Possibilità di differenziazione degli elettrodi cocleari nelle misurazioni radiologiche della posizione intracocleare e dell'angolo cordo-facciale

Con l'incremento del numero di impianti cocleari effettuati, il controllo di qualità è divenuto sempre più importante. Oltre alle misurazioni biofisiche intraoperatorie ci si può avvalere dell'imaging radiologico. Una nuova tecnica utilizzata in questo campo è il Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Nel presente studio sono stati valutati 65 casi (35 Nucleus Contour AdvanceCochlear; 30 Flex SoftMedEl) studiati mediante CBCT (Accu-I-tomo F17, Morita, Kyoto, Japan). Nello specifico sono stati rilevati: l'angolo di inserzione, l'altezza dell'impianto, la distanza dell'elettrodo dalla parete mediale o laterale, l'angolo tra la corda del timpano e il nervo facciale e la posizione precisa del filo dell'elettrodo nell'angolo cordo-facciale. È stato inoltre possibile valutare la differenza tra il decorso peri-modiolare e laterale degli elettrodi. I dati presentati dimostrano l'accuratezza e il vantaggio della CBCT nella visualizzazione di piccole strutture grazie al ridotto numero di artefatti da indurimento del fascio. Inoltre nel 75% dei pazienti è stato possibile visualizzare l'angolo tra la corda del timpano e il nervo facciale. È stato possibile notare differenze significative fra i vari tipi di elettrodo in funzione del tipo di rapporto con il nervo facciale. In conclusione mediante la CBCT è possibile ottenere una visualizzazione precisa e dettagliate misurazioni della posizione intracocleare dei diversi elettrodi. È persino possibile la corretta valutazione della posizione dell'elettrodo rispetto all'angolo cordo- facciale. La CBCT è quindi, dal nostro punto di vista, un utile strumento per il controllo intra e post-operatorio degli impianti cocleari

COVID-19 and Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Case Series, Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). Results: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85% and the mortality at 52.18%, respectively. Conclusion: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future

Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgery in obese patients. High levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with lung recruitment maneuvers may improve intraoperative respiratory function, but they can also compromise hemodynamics, and the effects on PPCs are uncertain. We hypothesized that intraoperative mechanical ventilation using high PEEP with periodic recruitment maneuvers, as compared with low PEEP without recruitment maneuvers, prevents PPCs in obese patients. Methods/design The PRotective Ventilation with Higher versus Lower PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery in OBESE Patients (PROBESE) study is a multicenter, two-arm, international randomized controlled trial. In total, 2013 obese patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 scheduled for at least 2 h of surgery under general anesthesia and at intermediate to high risk for PPCs will be included. Patients are ventilated intraoperatively with a low tidal volume of 7 ml/kg (predicted body weight) and randomly assigned to PEEP of 12 cmH2O with lung recruitment maneuvers (high PEEP) or PEEP of 4 cmH2O without recruitment maneuvers (low PEEP). The occurrence of PPCs will be recorded as collapsed composite of single adverse pulmonary events and represents the primary endpoint. Discussion To our knowledge, the PROBESE trial is the first multicenter, international randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of two different levels of intraoperative PEEP during protective low tidal volume ventilation on PPCs in obese patients. The results of the PROBESE trial will support anesthesiologists in their decision to choose a certain PEEP level during general anesthesia for surgery in obese patients in an attempt to prevent PPCs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02148692. Registered on 23 May 2014; last updated 7 June 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Abstracts from the 8th International Conference on cGMP Generators, Effectors and Therapeutic Implications

This work was supported by a restricted research grant of Bayer AG