5 research outputs found

    Dependence of the Star Formation Efficiency on the Parameters of Molecular Cloud Formation Simulations

    Full text link
    We investigate the response of the star formation efficiency (SFE) to the main parameters of simulations of molecular cloud formation by the collision of warm diffuse medium (WNM) cylindrical streams, neglecting stellar feedback and magnetic fields. The parameters we vary are the Mach number of the inflow velocity of the streams, Msinf, the rms Mach number of the initial background turbulence in the WNM, and the total mass contained in the colliding gas streams, Minf. Because the SFE is a function of time, we define two estimators for it, the "absolute" SFE, measured at t = 25 Myr into the simulation's evolution (sfeabs), and the "relative" SFE, measured 5 Myr after the onset of star formation in each simulation (sferel). The latter is close to the "star formation rate per free-fall time" for gas at n = 100 cm^-3. We find that both estimators decrease with increasing Minf, although by no more than a factor of 2 as Msinf increases from 1.25 to 3.5. Increasing levels of background turbulence similarly reduce the SFE, because the turbulence disrupts the coherence of the colliding streams, fragmenting the cloud, and producing small-scale clumps scattered through the numerical box, which have low SFEs. Finally, the SFE is very sensitive to the mass of the inflows, with sferel decreasing from ~0.4 to ~0.04 as the the virial parameter in the colliding streams increases from ~0.15 to ~1.5. This trend is in partial agreement with the prediction by Krumholz & McKee (2005), since the latter lies within the same range as the observed efficiencies, but with a significantly shallower slope. We conclude that the observed variability of the SFE is a highly sensitive function of the parameters of the cloud formation process, and may be the cause of significant scatter in observational determinations.Comment: 19 pages, submitted to MNRA

    High- and Low-Mass Star Forming Regions from Hierarchical Gravitational Fragmentation. High local Star Formation Rates with Low Global Efficiencies

    Full text link
    We investigate the properties of "star forming regions" in a previously published numerical simulation of molecular cloud formation out of compressive motions in the warm neutral atomic interstellar medium, neglecting magnetic fields and stellar feedback. In this simulation, the velocity dispersions at all scales are caused primarily by infall motions rather than by random turbulence. We study the properties (density, total gas+stars mass, stellar mass, velocity dispersion, and star formation rate) of the cloud hosting the first local, isolated "star formation" event in the simulation and compare them with those of the cloud formed by a later central, global collapse event. We suggest that the small-scale, isolated collapse may be representative of low- to intermediate-mass star-forming regions, while the large-scale, massive one may be representative of massive star forming regions. We also find that the statistical distributions of physical properties of the dense cores in the region of massive collapse compare very well with those from a recent survey of the massive star forming region in the Cygnus X molecular cloud. The star formation efficiency per free-fall time (SFE_ff) of the high-mass SF clump is low, ~0.04. This occurs because the clump is accreting mass at a high rate, not because its specific SFR (SSFR) is low. This implies that a low value of the SFE_ff does not necessarily imply a low SSFR, but may rather indicate a large gas accretion rate. We suggest that a globally low SSFR at the GMC level can be attained even if local star forming sites have much larger values of the SSFR if star formation is a spatially intermittent process, so that most of the mass in a GMC is not participating of the SF process at any given time.Comment: Accepted by ApJ. Revised version, according to exchanges with referee. Original results unchanged. Extensive new discussion on the low global efficiency vs. high local efficiency of star formation. Abstract abridge
    corecore