Evolving trends in the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 waves. The ACIE appy II study

Background: In 2020, ACIE Appy study showed that COVID-19 pandemic heavily affected the management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) worldwide, with an increased rate of non-operative management (NOM) strategies and a trend toward open surgery due to concern of virus transmission by laparoscopy and controversial recommendations on this issue. The aim of this study was to survey again the same group of surgeons to assess if any difference in management attitudes of AA had occurred in the later stages of the outbreak. Methods: From August 15 to September 30, 2021, an online questionnaire was sent to all 709 participants of the ACIE Appy study. The questionnaire included questions on personal protective equipment (PPE), local policies and screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection, NOM, surgical approach and disease presentations in 2021. The results were compared with the results from the previous study. Results: A total of 476 answers were collected (response rate 67.1%). Screening policies were significatively improved with most patients screened regardless of symptoms (89.5% vs. 37.4%) with PCR and antigenic test as the preferred test (74.1% vs. 26.3%). More patients tested positive before surgery and commercial systems were the preferred ones to filter smoke plumes during laparoscopy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was the first option in the treatment of AA, with a declined use of NOM. Conclusion: Management of AA has improved in the last waves of pandemic. Increased evidence regarding SARS-COV-2 infection along with a timely healthcare systems response has been translated into tailored attitudes and a better care for patients with AA worldwide

Infected pancreatic necrosis: outcomes and clinical predictors of mortality. A post hoc analysis of the MANCTRA-1 international study

: The identification of high-risk patients in the early stages of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is critical, because it could help the clinicians to adopt more effective management strategies. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the MANCTRA-1 international study to assess the association between clinical risk factors and mortality among adult patients with IPN. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic factors of mortality. We identified 247 consecutive patients with IPN hospitalised between January 2019 and December 2020. History of uncontrolled arterial hypertension (p = 0.032; 95% CI 1.135-15.882; aOR 4.245), qSOFA (p = 0.005; 95% CI 1.359-5.879; aOR 2.828), renal failure (p = 0.022; 95% CI 1.138-5.442; aOR 2.489), and haemodynamic failure (p = 0.018; 95% CI 1.184-5.978; aOR 2.661), were identified as independent predictors of mortality in IPN patients. Cholangitis (p = 0.003; 95% CI 1.598-9.930; aOR 3.983), abdominal compartment syndrome (p = 0.032; 95% CI 1.090-6.967; aOR 2.735), and gastrointestinal/intra-abdominal bleeding (p = 0.009; 95% CI 1.286-5.712; aOR 2.710) were independently associated with the risk of mortality. Upfront open surgical necrosectomy was strongly associated with the risk of mortality (p < 0.001; 95% CI 1.912-7.442; aOR 3.772), whereas endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis (p = 0.018; 95% CI 0.138-0.834; aOR 0.339) and enteral nutrition (p = 0.003; 95% CI 0.143-0.716; aOR 0.320) were found as protective factors. Organ failure, acute cholangitis, and upfront open surgical necrosectomy were the most significant predictors of mortality. Our study confirmed that, even in a subgroup of particularly ill patients such as those with IPN, upfront open surgery should be avoided as much as possible. Study protocol registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov (I.D. Number NCT04747990)

Burnout among surgeons before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international survey

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had many significant impacts within the surgical realm, and surgeons have been obligated to reconsider almost every aspect of daily clinical practice. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study reported in compliance with the CHERRIES guidelines and conducted through an online platform from June 14th to July 15th, 2020. The primary outcome was the burden of burnout during the pandemic indicated by the validated Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure. Results: Nine hundred fifty-four surgeons completed the survey. The median length of practice was 10 years; 78.2% included were male with a median age of 37 years old, 39.5% were consultants, 68.9% were general surgeons, and 55.7% were affiliated with an academic institution. Overall, there was a significant increase in the mean burnout score during the pandemic; longer years of practice and older age were significantly associated with less burnout. There were significant reductions in the median number of outpatient visits, operated cases, on-call hours, emergency visits, and research work, so, 48.2% of respondents felt that the training resources were insufficient. The majority (81.3%) of respondents reported that their hospitals were included in the management of COVID-19, 66.5% felt their roles had been minimized; 41% were asked to assist in non-surgical medical practices, and 37.6% of respondents were included in COVID-19 management. Conclusions: There was a significant burnout among trainees. Almost all aspects of clinical and research activities were affected with a significant reduction in the volume of research, outpatient clinic visits, surgical procedures, on-call hours, and emergency cases hindering the training. Trial registration: The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov "NCT04433286" on 16/06/2020

A Walk in the Forest: Elementary Students’ Perceptions and Knowledge of Forestry Principles

A Walk in the Forest is an educational program sponsored by the Society of American Foresters, Project Learning Tree, and the American Tree Farm System. The purpose of this outreach effort is to educate participants about forest-related benefits, increase awareness of forest ecosystems, and promote understanding of the forestry profession. The Mary Kahrs Warnell Forest Education Center conducted Walks for over 3,000 sixth grade students, teachers, and parents between 2002 and 2008. This outreach effort was the result of a partnership between the Warnell Center, the Savannah SAF chapter, the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, the Georgia Forestry Commission, and many others. This paper reports the results of a pilot study that assessed changes in perceptions and knowledge of forestry principles among 285 fourth grade students who participated in the 7th Annual Walk in the Warnell Forest. Positive outcomes of the Walk were evident despite changes in the duration, scope, and location of the event necessitated by inclement weather. Consistent with previous research, findings suggest that environmental knowledge was more amenable to change than environmental perceptions. Results of the pilot study provide insight on the planning and design of environmental educational programs that can be used to meet the needs of local school children. The Walk is an inherently experiential and multidisciplinary program that relies on local environments and local forestry professionals to address state-mandated academic content through the lens of forestry and related professions. The Walk addresses salient needs in environmental education by emphasizing community learning, as well as the interconnectedness of ecological and social dimensions of forestry. The authors recommend that future educational efforts devote increased attention to the roles of fire, timber harvesting, and hunting as forest management tools

Breast cancer differential diagnosis using diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging and regression with z-score normalized data.

SignificanceCurrent imaging paradigms for differential diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions suffer from high false positive rates that force patients to undergo unnecessary biopsies. Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) noninvasively probes functional hemodynamic and compositional parameters in deep tissue and has been shown to be sensitive to contrast between normal and malignant tissues.AimDOSI methods are under investigation as an adjunct to mammography and ultrasound that could reduce false positive rates and unnecessary biopsies, particularly in radiographically dense breasts.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 212 subjects with suspicious breast lesions who underwent DOSI imaging. Physiological tissue parameters were z-score normalized to the patient's contralateral breast tissue and input to univariate logistic regression models to discriminate between malignant tumors and the surrounding normal tissue. The models were then used to differentiate malignant lesions from benign lesions.ResultsModels incorporating several individual hemodynamic parameters were able to accurately distinguish malignant tumors from both the surrounding background tissue and benign lesions with area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.85. Z-score normalization improved the discriminatory ability and calibration of these predictive models relative to unnormalized or ratio-normalized data.ConclusionsFindings from a large subject population study show how DOSI data normalization that accounts for normal tissue heterogeneity and quantitative statistical regression approaches can be combined to improve the ability of DOSI to diagnose malignant lesions. This improved diagnostic accuracy, combined with the modality's inherent logistical advantages of portability, low cost, and nonionizing radiation, could position DOSI as an effective adjunct modality that could be used to reduce the number of unnecessary invasive biopsies

Breast cancer differential diagnosis using diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging and regression with z-score normalized data.

Current imaging paradigms for differential diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions suffer from high false positive rates that force patients to undergo unnecessary biopsies. Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) noninvasively probes functional hemodynamic and compositional parameters in deep tissue and has been shown to be sensitive to contrast between normal and malignant tissues. DOSI methods are under investigation as an adjunct to mammography and ultrasound that could reduce false positive rates and unnecessary biopsies, particularly in radiographically dense breasts. We performed a retrospective analysis of 212 subjects with suspicious breast lesions who underwent DOSI imaging. Physiological tissue parameters were z-score normalized to the patient's contralateral breast tissue and input to univariate logistic regression models to discriminate between malignant tumors and the surrounding normal tissue. The models were then used to differentiate malignant lesions from benign lesions. Models incorporating several individual hemodynamic parameters were able to accurately distinguish malignant tumors from both the surrounding background tissue and benign lesions with area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.85. Z-score normalization improved the discriminatory ability and calibration of these predictive models relative to unnormalized or ratio-normalized data. Findings from a large subject population study show how DOSI data normalization that accounts for normal tissue heterogeneity and quantitative statistical regression approaches can be combined to improve the ability of DOSI to diagnose malignant lesions. This improved diagnostic accuracy, combined with the modality's inherent logistical advantages of portability, low cost, and nonionizing radiation, could position DOSI as an effective adjunct modality that could be used to reduce the number of unnecessary invasive biopsies