12 research outputs found

    Aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: anatomic observations and surgical results

    No full text
    Background. One of the most frequent causes of reoperation after heart valve replacement is periprosthetic leakage (PPL). Previous studies have failed to determine whether PPL is linked to specific anatomic details. The aim of this study was to examine the location within the aortic annulus where PPL occurs, and to evaluate the postoperative outcome after surgical correction. Methods. Between January 1985 and December 2001, 28 patients underwent reoperation because of PPL after aortic valve replacement. The aortic annulus was analyzed in a clockwise format with hour 1 corresponding to the commissure between the left coronary sinus and the right coronary sinus, hour 5 to the commissure between the right coronary sinus and the noncoronary sinus, and hour 9 to the commissure between the noncoronary sinus and the left coronary sinus. Results. Overall operative mortality was 7.1% (2 patients). Repair of PPL was carried out in 8 patients whereas prosthetic valve replacement was necessary in 20 patients. Urgency or emergency operation (p < 0.0037), preoperative New York Heart Association class IV (p < 0.04), need for prosthetic valve replacement (p = 0.05), and implant of mechanical valve (p = 0.031) were independent determinants of dismal prognosis. Periprosthetic leakage occurred more frequently between hour 4 and hour 8 (19 patients), with the risk of leakage being two times greater than in other annular areas. Conclusions. Our study suggests that PPL occurs more frequently in a specific portion of the peculiar aortic annulus. In case of PPL diagnosis, a timely reoperation might decrease operative risks by avoiding emergency procedures and unfavorable preoperative clinical conditions, and preventing prosthetic valve replacement

    The farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 (Zarnestra) synergistically enhances growth inhibition and apoptosis induced on epidermoid cancer cells by Zoledronic acid (Zometa) and Pamidronate

    No full text
    Pamidronate (PAM) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) are aminobisphosphonates (BPs) able to affect the isoprenylation of intracellular small G proteins. We have investigated the antitumor activity of BPs and R115777 farnesyl transferase inhibitor (FTI) against epidermoid cancer cells. In human epidermoid head and neck KB and lung H1355 cancer cells, 48 h exposure to PAM and ZOL induced growth inhibition (IC(50) 25 and 10 microM, respectively) and apoptosis and abolished the proliferative and antiapoptotic stimuli induced by epidermal growth factor (EGF). In these experimental conditions, ZOL induced apoptosis through the activation of caspase 3 and a clear fragmentation of PARP was also demonstrated. A strong decrease of basal ras activity and an antagonism on its stimulation by EGF was recorded in the tumor cells exposed to BPs. These effects were paralleled by impaired activation of the survival enzymes extracellular signal regulated kinase 1 and 2 (Erk-1/2) and Akt that were not restored by EGF. Conversely, farnesol induced a recovery of ras activity and antagonized the proapoptotic effects induced by BPs. The combined treatment with BPs and R115777 resulted in a strong synergism both in growth inhibition and apoptosis in KB and H1355 cells. The synergistic activity between the drugs allowed BPs to produce tumor cell growth inhibition and apoptosis at in vivo achievable concentrations (0.1 micromolar for both drugs). Moreover, the combination was highly effective in the inhibition of ras, Erk and Akt activity, while farnesol again antagonized these effects. In conclusion, the combination of BPs and FTI leads to enhanced antitumor activity at clinically achievable drug concentrations that resides in the inhibition of farnesylation-dependent survival pathways and warrants further studies for clinical translation

    The farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 (Zarnestra) synergistically enhances growth inhibition and apoptosis induced on epidermoid cancer cells by Zoledronic acid (Zometa) and Pamidronate.

    No full text
    Pamidronate (PAM) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) are aminobisphosphonates (BPs) able to affect the isoprenylation of intracellular small G proteins. We have investigated the antitumor activity of BPs and R115777 farnesyl transferase inhibitor (FTI) against epidermoid cancer cells. In human epidermoid head and neck KB and lung H1355 cancer cells, 48 h exposure to PAM and ZOL induced growth inhibition (IC50 25 and 10 lM, respectively) and apoptosis and abolished the proliferative and antiapoptotic stimuli induced by epidermal growth factor (EGF). In these experimental conditions, ZOL induced apoptosis through the activation of caspase 3 and a clear fragmentation of PARP was also demonstrated. A strong decrease of basal ras activity and an antagonism on its stimulation by EGF was recorded in the tumor cells exposed to BPs. These effects were paralleled by impaired activation of the survival enzymes extracellular signal regulated kinase 1 and 2 (Erk-1/2) and Akt that were not restored by EGF. Conversely, farnesol induced a recovery of ras activity and antagonized the proapoptotic effects induced by BPs. The combined treatment with BPs and R115777 resulted in a strong synergism both in growth inhibition and apoptosis in KB and H1355 cells. The synergistic activity between the drugs allowed BPs to produce tumor cell growth inhibition and apoptosis at in vivo achievable concentrations (0.1 micromolar for both drugs). Moreover, the combination was highly effective in the inhibition of ras, Erk and Akt activity, while farnesol again antagonized these effects. In conclusion, the combination of BPs and FTI leads to enhanced antitumor activity at clinically achievable drug concentrations that resides in the inhibition of farnesylationdependent survival pathways and warrants further studies for clinical translation

    Metronomic administration of zoledronic acid and taxotere combination in castration resistant prostate cancer patients : phase I ZANTE trial

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (DTX) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) are effective in patients with hormone resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) with bone metastases. A phase I clinical trial of metronomic administration of Zoledronic Acid AN d TaxoterE combination (ZANTE trial) in 2 different sequences was conducted in HRPC. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose was not achieved with sequence A. Two patients at third level of sequence B developed dose limiting toxicity. A disease control was obtained in six out of nine patients treated with sequence A, where a decrease of biological markers and PSA were also observed. No evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed in patients treated with sequence B. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients enrolled into the study (median age: 73 years; range: 43-80) received one of three escalated doses of DTX (30, 40 and 50 mg/m(2)) in combination with a fixed dose of ZOL (2 mg), both administered every 14 days in two different sequences: DTX at the day 1 followed by ZOL at the day 2 (sequence A) or the reverse (sequence B). Patients were evaluated for adverse events and serum IL-8, MMP-2 and MMP-9 were evaluated prior and after therapy with the two sequences of administration of DTX and ZOL. CONCLUSIONS: The bi-weekly combination of DTX (50 mg/m(2)) followed by ZOL was feasible and show promising anti-tumor activity

    The role of diabetes in metastatic melanoma patients treated with nivolumab plus relatlimab.

    No full text
    The combination of nivolumab + relatlimab is superior to nivolumab alone in the treatment of naive patients and has activity in PD-1 refractory melanoma. We had previously observed a reduced expression of LAG3 in melanoma tissue from patients with type 2 diabetes. To evaluate the impact of diabetes on oncological outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab plus the LAG3 inhibitor relatlimab we performed a retrospective multicenter study. Overall, 129 patients were included: 88 without diabetes before the treatment, 37 who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes before the start of treatment, and 4 without diabetes before treatment who developed immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes (ICI-DM). PFS was 21.71 months (95% CI: 15.61-27.81) in patients without diabetes, 10.23 months (95% CI: 5.81-14.66) in patients with type 2 diabetes, and 50.85 months (95% CI: 23.04-78.65) in patients who developed ICI-DM. OS was 37.94 months (95% CI: 31.02-44.85) in patients without diabetes, 22.12 months (95% CI: 14.41-29.85) in those with type 2 diabetes and 57.64 months (95% CI: 42.29-72.99) in those who developed ICI-DM. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of diabetes and LDH was correlated with OS and PFS. The mean OS was 64.63 months in subjects with low levels of glucose (< 137 mg/dl) and 36.27 months in those with high levels (hazard ratio 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04-0.58; p = 0.005). The patients whose glucose blood level increased after 3 months of treatment with nivolumab + relatinib compared to baseline (ratio of blood level at baseline/after 3 months > 1.5) had a worse prognosis than those whose glucose level had not increased. This result was observed also in subgroups treated either in first line or further lines. Patients who developed ICI-DM during the study period had better outcomes than the overall population and patients without diabetes. LAG3 inhibition for treating metastatic or unresectable melanoma has a reduced efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, possibly due to a low expression of LAG3 in tumor tissue. Higher level evidence should be obtained
    corecore