9 research outputs found

    A comparison of laboratory and in situ methods to determine soil thermal conductivity for energy foundations and other ground heat exchanger applications

    Get PDF
    Soil thermal conductivity is an important factor in the design of energy foundations and other ground heat exchanger systems. It can be determined by a field thermal response test, which is both costly and time consuming, but tests a large volume of soil. Alternatively, cheaper and quicker laboratory test methods may be applied to smaller soil samples. This paper investigates two different laboratory methods: the steady-state thermal cell and the transient needle probe. U100 soil samples were taken during the site investigation for a small diameter test pile, for which a thermal response test was later conducted. The thermal conductivities of the samples were measured using the two laboratory methods. The results from the thermal cell and needle probe were significantly different, with the thermal cell consistently giving higher values for thermal conductivity. The main difficulty with the thermal cell was determining the rate of heat flow, as the apparatus experiences significant heat losses. The needle probe was found to have fewer significant sources of error, but tests a smaller soil sample than the thermal cell. However, both laboratory methods gave much lower values of thermal conductivity compared to the in situ thermal response test. Possible reasons for these discrepancies are discussed, including sample size, orientation and disturbance

    Thermal conductivity of a sandy soil

    No full text
    The thermal properties of soils are of great importance in many thermo-active ground structures such as energy piles and borehole heat exchangers. In this paper the effect of the porosity and degree of saturation on the thermal conductivity of a sandy soil that has not been previously thermally tested is investigated using steady state experimental tests. The steady state apparatus used in these tests was designed to provide high performance in controlling all boundary conditions. Twenty thermal conductivity experimental tests have been carried out at different porosity and saturation values. The performance of selected prediction methods have been validated against the experimental results. The validation shows that none of the selected models can be used effectively in predicting the thermal conductivity of Tripoli sand at all porosity and saturation values. However, some can provide good agreement at dry or nearly dry condition while others perform well at high saturations. The performance of most of the selected models also increases as the soil approaches a two phase state where conduction plays the dominant role in controlling heat transfer. An empirical equation of thermal conductivity expressed as a function of water content and porosity has been developed based on the experimental results obtained
    corecore