Thromboxane Antagonism with terutroban in Peripheral Arterial Disease: the TAIPAD study

BACKGROUND: Terutroban is a selective prostaglandin endoperoxide (TP) receptor antagonist with antithrombotic, antivasoconstrictive and antiatherosclerotic properties and is currently in development for long-term cardiovascular secondary prevention. OBJECTIVES: TAIPAD is an international, double-blind, randomized controlled study comparing the effects of five dosages of oral terutroban vs. aspirin and placebo on platelet aggregation in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: After 10 day's placebo run-in, included patients (n = 435; ankle-brachial pressure index, 0.7 ± 0.1) were randomly allocated to aspirin 75 mg day(-1), terutroban 1, 2.5, 5, 10 or 30 mg day(-1) or placebo. On day 5, the placebo group was reallocated to one of the terutroban groups for the rest of the study (day 83). Ex vivo platelet aggregation induced by the thromboxane analog U46619 (7 μm) was measured 24 h after dosing, as well as platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid (AA), collagen and ADP. RESULTS: Terutroban dose-dependently inhibited U46619-induced platelet aggregation at days 5 and 83. At day 5, the inhibition was significant vs. placebo for all terutroban dosages (P < 0.001). Terutroban (5, 10 and 30 mg day(-1)) was at least as effective as aspirin in inhibiting platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid (AA), collagen and adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Terutroban was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: In PAD patients, terutroban dose-dependently inhibited platelet aggregation 24 h after dosing, and was at least as effective as aspirin at 5, 10 and 30 mg day(-1). Terutroban was well tolerated

Management strategies for a better outcome in unstable coronary artery disease

Item does not contain fulltex

Management strategies in unstable coronary artery disease: current problems and future perspectives.

Item does not contain fulltex

Risk profiles and antithrombotic treatment of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: perspectives from the international, observational, prospective GARFIELD registry

Contains fulltext : 119188.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke, from a worldwide perspective. The aim of this study was to describe the baseline characteristics and initial therapeutic management of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation across the spectrum of sites at which these patients are treated. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD) is an observational study of patients newly diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Enrollment into Cohort 1 (of 5) took place between December 2009 and October 2011 at 540 sites in 19 countries in Europe, Asia-Pacific, Central/South America, and Canada. Investigator sites are representative of the distribution of atrial fibrillation care settings in each country. Cohort 1 comprised 10,614 adults (>/=18 years) diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation within the previous 6 weeks, with >/=1 investigator-defined stroke risk factor (not limited to those in existing risk-stratification schemes), and regardless of therapy. Data collected at baseline included demographics, medical history, care setting, nature of atrial fibrillation, and treatments initiated at diagnosis. The mean (SD) age of the population was 70.2 (11.2) years; 43.2% were women. Mean+/-SD CHADS2 score was 1.9+/-1.2, and 57.2% had a score >/=2. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.2+/-1.6, and 8,957 (84.4%) had a score >/=2. Overall, 38.0% of patients with a CHADS2 score >/=2 did not receive anticoagulant therapy, whereas 42.5% of those at low risk (score 0) received anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These contemporary observational worldwide data on non-valvular atrial fibrillation, collected at the end of the vitamin K antagonist-only era, indicate that these drugs are frequently not being used according to stroke risk scores and guidelines, with overuse in patients at low risk and underuse in those at high risk of stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov TRI08888