A national observation study of cancer incidence and mortality risks in type 2 diabetes compared to the background population over time

We examined changing patterns in cancer incidence and deaths in diabetes compared to the background population. A total of 457,473 patients with type 2 diabetes, included between 1998 and 2014, were matched on age, sex, and county to five controls from the population. Incidence, trends in incidence and post-cancer mortality for cancer were estimated with Cox regression and standardised incidence rates. Causes of death were estimated using logistic regression. Relative importance of risk factors was estimated using Heller’s relative importance model. Type 2 diabetes had a higher risk for all cancer, HR 1.10 (95% CI 1.09–1.12), with highest HRs for liver (3.31), pancreas (2.19) and uterine cancer (1.78). There were lesser increases in risk for breast (1.05) and colorectal cancers (1.20). Type 2 diabetes patients experienced a higher HR 1.23 (1.21–1.25) of overall post-cancer mortality and mortality from prostate, breast, and colorectal cancers. By the year 2030 cancer could become the most common cause of death in type 2 diabetes. Persons with type 2 diabetes are at greater risk of developing cancer and lower chance of surviving it. Notably, hazards for specific cancers (e.g. liver, pancreas) in type 2 patients cannot be explained by obesity alone

Age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and associations with cardiovascular and mortality risks findings from the Swedish National Diabetes Registry

Background: Risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality for patients with versus without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) appears to vary by the age at T2DM diagnosis, but few population studies have analyzed mortality and CVD outcomes associations across the full age range. Methods: With use of the Swedish National Diabetes Registry, everyone with T2DM registered in the Registry between 1998 and 2012 was included. Controls were randomly selected from the general population matched for age, sex, and county. The analysis cohort comprised 318083 patients with T2DM matched with just <1.6 million controls. Participants were followed from 1998 to 2013 for CVD outcomes and to 2014 for mortality. Outcomes of interest were total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular mortality, coronary heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. We also examined life expectancy by age at diagnosis. We conducted the primary analyses using Cox proportional hazards models in those with no previous CVD and repeated the work in the entire cohort. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 5.63 years, patients with T2DM diagnosed at ≤40 years had the highest excess risk for most outcomes relative to controls with adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 2.05 (1.81–2.33) for total mortality, 2.72 (2.13–3.48) for cardiovascularrelated mortality, 1.95 (1.68–2.25) for noncardiovascular mortality, 4.77 (3.86–5.89) for heart failure, and 4.33 (3.82–4.91) for coronary heart disease. All risks attenuated progressively with each increasing decade at diagnostic age; by the time T2DM was diagnosed at >80 years, the adjusted hazard ratios for CVD and non-CVD mortality were <1, with excess risks for other CVD outcomes substantially attenuated. Moreover, survival in those diagnosed beyond 80 was the same as controls, whereas it was more than a decade less when T2DM was diagnosed in adolescence. Finally, hazard ratios for most outcomes were numerically greater in younger women with T2DM. Conclusions: Age at diagnosis of T2DM is prognostically important for survival and cardiovascular risks, with implications for determining the timing and intensity of risk factor interventions for clinical decision making and for guideline-directed care. These observations amplify support for preventing/delaying T2DM onset in younger individuals

Range of risk factor levels: control, mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Background—Individuals with type 1 diabetes have high risk of cardiovascular complications, but it is unknown to what extent fulfilling all cardiovascular treatment goals is associated with residual risk of mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes compared with the general population. Methods—We included all patients with type 1 diabetes aged >=18 years registered in the Swedish National Diabetes Register from January 1, 1998 - December 31, 2014, in all 33,333 patients, each matched for age and sex with 5 controls without diabetes randomly selected from the population. Patients with type 1 diabetes were categorized according to number of risk factors not at target: glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure, albuminuria, smoking and LDL cholesterol. Risk of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure hospitalization (HF) and stroke was examined in relation to the number of risk factors at target.Results—The mean follow-up was 10.4 years in the diabetes group. Overall, 2074 of 33,333 patients with diabetes and 4141 of 166,529 controls died. Risk for all outcomes increased stepwise for each additional risk factor not at target. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for patients achieving all risk factor targets compared with controls were 1.31 (95% CI 0.93-1.85) for all-cause mortality; 1.82 (95% CI 1.15-2.88) for AMI; 1.97 (95% CI 1.04-3.73) for HF; and 1.17 (95% CI 0.51-2.68) for stroke. HR for patients versus controls with none of the risk factors meeting target was 7.33 (95% CI 5.08-10.57) for all-cause mortality; 12.34 (95% CI 7.91-19.48) for AMI: 15.09 (95% CI 9.87-23.09) for HF; and 12.02 (95% CI 7.66-18.85) for stroke.Conclusions—A steep graded association exists between decreasing number of CV risk factors at target and major adverse CV outcomes among patients with T1DM. However, risks for all outcomes were numerically higher for T1DM patients compared with controls, even when all risk factors were at target, with risk for AMI and HF statistically significantly so

Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background: Patients with diabetes are at higher risk for death and cardiovascular outcomes than the general population. We investigated whether the excess risk of death and cardiovascular events among patients with type 2 diabetes could be reduced or eliminated. Methods: In a cohort study, we included 271,174 patients with type 2 diabetes who were registered in the Swedish National Diabetes Register and matched them with 1,355,870 controls on the basis of age, sex, and county. We assessed patients with diabetes according to age categories and according to the presence of five risk factors (elevated glycated hemoglobin level, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, albuminuria, smoking, and elevated blood pressure). Cox regression was used to study the excess risk of outcomes (death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure) associated with smoking and the number of variables outside target ranges. We also examined the relationship between various risk factors and cardiovascular outcomes. Results: The median follow-up among all the study participants was 5.7 years, during which 175,345 deaths occurred. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, the excess risk of outcomes decreased stepwise for each risk-factor variable within the target range. Among patients with diabetes who had all five variables within target ranges, the hazard ratio for death from any cause, as compared with controls, was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.12), the hazard ratio for acute myocardial infarction was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93), and the hazard ratio for stroke was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.07). The risk of hospitalization for heart failure was consistently higher among patients with diabetes than among controls (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.57). In patients with type 2 diabetes, a glycated hemoglobin level outside the target range was the strongest predictor of stroke and acute myocardial infarction; smoking was the strongest predictor of death. Conclusions: Patients with type 2 diabetes who had five risk-factor variables within the target ranges appeared to have little or no excess risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, as compared with the general population. (Funded by the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions and others.)

Severe COVID-19 in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Sweden: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

Background: Whether infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to excess risk of requiring hospitalization or intensive care in persons with diabetes has not been reported, nor have risk factors in diabetes associated with increased risk for these outcomes. Methods: We included 44,639 and 411,976 adult patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes alive on Jan 1, 2020, and compared them to controls matched for age, sex, and county of residence (n=204,919 and 1,948,900). Age- and sex-standardized rates for COVID-19 related hospitalizations, admissions to intensive care and death, were estimated and hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression analyses. Findings: There were 10,486 hospitalizations and 1,416 admissions into intensive care. A total of 1,175 patients with diabetes and 1,820 matched controls died from COVID-19, of these 53•2% had been hospitalized and 10•7% had been in intensive care. Patients with type 2 diabetes, compared to controls, displayed an age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2•22, 95%CI 2•13-2•32) of being hospitalized for COVID-19, which decreased to HR 1•40, 95%CI 1•34-1•47) after further adjustment for sociodemographic factors, pharmacological treatment and comorbidities, had higher risk for admission to ICU due to COVID-19 (age- and sex-adjusted HR 2•49, 95%CI 2•22-2•79, decreasing to 1•42, 95%CI 1•25-1•62 after adjustment, and increased risk for death due to COVID-19 (age- and sex-adjusted HR 2•19, 95%CI 2•03-2•36, complete adjustment 1•50, 95%CI 1•39-1•63). Age- and sex-adjusted HR for COVID-19 hospitalization for type 1 diabetes was 2•10, 95%CI 1•72-2•57), decreasing to 1•25, 95%CI 0•3097-1•62) after adjustment• Patients with diabetes type 1 were twice as likely to require intensive care for COVID-19, however, not after adjustment (HR 1•49, 95%CI 0•75-2•92), and more likely to die (HR 2•90, 95% CI 1•6554-5•47) from COVID-19, but not independently of other factors (HR 1•38, 95% CI 0•64-2•99). Among patients with diabetes, elevated glycated hemoglobin levels were associated with higher risk for most outcomes. Interpretation: In this nationwide study, type 2 diabetes was independently associated with increased risk of hospitalization, admission to intensive care and death for COVID-19. There were few admissions into intensive care and deaths in type 1 diabetes, and although hazards were significantly raised for all three outcomes, there was no independent risk persisting after adjustment for confounding factors

Estimación del riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en un consultorio médico

Introduction: traumatic injuries are the leading cause of death in young people, ages under 45, and brain injuries have a high incidence of death in more than half of those suffering from these injuries.Objective: to characterize patients with severe cranioencephalic trauma in the Intensive Care Unit at Arnaldo Milián Castro General Teaching Hospital during the year 2018.Methods: an observational, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted in 38 patients with the diagnosis of severe head trauma from January 1, 2018 to January 1, 2019. Medical records were reviewed; variables such as age, cause of trauma, type of injury, complications and hospital staying were collected. Results: male patients predominated (92,11%), ages between 36 and 64 years (50 %); 50 % of traumas were due to traffic accidents. Subdural hematoma represented 52,63 % of lesions and pneumonia the most common complication (65,79 %). Patients admitted for more than 9 days predominated (44,74%); 73,68 % of patients were admitted alive; 65.79 % of patients underwent surgery. Severe cerebral edema was found among the causes of death (70 %).Conclusions: male patients after the third decade of life are prone to severe cranioencephalic trauma. Intervention on primary lesions avoids complications, where ventilation and prolonged hospital staying can trigger sepsis and act as factors affecting survival.Introducción: la diabetes mellitus es una enfermedad crónica no transmisible en aumento, y que, a la vez, representa un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de enfermedades cardiovasculares. Objetivo: determinar el riesgo cardiovascular existente en los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 pertenecientes al Consultorio Médico 15 del Policlínico Universitario “Federico Capdevila”.Método: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, longitudinal con carácter retrospectivo, en el periodo comprendido entre septiembre de 2018 y febrero de 2019. La población estuvo constituida por los 87 pacientes con diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus tipo 2, trabajándose con la totalidad. Los datos fueron obtenidos mediante la entrevista, las historias clínicas individuales, y de salud familiar. Se cumplieron los principios de bioética.Resultados: se identificó riesgo cardiovascular en el sexo femenino (58,62 %), y en el grupo etario de 70 a 79 años de edad (28,73 %); así como en pacientes con obesidad (65,51 %); donde el 68,97 % de los pacientes sufrió de alguna enfermedad cardiovascular; entre ellas la hipertensión arterial (67,82 %). Predominó el riesgo cardiovascular leve (25,30 %). Se encontró relación entre la presencia de hipertensión arterial descompensada y un riesgo cardiovascular alto/muy alto (p<0,05).Conclusiones: las féminas que sufrían de diabetes mellitus tipo 2, que sobrepasaban la séptima década de vida y que sufrían de obesidad he hipertensión arterial presentaron riesgo cardiovascular, en su mayoría con riesgo leve. La hipertensión arterial descompensada se relacionó a un mayor riesgo cardiovascula

Epidemiological aspects of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among individuals with diabetes: the relative importance of cardiovascular risk factors

Background: Long-term trends of cardiovascular complications and death among patients with diabetes have not been studied extensively. In addition, we aimed to examine the effect of multifactorial risk factor control, as well as optimal levels- and relative importance of cardiovascular risk factors, in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. The analyses for patients with diabetes were compared to the general population. Method: We used data from the National Diabetes Register along with other Swedish health registries and applied different statistical methods such as survival analysis and different machine learning models to study our research questions. We have focused on the following outcomes: all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke and heart failure. Results: During the period 1998-2014, patients with type 1 diabetes experienced approximately 40% greater relative risk reduction for cardiovascular complications, compared to matched controls, while patients with type 2 diabetes experienced roughly 20% greater risk reduction than their matched controls. A paradoxical finding was the lower relative risk reduction of fatal outcomes in patients with diabetes. Nevertheless, death and complications have decreased substantially during the last two decades. Multifactorial risk factor control is associated with significant risk reduction for patients with diabetes. Still, patients with type 1 diabetes display 82% and 97% elevated risk for myocardial infarction and heart failure, respectively. For type 2 diabetes, we observed marginally increased risk of death and cardiovascular complications in patients with all risk factor at target level. Moreover, there is a monotone relationship between number of risk factor at target level and excess risk of outcomes in patients with diabetes. Patients with type 2 diabetes and all risk factors at target level had 16% lower relative risk for myocardial infarction, compared to the general population. The most important risk factors for cardiovascular complications were glycated hemoglobin, physical activity level, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, albuminuria, as well as risk factors that in some form denote exposure time to the disease (e.g. age, duration of diabetes and age at onset of disease). Lower levels for glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is associated with reduced risk for cardiovascular complications, compared to matched controls. The relative importance analyses suggest that risk factors contribute differently between outcomes and type of diabetes. Conclusion: Morbidity and mortality have decreased significantly among individuals with diabetes. Multifactorial risk factor control is associated with significant risk reduction and could perhaps even eliminate the excess risk for cardiovascular disease. Lower levels for selected risk factors than recommended target levels is associated with lower risk for complications. Heart failure is an emerging diabetes-related complication and young individuals with diabetes are at the highest risk of complications

Association between exercise load, resting heart rate, and maximum heart rate and risk of future ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Objective This study aimed to examine the association between exercise workload, resting heart rate (RHR), maximum heart rate and the risk of developing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Methods The study included all participants from the UK Biobank who had undergone submaximal exercise stress testing. Patients with a history of STEMI were excluded. The allowed exercise load for each participant was calculated based on clinical characteristics and risk categories. We studied the participants who exercised to reach 50% or 35% of their expected maximum exercise tolerance. STEMI was adjudicated by the UK Biobank. We used Cox regression analysis to study how exercise tolerance and RHR were related to the risk of STEMI.Results A total of 66 949 participants were studied, of whom 274 developed STEMI during a median follow-up of 7.7 years. After adjusting for age, sex, blood pressure, smoking, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, peak expiratory flow and diabetes, we noted a significant association between RHR and the risk of STEMI (p=0.015). The HR for STEMI in the highest RHR quartile (&gt;90 beats/min) compared with that in the lowest quartile was 2.92 (95% CI 1.26 to 6.77). Neither the maximum achieved exercise load nor the ratio of the maximum heart rate to the maximum load was significantly associated with the risk of STEMI. However, a non-significant but stepwise inverse association was noted between the maximum load and the risk of STEMI.Conclusion RHR is an independent predictor of future STEMI. An RHR of &gt;90 beats/min is associated with an almost threefold increase in the risk of STEMI

Trajectories in HbA1c and other risk factors among adults with type 1 diabetes by age at onset

Introduction In type 1 diabetes, potential loss of life-years is greatest in those who are youngest at the time of onset. Using data from a nationwide cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes, we aimed to study risk factor trajectories by age at diagnosis.Research design and methods We stratified 30 005 patients with type 1 diabetes aged 18–75 years into categories based on age at onset: 0–10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–25, and 26–30 years. HbA1c, albuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body mass index (BMI), low-denisty lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure trends were analyzed using mixed models. Variable importance for baseline HbA1c was analyzed using conditional random forest and gradient boosting machine approaches.Results Individuals aged ≥16 years at onset displayed a relatively low mean HbA1c level (~55–57 mmol/mol) that gradually increased. In contrast, individuals diagnosed at ≤15 years old entered adulthood with a mean HbA1c of approximately 70 mmol/mol. For all groups, HbA1c levels stabilized at a mean of approximately 65 mmol/mol by about 40 years old. In patients who were young at the time of onset, albuminuria appeared at an earlier age, suggesting a more rapid decrease in eGFR, while there were no distinct differences in BMI, SBP, and LDL-cholesterol trajectories between groups. Low education, higher age, and poor risk factor control were associated with higher HbA1c levels.Conclusions Young age at the diabetes onset plays a substantial role in subsequent glycemic control and the presence of albuminuria, where patients with early onset may accrue a substantial glycemic load during this period