581,338 research outputs found
Regulating Mobile Mental Health Apps
Mobile medical apps (MMAs) are a fastâgrowing category of software typically installed on personal smartphones and wearable devices. A subset of MMAs are aimed at helping consumers identify mental states and/or mental illnesses. Although this is a fledgling domain, there are already enough extant mental health MMAs both to suggest a typology and to detail some of the regulatory issues they pose. As to the former, the current generation of apps includes those that facilitate selfâassessment or selfâhelp, connect patients with online support groups, connect patients with therapists, or predict mental health issues. Regulatory concerns with these apps include their quality, safety, and data protection. Unfortunately, the regulatory frameworks that apply have failed to provide coherent riskâassessment models. As a result, prudent providers will need to progress with caution when it comes to recommending apps to patients or relying on appâgenerated data to guide treatment
Stop \u3cem\u3eTerry \u3c/em\u3e: Reasonable Suspicion, Race, and a Proposal to Limit \u3cem\u3eTerry\u3c/em\u3e Stops
The Terry doctrine, which grants a police officer the authority to stop and frisk based on his or her reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause, was created by the Supreme Court at a time when the nation con- fronted a particular moment of violent racial strife. Since Terry was decided, the Supreme Court has continued to expand the reach of the doctrineâwhich opened the door for potential abuse. Existing data is increasingly proving that the loosening of constitutional standards is causing substantial harms to people of color nationwide. This article joins the existing scholarly discussion surrounding this decision to suggest one additional tool that might be used to address the racial impact of the Terry doctrine. In particular, this Article proposes that police authority to stop suspects on nothing more than reasonable suspicion be limited to cases in which an officer reasonably believes the suspect is engaged in something more than a mere possessory offense. The proposal is consistent with much of the Supreme Courtâs past language and will not substantially undercut police efforts to combat violent crime. In addition, this proposal will not be administratively burdensome since it would only require a police officer to articulate what about the suspect made him believe he was engaged in something other than a possessory criminal offense, which is not all that different from what police officers are currently required to do as a matter of internal policy. It is time to stop Terry to avoid the further erosion of rights caused by Terry stops
Birth Fathers: Unequal Power and Myth in the Terry Achance Case
In the Terry Achane case, a birth father who was in the military was not notified when his child's birth mother put up their child for adoption. Birth fathers are often stereotyped as uninvolved and irresponsible, especially when they are not married to the birth mother. Terry Achane was married. The adoption agency made little effort to contact him, raising ethical issues about the roles played by the race, economic status, and perhaps religious beliefs of the adopting parents
Animals as Neighbours: The Past and Present of Commensal Animals by Terry O\u27Connor
Review of Terry O\u27Connor\u27s Animals as Neighbours: The Past and Present of Commensal Animals
Canadian Infantry: Besting the Best
Review of Terry Copp, The Brigade: The Fifth Canadian Infantry Brigade, 1939-1945. Stoney Creek, ON: Fortress Publications, 1992
Berkemer Revisited: Uncovering the Middle Ground Between Miranda and the New Terry
Over the past twenty-five years, appellate courts have significantly expanded the scope of police authority to stop and frisk potential suspects without probable cause, a power originally granted to law enforcement by the Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio. This development has led Terryâs once limited licensing of police searches to run into conflict with a defendantâs right against compulsory self-incrimination while in police custody, as articulated by Miranda v. Arizona. This Note explores the contours of this unforeseen collision between two core constitutional doctrines and the solutions generated by appellate courts to resolve the conflict. Courts today are generally divided as to whether Miranda should apply during a valid, but intrusive Terry stop. This Note argues that a distinct overlap now exists between Miranda and Terry; one that should compel courts to invoke Miranda where police detain and question a suspect in a manner analogous to custodial interrogation. However, this Note also stresses that courts should be vigilant in enforcing the public safety exception to Miranda, particularly in light of Terryâs inherent unpredictability and extemporaneous nature
âUnder the Blue Beret: A U.N. Peacekeeper in the Middle East (Book Review)â by Terry âStoneyâ Burke
Review of Under the Blue Beret: A U.N. Peacekeeper in the Middle East by Terry âStoneyâ Burk
An Ecological Study of the Prairie and Sedge Meadow Communities of Richardson Wildlife Foundation
ID: 8259; Issue date not indicated on report.INHS Technical Report prepared for Terry Moyer, Richardson Wildlife Foundatio
\u3cem\u3eTestimony\u3c/em\u3e, \u3cem\u3eRefuge\u3c/em\u3e, and the Sense of Place: A Conversation with Terry Tempest Williams
This interview with Terry Tempest Williams is part of a series of conversations with contemporary western writers about the ethical and cultural implications of nature writing
\u3cem\u3eA Canadianâs Guide to the Battlefields of Normandy\u3c/em\u3e by Terry Copp [Review]
Review of Terry Copp, A Canadian\u27s Guide to the Battlefields of Normandy. Waterloo, ON: Laurier Centre for Military Strategic and Disarmament Studies, 1994
- âŠ