Citizen science breathes new life into participatory agricultural research : A review

Participatory research can improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and scope of research processes, and foster social inclusion, empowerment and sustainability. Yet despite four decades of agricultural research institutions exploring and developing methods for participatory research, it has never become mainstream in the agricultural technology development cycle. Citizen science promises an innovative approach to participation in research, using the unique facilities of new digital technologies, but its potential in agricultural research participation has not been systematically probed. To this end, we conducted a critical literature review. We found that citizen science opens up four opportunities for creatively reshaping research: i) new possibilities for interdisciplinary collaboration, ii) rethinking configurations of socio-computational systems, iii) research on democratization of science more broadly, and iv) new accountabilities. Citizen science also brings a fresh perspective on the barriers to institutionalizing participation in the agricultural sciences. Specifically, we show how citizen science can reconfigure cost-motivation-accountability combinations using digital tools, open up a larger conceptual space of experimentation, and stimulate new collaborations. With appropriate and persistent institutional support and investment, citizen science can therefore have a lasting impact on how agricultural science engages with farming communities and wider society, and more fully realize the promises of participation

Characteristics of human monocytes cultured in the Teflon culture bag.

Blood monocytes from healthy volunteers were isolated by Ficoll-Isopaque centrifugation and cultured (together with lymphocytes) in medium 199 with 20% heat-inactivated newborn calf serum in a Teflon culture bag. Quantifiable data on survival showed that up to 21 days of culture, approximately 40% of the initial number of monocytes were still viable. Such cultures could be maintained for more than 8 weeks without refeeding. The monocytes exhibited the morphology of macrophages after 5-7 days of culture, and increased in size during culture. Less than 1% of the cells became giant cells even after long culture periods. Almost all cultured monocytes were positive for alpha-naphthyl butyrate esterase, whereas the peroxidase-positive granules disappeared during the first week of culture. After long culture times increasing amounts of lysozyme and angiotensin-converting enzyme were detected in the culture supernatants. Phagocytosis of staphylococci did not decrease appreciably during culture, and the same holds for intracellular killing of these bacteria. Chemotactic activity decreased during culture, whereas the chemokinetic response of the monocytes persisted

The Nexus between Artificial Intelligence and Economics

This book is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the notion of the Singularity, a stage in development in which technological progress and economic growth increase at a near-infinite rate. Section 3 describes what artificial intelligence is and how it has been applied. Section 4 considers artificial happiness and the likelihood that artificial intelligence might increase human happiness. Section 5 discusses some prominent related concepts and issues. Section 6 describes the use of artificial agents in economic modeling, and section 7 considers some ways in which economic analysis can offer some hints about what the advent of artificial intelligence might bring. Chapter 8 presents some thoughts about the current state of AI and its future prospects.