Sobre desenvolvimento de processo da personalidade no conceito de G. Hegel

Article is devoted to the analysis of stages of development of the personality in the history. Cultural and historical process at Hegel moves from the East to the west. Progress in development of the personality, that is consciousness of freedom is the cornerstone of this process. In this article in a context of consideration of the doctrine of Hegel ideas of F. Engels, K. Marx and other scientists about the personality in the history are given.Artículo dedicado al análisis de las etapas de desarrollo de la personalidad en la historia. El proceso cultural e histórico en Hegel se mueve de este a oeste. El progreso en el desarrollo de la personalidad, que es la conciencia de la libertad, es la piedra angular de este proceso. En este artículo en un contexto de consideración de la doctrina de Hegel, se dan ideas de F. Engels, K. Marx y otros científicos sobre la personalidad en la historia.O artigo dedica-se à análise de etapas do desenvolvimento da personalidade na história. O processo cultural e histórico de Hegel se move do leste para o oeste. O progresso no desenvolvimento da personalidade, que é a consciência da liberdade, é a pedra angular desse processo. Neste artigo em um contexto de consideração da doutrina de idéias de Hegel de F. Engels, K. Marx e outros cientistas sobre a personalidade na história dão-se

Adaptation and Resilience in the Era of Technological Breakthroughs

The following article aims to demonstrate that in modern time new technologies play a pivotal role in the job market. Their impact encompasses both negative and positive effects. Lately, due to the development of certain methods and technological progress, it has become challenging to discern for seekers, employees and other interested ones which jobs are preferable in the job market. This article will explore how various technological advancements and other factors influence and introduce uncertainties into the job sector for job seekers and employees alike. This work will also examine the opportunities that can be seized from these market shifts, as well as ways to navigate those who are lost in the dilemma of what to look out for to secure their future

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Treatment of Idiopathic Thrompocytopenic Purpura (Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia): Efficacy and Safety in Everyday Clinical Practice

Background & Aims. The use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (aTPO-r) is a new approach to the treatment of patients with idiopathic thrompocytopenic purpura (ITP) irresponsive to other methods. Data on the efficacy and safety of aTPO-r outside the frames of clinical trials are limited. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the therapy in the routine clinical practice as the second and subsequent lines of therapy, as well as the frequency and nature of complications of the treatment in chronic ITP patients. Methods. Data on 58 adult patients (median age: 56 years) with chronic ITP were retrospectively evaluated; 43 (74 %) of them were treated with romiplostim and 15 (26 %) patients received eltrombopag. Two or more lines of prior therapy were ineffective in 19 (33 %) patients (14 from the romiplostim group and 5 from the eltrombopag group). aTPO-r was prescribed and adjusted according to the prescription guidelines. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed based on the platelet response and the possibility of achieving a sustained response after discontinuation of the therapy. Hemorrhagic manifestations were classified according to the WHO bleeding scale. The safety assessment is conducted by identifying adverse events (AEs) and lab test abnormalities. Treatment-related adverse events was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Results. The therapy with aTPO-r was effective in 49 (84 %) patients, including 36 patients (84 %) treated with romiplostim and 13 patients (87 %) with eltrombopag. The median dose to maintain a response was 3.7 mg/kg and 44 mg, respectively. A stable remission was achieved in 4 patients after discontinuation of romiplostim and 1 patient after discontinuation of eltrombopag. aTPO-r resistance was diagnosed in 9 (16 %) patients: 7 (16 %) of them were from the romiplostim group and 2 (13 %) from the eltrombopag group. Complete arrest of bleeding was achieved in 43 (88 %) responders and its reduction to grade I was achieved in the remaining 6 (12 %) of them. The most frequent AEs of romiplostim therapy were headache, arthralgia and dermatitis; and the treatment with eltrombopag caused hepatotoxicity, headache, and nausea. The severity of events did not lead to complete discontinuation of the therapy in any case. Different types of thrombotic complications were diagnosed in 3 patients (5.2 %). Conclusion. The therapy with aTPO-r is an effective and safe method for the treatment of patients with chronic ITP in the second and subsequent lines of therapy

Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone compared with melphalan and prednisone in previously untreated multiple myeloma: updated follow-up and impact of subsequent therapy in the phase III VISTA trial

[EN]The purpose of this study was to confirm overall survival (OS) and other clinical benefits with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) versus melphalan and prednisone (MP) in the phase III VISTA (Velcade as Initial Standard Therapy in Multiple Myeloma) trial after prolonged follow-up, and evaluate the impact of subsequent therapies. Previously untreated symptomatic patients with myeloma ineligible for high-dose therapy received up to nine 6-week cycles of VMP (n = 344) or MP (n = 338). With a median follow-up of 36.7 months, there was a 35% reduced risk of death with VMP versus MP (hazard ratio, 0.653; P < .001); median OS was not reached with VMP versus 43 months with MP; 3-year OS rates were 68.5% versus 54.0%. Response rates to subsequent thalidomide- (41% v 53%) and lenalidomide-based therapies (59% v 52%) appeared similar after VMP or MP; response rates to subsequent bortezomib-based therapy were 47% versus 59%. Among patients treated with VMP (n = 178) and MP (n = 233), median survival from start of subsequent therapy was 30.2 and 21.9 months, respectively, and there was no difference in survival from salvage among patients who received subsequent bortezomib, thalidomide, or lenalidomide. Rates of adverse events were higher with VMP versus MP during cycles 1 to 4, but similar during cycles 5 to 9. With VMP, 79% of peripheral neuropathy events improved within a median of 1.9 months; 60% completely resolved within a median of 5.7 months. VMP significantly prolongs OS versus MP after lengthy follow-up and extensive subsequent antimyeloma therapy. First-line bortezomib use does not induce more resistant relapse. VMP used upfront appears more beneficial than first treating with conventional agents and saving bortezomib- and other novel agent-based treatment until relapse

Molecular Genetic Markers and Clinical Characteristics of Essential Thrombocythemia

Background & Aims. The presence of different molecular genetic markers of clonality (mutations in JAK2, MPL, CALR) or their absence (triple negative status, TN) in essential thrombocythemia (ET) indicates a biological heterogeneity of the disease and can determine its clinical forms. The aim was to evaluate the association of molecular genetic markers with the clinical form and the prognosis of ET. Materials & Methods. We analyzed the data of 240 patients with ET at the age of 20–91 years (median age 58.7 years), who were observed in the Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology from 1999 to 2016 (median observation period 37.2 months). Results. The JAK2V617F (JAK2+) mutation was found in 182 (75.9 %) of 240 patients. CALR (CALR+) mutations were found in 30 (12.5 %): type 1 (CALR1+) mutations in 13/30 (43.3 %) and type 2 (CALR2+) in 17/30 (56.7 %). MPL (MPL+) mutations were found in only 2 (0.8 %) of 240 patients. None of the mutations were detected in 26 (10.8 %) of 240 patients (TN status). Significantly higher platelet counts were observed in CALR1+ and CALR2+ subgroups during the primary diagnosis of ET compared with JAK2+ and TN groups. The mean platelet counts were 1252 × 109/L for CALR2+ and 1079 × 109/L for CALR1+ vs 841 × 109/L (p < 0.001; p = 0.06) and 775 × 109/L (p < 0.001; p = 0.04) for JAK2+ and TN, respectively. Thrombosis was diagnosed in 50 (27.4 %) of 182 patients of the JAK2+ subgroup, in 8 (30.7 %) of the 26 patients of the TN subgroup, and in 2 (18.2 %) of 11 patients of the CALR1+ subgroup. No thrombosis was found in the CALR2+ and MPL+ subgroups (p < 0.001). In general, the CALR1+ status was characterized as the most favorable in terms of prognosis (5-year overall survival rate of 100 %), compared to the least favorable TN status (5-year overall survival rate of 85 %). Conclusion. Mutations in the CALR gene were characterized by a more favorable prognosis in comparison with JAK2+ and TN, as well as a decrease in the risk and frequency of thrombosis, despite higher platelet counts. TN-status of ET was associated with unfavorable prognosis

Genetic Markers of Hereditary Thrombophilia and Risk of Thrombotic Complications in Patients with Polycythemia Vera

Background. Thrombotic complications are one of the main problems of polycythemia vera (PV) treatment. They significantly impair the quality of life of these patients and may lead to the lethal outcome. A thrombotic event often precedes the diagnosis of this hematological disease. The pathogenesis of thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms, PV, in particular, is a complex one. Prescription of antiaggregants in the absence of thrombosis and anticoagulants after a thrombotic event requires special attention and development of corresponding recommendations. The prescription of anticoagulants is impossible without taking into account the risks of hemorrhagic complications, which are also typical for myeloproliferative neoplasms. Aim. Assessment of the impact of hereditary thrombophilia genetic markers on the risk of thrombotic complications in patients with PV. Methods. The study examined 116 patients with PV, who were screened for markers of hereditary thrombophilia: factor V (G1691A, FV Leiden), prothrombin, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), fibrinogen (FI), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), and platelet fibrinogen receptor type IIIA (GPIIIA). The incidence of these markers and their role in thrombosis in such patients was investigated. Results. The study provided data on the incidence of hereditary thrombophilia markers in patients with PV. Statistically significant differences in the incidence of these markers and homocysteine level were found between patients with thrombosis and without them. Conclusion. The information about the hereditary thrombophilia markers presence may be useful for the prescription of adequate antiaggregant and anticoagulant therapy for PV patients. Further research in this field is justified and it will probably demonstrate the relevance of hereditary thrombophilia markers as prognostic factors for thrombotic complications risk assessment

Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): And randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study

Background: Bortezomib with dexamethasone is a standard treatment option for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib with dexamethasone has shown promising activity in patients in this disease setting. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: In this randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study, patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had one to three previous treatments were randomly assigned (1:1) using a blocked randomisation scheme (block size of four) to receive carfilzomib with dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or bortezomib with dexamethasone (bortezomib group). Randomisation was stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, previous lines of treatment, International Staging System stage, and planned route of bortezomib administration if randomly assigned to bortezomib with dexamethasone. Patients received treatment until progression with carfilzomib (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 56 mg/m2 thereafter; 30 min intravenous infusion) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion) or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2; intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. The study is ongoing but not enrolling participants; results for the interim analysis of the primary endpoint are presented. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01568866. Findings: Between June 20, 2012, and June 30, 2014, 929 patients were randomly assigned (464 to the carfilzomib group; 465 to the bortezomib group). Median follow-up was 11·9 months (IQR 9·3-16·1) in the carfilzomib group and 11·1 months (8·2-14·3) in the bortezomib group. Median progression-free survival was 18·7 months (95% CI 15·6-not estimable) in the carfilzomib group versus 9·4 months (8·4-10·4) in the bortezomib group at a preplanned interim analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53 [95% CI 0·44-0·65]; p<0·0001). On-study death due to adverse events occurred in 18 (4%) of 464 patients in the carfilzomib group and in 16 (3%) of 465 patients in the bortezomib group. Serious adverse events were reported in 224 (48%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group and in 162 (36%) of 456 patients in the bortezomib group. The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events were anaemia (67 [14%] of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group vs 45 [10%] of 456 patients in the bortezomib group), hypertension (41 [9%] vs 12 [3%]), thrombocytopenia (39 [8%] vs 43 [9%]), and pneumonia (32 [7%] vs 36 [8%]). Interpretation: For patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, carfilzomib with dexamethasone could be considered in cases in which bortezomib with dexamethasone is a potential treatment option. Funding: Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Amgen subsidiary

Metastatic bone disease: Pathogenesis and therapeutic options: Up-date on bone metastasis management.

Bone metastases (BM) are a common complication of cancer, whose management often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Despite the recent therapeutic advances, patients with BM may still experience skeletal-related events and symptomatic skeletal events, with detrimental impact on quality of life and survival. A deeper knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the onset of lytic and sclerotic BM has been acquired in the last decades, leading to the development of bone-targeting agents (BTA), mainly represented by anti-resorptive drugs and bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals. Recent pre-clinical and clinical studies have showed promising effects of novel agents, whose safety and efficacy need to be confirmed by prospective clinical trials. Among BTA, adjuvant bisphosphonates have also been shown to reduce the risk of BM in selected breast cancer patients, but failed to reduce the incidence of BM from lung and prostate cancer. Moreover, adjuvant denosumab did not improve BM free survival in patients with breast cancer, suggesting the need for further investigation to clarify BTA role in early-stage malignancies. The aim of this review is to describe BM pathogenesis and current treatment options in different clinical settings, as well as to explore the mechanism of action of novel potential therapeutic agents for which further investigation is needed