10 research outputs found

    Using Synchronic and Diachronic Relations for Summarizing Multiple Documents Describing Evolving Events

    Full text link
    In this paper we present a fresh look at the problem of summarizing evolving events from multiple sources. After a discussion concerning the nature of evolving events we introduce a distinction between linearly and non-linearly evolving events. We present then a general methodology for the automatic creation of summaries from evolving events. At its heart lie the notions of Synchronic and Diachronic cross-document Relations (SDRs), whose aim is the identification of similarities and differences between sources, from a synchronical and diachronical perspective. SDRs do not connect documents or textual elements found therein, but structures one might call messages. Applying this methodology will yield a set of messages and relations, SDRs, connecting them, that is a graph which we call grid. We will show how such a grid can be considered as the starting point of a Natural Language Generation System. The methodology is evaluated in two case-studies, one for linearly evolving events (descriptions of football matches) and another one for non-linearly evolving events (terrorist incidents involving hostages). In both cases we evaluate the results produced by our computational systems.Comment: 45 pages, 6 figures. To appear in the Journal of Intelligent Information System

    Splitting Arabic Texts into Elementary Discourse Units

    Get PDF
    International audienceIn this article, we propose the first work that investigates the feasibility of Arabic discourse segmentation into elementary discourse units within the segmented discourse representation theory framework. We first describe our annotation scheme that defines a set of principles to guide the segmentation process. Two corpora have been annotated according to this scheme: elementary school textbooks and newspaper documents extracted from the syntactically annotated Arabic Treebank. Then, we propose a multiclass supervised learning approach that predicts nested units. Our approach uses a combination of punctuation, morphological, lexical, and shallow syntactic features. We investigate how each feature contributes to the learning process. We show that an extensive morphological analysis is crucial to achieve good results in both corpora. In addition, we show that adding chunks does not boost the performance of our system

    Deep Reinforcement Learning in Strategic Board Game Environments

    No full text
    International audienceIn this paper we propose a novel Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithm that uses the concept of “action-dependent state features”, and exploits it to approximate the Q-values locally, employing a deep neural network with parallel Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) components, each one responsible for computing an action-related Q-value. As such, all computations occur simultaneously, and there is no need to employ “target” networks and experience replay, which are techniques regularly used in the DRL literature. Moreover, our algorithm does not require previous training experiences, but trains itself online during game play. We tested our approach in the Settlers Of Catan multi-player strategic board game. Our results confirm the effectiveness of our approach, since it outperforms several competitors, including the state-of-the-art jSettler heuristic algorithm devised for this particular domain

    Extractive text summarization: can we use the same techniques for any text?

    No full text
    In this paper we address two issues. The first one analyzes whether the performance of a text summarization method depends on the topic of a document. The second one is concerned with how certain linguistic properties of a text may affect the performance of a number of automatic text summarization methods. For this we consider semantic analysis methods, such as textual entailment and anaphora resolution, and we study how they are related to proper noun, pronoun and noun ratios calculated over original documents that are grouped into related topics. Given the obtained results, we can conclude that although our first hypothesis is not supported, since it has been found no evident relationship between the topic of a document and the performance of the methods employed, adapting summarization systems to the linguistic properties of input documents benefits the process of summarization.This research work has been partially funded by the European Commission under the Seventh (FP7 - 2007-2013) Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development through the FIRST project (FP7-287607); the Spanish Government through the project TEXTMESS 2.0 (TIN2009-13391-C04), ”Análisis de Tendencias Mediante Técnicas de Opinión Semántica” (TIN2012-38536-C03-03 ) and “Técnicas de Deconstrucción en la Tecnologías del Lenguaje Humano” (TIN2012-31224); and by the Valencian Government through the project PROMETEO (PROMETEO/2009/199)

    Design and development of a concept-based multi-document summarization system for research abstracts

    No full text
    This paper describes a new concept-based multi-document summarization system that employs discourse parsing, information extraction and information integration. Dissertation abstracts in the field of sociology were selected as sample documents for this study. The summarization process includes four major steps — (1) parsing dissertation abstracts into five standard sections; (2) extracting research concepts (often operationalized as research variables) and their relationships, the research methods used and the contextual relations from specific sections of the text; (3) integrating similar concepts and relationships across different abstracts; and (4) combining and organizing the different kinds of information using a variable-based framework, and presenting them in an interactive web-based interface. The accuracy of each summarization step was evaluated by comparing the system-generated output against human coding. The user evaluation carried out in the study indicated that the majority of subjects (70%) preferred the concept-based summaries generated using the system to the sentence-based summaries generated using traditional sentence extraction techniques

    Linguistic Fundamentals for Natural Language Processing II: 100 Essentials from Semantics and Pragmatics

    No full text
    corecore