89 research outputs found
SĂłcrates y la aporĂa ontolĂłgica
[ES] Si remitimos la dialĂ©ctica a su punto de partida socrĂĄtico, es decir, a un mĂ©todo puramente interrogativo, hemos de comprender la aporia en un sentido radical: lejos de deberse a factores subjetivos o existenciales tales como la ignorancia de la respuesta, la aporia propiamente dicha es una cuestiĂłn que objetivamente no se puede decidir, pero que sin embargo, paradĂłjicamente, no puede ser superada sino a travĂ©s de una decisiĂłn. Se pone de manifiesto aquĂ que la cuestiĂłn del sentido de ser, bĂĄsico en la metafĂsica desde AristĂłteles, presenta este carĂĄcter de manera ejemplar.[EN] If we bring dialectics back to its socratic origin, i.e. to a purely interrogative method, we are at the same time led to take aporia in a radical far from being due to such subjective or existential factors as the ignorance of the answer, aporia is, strictly speaking, a question that objectively cannot be settled in one sens more than in another- to the effect that, paradoxically, it is a question upon which one has necessarily and only to decide. The point here is that the question, basic to metaphysics from Aristotle onwards, «What does mean being?» presents this character in a paradigmatic way
Can we, nowadays, talk about the end of the metaphysics?
Si histĂłricamente la metafĂsica estĂĄ agotada, la hermenĂ©utica abre la vĂa a un pensamiento que ve en el fin de la metafĂsica un destino y no un simple accidente. Esta situaciĂłn hermenĂ©utica es asumida por el proyecto deconstructivista el cual dota de un nuevo sentido al proyecto aporĂ©tico en que consiste la pregunta por el ser desde que AristĂłteles la enunciara.If historically the metaphysics
is finished, the hermeneutic opens a way to a thought which can see a destiny in the end of
the metaphysics and not just an accident. This hermeneutic situation becomes a deconstructivist project which gives a new sense to the aporetic project which the question about
the being consists of, since Aristotle enunciated it
SuĂĄrez and the advent of the concept of being
This workâs purpose is to explain those words that Heidegger said about SuĂĄrez in Being and Time, i.e., to explain what is the importance of SuĂĄrez in the History of Metaphysics, specially on how something that was in its origin a problem became a discipline: the ontology; and also how the consequences that came from SuĂĄrez, and particularly how he understand the conceptus entis, mark the future of the Metaphysics of the Modernity
O melhor governo possĂvel: Francesco Guicciardini e o mĂ©todo prudencial de anĂĄlise da polĂtica
Ravaisson interprĂšte dâAristote
La carriĂšre de Ravaisson a dĂ©butĂ© par un coup de maĂźtre, qui ne devait pas seulement le consacrer comme philosophe, mais aussi lâinstaller dâemblĂ©e Ă une place importante dans lâhistoire de lâaristotĂ©lisme. Je ne rappellerai que briĂšvement les circonstances qui lâamenĂšrent Ă publier en 1837, Ă lâĂąge de vingt-quatre ans, le premier volume de son Essai sur la MĂ©taphysique dâAristote, qui devait ĂȘtre suivi dâun second en 1845. Lâoccasion en avait Ă©tĂ© le sujet mis au concours en 1833 â Ravaisson ..
Jean Brun, Socrate, (Collection « Que sais-je ? », n° 899), 1960
Aubenque Pierre. Jean Brun, Socrate, (Collection « Que sais-je ? », n° 899), 1960. In: Revue des Ătudes Anciennes. Tome 64, 1962, n°1-2. p. 166
- âŠ