Vitamin D and the hepatitis B vaccine response: a prospective cohort study and a randomized, placebo-controlled oral vitamin D3 and simulated sunlight supplementation trial in healthy adults.

PURPOSE: To determine serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D relationship with hepatitis B vaccination (study 1). Then, to investigate the effects on hepatitis B vaccination of achieving vitamin D sufficiency (serum 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/L) by a unique comparison of simulated sunlight and oral vitamin D3 supplementation in wintertime (study 2). METHODS: Study 1 involved 447 adults. In study 2, 3 days after the initial hepatitis B vaccination, 119 men received either placebo, simulated sunlight (1.3 × standard-erythema dose, 3 × /week for 4 weeks and then 1 × /week for 8 weeks) or oral vitamin D3 (1000 IU/day for 4 weeks and 400 IU/day for 8 weeks). We measured hepatitis B vaccination efficacy as percentage of responders with anti-hepatitis B surface antigen immunoglobulin G ≥ 10 mIU/mL. RESULTS: In study 1, vaccine response was poorer in persons with low vitamin D status (25(OH)D ≤ 40 vs 41-71 nmol/L mean difference [95% confidence interval] - 15% [- 26, - 3%]; 1,25(OH)2D ≤ 120 vs ≥ 157 pmol/L - 12% [- 24%, - 1%]). Vaccine response was also poorer in winter than summer (- 18% [- 31%, - 3%]), when serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D were at seasonal nadirs, and 81% of persons had serum 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L. In study 2, vitamin D supplementation strategies were similarly effective in achieving vitamin D sufficiency from the winter vitamin D nadir in almost all (~ 95%); however, the supplementation beginning 3 days after the initial vaccination did not effect the vaccine response (vitamin D vs placebo 4% [- 21%, 14%]). CONCLUSION: Low vitamin D status at initial vaccination was associated with poorer hepatitis B vaccine response (study 1); however, vitamin D supplementation commencing 3 days after vaccination (study 2) did not influence the vaccination response. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: Study 1 NCT02416895; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02416895; Study 2 NCT03132103; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03132103

Mechanisms of CD8+ T cell failure in chronic hepatitis E virus infection

Background and aims In immunosuppressed patients, persistent hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is common and may lead to cirrhosis and liver failure. HEV clearance depends on an effective virus-specific CD8+ T cell response, however, the knowledge gap of HEV-specific CD8+ T cell epitopes hindered analysis of the mechanisms of T cell failure in persistent infection thus far. Methods We comprehensively studied HEV-specific CD8+ T cell responses in 46 patients with self-limiting (n=34) or chronic HEV infection (n=12), by epitope-specific expansion, functional testing, ex vivo peptide HLA class I tetramer multi-parametric staining, and viral sequence analysis. Results We identified 25 HEV-specific CD8+ T cell epitopes restricted by 9 different HLA class I alleles. In self-limiting HEV infection, HEV-specific CD8+ T cells were vigorous, contracted after resolution of infection, and formed functional memory responses. In contrast, in chronic infection, the HEV-specific CD8+ T cell response was diminished, declined over time, and displayed phenotypic features of exhaustion. However, improved proliferation and interferon-γ production of HEV-specific CD8+ T cells and evolution of a memory-like phenotype was observed upon reduction of immunosuppression and/or ribavirin treatment and was associated with viral clearance. In one patient, mutational viral escape in a targeted CD8+ T cell epitope contributed to CD8+ T cell failure. Conclusion Chronic HEV infection is associated with HEV-specific CD8+ T cell exhaustion, indicating that T cell exhaustion driven by persisting antigen recognition also occurs in severely immunosuppressed hosts. Functional reinvigoration of virus-specific T cells is at least partially possible when antigen is cleared. In a minority of patients, viral escape also contributes to HEV-specific CD8+ T cell failure and thus needs to be taken into account in personalized immunotherapeutic approaches. Lay Summary In immunosuppressed patients, chronic HEV infection is common. For resolution of infection a functional HEV-specific CD8+ T cell response is essential, however, in immunosuppressed individuals CD8+ T cell exhaustion and viral escape contribute to CD8+ T cell failure

Adverse effects of the antimalaria drug, mefloquine: due to primary liver damage with secondary thyroid involvement?

BACKGROUND: Mefloquine is a clinically important antimalaria drug, which is often not well tolerated. We critically reviewed 516 published case reports of mefloquine adverse effects, to clarify the phenomenology of the harms associated with mefloquine, and to make recommendations for safer prescribing. PRESENTATION: We postulate that many of the adverse effects of mefloquine are a post-hepatic syndrome caused by primary liver damage. In some users we believe that symptomatic thyroid disturbance occurs, either independently or as a secondary consequence of the hepatocellular injury. The mefloquine syndrome presents in a variety of ways including headache, gastrointestinal disturbances, nervousness, fatigue, disorders of sleep, mood, memory and concentration, and occasionally frank psychosis. Previous liver or thyroid disease, and concurrent insults to the liver (such as from alcohol, dehydration, an oral contraceptive pill, recreational drugs, and other liver-damaging drugs) may be related to the development of severe or prolonged adverse reactions to mefloquine. IMPLICATIONS: We believe that people with active liver or thyroid disease should not take mefloquine, whereas those with fully resolved neuropsychiatric illness may do so safely. Mefloquine users should avoid alcohol, recreational drugs, hormonal contraception and co-medications known to cause liver damage or thyroid damage. With these caveats, we believe that mefloquine may be safely prescribed in pregnancy, and also to occupational groups who carry out safety-critical tasks. TESTING: Mefloquine's adverse effects need to be investigated through a multicentre cohort study, with small controlled studies testing specific elements of the hypothesis