8 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Judging the difference between attractiveness and health: does exposure to model images influence the judgments made by men and women?
Recent research has shown facial adiposity (apparent weight in the face) to be a significant predictor of both attractiveness and health, thus making it an important determinant of mate selection. Studies looking at the relationship between attractiveness and health have shown that individuals differentiate between the two by preferring a lower weight for attractiveness than for health in female faces. However, these studies have either been correlational studies, or have investigated weight perceived from only the face. These differences have been discussed with regard to sociocultural factors such as pressure from parents, peers and also media, which has been seen to have the highest influence. While exposure to media images has been shown to influence women’s own body image, no study has yet directly tested the influence of these factors on people’s preferred weight in other women’s bodies. Here we examine how a short exposure to images of models influences men’s and women’s judgments of the most healthy looking and attractive BMI in Malaysian Chinese women’s bodies by comparing differences in preferences (for attractiveness and health) between groups exposed to images of models of varying attractiveness and body weight. Results indicated that participants preferred a lower weight for attractiveness than for health. Further, women’s but not men’s preferred BMI for attractiveness, but not health, was influenced by the type of media images to which they were exposed, suggesting that short term exposure to model images affect women’s perceptions of attractiveness but not health
Mean chosen BMI for attractiveness (blue, solid line) and health (red, dashed line) made by men.
<p>Error bars show standard error of the mean. Asterisks indicate the significant difference between preferred BMI for attractiveness and health (* p<.05; ** p<.001).</p
Correlation between women’s own BMI and preferred BMI for attractiveness.
<p>Correlation between women’s own BMI and preferred BMI for attractiveness.</p
Composite image produced by averaging images of three individuals.
<p>Composite image produced by averaging images of three individuals.</p
Tackling Bisexual Erasure: An Explorative Comparison of Bisexual, Gay and Straight Cisgender Men’s Body Image
Previous body image research often grouped both gay and bisexual men into a single category: sexual minoritised men, limiting our understanding of how sexual identity influences body image. However, there is strong reason to believe that bisexual and gay men experience distinct body image concerns. Here, we explored motivations to alter one’s leanness and muscularity, as well as (dis)satisfaction with overall body image, body fat, muscularity, height and penis size, and appreciation for the functionality of one’s body across gay, bisexual, and straight cisgender men. We sampled 378 white participants aged 18 to 85 (ngay = 128, nbisexual = 125, nstraight = 125). We found that gay men were significantly more motivated to be lean and showed greater overall body and muscularity dissatisfaction relative to bisexual and straight men. We found no differences across other measures. Our findings demonstrate that despite research perceiving the body image of bisexual and gay men as homogenous, they experience differences in their body image concerns concerning leanness and muscularity and overall body dissatisfaction. Future research should incorporate this understanding
Changing hands: persistent alterations to body image following brief exposure to multisensory distortions
The dynamic flexibility of body representation has been highlighted through numerous lines of research that range from clinical studies reporting disorders of body ownership, to experimentally induced somatic illusions that have provided evidence for the embodiment of manipulated representations and even fake limbs. While most studies have reported that enlargement of body parts alters somatic perception, and that these can be more readily embodied, shrunken body parts have not been found to consistently alter somatic experiences, perhaps due to reduced feelings of ownership over smaller body parts. Over two experiments, we aimed to investigate the mechanisms responsible for altered somatic representations following exposure to both enlarged and shrunken body parts. Participants were given the impression that their hand and index finger were either longer or shorter than veridical length and asked to judge veridical finger length using online and offline size estimation tasks, as well as to report the degree of ownership towards the distorted finger and hand representations. Ownership was claimed over all distorted representations of the hand and finger and no differences were seen across ownership ratings, while the online and offline measurements of perceived size demonstrated differing response patterns. These findings suggest that ownership towards manipulated body representations is more bidirectional than previously thought and also suggest differences in perceived body representation with respect to the method of measurement suggesting that online and offline tasks may tap into different aspects of body representation
Multisensory distortions of the hand have differential effects on tactile perception
Research has suggested that altering the perceived
shape and size of the body image significantly
affects perception of somatic events. The current study
investigated how multisensory illusions applied to the body
altered tactile perception using the somatic signal detection
task. Thirty-one healthy volunteers were asked to report the
presence or absence of near-threshold tactile stimuli delivered
to the index finger under three multisensory illusion
conditions: stretched finger, shrunken finger and detached
finger, as well as a veridical baseline condition. Both
stretching and shrinking the stimulated finger enhanced
correct touch detections; however, the mechanisms underlying
this increase were found to be different. In contrast,
the detached appearance reduced false touch reports—possibly
due to reduced tactile noise, as a result of attention
being directed to the tip of the finger only. These findings
suggest that distorted representations of the body could
have different modulatory effects on attention to touch and
provide a link between perceived body representation and
somatosensory decision-making