Circulating cell-free nucleic acids of plasma in human aging, healthy aging and longevity: current state of knowledge

Circulating cell-free nucleic acids (ccfNAs) of plasma are a remarkable source of genetic, epigenetic and transcriptomic materials originating from different cells, tissues and organs of an individual. They have been increasingly studied over the past decade as they can carry several important pieces of information about the health status of an individual, which makes them biomarkers of choice for non-invasive diagnosis of numerous diseases and health conditions. However, few studies have investigated variations of plasma ccfNAs in healthy subjects, particularly in relation to aging, healthy aging and longevity, despite the great variability of these biological processes among individuals. Here, we reviewed several studies that focused on the analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) and microRNAs (ccfmiRNAs) during aging and in the elderly, including some on exceptionally long-lived individuals, i.e., centenarians. After a brief overview of the types, origins and functions of plasma ccfNAs, we described the variations of both ccfDNA and ccfmiRNAs during aging as well as the identification of several potential ccfDNA-based and ccfmiRNA-based biomarkers of aging, healthy aging and/or longevity. We finally highlighted some prospects offered by ccfNAs for the understanding and improvement of healthy aging and longevity

Molecular and Computational Methods for the Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a genomic alteration in which microsatellites, usually of one to four nucleotide repeats, accumulate mutations corresponding to deletions/insertions of a few nucleotides. The MSI phenotype has been extensively characterized in colorectal cancer and is due to a deficiency of the DNA mismatch repair system. MSI has recently been shown to be present in most types of cancer with variable frequencies (from <1 to 30%). It correlates positively to survival outcome and predicts the response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. The different methods developed for MSI detection in cancer require taking into consideration two critical parameters which influence method performance. First, the microsatellite markers used should be chosen carefully to ensure they are highly sensitive and specific for MSI detection. Second, the analytical method used should be highly resolute to allow clear identification of MSI and of the mutant allele genotype, and should present the lowest limit of detection possible for application in samples with low mutant allele frequency. In this review, we describe all the different molecular and computational methods developed to date for the detection of MSI in cancer, how they have evolved and improved over the years, and their advantages and drawbacks

NRAS Mutation Is the Sole Recurrent Somatic Mutation in Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevi

Congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) is a particular melanocytic in utero proliferation characterized by an increased risk of melanoma transformation during infancy or adulthood. NRAS and BRAF mutations have consistently been reported in CMN samples, but until recently results have been contradictory. We therefore studied a series of large and giant CMNs and compared them with small and medium CMNs using Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, high-resolution melting analysis, and mutation enrichment by an enhanced version of ice-COLD-PCR. Large–giant CMNs displayed NRAS mutations in 94.7% of cases (18/19). At that point, the role of additional mutations in CMN pathogenesis had to be investigated. We therefore performed exome sequencing on five specimens of large–giant nevi. The results showed that NRAS mutation was the sole recurrent somatic event found in such melanocytic proliferations. The genetic profile of small–medium CMNs was significantly different, with 70% of cases bearing NRAS mutations and 30% showing BRAF mutations. These findings strongly suggest that NRAS mutations are sufficient to drive melanocytic benign proliferations in utero

A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase protein governs tomato fruit ripening

In plants, genomic DNA methylation which contributes to development and stress responses can be actively removed by DEMETER-like DNA demethylases (DML). Indeed, in Arabidopsis DMLs are important for maternal imprinting and endosperm demethylation, but only few studies demonstrate the developmental roles of active DNA demethylation conclusively in this plant. Here we show a direct cause and effect relationship between active DNA demethylation mainly mediated by the tomato DML, SlDML2, and fruit ripening; an important developmental process unique to plants. RNAi SlDML2 knock-down results in ripening inhibition via hypermethylation and repression of the expression of genes encoding ripening transcription factors and rate-limiting enzymes of key biochemical processes such as carotenoid synthesis. Our data demonstrate that active DNA demethylation is central to the control of ripening in tomat

Contrôle épigénétique du développement et de la qualité des fruits de tomate

L’étude du contrôle de l’expression des gènes a été, au cours de ces dernières années, révolutionnée par la découverte des régulations épigénétiques. Parmi les différents acteurs participant à ces régulations se trouvent les protéines du groupe Polycomb (PcG). Ces protéines, initialement découvertes chez la drosophile, sont responsables de la mise en place et du maintien de "marques épigénétiques" au niveau de gènes cibles, qui sont alors réprimés. Les protéines PcG agissent sous forment de trois complexes dinstincts chez les animaux nommés PRC1 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 1), PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) et PhoRC (Pleiohomeotic Repressive Complex); le PRC2 possédant une activité histone méthyltransférase de type H3 K9/27. Chez les plantes, seules trois classes de protéines PcG sont retrouvées: la classe des Enhancer of zeste E(z), des Extra Sex Combs (ESC) et des Supressor of zeste 12 (Su(z)12), formant le complexe PRC2. Leur rôle dans le développement des plantes a été mis en évidence chez Arabidopsis, au niveau du gamétophyte femelle et de la graine, du maintien de l’état végétatif, de l’identité florale et de la vernalisation. Cependant leur implication dans le développement du fruit reste inconnue. Mon travail a permis d'identifier et de caractériser deux gènes PcG de la classe des E(z) de tomate exprimés dans le fruit, nommés SlEZ1 et SlEZ2. Les proteines SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 présentent l’ensemble des domaines caractéristiques des protéines de cette classe et sont localisées dans les noyaux. Les expériences de double hybride révèlent que les protéines SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 sont capables de former des complexes de type PRC2 avec certaines autres protéines PcG de tomate (de type ESC et Su(z)12). Ceci suggère que SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 sont effectivement des protéines fonctionnelles. L’analyse de des profils d’expression des gènes SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 révèle une expression ubiquitaire dans la plante au niveau de l’appareil végétatif, de la fleur et dans le fruit. Cependant, dans la fleur, seul SlEZ1 présente une expression dans les étamines tandis que les ARNm de SlEZ2 sont présent de façon spécifique dans le tissu de transmission du style. Dans le fruit, SlEZ1 est exprimé de façon constante, tandis que SlEZ2 semble faiblement exprimé dans les fruits en cours de mûrissement. Afin d’identifier la fonction de SlEZ1 dans le développement du fruit, des plantes transgéniques sous-exprimant SlEZ1 de façon constitutive ont été générées. Elles présentent une morphologie altérée de la fleur: les étamines sont torsadées et ne forment pas de cône staminal fermé. De plus, une augmentation du nombre moyen de carpelles par fruit est observée.The control of gene expression has been challenged by the discovery of epigenetic regulation. Among the different factors involved in epigenetic regulations, the Polycomb (PcG) proteins are known to repress gene expression by setting epigenetic marks. The PcG protein, initially discovered in drosophila, act together in three distinct complexes named PRC1 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 1), PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) and PhoRC (Pleiohomeotic Repressive Complex). PRC2 complexes methylate histone H3 on lysines K9/27. In plants, only three classes of PcG protein has been found: the Enhancer of zeste (E(z)) class, the Extra Sex Combs (ESC) class and the Supressor of zeste 12 (Su(z)12) class, which belong to the PRC2. Their function in plant development has been brought to light in Arabidopsis thaliana. They control female gametophyte and seed development, maintain the vegetative development, and are involved in floral identity and vernalization. However, their function in fruit development is still unknown. My work was aimed to identify and characterize two PcG genes, named SlEZ1 and SlEZ2, encoding tomato E(z) class proteins. SlEZ1 and SlEZ2 proteins contain all the five E(z) characteristic domains and are both localized in the nucleus. Furthermore, as double-hybrid experiments reveal that both SlEZ1 and SlEZ2 proteins are able to form PRC2 complexes and interact with PcG proteins of other classes (ESC and Su(z)12 classes), it seems that these proteins are functional. Their expression profiles reveal ubiquitous expression during vegetative development (leaves, buds, stems) and reproductive development (flowers and fruits). However SlEZ1 is specifically expressed in the stamens whereas SlEZ2 shows specific expression in the transmitting tissue of the style. Moreover, their expression during fruit development shows some differences: if SlEZ1 expression is almost constant, SlEZ2 expression decreases during fruit development. In order to indentify SlEZ1 functions in fruit development, transgenic plants underexpressing constitutively SlEZ1 have been generated. These plants present altered flower morphology with twisted stamens and increased carpel number fruits

Contrôle épigénétique du développement et de la qualité des fruits de tomate

L’étude du contrôle de l’expression des gènes a été, au cours de ces dernières années, révolutionnée par la découverte des régulations épigénétiques. Parmi les différents acteurs participant à ces régulations se trouvent les protéines du groupe Polycomb (PcG). Ces protéines, initialement découvertes chez la drosophile, sont responsables de la mise en place et du maintien de "marques épigénétiques" au niveau de gènes cibles, qui sont alors réprimés. Les protéines PcG agissent sous forment de trois complexes dinstincts chez les animaux nommés PRC1 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 1), PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) et PhoRC (Pleiohomeotic Repressive Complex); le PRC2 possédant une activité histone méthyltransférase de type H3 K9/27. Chez les plantes, seules trois classes de protéines PcG sont retrouvées: la classe des Enhancer of zeste E(z), des Extra Sex Combs (ESC) et des Supressor of zeste 12 (Su(z)12), formant le complexe PRC2. Leur rôle dans le développement des plantes a été mis en évidence chez Arabidopsis, au niveau du gamétophyte femelle et de la graine, du maintien de l’état végétatif, de l’identité florale et de la vernalisation. Cependant leur implication dans le développement du fruit reste inconnue. Mon travail a permis d'identifier et de caractériser deux gènes PcG de la classe des E(z) de tomate exprimés dans le fruit, nommés SlEZ1 et SlEZ2. Les proteines SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 présentent l’ensemble des domaines caractéristiques des protéines de cette classe et sont localisées dans les noyaux. Les expériences de double hybride révèlent que les protéines SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 sont capables de former des complexes de type PRC2 avec certaines autres protéines PcG de tomate (de type ESC et Su(z)12). Ceci suggère que SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 sont effectivement des protéines fonctionnelles. L’analyse de des profils d’expression des gènes SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 révèle une expression ubiquitaire dans la plante au niveau de l’appareil végétatif, de la fleur et dans le fruit. Cependant, dans la fleur, seul SlEZ1 présente une expression dans les étamines tandis que les ARNm de SlEZ2 sont présent de façon spécifique dans le tissu de transmission du style. Dans le fruit, SlEZ1 est exprimé de façon constante, tandis que SlEZ2 semble faiblement exprimé dans les fruits en cours de mûrissement. Afin d’identifier la fonction de SlEZ1 dans le développement du fruit, des plantes transgéniques sous-exprimant SlEZ1 de façon constitutive ont été générées. Elles présentent une morphologie altérée de la fleur: les étamines sont torsadées et ne forment pas de cône staminal fermé. De plus, une augmentation du nombre moyen de carpelles par fruit est observée.The control of gene expression has been challenged by the discovery of epigenetic regulation. Among the different factors involved in epigenetic regulations, the Polycomb (PcG) proteins are known to repress gene expression by setting epigenetic marks. The PcG protein, initially discovered in drosophila, act together in three distinct complexes named PRC1 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 1), PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) and PhoRC (Pleiohomeotic Repressive Complex). PRC2 complexes methylate histone H3 on lysines K9/27. In plants, only three classes of PcG protein has been found: the Enhancer of zeste (E(z)) class, the Extra Sex Combs (ESC) class and the Supressor of zeste 12 (Su(z)12) class, which belong to the PRC2. Their function in plant development has been brought to light in Arabidopsis thaliana. They control female gametophyte and seed development, maintain the vegetative development, and are involved in floral identity and vernalization. However, their function in fruit development is still unknown. My work was aimed to identify and characterize two PcG genes, named SlEZ1 and SlEZ2, encoding tomato E(z) class proteins. SlEZ1 and SlEZ2 proteins contain all the five E(z) characteristic domains and are both localized in the nucleus. Furthermore, as double-hybrid experiments reveal that both SlEZ1 and SlEZ2 proteins are able to form PRC2 complexes and interact with PcG proteins of other classes (ESC and Su(z)12 classes), it seems that these proteins are functional. Their expression profiles reveal ubiquitous expression during vegetative development (leaves, buds, stems) and reproductive development (flowers and fruits). However SlEZ1 is specifically expressed in the stamens whereas SlEZ2 shows specific expression in the transmitting tissue of the style. Moreover, their expression during fruit development shows some differences: if SlEZ1 expression is almost constant, SlEZ2 expression decreases during fruit development. In order to indentify SlEZ1 functions in fruit development, transgenic plants underexpressing constitutively SlEZ1 have been generated. These plants present altered flower morphology with twisted stamens and increased carpel number fruits

Contrôle épigénétique du développement et de la qualité des fruits de tomate

L étude du contrôle de l expression des gènes a été, au cours de ces dernières années, révolutionnée par la découverte des régulations épigénétiques. Parmi les différents acteurs participant à ces régulations se trouvent les protéines du groupe Polycomb (PcG). Ces protéines, initialement découvertes chez la drosophile, sont responsables de la mise en place et du maintien de "marques épigénétiques" au niveau de gènes cibles, qui sont alors réprimés. Les protéines PcG agissent sous forment de trois complexes dinstincts chez les animaux nommés PRC1 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 1), PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) et PhoRC (Pleiohomeotic Repressive Complex); le PRC2 possédant une activité histone méthyltransférase de type H3 K9/27. Chez les plantes, seules trois classes de protéines PcG sont retrouvées: la classe des Enhancer of zeste E(z), des Extra Sex Combs (ESC) et des Supressor of zeste 12 (Su(z)12), formant le complexe PRC2. Leur rôle dans le développement des plantes a été mis en évidence chez Arabidopsis, au niveau du gamétophyte femelle et de la graine, du maintien de l état végétatif, de l identité florale et de la vernalisation. Cependant leur implication dans le développement du fruit reste inconnue. Mon travail a permis d'identifier et de caractériser deux gènes PcG de la classe des E(z) de tomate exprimés dans le fruit, nommés SlEZ1 et SlEZ2. Les proteines SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 présentent l ensemble des domaines caractéristiques des protéines de cette classe et sont localisées dans les noyaux. Les expériences de double hybride révèlent que les protéines SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 sont capables de former des complexes de type PRC2 avec certaines autres protéines PcG de tomate (de type ESC et Su(z)12). Ceci suggère que SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 sont effectivement des protéines fonctionnelles. L analyse de des profils d expression des gènes SlEZ1 et SlEZ2 révèle une expression ubiquitaire dans la plante au niveau de l appareil végétatif, de la fleur et dans le fruit. Cependant, dans la fleur, seul SlEZ1 présente une expression dans les étamines tandis que les ARNm de SlEZ2 sont présent de façon spécifique dans le tissu de transmission du style. Dans le fruit, SlEZ1 est exprimé de façon constante, tandis que SlEZ2 semble faiblement exprimé dans les fruits en cours de mûrissement. Afin d identifier la fonction de SlEZ1 dans le développement du fruit, des plantes transgéniques sous-exprimant SlEZ1 de façon constitutive ont été générées. Elles présentent une morphologie altérée de la fleur: les étamines sont torsadées et ne forment pas de cône staminal fermé. De plus, une augmentation du nombre moyen de carpelles par fruit est observée.The control of gene expression has been challenged by the discovery of epigenetic regulation. Among the different factors involved in epigenetic regulations, the Polycomb (PcG) proteins are known to repress gene expression by setting epigenetic marks. The PcG protein, initially discovered in drosophila, act together in three distinct complexes named PRC1 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 1), PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) and PhoRC (Pleiohomeotic Repressive Complex). PRC2 complexes methylate histone H3 on lysines K9/27. In plants, only three classes of PcG protein has been found: the Enhancer of zeste (E(z)) class, the Extra Sex Combs (ESC) class and the Supressor of zeste 12 (Su(z)12) class, which belong to the PRC2. Their function in plant development has been brought to light in Arabidopsis thaliana. They control female gametophyte and seed development, maintain the vegetative development, and are involved in floral identity and vernalization. However, their function in fruit development is still unknown. My work was aimed to identify and characterize two PcG genes, named SlEZ1 and SlEZ2, encoding tomato E(z) class proteins. SlEZ1 and SlEZ2 proteins contain all the five E(z) characteristic domains and are both localized in the nucleus. Furthermore, as double-hybrid experiments reveal that both SlEZ1 and SlEZ2 proteins are able to form PRC2 complexes and interact with PcG proteins of other classes (ESC and Su(z)12 classes), it seems that these proteins are functional. Their expression profiles reveal ubiquitous expression during vegetative development (leaves, buds, stems) and reproductive development (flowers and fruits). However SlEZ1 is specifically expressed in the stamens whereas SlEZ2 shows specific expression in the transmitting tissue of the style. Moreover, their expression during fruit development shows some differences: if SlEZ1 expression is almost constant, SlEZ2 expression decreases during fruit development. In order to indentify SlEZ1 functions in fruit development, transgenic plants underexpressing constitutively SlEZ1 have been generated. These plants present altered flower morphology with twisted stamens and increased carpel number fruits.BORDEAUX1-Bib.electronique (335229901) / SudocSudocFranceF

COLD-PCR Technologies in the Area of Personalized Medicine: Methodology and Applications

International audienceSomatic mutations bear great promise for use as biomarkers for personalized medicine, but are often present only in low abundance in biological material and are therefore difficult to detect. Many assays for mutation analysis in cancer-related genes (hotspots) have been developed to improve diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of drug resistance, and monitoring of the response to treatment. Two major approaches have been developed: mutation-specific amplification methods and methods that enrich and detect mutations without prior knowledge on the exact location and identity of the mutation. CO-amplification at Lower Denaturation temperature Polymerase Chain Reaction (COLD-PCR) methods such as full-, fast-, ice- (improved and complete enrichment), enhanced-ice, and temperature-tolerant COLD-PCR make use of a critical temperature in the polymerase chain reaction to selectively denature wild-type-mutant heteroduplexes, allowing the enrichment of rare mutations. Mutations can subsequently be identified using a variety of laboratory technologies such as high-resolution melting, digital polymerase chain reaction, pyrosequencing, Sanger sequencing, or next-generation sequencing. COLD-PCR methods are sensitive, specific, and accurate if appropriately optimized and have a short time to results. A large variety of clinical samples (tumor DNA, circulating cell-free DNA, circulating cell-free fetal DNA, and circulating tumor cells) have been studied using COLD-PCR in many different applications including the detection of genetic changes in cancer and infectious diseases, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis, detection of microorganisms, or DNA methylation analysis. In this review, we describe in detail the different COLD-PCR approaches, highlighting their specificities, advantages, and inconveniences and demonstrating their use in different fields of biological and biomedical research

Molecular and Computational Methods for the Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Cancer

International audienceMicrosatellite instability (MSI) is a genomic alteration in which microsatellites, usually of one to four nucleotide repeats, accumulate mutations corresponding to deletions/insertions of a few nucleotides. The MSI phenotype has been extensively characterized in colorectal cancer and is due to a deficiency of the DNA mismatch repair system. MSI has recently been shown to be present in most types of cancer with variable frequencies (from <1 to 30%). It correlates positively to survival outcome and predicts the response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. The different methods developed for MSI detection in cancer require taking into consideration two critical parameters which influence method performance. First, the microsatellite markers used should be chosen carefully to ensure they are highly sensitive and specific for MSI detection. Second, the analytical method used should be highly resolute to allow clear identification of MSI and of the mutant allele genotype, and should present the lowest limit of detection possible for application in samples with low mutant allele frequency. In this review, we describe all the different molecular and computational methods developed to date for the detection of MSI in cancer, how they have evolved and improved over the years, and their advantages and drawbacks