23 research outputs found

    (The) comparative study on appendectomy costs between a civilian hospital and an army hospital : 좩수 절제술 ν™˜μž μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ

    No full text
    μ§€μ—­μ‚¬νšŒ κ°„ν˜Έν•™κ³Ό/석사[ν•œκΈ€]λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ˜ 원가뢄석을 ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ 일 민간병원과 κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ˜ 좩수 절제술 ν™˜μž 1인 μˆ˜μˆ μ›κ°€λ₯Ό 비ꡐ 뢄석을 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€ 이λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ˜ μˆ˜μˆ μ›κ°€κ°€ λ―Όκ°„λ³‘μ›μ˜ μˆ˜μˆ μ›κ°€μ˜ μ–΄λŠ 정도인지와 과학적인 μ›κ°€λΆ„μ„μœΌλ‘œ νš¨μœ¨μ„± μ¦λŒ€ 및 λΉ„μš©μ ˆκ°μ„ ν†΅ν•œ κ΅° 병원 경영 관리λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ μ •λ³΄μ œκ³΅, μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ •μ— 도움을 주고자 μ‹œλ„λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μ—°κ΅¬λŒ€μƒμ€ 2000λ…„ 1μ›” 1일뢀터 6μ›” 30μΌκΉŒμ§€ 경기도에 μ†Œμž¬ν•œ ν•œ λŒ€ν•™λ³‘μ› 및 κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ—μ„œ 좩수 μ ˆμ œμˆ μ„ μ‹œν–‰ν•œ μˆ˜μˆ ν™˜μž(민간병원 156λͺ…, κ΅° 병원 65λͺ…)λ₯Ό λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ μ‘°μ‚¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 연ꡬ방법은 λ¬Έν—Œκ³ μ°°, 인터뷰, μ˜λ¬΄κΈ°λ‘μ§€ 쑰사, μžλ£Œμ‘°μ‚¬λ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ—¬ μ›κ°€μš”μ†Œλ₯Ό 쑰사, μˆ˜μ§‘, λ°°λΆ„ν•˜μ—¬ 좩수 절제술 ν™˜μž 1인 μˆ˜μˆ μ›κ°€λ₯Ό μ‚°μΆœν•˜μ—¬ λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μ£Όμš” κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 1. 인건비 μ‚°μ •κ²°κ³Ό, λ―Όκ°„ 병원은 241,895원, κ΅° 병원 62,988μ›μœΌλ‘œ κ΅° 병원 μΈκ±΄λΉ„λŠ” λ―Όκ°„ λ³‘μ›μ˜ μ•½ 1/4둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. λ―Όκ°„λ³‘μ›μ˜ 인건비 쀑 마취 κ΄€λ ¨ 인건비가 47%, 수술 κ΄€λ ¨ 인건비 53%인 반면, κ΅° 병원은 λ§ˆμ·¨κ΄€λ ¨ 인건비 34%, μˆ˜μˆ κ΄€λ ¨μΈκ±΄λΉ„ 56%둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜κ³  직접 인건비가 90%, κ°„μ ‘ μΈκ±΄λΉ„λŠ” 10% μ˜€λ‹€. 2. μž¬λ£ŒλΉ„ μ‚°μ •κ²°κ³Ό, λ―Όκ°„ 병원 108,561원, κ΅° 병원 51,940μ›μœΌλ‘œ κ΅° 병원이 λ―Όκ°„λ³‘μ›μ˜ 1/2배이닀. μˆ˜μˆ κ΄€λ ¨ μž¬λ£ŒλΉ„λŠ” μ»€λ‹€λž€ 차이(민간병원 24,915원, κ΅° 병원 28,357원)κ°€ μ—†μ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜ λ§ˆμ·¨κ΄€λ ¨ μž¬λ£ŒλΉ„λŠ” 민간병원 83,646원, κ΅° 병원 23,583μ›μœΌλ‘œ κ΅° 병원이 λ―Όκ°„ λ³‘μ›μ˜ 1/3.5λ°° μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŠ” μ²™μΆ”λ§ˆμ·¨ 보닀 5배의 μž¬λ£ŒλΉ„λ₯Ό λ°œμƒν•˜λŠ” μ „μ‹  마취율이 κ΅° 병원은 30.8%, 민간병원 95%이기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. 3. 관리비 μ‚°μ •κ²°κ³Ό, 민간병원 32,325원, κ΅° 병원 47,966μ›μœΌλ‘œ κ΅° 병원이 λ―Όκ°„λ³‘μ›μ˜ 1.5배이닀, 특히 κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ˜ 이전 κ΄€κ³„λ‘œ 감가상각비가 κ΅° 병원이 λ―Όκ°„λ³‘μ›μ˜ 1.6λ°°(민간병원 18,420원, κ΅° 병원 28,602원)이고 μˆ˜λ„κ΄‘μ—΄λΉ„λŠ” μˆ˜μˆ μ‹€ 면적이 1/2배인데 λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³ , 민간병원 5,728원, κ΅° 병원 10,387μ›μœΌλ‘œ 1.8λ°° λ†’κ²Œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 4. μœ„μ˜ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ’…ν•©ν•΄ 보면 좩수 절제술 ν™˜μž 1인 μˆ˜μˆ μ›κ°€λŠ” 민간병 원 422,590원, κ΅° 병원 170,457μ›μœΌλ‘œ κ΅° 병원이 λ―Όκ°„ λ³‘μ›μ˜ 1/2.5λ°° 둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 결둠적으둜 κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ—μ„œ 6κ°œμ›”κ°„ 총65λͺ…μ˜ 좩수 절제술 ν™˜μžμ˜ μˆ˜μˆ μ›κ°€λŠ” 11,079,705μ›μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. 65λͺ…μ˜ 좩수 절제술 ν™˜μžλ“€μ΄ λŒ€ν•™λ³‘μ›μ—μ„œ μˆ˜μˆ μ„ λ°›μ•˜μ„ 경우 μˆ˜μˆ μ§„λ£ŒλΉ„κ°€ 42,430,570원(수술료 652,778원 Γ—65λͺ…)으둜 κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ—μ„œ 31,350,865μ›μ˜ κ²½μ œμ„±μ΄ μžˆμŒμ„ μ•Œ 수 μžˆλ‹€. κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ˜ 좩수 절제술 1건당 κ³ μ •μ›κ°€λŠ” 102,037원(60%), λ³€λ™μ›κ°€λŠ” 68,420원(40%)으둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λŠ”λ° μž¬λ£ŒλΉ„, μ—°λ£ŒλΉ„, μˆ˜μ„ λΉ„ 등이 ν¬ν•¨λ˜λŠ” λ³€λ™μ›κ°€λŠ” κ΄€λ¦¬μžμ˜ κ·Έ κΆŒν•œκ³Ό μ±…μž„μ˜ λ²”μœ„λ₯Ό λͺ…ν™•νžˆ ν•˜κ³  μ² μ €ν•œ 원가관리λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ ν†΅μ œ κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜λ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 졜초둜 κ΅° λ³‘μ›μ˜ μˆ˜μˆ μ›κ°€λ₯Ό μ‚°μΆœν•˜μ—¬ 민간병원과 λΉ„κ΅ν–ˆλ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ μ˜μ˜κ°€ μžˆμœΌλ‚˜ 각 λΆ€μ„œμ˜ μ „μ‚° μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ— μ˜ν•œ 자료 μˆ˜μ§‘μ΄ λΆˆκ°€λŠ₯ν•˜μ—¬ μžλ£Œμ‘°μ‚¬λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚°μΆœν•˜μ˜€κΈ°μ— μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μ œν•œμ μ΄ μžˆλ‹€. [영문]The objective of this study was to compare the difference of costs between at a civilian hospital and at a army hospital. The subjects of study were 156 patients who had appendectomies at the civilian hospital and 65 patients at the army hospital during the period of January 2000 through June 2000. To describe the cost factors, literature review, interviews, surveys and statistical analyses were carried out and compared. Total cost of appendectomy was comprises the direct costs which were directly attributed to the cost objects and the indirect costs which were paid for maintenance and supporting expenses of the operating rooms. The major findings of this research were as follows ; 1. The personnel expens of the civilian hospital was 241,895 won and that of the army hospital was 62,993 won. This shows the personnel expense of the civilian hospital was about four times as much as that of the army hospital. That is because the civilian hospital had paid for the services from residents and partly because of the university hospital expenses. 2. The material costs of the civilian hospital was 108,561 won and that of the army hospital was 51,940 won. There were differences in material costs for anesthesia at two hospitals. The material costs for a general anesthesia was about five times as much as a spinal anesthesia. And, general anesthesia rate in the civilian hospital was 95% and that in the army hospital was 30.8%. 3. The administrative expenses were 32,325 won in the civilian hospital and 47,966 won in the army hospital. Especially there were some differences in the depreciation expenses of the buildings because the army hospital was reconstructed in 1999. And, in spite of the fact that the size of operating rooms of the army hospital is half as large as those of civilian operating rooms, power utilities of the army hospital were about double times as much as those of a civilian hospital. 4. Total appendectomy costs were 422,590 won in the civilian hospital and 170,457 won in the army hospital. In conclusion, total appendectomy costs for 65 patients in an army hospital was 11,079,705 won. If they had received appendectomy in a civilian hospital, the operation fee would have been 42,430,570 won. Therefore the army hospital have the cost cutting effect of 31,350,865 won. The accuracy of cost accounting depends on computation system. However, the cost accounting system in army hospitals should be carried out for the rationalization system of army hospitals management. It is believed that the important and successful elements of cost accounting is all worker's strong concernment and will.ope

    Qualitative study on teachers’ perception and coping of classism in Schools

    No full text
    λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ΄ˆγ†μ€‘γ†κ³ λ“±ν•™κ΅ ꡐ사듀이 μ§€κ°ν•˜λŠ” ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œμ˜ κ³„μΈ΅μ˜ 영ν–₯ 및 계측차별에 λŒ€ ν•œ 인식 정도와 λŒ€μ²˜λ₯Ό νƒμƒ‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ μ„œμšΈ, κ²½κΈ°, 인천 μ§€μ—­μ—μ„œ 재직 쀑인 μ΄ˆγ†μ€‘γ†κ³ λ“±ν•™κ΅ ꡐ사 43λͺ…(남 11λͺ…, μ—¬ 32λͺ…, 평균 35.3μ„Έ)μœΌλ‘œλΆ€ν„° 자료λ₯Ό μˆ˜μ§‘ν•˜κ³ ,, μˆ˜μ •λœ ν•© 의적 질적 연ꡬ방법(Consensual Qualitative Research-Modified, CQR-M)을 μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό, ꡐ사가 μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 학ꡐ λ‚΄ κ³„μΈ΅μ˜ 영ν–₯κ³Ό 차별, 이에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식과 λŒ€μ²˜λŠ” 3개 영 μ—­, 13개 λ²”μ£Ό, 30개 ν•˜μœ„λ²”μ£Όλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. ꡬ체적으둜, λ„μΆœλœ μ˜μ—­μ€ β€˜ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜λŠ” 계 측의 영ν–₯’, β€˜ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œμ˜ κ³„μΈ΅μ˜ 영ν–₯μ΄λ‚˜ 차별에 λŒ€ν•œ κ΅μ‚¬μ˜ 인식’, β€˜ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œμ˜ 계측차별에 λŒ€ν•œ κ΅μ‚¬μ˜ λŒ€μ²˜ κ²½ν—˜β€™μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Όμ—μ„œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚œ μ΄ˆγ†μ€‘λ“±ν•™κ΅ ꡐ사 κ°„ 인식 μ–‘μƒμ˜ 차이와 상λ₯˜μΈ΅, 쀑산측, ν•˜μœ„μΈ΅μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ„œλ‘œ λ‹€λ₯Έ νƒœλ„μ™€ 인식을 λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ, ν–₯ν›„ 학ꡐ λ‚΄ κ³„μΈ΅μ°¨λ³„μ£Όμ˜ λŒ€μ²˜ μ—­λŸ‰ ν–₯상을 μœ„ν•œ ꡐ사 ꡐ윑 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ 개발과 학ꡐ 급별 κ°œμž… λ°©μ•ˆ 체 계 ꡬ좕 λ“± ν–₯ν›„ 학ꡐ상담과 μƒν™œμ§€λ„, ꡐ사 ꡐ윑, μ •μ±…κ³Όμ œμ— λŒ€ν•œ μ‹œμ‚¬μ κ³Ό μ œμ–Έμ„ λ…Όμ˜ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. The purpose of this study is exploring the impact of classism, which is a discriminatory stereotype and attitude related to socio-economic class, in schools from the teachers’ perspective. The research participants were 43 teachers (11 males, 32 females) working in elementary, middle and high schools and special education schools in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon. We used a consensual qualitative research-modified (CQR-M) to collect and analyze the data. By analyzing the data, the teachers' perceived influence of classism in the school, and their perception and coping with classism were categorized in 3 areas, 13 middle categories, and 30 sub-categories. Specifically, the derived areas were β€˜the influence of the class in school’, β€˜the teacher’s perception of the class’ influence or discrimination in school’, and β€˜the teacher’s response to class discrimination in school’. Based on the differences in the recognition patterns among elementary and secondary school teachers and the different attitudes and perceptions of the upper, middle, and lower classes in the results of this study, suggestions for school counseling and guidance, research and policy tasks were discussed, such as developing teacher education and training programs to improve ability to address classism and establishing intervention plans by school levels.N

    The Effects of Parental Involvement on Middle School Students' Academic Self-efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation

    No full text
    λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ κ΄€μ—¬ 행동이 μ€‘ν•™μƒμ˜ 학업적 μžμ•„νš¨λŠ₯감과 내적 동기에 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 영ν–₯을 λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³  λ‚˜μ•„κ°€ λ―Έκ΅­ λΆ€λͺ¨ 및 μ²­μ†Œλ…„λ“€μ˜ νŠΉμ„±κ³Ό λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ—¬ λ…Όμ˜ν•˜λŠ” 데 μžˆλ‹€. μžλ…€μ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ λ°œλ‹¬μ  νŠΉμ„±μ΄ ν˜•μ„±λ˜λŠ” 데 μžˆμ–΄ μ£Όμš” μ‚¬νšŒμ  ν™˜κ²½μš”μΈμΈ λΆ€λͺ¨λŠ” μ²­μ†Œλ…„λ“€μ˜ 학업동기 ν˜•μ„±μ—μ„œλ„ μ€‘μš”ν•œ 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉœλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ ꡬ체적으둜 λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ μ–΄λ–€ 관여행동이 μ²­μ†Œλ…„λ“€μ˜ 학업동기 νŠΉμ„±μ— μ–΄λ– ν•œ 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” 지에 λŒ€ν•œ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μΆ©λΆ„ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ•˜λ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” ν•œκ΅­κ΅μœ‘κ°œλ°œμ›μ˜ ν•œκ΅­κ΅μœ‘μ’…λ‹¨μ‘°μ‚¬(Korea Education Longitudinal Study, μ΄ν•˜ KELS) 1차년도 데이터λ₯Ό μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ κ΄€μ—¬ 행동이 쀑학생 μžλ…€μ˜ 학업적 μžμ•„νš¨λŠ₯감과 내적 동기에 μ–΄λ–€ 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ”κ°€λ₯Ό μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄κ³ μž ν•œλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 뢄석결과λ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ, KELS의 λͺ¨νƒœκ°€ λ˜μ—ˆλ˜ 미ꡭ의 ELS2002 자료λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ λ™μΌν•œ 주제λ₯Ό μ—°κ΅¬ν–ˆλ˜ λ―Έκ΅­ 연ꡬ결과와 λΉ„κ΅ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ νŠΉμ„±λ“€μ˜ λ¬Έν™”κ°„ 비ꡐλ₯Ό μ‹œλ„ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석결과, μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ κ΄€μ—¬ 행동 λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„μ€ 쀑학생 μžλ…€μ˜ 학업적 μžμ•„νš¨λŠ₯감과 내적 동기와 정적 상관이 μžˆμŒμ„ ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 비둝 μ„€λͺ…λŸ‰μ€ μž‘μ§€λ§Œ, λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ κ΄€μ—¬ 행동 쀑 β€˜μžλ…€μ™€ ν•¨κ»˜ ν•˜λŠ” ν™œλ™β€™μ΄λ‚˜ β€˜μžλ…€μ— λŒ€ν•œ ꡐ윑적 κΈ°λŒ€β€™κ°€ μžλ…€μ˜ 학업적 μžμ•„νš¨λŠ₯감 및 내적 동기에 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 영ν–₯ λ³€μΈμž„μ„ ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λŠ”λ° μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 연ꡬ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” 미ꡭ의 κ²½μš°μ™€ μΌμΉ˜ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 이후 μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 연ꡬ결과가 μš°λ¦¬λ‚˜λΌ λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ κ΄€μ—¬ 행동과 μ²­μ†Œλ…„λ“€μ˜ 학업동기에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ‹œμ‚¬ν•˜λŠ” λ°”λ₯Ό λ…Όμ˜ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of parental involvement on students' academic self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation and to compare this results with those of American similar study using the data of Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002(ELS2002). To do this, we examined whether various parental involvement behavior predicted middle school students' academic self-efficacy towards maths, English and Korean and intrinsic motivation towards maths, English and Korean using data from the Korean Educational Longitudinal Study(KELS). The results show that most parental involvement behaviors are positively related to children' academic self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation, especially parents’ educational aspiration for their children and parents' participation in activities with children had strong positive effects on all six motivational outcomes. These results are almost like the ones of American similar study(Fan & Williams, 2010). Lastly discussion is focused on the meaning of these findings and the suggestions for the further studies

    Smart students academic underachievement and their responses

    No full text
    이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ 성적 ν•˜λ½μ„ κ²½ν—˜ν•œ ν•™μ—…μš°μˆ˜ ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ ν•™μ—…μ‹€νŒ¨ κ³Όμ •κ³Ό λ°˜μ‘μ„ νƒκ΅¬ν•˜λŠ” 데 μžˆλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ μž…ν•™μ„±μ μ΄ 높은 λŒ€ν•™κ΅ μž¬ν•™μƒ 쀑 μ΄ˆΒ·μ€‘Β·κ³ κ΅ μ‹œμ ˆ 성적 ν•˜λ½μ„ κ²½ν—˜ν•œ 학생 11λͺ…을 μ„ μ •ν•˜μ˜€κ³  심측면접을 톡해 자료λ₯Ό μˆ˜μ§‘ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이 심측면접 자료λ₯Ό 5λͺ…μ˜ μ „λ¬Έμ—°κ΅¬μžλ“€μ΄ ν•©μ˜μ  질적 연ꡬ(CQR) λ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό, 성적 ν•˜λ½μ„ κ²½ν—˜ν•œ ν•™μ—…μš°μˆ˜ 학생듀은 성적 ν•˜λ½μ„ ν•œλ²ˆ κ²½ν—˜ν•˜κ³  λ‹€μ‹œ 성적이 였λ₯Έ 학생도 μžˆμ—ˆλ˜ 반면 반볡적으둜 μ„±μ μ˜ ν•˜λ½κ³Ό μƒμŠΉμ΄ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜λŠ” 학생듀도 μžˆμ–΄ 성적 ν•˜λ½ 및 회볡 양상에 μžˆμ–΄ 곡톡점을 μ°Ύμ•„λ³΄κΈ°λŠ” μ–΄λ €μ› λ‹€. 이듀은 λŒ€μ²΄λ‘œ 성적 ν•˜λ½ 이전에 κ³΅λΆ€μŠ΅κ΄€μ΄ ν˜•μ„±λ˜μ–΄μžˆκ³  λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ κΎΈμ€€ν•œ 관심을 λ°›κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 성적 ν•˜λ½μ˜ μ΄μœ λŠ” κ²Œμž„ λ“± λ‹€λ₯Έ ν™œλ™μ˜ 집쀑, 학업무관심, ν•™κ΅μƒν™œ 뢀적응 등이 주둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜, 이미 κ³΅λΆ€μŠ΅κ΄€μ΄ ν˜•μ„±λœ ν•™μ—…μš°μˆ˜ν•™μƒμ˜ 경우 ν•™μŠ΅λ™κΈ°μ˜ λΆ€μž¬κ°€ 성적 ν•˜λ½μ˜ 주된 μ›μΈμž„μ„ μ•Œ 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 이듀은 성적 ν•˜λ½ 이후 원인뢄석, 극볡할 수 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” κΈ°λŒ€, 성적 ν•˜λ½μ—μ˜ 무관심 λ“± 극볡에 도움이 λ˜λŠ” κ±΄κ°•ν•œ λ°˜μ‘λ“€μ„ 주둜 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 성적 ν•˜λ½ μƒν™©μ—μ„œμ˜ λΆ€λͺ¨ λ°˜μ‘μ€ 무관심, μœ„λ‘œ, κΈ°λ‹€λ¦Ό, 적극적 λŒ€μ²˜ 강ꡬ, 싀망, μ§ˆμ±… λ“±μœΌλ‘œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ‚˜, 학생듀은 λΆ€λͺ¨μ˜ λ°˜μ‘μ„ λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„ λΆ€μ μ ˆν•˜λ‹€κ³  μΈμ‹ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€, κ΅μ‚¬μ˜ 경우 별닀λ₯Έ λ°˜μ‘μ΄ μ—†λŠ” κ²½μš°κ°€ κ°€μž₯ λ§Žμ•˜κ³ , 학생듀은 성적 ν•˜λ½ μƒν™©μ—μ„œμ˜ κ΅μ‚¬μ˜ λ°˜μ‘ μ—­μ‹œ λΆ€μ μ ˆν•˜λ‹€κ³  μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λΆ€λͺ¨μ™€ ꡐ사가 ν•™μ—…μš°μˆ˜ ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ 성적 ν•˜λ½μ— 보닀 효과적으둜 λ°˜μ‘ν•΄μ•Ό ν•  ν•„μš”μ„±μ„ ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 연ꡬ결과λ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ ν•™μ—…μš°μˆ˜ν•™μƒμ˜ νŠΉμ„± 연ꡬ 및 지원 λ°©μ•ˆ λ§ˆλ ¨μ—μ˜ μ‹œμ‚¬μ μ„ λ…Όμ˜ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. The purpose of this study was to examine the academic failures of academically talented Korean adolescents and their responses to underachievements. To do this, smart students' experiences of the academic achievement fluctuations through school ages were collected by individual interviews and analyzed based on CQR. The sample group of this study consisted of eleven students from a high ranked university. Participants who experienced academic failure but overcame were selected based on the fluctuations of their academic achievement through school ages. Retrospective data of their experiences of academic success and failure were collected by in-depth interviews. The interview data were analyzed by using Consensual Quality Research method(Hill, Thomson, & Williams, 1997; Hill et al., 2005) and five researchers were participated in CQR process. The main findings were as follows: a) The patterns of academic achievement fluctuations were different from each case, some students experienced just one time academic failure but other students several times; b) they already had good study habits and had been taken care of by their parents through school ages; c) the main reason of the academic failure was the lack of study time because of other activities such as computer games, reading comic books, or hanging out with friend, also secondly, academic amotivation and school maladjustment caused academic failure of smart girls and boys; d) smart students responded to academic failure constructively, for example, they analyse the causes of failure, expect the increase of scores with patience, or indifference to academic declines; e) their parents and teachers showed various responses including unconcern, recognition, waiting, positive management, disappointment, rebuke, and so on. But most students regarded them as helpless. Lastly, the implications, limitations, and suggestions for the future research were discussed. Key words: smart students, academic underachievement, constructive failure response, qualitative research, CQ
    corecore