Hombre de 31 años con dolor abdominal, diarrea y síndrome constitucional

A 31-year-old male with paroxysmal abdominal pain of 2 months of evolution and diarrhea. The complementary tests revealed the presence of multiple lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, hypodense focal lesions in the liver and spleen, as well as an intra-ileum mass in the terminal ileum. Finally the diagnosis of Sarcoidosis with mainly digestive affectation is established. There are few cases described in the scientific literature of gastrointestinal Sarcoidosis. A high clinical suspicion is necessary for the diagnosis, and this is established within a clinical-radiological and anatomopathological context, excluding other causes of granulomatosis.Varón de 31 años con dolor abdominal paroxístico de 2 meses de evolución y cuadro diarreico. Las pruebas complementarias realizadas pusieron de manifiesto la presencia de múltiples adenopatías, esplenomegalia, lesiones focales hipodensas en hígado y bazo, así como una masa intraasa en íleon terminal. Finalmente se establece el diagnóstico de sarcoidosis con afectación principalmente digestiva. Existen pocos casos descritos en la literatura científica de sarcoidosis gastrointestinal. Para el diagnóstico es necesario una sospecha clínica alta, y este se establece dentro de un contexto clinicorradiológico y anatomopatológico, excluyendo otras causas de granulomatosis

Relevance of Carotid Reocclusion in Tandem Lesions

© 2023 Japan Atherosclerosis Society. This article is distributed under the terms of the latest version of CC BY-NC-SA defined by the Creative Commons Attribution License.Aims: Carotid reocclusion (CRO) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to tandem lesion (TL) or isolated internal carotid occlusion (ICO) is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Our aim was to analyze the predictors and clinical impact of CRO. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis of all patients with anterior circulation strokes who underwent MT prospectively included in a registry between 2017 and 2020 was performed. ICO and TL as stroke causes were included. Stent deployment was left to the discretion of the interventionist. All patients received at least intravenous aspirin during MT. CRO was assessed using ultrasound within the first 24 h after MT. Efficacy and safety of stenting were assessed. Results: Among 1304 AIS cases, 218 (16.7%) were related to TL or ICO. Of them, 5% (n=11) were associated with internal CRO 24 h after the endovascular procedure. After adjusting per confounders, multivariate analysis showed that the independent variables associated with CRO were the TICI recanalization grade [TICI 2b–3; OR 0.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.89, p=0.040], pial collateral circulation presence (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02–0.45, p=0.03), stent deployment during MT (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03–0.84, p=0.030), and general anesthesia use (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.13–7.90, p=0.034). CRO showed a trend toward worst outcomes (modified Rankin scale 3–6) at 3 months (OR 3.4, 95% CI 0.96–12, p=0.057). After multivariate analysis, variables independently associated with worse outcomes at 90 days were intrastent platelet aggregation phenomena during endovascular therapy, admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, and age. Conversely, intravenous thrombolysis and TICI 2b–3 recanalization grade were identified as independent predictors of good outcomes at 90 days. Conclusions: CRO has a relevant clinical impact in our study, associating lower rates of good functional outcomes at 3 months. Independent factors of CRO were the recanalization degree, presence of pial collateral circulation, use of a stent as a protective factor, and use of general anesthesia during thrombectomy.This project was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project PI21/01322 and co-funded by the European Union. The ITRIBiS project (Improving Translational Research Potential at the Institute of Biomedicine of Seville) has the registration number REGPOT-2013-1. M. Medina was granted a Rio Hortega contract. The project was included in the Cooperative Cerebrovascular Disease Research Network (INVICTUS) (RD16/0019/0015).Peer reviewe

Statistical analysis plan for the multicenter, open, randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban vs aspirin in acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesion, undergoing recanalization therapy by endovascular treatment (ATILA trial)

© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.[Rationale] In-stent reocclusion after endovascular therapy has a negative impact on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to tandem lesions (TL). Optimal antiplatelet therapy approach in these patients to avoid in-stent reocclusion is yet to be elucidated.[Aims] To assess efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus intravenous aspirin in patients undergoing MT plus carotid stenting in the setting of AIS due to TL.[Sample size estimates] Two hundred forty patients will be enrolled, 120 in every treatment arm.[Methods and design] A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled (aspirin group), assessor-blinded clinical trial will be conducted. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomized at MT onset to the experimental or control group (1:1). Intravenous aspirin will be administered at a 500-mg single dose and tirofiban at a 500-mcg bolus followed by a 200-mcg/h infusion during the first 24 h. All patients will be followed for up to 3 months.[Study outcomes] Primary efficacy outcome will be the proportion of patients with carotid in-stent thrombosis within the first 24 h after MT. Primary safety outcome will be the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.[Discussion] This will be the first clinical trial to assess the best antiplatelet therapy to avoid in-stent thrombosis after MT in patients with TL.[Trial registration] The trial is registered as NCT05225961. February, 7th, 2022.This project was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project PI21/01322 and co-funded by the European Union. The Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCReNCode: 21.033) also contributed to the study. The ITRIBiS project (Improving Translational Research Potential at the Institute of Biomedicine of Seville) has the registration number REGPOT-2013-1. M. Medina-Rodríguez was granted a Rio Hortega contract (CM21/00096). The project was included in the Cooperative Cerebrovascular Disease Research Network (INVICTUS) (RD16/0019/0015).Peer reviewe

Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesions undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: A multicenter randomized clinical trial (ATILA) protocol

[Background] In-stent thrombosis after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) worsen outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to tandem lesions (TL). Although an optimal antiplatelet therapy is needed, the best approach to avoid in-stent thrombosis is yet to be elucidated.[Hypothesis] Low-dose intravenous tirofiban is superior to intravenous aspirin in avoiding in-stent thrombosis in patients undergoing MT plus carotid stenting in the setting of AIS due to TL.[Methods] The ATILA-trial is a multicenter, prospective, phase IV, randomized, controlled (aspirin group as control), assessor-blinded clinical trial. Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria (AIS due to TL, ASPECTS ⩾ 6, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale ⩽2 and onset <24 h) will be randomized (1:1) at MT onset to experimental (intravenous tirofiban) or control group (intravenous aspirin). Intravenous aspirin will be administered at a 500 mg single dose and tirofiban at a 500 µg bolus followed by a 200 µg/h infusion during first 22 h. All patients will be followed up to 3 months. Sample size estimated is 240 patients.[Outcomes] The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of patients with carotid in-stent thrombosis within the first 24 h after MT. The primary safety outcome is the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes include functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale 0–2, proportion of patients undergoing rescue therapy due to in-stent aggregation during MT and carotid reocclusion at 30 days.[Discussion] ATILA-trial will be the first clinical trial regarding the best antiplatelet therapy to avoid in-stent thrombosis after MT in patients with TL.[Trial registration] NCT0522596.This project was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project PI21/01322 and co-funded by the European Union. The Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCReN-Code:21.033) also contributed to the study. The ITRIBiS project (Improving Translational Research Potential at the Institute of Biomedicine of Seville) has the registration number REGPOT-2013-1. M. Medina-Rodríguez was granted a Rio Hortega contract (CM21/00096). The project was included in the Cooperative Cerebrovascular Disease Research Network (INVICTUS) (RD16/0019/0015).Peer reviewe

Safety and efficacy of intra-arterial bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in patients with acute ischaemic stroke in Spain (IBIS trial): a phase 2, randomised, open-label, standard-of-care controlled, multicentre trial

[Background] Pilot clinical trials have shown the safety of intra-arterial bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) in stroke. However, the efficacy of different doses of intra-arterial BMMNCs in patients with acute stroke has not been tested in a randomised clinical trial. We aimed to show safety and efficacy of two different doses of autologous intra-arterial BMMNC transplantation in patients with acute stroke.[Methods] The IBIS trial was a multicentre phase 2, randomised, controlled, investigator-initiated, assessor-blinded, clinical trial, in four stroke centres in Spain. We included patients (aged 18–80 years) with a non-lacunar, middle cerebral artery ischaemic stroke within 1–7 days from stroke onset and with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6–20. We randomly assigned patients (2:1:1) with a computer-generated randomisation sequence to standard of care (control group) or intra-arterial injection of autologous BMMNCs at one of two different doses (2 × 106 BMMNCs/kg or 5 × 106 BMMNCs/kg). The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–2 at 180 days in the intention-to-treat population, comparing each BMMNC dose group and the pooled BMMNC group versus the control group. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of serious adverse events. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02178657 and is completed.[Findings] Between April 1, 2015, and May 20, 2021, we assessed 114 patients for eligibility. We randomly assigned 77 (68%) patients: 38 (49%) to the control group, 20 (26%) to the low-dose BMMNC group, and 19 (25%) the high-dose BMMNC group. The mean age of participants was 62·4 years (SD 12·7), 46 (60%) were men, 31 (40%) were women, all were White, and 63 (82%) received thrombectomy. The median NIHSS score before randomisation was 12 (IQR 9–15), with intra-arterial BMMNC injection done a median of 6 days (4–7) after stroke onset. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 14 (39%) patients in the control group versus ten (50%) in the low-dose group (adjusted odds ratio 2·08 [95% CI 0·55–7·85]; p=0·28), eight (44%) in the high-dose group (1·89 [0·52–6·96]; p=0·33), and 18 (47%) in the pooled BMMNC group (2·22 [0·72–6·85]; p=0·16). We found no differences in the proportion of patients who had adverse events or dose-related events, but two patients had a groin haematoma after cell injection in the low-dose BMMNC group.[Interpretation] Intra-arterial BMMNCs were safe in patients with acute ischaemic stroke, but we found no significant improvement at 180 days on the mRS. Further clinical trials are warranted to investigate whether improvements might be possible at different timepoints.The Andalusian Network for the Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies through the Andalusian Progress and Health Public Foundation is the study sponsor. We acknowledge all the participants of the trial and the investigators. We thank the funding bodies Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the projects PI18/01414, PI15/01197, RD16/0019/0015 (INVICTUS+), and RD21/0006/0015 (co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund “A way to make Europe” and by the European Social Fund [FSE] “The FSE invests in your future”), Mutua Madrileña grant, and the Regional Ministry of Health of Andalusia, who financed the costs incurred by participating hospitals and the Andalusian Network for the Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies through the Andalusian Progress and Health Public Foundation. MM-R has a Rio Hortega grant (CM21/00096). We acknowledge the Methodological and Statistical Support Unit from the Andalusian Public Foundation for Health Research Management in Seville (FISEVI) for their support in the statistical analysis.Peer reviewe

Additional file 1 of Statistical analysis plan for the multicenter, open, randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban vs aspirin in acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesion, undergoing recanalization therapy by endovascular treatment (ATILA trial)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Material 1. Minor Revision. Supplementary Material 2. DSMB. Supplementary Material 3. Full protocol