79 research outputs found

    Oligosaccharin - A new systemic factor in the acquisition of freeze tolerance in winter plants

    Get PDF
    The acquisition of freeze tolerance in winter plants involves, among other cellular responses, activated catabolism of cell wall polysaccharides, thereby liberating oligosaccharides. One of these was identified as an oligosaccharin (physiologically active fragment) that most likely originates from hemicelluloses. Treatment of winter wheat seedlings with the oligosaccharin at 2°C increased their freeze tolerance by ∼30%. Results obtained to date suggest that the oligosaccharin acts as an endogenous and systemic signaling molecule during cold adaptation. © 2005 Società Botanica Italiana

    The effect of local immunity on gastric cancer prognosis

    Get PDF
    Aim. To study the state of local immunity in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Materials and methods. From 2017 to 2018, 45 previously untreated patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (25 with stage IIII, 20 with stage IV) received surgical/combined treatment or chemotherapy, respectively, at the Blokhin Scientific Research Center of Oncology. Tumor tissue was taken before treatment. By using flow cytometry there were evaluated the percentage of tumor tissue infiltration by lymphocytes (CD45+CD14-TIL); T cells (CD3+CD19-TIL); B cells (CD3-CD19+TIL); NK cell (CD3-CD16+CD56+TIL); effector cells CD16 (CD16+Perforin+TIL) and CD8 (CD8+Perforin+TIL) with their cytotoxic potential active CD16TIL and active CD8TIL; subpopulations of regulatory T cells NKT cells (CD3+CD16+CD56+TIL), regulatory cells CD4 (CD4+CD25+CD127-TIL) and CD8 (CD8+CD11b-CD28-TIL). The prognostic value of immune cells for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed. Results. A favorable prognosis factor for progression-free survival in patients with local and locally advanced forms of gastric cancer was an increase in the number of CD3-CD19+TIL (HR 0.862, 95% CI 0.7820.957, p=0.005), and an unfavorable prognosis was an increase in NK cells (CD3-CD16+CD56+TIL); HR 1.382, 95% CI 1.0871.758, p=0.008. The negative effect of the relative content of NK cells (CD3-CD16+CD56+TIL) and NKT cells (CD3+CD16+CD56+TIL) on OS of patients with metastatic gastric cancer noted (HR 1.249, 95% CI 0.9971.564, p=0.053; HR 1.127, 95% CI 1.0251.239, p=0.013). At the same time, an increase in the percentage of tumor tissue infiltration by lymphocytes (CD45+CD14-TIL) and an increase in the age of patients (HR 1.005, 95% CI 1.0021.008, p=0.003; HR 1.098, 95% CI 1.0311.170, p=0.004) reduce the incidence of PFS in patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma. Conclusion. Indices of local immunity can serve as additional prognostic factors for gastric carcinoma

    МСдико-ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ расчСт экономичСского Π±Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ аксиального спондилоартрита Π² Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ

    Get PDF
    Objective: to assess the economic burden of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiological axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) in the Russian Federation, as well as the availability and economic prospects for more complete provision of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) to patients with AS and nr-axSpA.Patients and methods. The prevalence of AS and nr-axSpA and organizational aspects of providing with bDMARDs to this category of patients were analyzed.A variant model has been developed in Microsoft Excel, allows to calculate the indicators of the economic burden of AS and nr-axSpA in the Russian Federation, taking into account the economic losses associated with disability, as well as the low availability of bDMARDs. During study preparation, data from real clinical practice and the opinions of experts in the field of AS from various regions of the Russian Federation were studied.The economic burden was calculated as the sum of direct and indirect costs per patient and the population. Additionally, the specific economic burden per capita was determined.Results and discussion. According to expert estimates, the prevalence of AS and nr-axSpA today is 105.0 and 33.2 thousand people, respectively.The current economic burden of the AS for 2019 is estimated at 21.9 billion rubles per population, or 395.5 thousand rubles for 1 patient. The ratio of direct and indirect costs was 1:4, i.e. 4.7 billion rubles – direct costs (84.3 thousand rubles per 1 patient) and 17.2 billion rubles – indirect costs (311.2 thousand rubles per 1 patient). The burden per capita – 149 rubles.Nr-axSpA's current economic burden in 2019 reached 3.0 billion rubles, or 182.9 thousand rubles for 1 patient. The ratio of direct and indirect costs is estimated as 2:5, or 0.9 billion rubles – direct costs (53.0 thousand rubles per 1 patient) and 2.2 billion rubles – indirect costs (130.0 thousand rubles per 1 patient). The burden per capita – 21 rubles.Conclusion. The economic burden of AS and nr-axSpA can be reduced by providing patients with bDMARDs in the required amount: 15% of patients with AS and 10% with nr-axSpA. Due to the imperfection of the regulatory framework, patients with nr-axSpA experience serious difficulties in receiving this therapy within the framework of preferential drug coverage and compulsory health insurance. With the provision of bDMARDs for about 15 and 10% of patients with AS and nr-axSpA, respectively, on the horizon of 5 years, a decrease in disability by 75% and temporary disability by 60% is expected. At the same time, the economic burden for 5 years will decrease by about 40% for each nosology.ЦСль исслСдования – ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° экономичСского Π±Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ спондилита (АБ) ΠΈ нСрСнтгСнологичСского аксиального спондилоартрита (Π½Ρ€-аксБпА) Π² Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ доступности ΠΈ экономичСских пСрспСктив Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ обСспСчСния Π³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ биологичСскими ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ (Π“Π˜Π‘ΠŸ) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… АБ ΠΈ Π½Ρ€-аксБпА.ΠŸΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‹ Ρ€Π°ΡΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ АБ ΠΈ Π½Ρ€-аксБпА ΠΈ ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ аспСкты обСспСчСния Π“Π˜Π‘ΠŸ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ….Π Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π°Π½Π° вариативная модСль Π² Microsoft Excel, которая позволяСт Ρ€Π°ΡΡΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ экономичСского Π±Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ АБ ΠΈ Π½Ρ€-аксБпА Π² Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ с ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡŒ, связанных с ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠΉ трудоспособности ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡƒΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ Π“Π˜Π‘ΠŸ.ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ΅ исслСдования Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ клиничСской ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ мнСния экспСртов Π² области аксиального спондилоартрита ΠΈΠ· Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΡΡƒΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ² Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ.ЭкономичСскоС брСмя Ρ€Π°ΡΡΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹Π²Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ сумма прямых ΠΈ косвСнных Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π° 1 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»ΡΡ†ΠΈΡŽ Π² Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ. Π”ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΡƒΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ экономичСскоС брСмя Π½Π° Π΄ΡƒΡˆΡƒ насСлСния.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ ΠΈ обсуТдСниС. По экспСртной ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅, Ρ€Π°ΡΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ АБ ΠΈ Π½Ρ€-аксБпА Π½Π° сСгодня составляСт 105,0 ΠΈ 33,2 тыс. Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ соотвСтствСнно. ΠΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ экономичСскоС брСмя АБ Π·Π° 2019 Π³. ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π² 21,9 ΠΌΠ»Ρ€Π΄ Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»ΡΡ†ΠΈΡŽ, ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π² 395,5 тыс. Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° 1 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°. Π‘ΠΎΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ прямых ΠΈ косвСнных Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ составляло 1:4, Ρ‚. Π΅. 4,7 ΠΌΠ»Ρ€Π΄ Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. – прямыС Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ (84,3 тыс. Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° 1 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°) ΠΈ 17,2 ΠΌΠ»Ρ€Π΄ Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. – косвСнныС Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ (311,2 тыс. Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° 1 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°). БрСмя Π½Π° Π΄ΡƒΡˆΡƒ насСлСния – 149 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±.ΠΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ экономичСскоС брСмя Π½Ρ€-аксБпА Π·Π° 2019 Π³. достигало 3,0 ΠΌΠ»Ρ€Π΄ Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡƒΠ»ΡΡ†ΠΈΡŽ, ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 182,9 тыс. Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° 1 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°. Π‘ΠΎΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ прямых ΠΈ косвСнных Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ расцСнСно ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ 2:5, ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 0,9 ΠΌΠ»Ρ€Π΄ Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. – прямыС Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ (53,0 тыс. Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° 1 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°) ΠΈ 2,2 ΠΌΠ»Ρ€Π΄ Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. – косвСнныС Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ (130,0 тыс. Ρ€ΡƒΠ±. Π½Π° 1 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°). БрСмя Π½Π° Π΄ΡƒΡˆΡƒ насСлСния – 21 Ρ€ΡƒΠ±.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ЭкономичСскоС брСмя АБ ΠΈ Π½Ρ€-аксБпА ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ сниТСно Π·Π° счСт обСспСчСния ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Π“Π˜Π‘ΠŸ Π² Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΌ объСмС: 15% ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ АБ ΠΈ 10% ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π½Ρ€-аксБпА. Из-Π·Π° Π½Π΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚Π²Π° Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π±Π°Π·Ρ‹ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ с Π½Ρ€-аксБпА ΠΈΡΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ ΡΠ΅Ρ€ΡŒΠ΅Π·Π½Ρ‹Π΅ трудности ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ… Π»ΡŒΠ³ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ лСкарствСнного обСспСчСния ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ мСдицинского страхования. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ обСспСчСнии Π“Π˜Π‘ΠŸ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 15 ΠΈ 10% Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… АБ ΠΈ Π½Ρ€-аксБпА соотвСтствСнно Π½Π° Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Π΅ 5 Π»Π΅Ρ‚ оТидаСтся сниТСниС ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° 75% ΠΈ Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ трудоспособности Π½Π° 60%. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ этом экономичСскоС брСмя Π·Π° 5 Π»Π΅Ρ‚ ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠΈΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° 40% для ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ

    МСдико-экономичСский Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· влияния ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, ассоциированной с рСвматичСскими заболСваниями, Π½Π° экономику страны с ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ пСнсионной Ρ€Π΅Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹

    Get PDF
    The paper presents the data of an original study evaluating the impact of disability associated with a number of rheumatic diseases (RDs) (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis) on the country's economy, as well as their related losses of the state under the conditions of implementation of the upcoming pension reform (PR). The authors consider the socioeconomic importance of disability associated with RDs in the current period and after PR implementation in 2019–2028, determine the degree of its influence on the country's gross domestic product, and also calculate the economic efficiency of return of the potentially able-bodied proportion of disabled people (able-bodied population) to socioeconomic activity.The opinions of experts and leading experts in this area from different subjects of the Russian Federation were taken into account when preparing the study.Π’ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ прСдставлСны Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ исслСдования, посвящСнного ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ влияния ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, ассоциированной с рядом рСвматичСских Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ – Π Π— (Ρ€Π΅Π²ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚, Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΉ спондилит ΠΈ псориатичСский Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚), Π½Π° экономику страны, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ связанных с Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΡŒ государства Π² условиях Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ прСдстоящСй пСнсионной Ρ€Π΅Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ (ПР). РассмотрСно ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-экономичСскоС Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, ассоциированной с Π Π—, Π² Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΈ послС провСдСния ПР 2019–2028 Π³Π³., ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡŒ Π΅Π΅ влияния Π½Π° Π²Π°Π»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π½ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠΊΡ‚ страны, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ рассчитана экономичСская ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ трудоспособной части ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² (Π»ΠΈΡ†, находящихся Π² трудоспособном возрастС) ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-экономичСской активности. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ΅ исслСдования Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ΡƒΡ‡Ρ‚Π΅Π½Ρ‹ мнСния экспСртов ΠΈ Π²Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΡ… спСциалистов Π² Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ области ΠΈΠ· Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΡΡƒΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ² Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ

    Π Π•Π¦Π•ΠŸΠ’ΠžΠ  Π”ΠžΠ€ΠΠœΠ˜ΠΠ D2 (DRD2) Π›Π˜ΠœΠ€ΠžΠ¦Π˜Π’ΠžΠ’ ΠŸΠ•Π Π˜Π€Π•Π Π˜Π§Π•Π‘ΠšΠžΠ™ ΠšΠ ΠžΠ’Π˜ КАК Π‘Π˜ΠžΠœΠΠ ΠšΠ•Π  ΠŸΠ ΠžΠ“ΠΠžΠ—Π АНВИПБИΠ₯ΠžΠ’Π˜Π§Π•Π‘ΠšΠžΠ™ Π’Π•Π ΠΠŸΠ˜Π˜

    Get PDF
    Introduction. Despite the evolution of antipsychotic drugs, the problem of the therapy effectiveness and safety of schizophrenia spectrum disorders and comorbid conditions is very acute. The dopamine receptor D2 gene (DRD2) is one of the keyΒ targets of modern pharmacogenetic studies of mental disorders.The objective of the study was to analyze the DRD2 mRNA level in peripheral blood lymphocytes and to identify geneticΒ variations of –141Π‘ Ins/Del as potential biomarkers for antipsychotic therapy prognosis.Methods and materials. The study included 112 patients with mental disorders: 61 – with a diagnosis of schizophreniaΒ spectrum disorder, 51 – with a comorbid disease course with alcohol dependence syndrome, and 112 people as a controlΒ group. Psychometric evaluation was carried out using PANSS scale. The material was peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs).Β The DRD2 mRNA level was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction with TaqMan probe. Genotyping –141Π‘Β Ins/Del was performed by the restriction fragment length polymorphism assay.Results. –141C Ins/Del DRD2 genetic variations are not associated with a risk of mental disorder development, andΒ they did not affect the DRD2 mRNA level in PBLs. There were no significant differences in the gene expression of DRD2 inΒ the control group and patients (p=0.194). Despite the improvement of the mental state in all patients included in the study,Β the studied DRD2 parameters did not affect either the mental disorder symptoms or the normalization of the patient statusΒ against the background of antipsychotic therapy. Ins/Ins genetic variation of –141C Ins/Del was significantly associatedΒ with an increase weight gain of more than 7 % on the 28th day of antipsychotic therapy.Conclusion. Ins/Ins genetic variation of –141C Ins/Del can be considered as a biomarker for the prognosis of antipsychotic-induced weight gain.Β Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. НСсмотря Π½Π° ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŽΡ†ΠΈΡŽ антипсихотичСских ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° эффСктивности ΠΈ бСзопасности Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ расстройств ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ спСктра ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ€Π±ΠΈΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Ρ… с Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ состояний стоит ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π½ΡŒ остро. Π“Π΅Π½ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π°Β Π΄ΠΎΡ„Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° Π”2 (DRD2) – ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ² соврСмСнных фармакогСнСтичСских исслСдований Π² психиатрии.ЦСль исслСдования – ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° антипсихотичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° основС молСкулярно-гСнСтичСских характСристик Π³Π΅Π½Π° DRD2 Π² Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ… пСрифСричСской ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ (уровня мРНК ΠΈ гСнСтичСских вариантов –141Π‘ Ins/Del).ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ 112 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с психичСскими патологиями: 61 – с диагнозом «Расстройство ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ спСктра», 51 – с ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ€Π±ΠΈΠ΄Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ расстройства ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ спСктра ΠΈ синдрома алкогольной зависимости ΠΈ 112 Π»ΠΈΡ† ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹. ΠŸΡΠΈΡ…ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΡƒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ на основании ΡˆΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ‹ PANSS. ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΌ слуТили Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹ пСрифСричСской ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ (Π›ΠŸΠš). Π£Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡŒ мРНК Π³Π΅Π½Π°Β DRD2 опрСдСляли ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ПЦР Π² Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ с использованиСм Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΄Π° TaqMan. Π“Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ –141Π‘ Ins/Del – ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ рСстрикционных Ρ„Ρ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ².Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ГСнСтичСскиС Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ –141Π‘ Ins/Del DRD2 Π½Π΅ ассоциированы с риском развития психичСских патологий ΠΈ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΌ мРНК Π³Π΅Π½Π° DRD2 Π² Π›ΠŸΠš. ЭкспрСссия Π³Π΅Π½Π° DRD2 Ρƒ Π»ΠΈΡ† ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ…ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°Π»Π°ΡΡŒ (Ρ€=0,194). НСсмотря Π½Π° ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ психичСского состояния Ρƒ всСх ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π² исслСдованиС, ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π°Π΅ΠΌΡ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ DRD2 Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°Π»ΠΈ влияния Π½ΠΈ Π½Π° симптоматику психичСских патологий, Π½ΠΈ Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ статуса ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Ρ„ΠΎΠ½Π΅ антипсихотичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ. ГСнСтичСский Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚Β Ins/Ins –141Π‘ Ins/Del статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ассоциировался с ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ массы Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 7 % Π½Π° 28-ΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½ΡŒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ антипсихотиками.Π’Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. ГСнСтичСский Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ Ins/Ins –141Π‘ Ins/Del ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ рассмотрСн Π² качСствС Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Π° прогноза антипсихотик-ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡ€Π° массы Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π°.

    ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Ρ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ кураксина CBL0137 Π½Π° модСлях острых Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ² in vitro

    Get PDF
    Background. Curaxin CBL0137 is a novel non-genotoxic compound with anti-cancer activity based on CBL0137 ability of non-covalent interaction with DNA causing histone chaperone FACT relocation. Anti-cancer activity of this drug was demonstrated previously on the wide panel of solid cancer models in vitro and in vivo.Objectives. Estimation of anticancer effects of CBL0137 on the acute myeloblastic leukemia cells (THP-1) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (CCRF-CEM).Materials and methods. CBL0137 cytotoxicity was analyzed using the MTT test, the effects on the cell cycle and the induction of apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry, the activity of signaling pathways in cells treated with CBL0137 was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction.Results. Cell treatment with CBL0137 led to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction. In the study of CBL0137 effect on target gene clusters of 10 signal transduction pathways involved in the pathogenesis of acute leukemia we have showed that CBL0137 inhibited the expression of down-stream genes of WNT and Hedgehog signaling in both cell lines. In THP-1 cells we also observed the inhibition of the expression of PPARΞ³ target and hypoxia-activated genes. In CCRF-CEM cells CBL0137 also induced the expression of Notch signaling target genes.Conclusion. The antitumor activity of CBL0137 was demonstrated on acute leukemia cell cultures, the drug possesses cytotoxicity, causes cell cycle arrest and activation of apoptosis. Significant changes in the expression of efferent gene clusters of several signaling pathways were observed in the cells treated with CBL0137.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠšΡƒΡ€Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ CBL0137 – Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ нСгСнотоксичноС соСдинСниС, ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ, Π² основС ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΉ Π»Π΅ΠΆΠΈΡ‚ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ с Π”ΠΠš, вызывая Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ гистонового ΡˆΠ°ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π° FACT Π² Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡƒΡŽ Ρ„Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡŽ. Π Π°Π½Π΅Π΅ противоопухолСвая Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ этого Π°Π³Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π° Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° продСмонстрирована ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ спСктра солидных ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ in vitro ΠΈ in vivo.ЦСль исслСдования – ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ активности CBL0137 Π² ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ острого миСлобластного Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·Π° (THP-1) ΠΈ острого лимфобластного Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·Π° (CCRF-CEM) in vitro.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Для опрСдСлСния цитотоксичности CBL0137 использовали МВВ-тСст, влияниС Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Ρ†ΠΈΠΊΠ» ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡƒΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡŽ Π°ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ с ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ„Π»ΡƒΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ, Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ функционирования ΡΠΈΠ³Π½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ дСйствии Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ CBL0137 опрСдСляли с ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π² Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ΠžΠ±Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ CBL0137 ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ арСсту ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ†ΠΈΠΊΠ»Π° ΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π°ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠ·Π°. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ исслСдовании влияния CBL0137 Π½Π° кластСры Ρ‚Π°Ρ€Π³Π΅Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² 10 ΡΠΈΠ³Π½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ, Π²ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π² ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π· острых Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ², Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π΅ дСйствиС Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ выявлСно для ΡΠΈΠ³Π½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ WNT ΠΈ Hedgehog Π² ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… линиях. Π’ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ THP-1 Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ наблюдалось ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ эффСрСнтных Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² PPARΞ³ ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ², Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ…ΡΡ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ гипоксии. Π’ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… CCRF-CEM ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ дСйствии CBL0137, ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, наблюдалось усилСниС экспрСссии всСх исслСдованных Ρ‚Π°Ρ€Π³Π΅Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² сигнального ΠΏΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ Notch.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. На ΠΊΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π°Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ острых Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ² продСмонстрирована противоопухолСвая Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ CBL0137, ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ Ρ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ, Π²Ρ‹Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°Π΅Ρ‚ арСст ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ†ΠΈΠΊΠ»Π° ΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ Π°ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠ·Π°. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ дСйствии CBL0137 Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ измСнСния Π² экспрСссии кластСров эффСрСнтных Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² сразу Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΈΡ… ΡΠΈΠ³Π½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ

    GO-PROMTO Illuminates Protein Membrane Topologies of Glycan Biosynthetic Enzymes in the Golgi Apparatus of Living Tissues

    Get PDF
    The Golgi apparatus is the main site of glycan biosynthesis in eukaryotes. Better understanding of the membrane topology of the proteins and enzymes involved can impart new mechanistic insights into these processes. Publically available bioinformatic tools provide highly variable predictions of membrane topologies for given proteins. Therefore we devised a non-invasive experimental method by which the membrane topologies of Golgi-resident proteins can be determined in the Golgi apparatus in living tissues. A Golgi marker was used to construct a series of reporters based on the principle of bimolecular fluorescence complementation. The reporters and proteins of interest were recombinantly fused to split halves of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and transiently co-expressed with the reporters in the Nicotiana benthamiana leaf tissue. Output signals were binary, showing either the presence or absence of fluorescence with signal morphologies characteristic of the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The method allows prompt and robust determinations of membrane topologies of Golgi-resident proteins and is termed GO-PROMTO (for GOlgi PROtein Membrane TOpology). We applied GO-PROMTO to examine the topologies of proteins involved in the biosynthesis of plant cell wall polysaccharides including xyloglucan and arabinan. The results suggest the existence of novel biosynthetic mechanisms involving transports of intermediates across Golgi membranes

    ЭкспрСссия Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° Π΄ΠΎΡ„Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° DRD1 (мРНК, Π±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΊ) Π² Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ… пСрифСричСской ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· антипсихотичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ

    Get PDF
    Introduction. There is a problem in predicting the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic therapy. Dopamine receptor D1 is one of the targets of antipsychotics. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) are the research object of neurotransmission receptors.The objective was to study DRD1 gene expression (mRNA, protein level) in PBL as a possible biomarker of olanzapine and haloperidol therapy prognosis.Methods and Materials. Sample: 106 patients diagnosed with schizophrenic spectrum disorder. Study design: prospective longitudinal follow-up with drug administration by randomization. Assessment of mental status and development of Parkinsonism: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Simpson-Agnus Scale (SAS), respectively. PBL was study material. DRD1 mRNA level was determined by real-time PCR. DRD1 protein concentration in PBL was measured by enzyme immunoassay.Results. Haloperidol (but not olanzapine) treatment for 28 days, leads to DRD1 protein concentration decrease in PBL in a manner dependent on its initial level. DRD1 mRNA level in PBL remained unchanged during the treatment. Patients with effective therapy by olanzapine had lower DRD1 mRNA levels. Side effects of the therapy (Parkinsonism, weight gain) were not associated with studied DRD1 parameters.Conclusions. Haloperidol treatment leads to a decrease of DRD1 protein concentration in PBL, which depends on the initial protein level. Effective olanzapine therapy is associated with reduced DRD1 mRNA level in PBL before the treatment.Β Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. БущСствуСт ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° эффСктивности ΠΈ бСзопасности Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ антипсихотичСскими ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π° ΠΈΠ· мишСнСй ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Ρ… – Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ Π΄ΠΎΡ„Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° D1. Π›ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹ пСрифСричСской ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ (Π›ΠŸΠš) – ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ исслСдования Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² нСйротрансмиссии.ЦСль – ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ экспрСссии Π³Π΅Π½Π° DRD1 (мРНК, Π±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΊ) Π² Π›ΠŸΠš ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ»Π°Π½Π·Π°ΠΏΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π³Π°Π»ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌ.ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹. Π’Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€ΠΊΠ°: 106 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ «Расстройство ΡˆΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡ„Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ спСктра». Π”ΠΈΠ·Π°ΠΉΠ½ исслСдования: проспСктивноС Π»ΠΎΠ½Π³ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ наблюдСниС с Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ. ΠžΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° психичСского статуса ΠΈ развития паркинсонизма: ΡˆΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠŸΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π³Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… синдромов (PANSS) ΠΈ Бимпсона Агнуса (SAS). ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» исслСдования – Π›ΠŸΠš. Π£Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡŒ мРНК Π³Π΅Π½Π° DRD1 опрСдСляли ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π² Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ. ΠšΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° DRD1 Π² Π›ΠŸΠš измСряли ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ воздСйствии Π³Π°Π»ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π° (Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠ»Π°Π½Π·Π°ΠΏΠΈΠ½Π°) Π² Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 28 Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ концСнтрация Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° DRD1 Π² Π›ΠŸΠš сниТалась зависимо ΠΎΡ‚ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ уровня. Π£Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡŒ мРНК Π³Π΅Π½Π° DRD1 Π² Π›ΠŸΠš оставался Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ дСйствии ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². ΠŸΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ с эффСктивной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΠ»Π°Π½Π·Π°ΠΏΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ значСния уровня мРНК DRD1. ΠŸΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ эффСкты Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ (паркинсонизм, Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡ€ вСса) Π½Π΅ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ассоциированы с ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π°Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ΠΌΠΈ характСристиками DRD1.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ДСйствиС Π³Π°Π»ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ сниТСнию ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° DRD1 Π² Π›ΠŸΠš, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ зависит ΠΎΡ‚ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ уровня Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ°. ЭффСктивная тСрапия ΠΎΠ»Π°Π½Π·Π°ΠΏΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ассоциирована с ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΌ мРНК DRD1 Π² Π›ΠŸΠš Π΄ΠΎ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° лСчСния.

    Активация сигнального ΠΏΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π°-Π°Π»ΡŒΡ„Π° рСсвСратролом, гСнистСином ΠΈ ΠΊΠ²Π΅Ρ€Ρ†Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ

    Get PDF
    Resveratrol, genistein and quercetin from the group of polyphenols from secondary plant metabolites reveal cancer preventive and antivirus effects realized via their pleiotropic influence on the different macromolecules in cells. These compounds can interact with DNA without the formation of covalent bonds. This process is usually followed by changes in spatial, physical-chemical and structural DNA characteristics that can result in disfunction of DNA metabolism enzymes and chromatin destabilization. Similar effects were described for anticancer drug Curaxine CBL0137 in association with activation of interferon-Ξ± signaling. We demonstrated dose-dependent stimulating effects of resveratrol, genistein and quercetin on interferon-Ξ± signaling using HeLa cells expressed mCherry protein with interferon-stimulated response elements (ISRE) in promoter. Furthermore, it was shown by live-cell fluorescent microscopy in HT1080 cells with mCherry-labeled histone H1.5 that described polyphenols induced the redistribution of this linker histone in cell nuclei. The data obtained suggest an existence of DNA-dependent mechanism of anticancer effects of plant polyphenols and a need for further study of crosslinks between the polyphenols’ influence on chromatin structure and the changes in genome function, in particular, induction of interferon- interferon-Ξ± signaling.РСсвСратрол, ΠΊΠ²Π΅Ρ€Ρ†Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½ ΠΈ гСнистСин, относящиСся ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»Π°ΠΌ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ² растСний, ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΈ противовирусным эффСктами, Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΡ‹ΠΌΠΈ Π² Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅ ΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΈΜ†ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ дСйствия Π½Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡƒΠ»Ρ‹ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ. Π­Ρ‚ΠΈ соСдинСния ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΈΜ†ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ с Π”ΠΠš, Π½Π΅ образуя ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹Π΅ связи. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ этом ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΡΡ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ пространствСнных, Ρ„ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-химичСских ΠΈ структурных характСристик Π”ΠΠš, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΊ Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ функционирования Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π”ΠΠš ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚Π°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π°. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ эффСкты Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ описаны для Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠšΡƒΡ€Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° CBL0137, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΠΌ индуцированная Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ соСдинСниСм дСстабилизация Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΊ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ сигнального ΠΏΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π°-Ξ±. Π˜ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΡ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΡƒΡŽ линию HeLa с трансгСнным флуорСсцСнтным Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΌ mCherry, содСрТащим Π² ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΈΜ† области консСнсусный сайт связывания ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π°-Ξ± (ISRE), ΠΌΡ‹ продСмонстрировали дозозависимый ΡΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΈΜ† эффСкт рСсвСратрола, ΠΊΠ²Π΅Ρ€Ρ†Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ гСнистСина Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ сигнального ΠΏΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π°-Ξ±. ИспользованиС ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΈΜ† флуорСсцСнтной микроскопии Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΈΜ† Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ HT1080 c трансгСнным флуорСсцСнтно-ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ гистоном H1.5 ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»Ρ‹ Π²Ρ‹Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ пСрСраспрСдСлСниС Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ гистона Π² ядрах ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ. ΠŸΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ ΠΎ возмоТности сущСствования Π”ΠΠš-зависимого ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ дСйствия Ρ€Π°ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ нСобходимости Π΄Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π΅ΠΈΜ†ΡˆΠ΅Π³ΠΎ изучСния влияния ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° структуру Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ связанного с этим измСнСния функционирования Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°, Π² частности рСгуляции сигнального ΠΏΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π°-Ξ±
    • …
    corecore