12 research outputs found

    A Study on Dead-weight Loss Estimation of Subsidy Policy for Hiring : Using Set Theory

    Get PDF
    ์ ๊ทน์  ๋…ธ๋™์‹œ์žฅ์ •์ฑ… ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ฏธ์‹œ์  ํ‰๊ฐ€์™€ ๊ฑฐ์‹œ์  ํ‰๊ฐ€๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ์ „์ž๋Š” ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด์— ํ›„์ž๋Š” ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์  ์ฐจ์› ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์—…๋‹จ์œ„์˜ ๊ณ ์šฉ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ทผ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๋กฏํ•œ ์„ ์ง„๊ตญ์—์„œ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณ ์šฉ์•ˆ์ •์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ๊ณ ์šฉ์ด‰์ง„์žฅ๋ ค๊ธˆ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ๋ฏธ์‹œ์  ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์‹œ์  ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํŠนํžˆ ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ์‚ฌ์ค‘์†์‹ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์ถ”์ •์€ ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ์„ฑํŒจ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๋ฆ„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ํ‰๊ฐ€์ง€ํ‘œ๋ผ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋™์•ˆ ์ฃผ๊ด€์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋‹จ์ˆœ ์„ค๋ฌธ์‘๋‹ต์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ค‘์†์‹ค ์ถ”์ •์—์„œ ํƒˆํ”ผํ•˜์—ฌ ํผ์ง€์ง‘ํ•ฉ์ด๋ก  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ณผํ•™์ ์ด๊ณ  ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ฃผ์š” ๋ชฉ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฃผ๊ด€์  ์„ค๋ฌธ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ์‚ฌ์ค‘์†์‹ค์„ ์ข€ ๋” ๊ณผ์žฅ๋˜๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ด๋Š” ์‘๋‹ต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™•์‹ ์„ฑ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‹ ๊ทœ๊ณ ์šฉ์ด‰์ง„์žฅ๋ ค๊ธˆ์‚ฌ์—…์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ น์ž๊ณ ์šฉ์žฅ๋ ค๊ธˆ์‚ฌ์—…๋ณด๋‹ค ์‚ฌ์ค‘์†์‹ค์ด ๋” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค.The evaluation for ALMPs(Active labor market policy) is divided by macro and micro evaluation methods. The former is performed based on individual's output, while the latter is carried in terms of employment variation in national or firm dimension. The main purpose to this study is to statistically and scientifically calculate by using fuzzy set theory, escaping from dead-weight loss estimation based on subjective and simple questionnaire survey. Our results found that method of dead-weight loss estimation based on subjective and simple make dead-weight loss overestimate more than that of fuzzy set theory. what this result occur is due to difference of a respondent's confirmability on answering. we find that dead weight loss is more in subsidy policy for new hiring than subsidy policy for the aged

    ์ €ํƒ„์†Œ ๋…น์ƒ‰์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ , ์‚ฐ์—… ๋ฐ ๋…ธ๋™

    No full text
    ์ง€๋‚œ 8์›”, ์ •๋ถ€๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ 60๋…„์˜ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ฐœ์ „ ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„์œผ๋กœ '์ €ํƒ„์†Œ ๋…น์ƒ‰์„ฑ์žฅ' ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์ €ํƒ„์†Œ ๋…น์ƒ‰์„ฑ์žฅ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ , ์ €ํƒ„์†Œ ๋…น์ƒ‰์„ฑ์žฅ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์  ์š”์†Œ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ , ์‚ฐ์—… ๋ฐ ๊ทธ๋ฆฐ ๋…ธ๋™๋ ฅ์˜ ์ „๋ง์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค

    A Study on Performance Evaluation for Arts and Culture Education Professional Training Program Using the AHP Model

    No full text
    ๋ฌธํ™”์˜ˆ์ˆ ๊ต์œก ์ „๋ฌธ์ธ๋ ฅ ์–‘์„ฑ์‚ฌ์—…์€ ๋ฌธํ™”์˜ˆ์ˆ  ์ „๋ฌธ์ธ๋ ฅ์˜ ์—ญ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฐ•ํ™”์™€ ์ „๋ฌธ์„ฑ ์ œ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฌธํ™”์˜ˆ์ˆ ๊ต์œก์˜ ์งˆ์ ยท์–‘์  ํ™•์‚ฐ์€ ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์ „๋ฌธ์ธ๋ ฅ์˜ ์ผ์ž๋ฆฌ ์ฐฝ์ถœ์—๋„ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” AHP(Analysis of Hierarchy Process)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์—…ํ‰๊ฐ€์™€ EC์˜ ์‚ฌ์—…ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‚ฌ์—…๊ณผ์ •์„ ํˆฌ์ž…-์šด์˜-์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •์„ฑยท์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ํ‰๊ฐ€์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ฐ€๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 2010๋…„ ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์ˆ˜๋Š” 66.9์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณดํ†ต ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„๋กœ๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ(79.4), ์šด์˜(64.6), ์„ฑ๊ณผ(64.5), ํˆฌ์ž…(62.7) ๋“ฑ์—์„œ๋„ ๋ณดํ†ต ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2010๋…„๋„ ์‚ฌ์—…์€ ์ด์ „์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ „๋ฌธ์ธ๋ ฅ์˜ ์‚ฌ์—… ์ฐธ์—ฌ๊ธฐํšŒ๊ฐ€ ํ™•๋Œ€๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ง์—… ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ทจ์•ฝ์ ์„ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์‚ฌ์—…์€ ์ฒญ๋…„์‹ค์—…์„ ํ•ด์†Œํ•˜๋Š” ์‚ฌํšŒ ์ผ์ž๋ฆฌ ์ฐฝ์ถœ์‚ฌ์—…๊ณผ ์ฐจ๋ณ„ํ™”๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์›ํ™œํ•œ ์ถ”์ง„์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฌธํ™”๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์‹œ์„ค ๋ฐ ๋ฌธํ™”์˜ˆ์ˆ ๊ต์œก ์–‘์„ฑ ์ „๋ฌธ์ธ(์‚ฐํ•™์—ฐ๊ณ„) ๋“ฑ๊ณผ์˜ ํ˜‘์˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋ฌธํ™”์˜ˆ์ˆ ๊ต์œก ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.The training program to foster arts and culture education professionals that has contributed to the qualitative and quantitative expansion of arts and culture education as well as the creation of jobs for professionals. This study evaluated the training program for evaluation based on a hierarchical structure corresponding to the nature of the training program by using the Analysis of Hierarchy Process(AHP). Specifically, this study divided the processes of the project into 'Input', 'Operation', 'Result' and 'Effect' in accordance to the EC evaluation method. According to the results, it was found to have achieved above average in performance, receiving an overall score of 66.9 for the year 2010. Among individual processes, 'Effect' received the highest score of 79.4 followed by 'Operation' 64.6, 'Result' 64.5 and 'Input' 62.7. The results showed that the program provided more opportunities in 2010 than in previous years for professionals to participate, but showed weakness in terms of job stability
    corecore