Protocol for the stimulating β3-Adrenergic receptors for peripheral artery disease (STAR-PAD) trial: a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of mirabegron on functional performance in patients with peripheral arterial disease

Introduction: There is currently only one approved medication effective at improving walking distance in people with intermittent claudication. Preclinical data suggest that the β3-adrenergic receptor agonist (mirabegron) could be repurposed to treat intermittent claudication associated with peripheral artery disease. The aim of the Stimulating β3-Adrenergic Receptors for Peripheral Artery Disease (STAR-PAD) trial is to test whether mirabegron improves walking distance in people with intermittent claudication. Methods and analysis: The STAR-PAD trial is a Phase II, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of mirabegron versus placebo on walking distance in patients with PAD. A total of 120 patients aged ≥40 years with stable PAD and intermittent claudication will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either mirabegron (50 mg orally once a day) or matched placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is change in peak walking distance as assessed by a graded treadmill test. Secondary endpoints will include: (i) initial claudication distance; (ii) average daily step count and total step count and (iii) functional status and quality of life assessment. Mechanistic substudies will examine potential effects of mirabegron on vascular function, including brachial artery flow-mediate dilatation; MRI assessment of lower limb blood flow, tissue perfusion and arterial stiffness and numbers and angiogenesis potential of endothelial progenitor cells. Given that mirabegron is safe and clinically available for alternative purposes, a positive study is positioned to immediately impact patient care. Ethics and dissemination: The STAR-PAD trial is approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/HAWKE/50). The study results will be published in peer-reviewed medical or scientific journals and presented at scientific meetings, regardless of the study outcomes

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

Supplemental Material - The prevalent causes of death in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing revascularisation or amputation

Supplemental Material for The prevalent causes of death in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing revascularisation or amputation by Stacey Telianidis and Sarah Joy Aitken in Vascular</p

Effect of Antiplatelet Therapy on Survival and Organ Support–Free Days in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19

International audienc