Regression of Human Prostate Tumors and Metastases in Nude Mice following Treatment with the Recombinant Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus GLV-1h68

Virotherapy using oncolytic vaccinia virus strains is one of the most promising new strategies for cancer therapy. In the current study, we analyzed the therapeutic efficacy of the oncolytic vaccinia virus GLV-1h68 against two human prostate cancer cell lines DU-145 and PC-3 in cell culture and in tumor xenograft models. By viral proliferation assays and cell survival tests, we demonstrated that GLV-1h68 was able to infect, replicate in, and lyse these prostate cancer cells in culture. In DU-145 and PC-3 tumor xenograft models, a single intravenous injection with GLV-1h68 resulted in a significant reduction of primary tumor size. In addition, the GLV-1h68-infection led to strong inflammatory and oncolytic effects resulting in drastic reduction of regional lymph nodes with PC-3 metastases. Our data documented that the GLV-1h68 virus has a great potential for treatment of human prostate carcinoma

Efficient Colonization and Therapy of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Using the Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Strain GLV-1h68

Virotherapy using oncolytic vaccinia virus strains is one of the most promising new strategies for cancer therapy. In this study, we analyzed for the first time the therapeutic efficacy of the oncolytic vaccinia virus GLV-1h68 in two human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines HuH7 and PLC/PRF/5 (PLC) in cell culture and in tumor xenograft models. By viral proliferation assays and cell survival tests, we demonstrated that GLV-1h68 efficiently colonized, replicated in, and did lyse these cancer cells in culture. Experiments with HuH7 and PLC xenografts have revealed that a single intravenous injection (i.v.) of mice with GLV-1h68 resulted in a significant reduction of primary tumor sizes compared to uninjected controls. In addition, replication of GLV-1h68 in tumor cells led to strong inflammatory and oncolytic effects resulting in intense infiltration of MHC class II-positive cells like neutrophils, macrophages, B cells and dendritic cells and in up-regulation of 13 pro-inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, GLV-1h68 infection of PLC tumors inhibited the formation of hemorrhagic structures which occur naturally in PLC tumors. Interestingly, we found a strongly reduced vascular density in infected PLC tumors only, but not in the non-hemorrhagic HuH7 tumor model. These data demonstrate that the GLV-1h68 vaccinia virus may have an enormous potential for treatment of human hepatocellular carcinoma in man

Preclinical Evaluation of Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus for Therapy of Canine Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Virotherapy using oncolytic vaccinia virus (VACV) strains is one promising new strategy for canine cancer therapy. In this study we describe the establishment of an in vivo model of canine soft tissue sarcoma (CSTS) using the new isolated cell line STSA-1 and the analysis of the virus-mediated oncolytic and immunological effects of two different Lister VACV LIVP1.1.1 and GLV-1h68 strains against CSTS. Cell culture data demonstrated that both tested VACV strains efficiently infected and destroyed cells of the canine soft tissue sarcoma line STSA-1. In addition, in our new canine sarcoma tumor xenograft mouse model, systemic administration of LIVP1.1.1 or GLV-1h68 viruses led to significant inhibition of tumor growth compared to control mice. Furthermore, LIVP1.1.1 mediated therapy resulted in almost complete tumor regression and resulted in long-term survival of sarcoma-bearing mice. The replication of the tested VACV strains in tumor tissues led to strong oncolytic effects accompanied by an intense intratumoral infiltration of host immune cells, mainly neutrophils. These findings suggest that the direct viral oncolysis of tumor cells and the virus-dependent activation of tumor-associated host immune cells could be crucial parts of anti-tumor mechanism in STSA-1 xenografts. In summary, the data showed that both tested vaccinia virus strains and especially LIVP1.1.1 have great potential for effective treatment of CSTS

Preclinical application of different oncolytic vaccinia viruses in human and canine tumor therapy

Nach Einschätzung der Weltgesundheitsorganisation WHO wird Krebs im Jahr 2013 die weltweit häufigste Todesursache bei Menschen und Haustieren sein. Diese Situation erfordert die Entwicklung neuer therapeutischer Ansätze. Hauptziel einer Tumortherapie ist es, sowohl den Primärtumor als auch die Metastasen möglichst vollständig zu entfernen. Dabei wird nach Methoden gesucht, die im Gegensatz zu den meisten gegenwärtigen therapeutischen Einsätzen, wie der chirurgischen Entfernung bösartiger Neubildungen, Chemotherapie und Strahlentherapie, selektiv die bösartigen Zellen erkennen und zerstören können. Eine faszinierende Möglichkeit in dieser Hinsicht ist die Verwendung von onkolytischen Viren, die die Fähigkeit besitzen, sich selektiv sowohl in Primärtumoren als auch in Metastasen anzusiedeln und die Krebszellen dort zu zerstören. Das Konzept, dass Viren nützlich für die Bekämpfung von Krebs sein könnten, ist nicht neu. Allerdings konnte erst in den letzten Jahren durch zahlreiche Studien bestätigt werden, dass verschiedene Viren in der Lage sind, eine signifikante Antitumorwirkung in vivo auszuüben. Zu den erfolgversprechenden onkolytischen Viren zählen insbesondere Adenovirus, Herpes simplex Virus, Reovirus und Vaccinia-Virus, die sich bereits in Phase III der klinischen Studien befinden oder kurz davor sind. Die therapeutische Nutzung von tumorspezifischen onkolytischen Viren beim Menschen hat bereits begonnen. Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Doktorarbeit wurden verschiedene Aspekte der Wirkungsweise von Vaccinia-Virus-Stämmen bei der Therapie verschiedener Tumore aus Mensch und Hund im Xenotransplantat-Mausmodell bearbeitet: die Onkolyse der Krebszellen und Inhibition des Tumorwachstums sowie die Effekte der Virusinfektion auf das Tumormikromilieu und die Mitwirkung des angeborenen Immunsystems bei der Virotherapie. Das Tumormikromilieu (Stroma) setzt sich aus einer Vielzahl verschiedener Zellen und Komponenten der extrazellulären Matrix zusammen. Die Krebszellen bilden unter anderem mit Endothelzellen des Blut- und Lymphsystems und verschiedenen Immunzellen eine komplexe Organ-ähnliche Struktur. Weitere wichtige Bestandteile des Stromas sind Wachstumsfaktoren, Chemokine und Zytokine und die Tumorvaskulatur. Diese ist durch zahlreiche strukturelle und funktionelle Abnormalitäten charakterisiert, wodurch die Effektivität von Strahlen- und Chemotherapie herabgesetzt wird. Weiterhin ist das Tumormikromilieu durch seine Ähnlichkeit mit einer chronischen Entzündungsreaktion gekennzeichnet und wirkt immunsupprimierend auf rekrutierte Leukozyten, die wiederum die Inflammation verstärken und die Angiogenese und das Tumorwachstum weiter fördern. Aufgrund dieser vielen Komponenten ist die Zusammensetzung jedes Tumors einzigartig, weswegen Standardtherapien häufig nicht zu einer Heilung führen. Die Wirkung der Viren bei der Virotherapie beruht vermutlich auf 4 Mechanismen, die einzeln oder in Kombination auftreten können: die direkte Onkolyse der Krebszellen, die Zerstörung des Tumorblutgefäßsystems, die Aktivierung des Immunsystems des Wirts und die Suppression der microRNA-Expression des Wirtes. Zusätzlich kann die Expression therapeutischer Gene die onkolytische Wirkung verstärken. Zum Nachweis der Onkolyse der Krebszellen und Inhibition des Tumorwachstums wurde zuerst das Virus GLV-1h68 in einem autologen humanen Melanomzellpaar, 888-MEL und 1936-MEL, eingesetzt. Das GLV-1h68-Virus wurde auf Basis des Wildtyp Vaccinia-Virus LIVP durch die Insertion von 3 Expressionskassetten in den drei Genloci F14.5L, J2R und A56 genetisch konstruiert. 888-MEL, eine zu einem frühen Zeitpunkt der Krebserkrankung aus einer Metastase isolierte Zelllinie, zeigt nach Infektion mit GLV-1h68 im Mausmodell Tumornekrose („Responder“), während 1936-MEL aus einer späten Metastasierungsphase kaum mit Onkolyse auf eine Virusinfektion reagiert („Poor-Responder“). Die onkolytische Wirkung konnte mittels Durchflusszytometrie in Tumoren beider Zelllinien zu einem frühen Zeitpunkt nach Virusinfektion nachgewiesen werden. In 888-MEL-Tumoren wurde hierbei eine große Zahl infizierter und toter Zellen nach Virusinfektion gefunden. Gleichzeitig wurde eine hohe Zahl an Immunzellen detektiert, die nach Virusinfektion reduziert war. In den schwächer reagierenden 1936-MEL-Tumoren konnte eine Onkolyse bei Infektion mit höherer Virusmenge und zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt demonstriert werden, wodurch mehr Zellen infiziert wurden. Zusätzlich wurde eine Steigerung der nur in geringer Zahl vorhandenen Immunzellen nachgewiesen. Trotz des unterschiedlichen Tumormikromilieus konnte somit ein onkolytischer Effekt in beiden Tumormodellen erzielt werden. ...The cancer mortality rate is increasing steadily in man and pet animals and it is estimated by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to be number one cause of deaths in 2013. This situation raises the need for developing new therapeutic approaches whereby the main goal of tumor therapy always is the complete elimination of primary tumor and metastases. In contrast to most current therapies, like surgical resection of malignant neoplasia, chemotherapy and radiation, the new cancer treatments should selectively recognize and destroy malignant cells. The application of oncolytic viruses offers fascinating opportunities, because of their ability to selectively colonize primary tumors and metastases and directly destroy cancer cells. The concept of fighting cancer with viruses is not new, but the significant anti-tumoral effect of different viruses in vivo was demonstrated by several studies in the last few years. Promising oncolytic viruses are adenovirus, Herpes simplex virus, reovirus and vaccinia virus. These viruses are currently in or entering phase III clinical trials but the therapeutic use of tumor specific oncolytic viruses for humans has already started. In this work, different aspects of the effects of vaccinia virus strains during therapy of canine and human tumors in mouse xenograft models were analyzed: oncolysis of cancer cells, inhibition of tumor growth, influence of virus infection on the tumor microenvironment and participation of the innate immunity in virotherapy. The tumor microenvironment (stroma) is composed of many different cells and components of the extracellular matrix. Cancer cells form structures similar to organs including endothelial cells of the blood and lymph system, different immune cells and many other cell types. Other important components of the stroma are growth factors, chemokines and cytokines as well as the tumor vasculature that is characterized by numerous structural and functional abnormalities which decrease the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy. Another hallmark of the tumor microenvironment is its similarity to chronic inflammation and its immunosuppressive effect on recruited leukocytes which in turn increase the inflammation and angiogenesis and promote tumor growth. Due to the many different components the composition of each tumor is unique and that is why standard therapies often do not result in cure. The effects of the viruses in the virotherapy are propably based on four mechanisms working alone or in combination: direct oncolysis of cancer cells, destruction of tumor vasculature, activation of host immune system and suppression of host microRNA expression. Additionally the expression of therapeutic genes can increase the oncolytic effect of the viruses. To analyze the oncolysis of cancer cells and the inhibition of tumor growth first the GLV-1h68 virus was used in an autologous pair of human melanoma 888-MEL and 1936-MEL. GLV-1h68 was genetically constructed on the basis of wild-type vaccinia virus LIVP by insertion of 3 expression cassettes into F14.5L, J2R and A56 gene loci. 888-MEL was isolated from metastases early during cancer disease and exhibits tumor necrosis after infection with GLV-1h68 in mouse xenograft model (responder) whereas 1936-MEL which was isolated in the late phase of metastases formation hardly shows oncolysis following virus treatment (poor-responder). The oncolytic effect was demonstrated by flow cytometric analysis of tumors of both cell lines at an early time after virus infection. In 888-MEL tumors high numbers of infected and dead cells were found after virus infection. Simultaneously, a high number of immune cells were detected which was reduced after infection. In the lower responding 1936-MEL tumors oncolysis was only observed after infection with higher amount of virus at an earlier time whereby the number of infected cells increased. Additionally, the low number of immune cells increased after infection. Despite the different tumor microenvironment an oncolytic effect was achieved in both tumor models. ..

Modulation of GABAB receptor signaling by associated proteins and phosphorylation

GABAB receptors are the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for y-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. They are membrane receptors with a seven membrane-spanning domain and are composed of the principal subunits GABAB1 and GABAB2. Activated GABAB receptors regulate G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K+ channels (GIRKs), voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs) and adenylyl cyclases (ACs). The K+ channel tetramerization domain-containing (KCTD) proteins were shown to be auxiliary subunits of GABAB receptors that constitutively bind to the receptor via GABAB2 and regulate receptor signaling in a KCTD-subtype specific manner (Schwenk et al., 2010). The aim of this thesis was to better understand the KCTD12-mediated modulation of GABAB receptor signaling as well as to explore new mechanisms of receptor fine-tuning. The first part of this thesis uncovers the mechanism of GABAB receptor-activated K+ current desensitization induced by KCTD12. Besides the constitutive binding of all KCTDs to the G-protein, selectively KCTD12 has a second binding site on the activated Gß? subunit. A switch in binding uncouples Gß? from the K+ channels and induces K+ current desensitization. Native KCTD12 associates exclusively with GABAB receptors rendering this mechanism receptor specific. (Turecek et al., 2014) In the second part, we investigated the effects of GABAB receptor phosphorylation on KCTD12-induced K+ current desensitization. Phosphorylation of serine-892 (S892) in GABAB2 by protein kinase A (PKA) was previously described as a rather slow mechanism to regulate GABAB receptor desensitization (Couve et al., 2002). In contrast, KCTD12-induced desensitization of GABAB receptor-activated K+ currents represents a fast form of desensitization. We show that both mechanisms of desensitization influence each other. S892 phosphorylation slows KCTD12-induced K+ current desensitization by rearranging KCTD12 at the receptor. In turn, KCTD12 promotes tonic S892 phosphorylation by binding to GABAB receptors. This cross-regulation renders the signaling of GABAB receptors more precise and highly dependent on both the expression of KCTD12 and the activity of PKA. (Adelfinger et al., 2014) The third part reveals that all KCTDs exert marginal allosteric influence on the ligand binding affinity of GABAB receptors. However, we show that KCTD8, in contrast to KCTD12 and KCTD16, reduces the basal G-protein activation of GABAB receptors. (Rajalu et al., 2014) The fourth part summarizes an ongoing project in which we investigate the effects of 14-3-3 proteins and cullin3 (CUL3) on GABAB receptor signaling. 14-3-3 e and ? specifically interact with KCTD16 through its H2-domain. This binding regulates the expression of KCTD16 and GABAB2 resulting in altered Ga-signaling of GABAB receptors. Furthermore, we report a specific interaction between KCTD16 and CUL3, which is controlled by 14-3-3 proteins. In summary, we propose that 14-3-3 proteins determine the rate of lysosomal GABAB receptor degradation, which is induced upon binding of KCTD16 and CUL3. (Adelfinger et al., in preparation) Finally, in collaboration with the group of Jan Siemens from Heidelberg we studied how GABAB receptors reciprocally counteract the sensitization of the capsaicin receptor TRPV1. (Hanack et al., in preparation

Preclinical Testing Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Strain GLV-5b451 Expressing an Anti-VEGF Single-Chain Antibody for Canine Cancer Therapy

Virotherapy on the basis of oncolytic vaccinia virus (VACV) strains is a novel approach for canine cancer therapy. Here we describe, for the first time, the characterization and the use of VACV strain GLV-5b451 expressing the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) single-chain antibody (scAb) GLAF-2 as therapeutic agent against different canine cancers. Cell culture data demonstrated that GLV-5b451 efficiently infected and destroyed all four tested canine cancer cell lines including: mammary carcinoma (MTH52c), mammary adenoma (ZMTH3), prostate carcinoma (CT1258), and soft tissue sarcoma (STSA-1). The GLV-5b451 virus-mediated production of GLAF-2 antibody was observed in all four cancer cell lines. In addition, this antibody specifically recognized canine VEGF. Finally, in canine soft tissue sarcoma (CSTS) xenografted mice, a single systemic administration of GLV-5b451 was found to be safe and led to anti-tumor effects resulting in the significant reduction and substantial long-term inhibition of tumor growth. A CD31-based immuno-staining showed significantly decreased neo-angiogenesis in GLV-5b451-treated tumors compared to the controls. In summary, these findings indicate that GLV-5b451 has potential for use as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of CSTS

Vaccinia virus injected human tumors: oncolytic virus efficiency predicted by antigen profiling analysis fitted boolean models

Virotherapy on the basis of oncolytic vaccinia virus (VACV) strains is a promising approach for cancer therapy. Recently, we showed that the oncolytic vaccinia virus GLV-1h68 has a therapeutic potential in treating human prostate and hepatocellular carcinomas in xenografted mice. In this study, we describe the use of dynamic boolean modeling for tumor growth prediction of vaccinia virus-injected human tumors. Antigen profiling data of vaccinia virus GLV-1h68-injected human xenografted mice were obtained, analyzed and used to calculate differences in the tumor growth signaling network by tumor type and gender. Our model combines networks for apoptosis, MAPK, p53, WNT, Hedgehog, the T-killer cell mediated cell death, Interferon and Interleukin signaling networks. The in silico findings conform very well with in vivo findings of tumor growth. Similar to a previously published analysis of vaccinia virus-injected canine tumors, we were able to confirm the suitability of our boolean modeling for prediction of human tumor growth after virus infection in the current study as well. In summary, these findings indicate that our boolean models could be a useful tool for testing of the efficacy of VACV-mediated cancer therapy already before its use in human patients

Treatment of malignant effusion by oncolytic virotherapy in an experimental subcutaneous xenograft model of lung cancer

Background Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is associated with advanced stages of lung cancer and is mainly dependent on invasion of the pleura and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by cancer cells. As MPE indicates an incurable disease with limited palliative treatment options and poor outcome, there is an urgent need for new and efficient treatment options. Methods In this study, we used subcutaneously generated PC14PE6 lung adenocarcinoma xenografts in athymic mice that developed subcutaneous malignant effusions (ME) which mimic pleural effusions of the orthotopic model. Using this approach monitoring of therapeutic intervention was facilitated by direct observation of subcutaneous ME formation without the need of sacrificing mice or special imaging equipment as in case of MPE. Further, we tested oncolytic virotherapy using Vaccinia virus as a novel treatment modality against ME in this subcutaneous PC14PE6 xenograft model of advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Results We demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy of Vaccinia virus treatment of both advanced lung adenocarcinoma and tumor-associated ME. We attribute the efficacy to the virus-mediated reduction of tumor cell-derived VEGF levels in tumors, decreased invasion of tumor cells into the peritumoral tissue, and to viral infection of the blood vessel-invading tumor cells. Moreover, we showed that the use of oncolytic Vaccinia virus encoding for a single-chain antibody (scAb) against VEGF (GLAF-1) significantly enhanced mono-therapy of oncolytic treatment. Conclusions Here, we demonstrate for the first time that oncolytic virotherapy using tumor-specific Vaccinia virus represents a novel and promising treatment modality for therapy of ME associated with advanced lung cancer

Pharmacological characterization of GABAB receptor subtypes assembled with auxiliary KCTD subunits

GABAB receptors (GABABRs) are considered promising drug targets for the treatment of mental health disorders. GABABRs are obligate heteromers of principal GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits. GABABRs can additionally associate with auxiliary KCTD8, 12, 12b and 16 subunits, which also bind the G-protein and differentially regulate G-protein signaling. It is unknown whether the KCTDs allosterically influence pharmacological properties of GABABRs. Here we show that KCTD8 and KCTD16 slightly but significantly increase GABA affinity at recombinant receptors. However, KCTDs clearly do not account for the 10-fold higher GABA affinity of native compared to recombinant GABABRs. The positive allosteric modulator (PAM) GS39783, which binds to GABAB2, increases both potency and efficacy of GABA-mediated G-protein activation ([(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, BRET between G-protein subunits), irrespective of whether KCTDs are present or not. Of note, the increase in efficacy was significantly larger in the presence of KCTD8, which likely is the consequence of a reduced tonic G-protein activation in the combined presence of KCTD8 and GABABRs. We recorded Kir3 currents to study the effects of GS39783 on receptor-activated G-protein betagamma-signaling. In transfected CHO cells and cultured hippocampal neurons GS39783 increased Kir3 current amplitudes activated by 1 muM of baclofen in the absence and presence of KCTDs. Our data show that auxiliary KCTD subunits exert marginal allosteric influences on principal GABABR subunits. PAMs at principal subunits will therefore not be selective for receptor subtypes owing to KCTD subunits. However, PAMs can differentially modulate the responses of receptor subtypes because the KCTDs differentially regulate G-protein signaling

GABAB receptor phosphorylation regulates KCTD12-induced K+ current desensitization

AbstractGABAB receptors assemble from GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits. GABAB2 additionally associates with auxiliary KCTD subunits (named after their K+ channel tetramerization-domain). GABAB receptors couple to heterotrimeric G-proteins and activate inwardly-rectifying K+ channels through the βγ subunits released from the G-protein. Receptor-activated K+ currents desensitize in the sustained presence of agonist to avoid excessive effects on neuronal activity. Desensitization of K+ currents integrates distinct mechanistic underpinnings. GABAB receptor activity reduces protein kinase-A activity, which reduces phosphorylation of serine-892 in GABAB2 and promotes receptor degradation. This form of desensitization operates on the time scale of several minutes to hours. A faster form of desensitization is induced by the auxiliary subunit KCTD12, which interferes with channel activation by binding to the G-protein βγ subunits. Here we show that the two mechanisms of desensitization influence each other. Serine-892 phosphorylation in heterologous cells rearranges KCTD12 at the receptor and slows KCTD12-induced desensitization. Likewise, protein kinase-A activation in hippocampal neurons slows fast desensitization of GABAB receptor-activated K+ currents while protein kinase-A inhibition accelerates fast desensitization. Protein kinase-A fails to regulate fast desensitization in KCTD12 knock-out mice or knock-in mice with a serine-892 to alanine mutation, thus demonstrating that serine-892 phosphorylation regulates KCTD12-induced desensitization in vivo. Fast current desensitization is accelerated in hippocampal neurons carrying the serine-892 to alanine mutation, showing that tonic serine-892 phosphorylation normally limits KCTD12-induced desensitization. Tonic serine-892 phosphorylation is in turn promoted by assembly of receptors with KCTD12. This cross-regulation of serine-892 phosphorylation and KCTD12 activity sharpens the response during repeated receptor activation