13 research outputs found
Activity and content of antioxidant enzymes in prostate tumors
To investigate the antioxidant enzyme system in blood of men with benign hyperplasia of prostate (BHP) and with prostate adenocarcinoma (CaP). Methods: The spectrophotometrical methods were applied to study content and activity changes of superoxide-dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ceruloplasmin (Cp), tripeptide glutathione (GSH), glutathione-peroxidase (GSH-Px), and glutathione-reductase (GR). Lipid peroxidation was evaluated using thiobarbituric acid (TBA)-test. Blood plasma and erythrocytes of men with prostate tumors served as the material for the studies; n = 15 for each group. Results: SOD activity was increased in BHP (24.65 Β± 1.20 U/Β΅l) and decreased in CaP (11.45 Β± 0.89 U/Β΅l), CAT activity remained unaltered in BHP (12.41 Β± 0.85 mcat/ml) and was slightly declined in CaP (9.52 Β± 0.56 mcat/ml). Cp was increased in both kind of tumors, especially in CaP (54.27 Β± 7.22 mg%), as well as GSH (0.736 Β± 0.07 Β΅M/l) and GR (0.031 Β± 0.002 Β΅M/g.Hemogl/min). GSH-Px was sharply increased in BHP (0.67 Β± 0.05 Β΅M/g.Hemogl/min) and reduced in CaP (0.16 Β± 0.01 Β΅M/g.Hemogl/min). Conclusion: The development of BHP reflects relatively weakly on blood system as activity and content of antioxidant enzymes are not revealing marked changes in this disease. The significant changes are revealed in case of CaP, showing the reduced functional state of blood antioxidant enzyme system.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
c Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡ
(ΠΠΠ) ΠΈ Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡ (ΠΠΠ). ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄-Π΄ΠΈΡΠΌΡΡΠ°Π·Ρ (Π‘ΠΠ),
ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°Π»Π°Π·Ρ (ΠΠΠ’), ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° (Π¦Π), ΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠ΄Π° Π³Π»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π° (ΠΠ), Π³Π»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½-ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄Π°Π·Ρ (ΠΠ) ΠΈ Π³Π»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½-ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠ°Π·Ρ
(ΠΠ ) Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΎΠ±Π°ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ
ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ (TBΠ-ΡΠ΅ΡΡ). ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΌΠ° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΌΠΈ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡ, n = 15 Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ: Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π‘ΠΠ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π² ΠΠΠ (24,65 Β± 1,20 Π΅Π΄./ΠΌΠΊΠ») ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ°Π»Π°ΡΡ
Π² ΠΠΠ (11,45 Β± 0,89 Π΅Π΄./ΠΌΠΊΠ»). ΠΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΠΠ’ ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π² ΠΠΠ (12,41 Β± 0,85 ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ/ΠΌΠ») ΠΈ ΡΠ»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠ°
ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π² ΠΠΠ (9,52 Β± 0,56 ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ/ΠΌΠ»). Π‘ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π¦Π ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ, Π² ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΠΠ
(54,27 Β± 7,22 mg%), ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΠ (0,736 Β± 0,07 ΠΌΠΊM/Π») ΠΈ ΠΠ (0,031 Β± 0,002 ΠΌΠΊΠ/Π³.Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π»/ΠΌΠΈΠ½). ΠΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΠ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΊΠΎ
Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π»Π° Π² ΠΠΠ (0,67 Β± 0,05 ΠΌΠΊΠ/Π³.Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π»/ΠΌΠΈΠ½) ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π² ΠΠΠ (0,16 Β± 0,01 ΠΌΠΊΠ/Π³.Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π»/ΠΌΠΈΠ½). ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅
ΠΠΠ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ»Π°Π±ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ²
Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ. ΠΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π² Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ ΠΠΠ,
ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ
Cervical cancer screening program in Thimphu, Bhutan: population coverage and characteristics associated with screening attendance
Hepatitis C virus seroprevalence in the general female population of 9 countries in Europe, Asia and Africa
Comparing human papillomavirus prevalences in women with normal cytology or invasive cervical cancer to rank genotypes according to their oncogenic potential: a meta-analysis of observational studies
The future role for colposcopy in Europe.
Improvements in the performance of cervical screening may be limited by the
diagnostic performance of colposcopy. Nonetheless, colposcopy remains the best
available tool to assess women considered at high risk for having or developing
cervical cancer. The provision and role of colposcopy across Europe is variable.
Introduction of vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 as
well as the possible switch to HPV-based screening is likely to change the
profiles of women presenting to colposcopy services and provide management
difficulties for the colposcopist.The standard of colposcopy in Europe can be
maintained or improved despite a variable availability of screening. The
prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 may decrease for women
having had HPV vaccination. The incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
grade 3 and cervical cancer in second and subsequent rounds of HPV-based
screening are likely to decrease compared to cytology-based screening. In
HPV-based screening, the numbers of women with no detectable or minor
abnormalities at colposcopy and with screen-detected glandular disease are likely
to increase. We have considered how these issues will affect states that have
varying implementation of organized cervical screening programs and varying
degrees of implementation of HPV testing or vaccination.The development of
quality assurance across Europe accompanying these program changes is discussed
HPV testing and vaccination in Europe
Current cytology-based screening has a moderate sensitivity to detect cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) and cervical cancer even in those
states providing rigorous quality control of their cervical screening programs.
The impact of vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 as
well as the incorporation of HPV testing on the detection of CIN 3 and cancer is
discussed. HPV testing used as a triage for atypical squamous cells of
undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions,
test of cure after treatment, and HPV-based primary screening may improve current
cervical screening programs.HPV testing as a triage test for ASCUS seems to offer
an improved sensitivity, with a similar specificity as compared to repeat
cytology for diagnosing high-grade CIN and has been recommended throughout most
EU states. HPV testing as a triage test for low-grade squamous intraepithelial
lesions has a low specificity and is not recommended in most member states. HPV
test of cure offers an improved sensitivity compared to cytology for women with
persistent cervical precancer after treatment. HPV-based cervical cancer
screening is more effective than screening with cytology. The effects of
HPV-based screening depend on the organization of the program and on adherence to
algorithms for screening triage. Otherwise, it is likely that HPV-based screening
will increase the referral rate to colposcopy including more women with no
detectable cervical lesion. HPV vaccination will require many years to evaluate
any beneficial effects on cervical cancer incidence and mortality
The future role for colposcopy in Europe.
<p>Improvements in the performance of cervical screening may be limited by the diagnostic performance of colposcopy. Nonetheless, colposcopy remains the best available tool to assess women considered at high risk for having or developing cervical cancer. The provision and role of colposcopy across Europe is variable. Introduction of vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 as well as the possible switch to HPV-based screening is likely to change the profiles of women presenting to colposcopy services and provide management difficulties for the colposcopist.The standard of colposcopy in Europe can be maintained or improved despite a variable availability of screening. The prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 may decrease for women having had HPV vaccination. The incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cervical cancer in second and subsequent rounds of HPV-based screening are likely to decrease compared to cytology-based screening. In HPV-based screening, the numbers of women with no detectable or minor abnormalities at colposcopy and with screen-detected glandular disease are likely to increase. We have considered how these issues will affect states that have varying implementation of organized cervical screening programs and varying degrees of implementation of HPV testing or vaccination.The development of quality assurance across Europe accompanying these program changes is discussed.</p></p
HPV testing and vaccination in Europe.
<p>Current cytology-based screening has a moderate sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) and cervical cancer even in those states providing rigorous quality control of their cervical screening programs. The impact of vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 as well as the incorporation of HPV testing on the detection of CIN 3 and cancer is discussed. HPV testing used as a triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, test of cure after treatment, and HPV-based primary screening may improve current cervical screening programs.HPV testing as a triage test for ASCUS seems to offer an improved sensitivity, with a similar specificity as compared to repeat cytology for diagnosing high-grade CIN and has been recommended throughout most EU states. HPV testing as a triage test for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions has a low specificity and is not recommended in most member states. HPV test of cure offers an improved sensitivity compared to cytology for women with persistent cervical precancer after treatment. HPV-based cervical cancer screening is more effective than screening with cytology. The effects of HPV-based screening depend on the organization of the program and on adherence to algorithms for screening triage. Otherwise, it is likely that HPV-based screening will increase the referral rate to colposcopy including more women with no detectable cervical lesion. HPV vaccination will require many years to evaluate any beneficial effects on cervical cancer incidence and mortality.</p></p