Holtzman rats were randomized into five groups. Group A received the saline solution (5mL/kg), group B received NMU 500 μg/kg (cancer inductor) by oral administration for 16 weeks, and groups C, D, and E were treated with OR extract (100, 200, and 300 mg/kg, respectively) and NMU in order to evaluate the preventive effect on cancer induced by NMU for 16 weeks. Blood and histological samples of stomachs were collected to determine histopathological, biochemical, and hematological parameters between different experimental groups. Results: Groups C, D, and E presented less histopathological changes such as anaplastic and hyperplastic cells, compared with group B. Hematological and biochemical parameters were recorded, and superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde, and nitric oxide levels were statistically less than those of NMU group (P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.01). Conclusion: Considering the histopathological signs and the antioxidant activity in vivo as well as hematological and biochemical parameters of ethanolic extract of OR, we concluded that its administration in rats has a protective effect on GC, which is induced experimentally. This species could be studied in clinical trials for patients with GC in the future.Revisión por pare