28 research outputs found
Mineral composition, textures and gold habit of the Hamama mineralizations (Central Eastern Desert of Egypt)
Mineralization in the Hamama area exists mainly as quartz-carbonate veins, extending along the contact between the footwall volcanics (basalt, dacite, and rhyolite) and the hanging wall volcaniclastics (laminated, massive and lapilli tuffs with minor breccia). Also, mineralization was recorded as low mineralized cavity filling dolomitic veins occupying NW-SE faults in the basalt. The principal mineralization is represented by a mineral association - quartz + dolomite + calcite + pyrite + chalcopyrite + sphalerite with varying amounts of barite, cinnabar, and galena. It is suggested that these carbonates are post-tectonic low-temperature hydrothermal solution (exhalations) filling fault zones. The injected mineralized carbonate solution dissolved the silicate minerals along contacts. This fault system was caused by the group of porphyritic rhyolite dykes extending NE-SW. The carbonates then were subjected to digenetic processes after their formation resulted in the formation of some secondary sedimentary textures (for example spherulitic, colloform and cockade textures) and dolomitization. The mineralized carbonates are rich in Zn, Cu, and occasionally Pb and Sb. The cavity filling dolomitic veins within basalt show low concentration of ore minerals. The pyrite was crystallized in four phases; the first phase is well-developed pyrite that was formed from the primary hydrothermal solution. The role of bacterial action is obvious in the formation of a second phase framboidal pyrite. The third phase represented by atoll structures formed by diagenetic reworking of the framboidal pyrite. The last phase of pyrite crystallization appears as fine skeletal grains mostly attached to sericite alteration of altered volcanics. The gold and silver are concentrated mainly in the upper iron cap. Secondary supergene enrichment of gold in the oxidation zone, especially in Hamama western zone, is indicated by the reprecipitation of gold as thin filaments or rounded nano-grains along cracks of the oxidized pyrite or at the periphery of the pyrite relicts
Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes
BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the long-term effect on cardiovascular events of adding sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 14,671 patients to add either sitagliptin or placebo to their existing therapy. Open-label use of antihyperglycemic therapy was encouraged as required, aimed at reaching individually appropriate glycemic targets in all patients. To determine whether sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo, we used a relative risk of 1.3 as the marginal upper boundary. The primary cardiovascular outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.0 years, there was a small difference in glycated hemoglobin levels (least-squares mean difference for sitagliptin vs. placebo, -0.29 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.32 to -0.27). Overall, the primary outcome occurred in 839 patients in the sitagliptin group (11.4%; 4.06 per 100 person-years) and 851 patients in the placebo group (11.6%; 4.17 per 100 person-years). Sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo for the primary composite cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09; P<0.001). Rates of hospitalization for heart failure did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.20; P = 0.98). There were no significant between-group differences in rates of acute pancreatitis (P = 0.07) or pancreatic cancer (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease, adding sitagliptin to usual care did not appear to increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure, or other adverse events
Measurement of the mass difference m(D-s(+))-m(D+) at CDF II
We present a measurement of the mass difference m(D-s(+))-m(D+), where both the D-s(+) and D+ are reconstructed in the phipi(+) decay channel. This measurement uses 11.6 pb(-1) of data collected by CDF II using the new displaced-track trigger. The mass difference is found to be m(D-s(+))-m(D+)=99.41+/-0.38(stat)+/-0.21(syst) MeV/c(2)
Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, GALACTICâHF: baseline characteristics and comparison with contemporary clinical trials
Aims:
The safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTICâHF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTICâHF and how these compare with other contemporary trials.
Methods and Results:
Adults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA)ââ„âII, EF â€35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for HF or history of hospitalization/ emergency department visit for HF within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokineticâguided dosing: 25, 37.5 or 50âmg bid). 8256 patients [male (79%), nonâwhite (22%), mean age 65âyears] were enrolled with a mean EF 27%, ischemic etiology in 54%, NYHA II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median NTâproBNP 1971âpg/mL. HF therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary HF trials. GALACTICâHF randomized patients representative of recent HF registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressureâ<â100âmmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate <â30âmL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 528), and treated with sacubitrilâvalsartan at baseline (n = 1594).
Conclusions:
GALACTICâHF enrolled a wellâtreated, highârisk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation
Effect of albumin on the transformation of dinitrosyl iron complexes with thiourea ligands
Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes
BACKGROUND
Data are lacking on the long-term effect on cardiovascular events of adding sitagliptin,
a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, to usual care in patients with type 2
diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
METHODS
In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 14,671 patients to add either
sitagliptin or placebo to their existing therapy. Open-label use of antihyperglycemic
therapy was encouraged as required, aimed at reaching individually appropriate
glycemic targets in all patients. To determine whether sitagliptin was noninferior
to placebo, we used a relative risk of 1.3 as the marginal upper boundary. The
primary cardiovascular outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal
myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina.
RESULTS
During a median follow-up of 3.0 years, there was a small difference in glycated
hemoglobin levels (least-squares mean difference for sitagliptin vs. placebo,
120.29 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 120.32 to 120.27). Overall,
the primary outcome occurred in 839 patients in the sitagliptin group (11.4%;
4.06 per 100 person-years) and 851 patients in the placebo group (11.6%; 4.17 per
100 person-years). Sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo for the primary composite
cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09; P<0.001).
Rates of hospitalization for heart failure did not differ between the two groups
(hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.20; P=0.98). There were no significant
between-group differences in rates of acute pancreatitis (P=0.07) or pancreatic
cancer (P=0.32).
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease, adding
sitagliptin to usual care did not appear to increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular
events, hospitalization for heart failure, or other adverse events.
(Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme; TECOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00790205.