7 research outputs found

    The importance of costoclavicular space on possible compression of the subclavian artery in the thoracic outlet region: a radio-anatomical study

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to identify possible compression points along the transit route of the subclavian artery and to provide a detailed anatomical analysis of areas that are involved in the surgical management of the thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). The results of the current study are based on measurements from cadavers, computed tomography (CT) scans and dry adult first ribs. METHODS: The width and length of the interscalene space and the width of the costoclavicular passage were measured on 18 cervical dissections in 9 cadavers, on 50 dry first ribs and on CT angiography sections from 15 patients whose conditions were not related to TOS. RESULTS: The average width and length of the interscalene space in cadavers were 15.28 ± 1.94mm and 15.98 ± 2.13 mm, respectively. The widths of the costoclavicular passage (12.42 ± 1.43mm) were significantly narrower than the widths and lengths of the interscalene space in cadavers (P < 0.05). The average width and length of the interscalene space (groove for the subclavian artery) in 50 dry ribs were 15.53 ± 2.12mm and 16.12 ± 1.95mm, respectively. In CT images, the widths of the costoclavicular passage were also significantly narrower than those of the interscalene space (P 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the costoclavicular width was the narrowest space along the passage route of the subclavian artery. When considering the surgical decompression of the subclavian artery for TOS, this narrowest area should always be kept in mind. Since measurements from CT images and cadavers were significantly similar, CT measurements may be used to evaluate the thoracic outlet region in patients with TOS

    Kolon Kanserine Yatkınlık ile p53 Geni Kodon 72 ve PAI-1 Geni 4G/5G Polimorfizmleri Arasındaki İlişki

    No full text
    msufbdWe aimed to investigate the relationship between colon cancer and p53 gene codon 72 and PAI-1 gene 4G/5G polymorphism in a Turkish study population. Genomic DNA was extracted from 72 patients with colon cancer and 76 controls. PCR technique was used to amplify extracted DNA with proper primers for each polymorphism. For identifying genotypes PCR products were assessed with UV transilluminator by being exposed to agarose gel electrophoresis. There was no statistical difference between colon cancer patients and controls according to p53 gene codon 72 genotype distribution and allele frequencies (p&gt;0.05). Due to PAI-1 gene 4G/5G genotype distribution 4G4G genotype was frequently higher in colon cancer patients compared to controls  (p&lt;0.05). As a conclusion of our study we may assert that p53 gene codon 72 polymorphism should not be related as a susceptibility factor for colon cancer development in the studied Turkish population while PAI-1 gene 4G/5G polymorphism should be related.Bu çalışmada Türk popülasyonunda kolon kanseri ile p53 geni kodon 72 ve PAI-1 geni 4G/5G polimorfizmleri arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Genomik DNA 72 kolon kanserli hastadan ve 76 kontrol bireyinden izole edilmiştir. Her bir polimorfizm için uygun primerler kullanılarak izolen edilen DNA PCR tekniği kullanılarak amplifiye edilmiştir. PCR ürünleri genotiplerin belirlenmesi için  agaroz jel elektroforezine tabi tutularak  UV translimünatör ile değerlendirilmiştir. p53 geni kodon 72 genotip dağılımı ve allel frekansları incelendiğinde kolon kanserli hastalar ve kontrol bireyleri arasında istatistiksel olarak bir fark belirlenmemiştir (p&gt;0.05). PAI-1 4G/5G genotip dağılımı ve allel frekansları açısından ise 4G4G genotipi kontrol bireylerine göre kolon kanserli hastalarda daha yüksek bulunmuştur (p&gt;0.05). Elde edilen verilere göre çalışmanın yapıldığı Türk popülasyonunda p53 geni kodon 72 polimorfizminin kolon kanseri gelişiminde bir yatkınlık faktörü olamayacağı, PAI-1 4G/5G polimorfizminin ise olabileceği kanısına varılmıştır.35014

    Mortality analysis of COVID-19 infection in chronic kidney disease, haemodialysis and renal transplant patients compared with patients without kidney disease: a nationwide analysis from Turkey

    No full text
    Background. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and immunosuppression, such as in renal transplantation (RT), stand as one of the established potential risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Case morbidity and mortality rates for any type of infection have always been much higher in CKD, haemodialysis (HD) and RT patients than in the general population. A large study comparing COVID-19 outcome in moderate to advanced CKD (Stages 3-5), HD and RT patients with a control group of patients is still lacking. Methods. We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study, involving hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 from 47 centres in Turkey. Patients with CKD Stages 3-5, chronic HD and RT were compared with patients who had COVID-19 but no kidney disease. Demographics, comorbidities, medications, laboratory tests, COVID-19 treatments and outcome [in-hospital mortality and combined in-hospital outcome mortality or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU)] were compared. Results. A total of 1210 patients were included [median age, 61 (quartile 1-quartile 3 48-71) years, female 551 (45.5%)] composed of four groups: Control (n = 450), HD (n = 390), RT (n = 81) and CKD (n = 289). The ICU admission rate was 266/ 1210 (22.0%). A total of 172/1210 (14.2%) patients died. The ICU admission and in-hospital mortality rates in the CKD group [114/289 (39.4%); 95% confidence interval (CI) 33.9-45.2; and 82/289 (28.4%); 95% CI 23.9-34.5)] were significantly higher than the other groups: HD = 99/390 (25.4%; 95% CI 21.3-29.9; P<0.001) and 63/390 (16.2%; 95% CI 13.0-20.4; P<0.001); RT = 17/81 (21.0%; 95% CI 13.2-30.8; P = 0.002) and 9/81 (11.1%; 95% CI 5.7-19.5; P = 0.001); and control = 36/450 (8.0%; 95% CI 5.8-10.8; P<0.001) and 18/450 (4%; 95% CI 2.5-6.2; P<0.001). Adjusted mortality and adjusted combined outcomes in CKD group and HD groups were significantly higher than the control group [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) CKD: 2.88 (1.52- 5.44); P = 0.001; 2.44 (1.35-4.40); P = 0.003; HD: 2.32 (1.21- 4.46); P = 0.011; 2.25 (1.23-4.12); P = 0.008), respectively], but these were not significantly different in the RT from in the control group [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (0.76-4.72); P = 0.169; 1.87 (0.81-4.28); P = 0.138, respectively]. Conclusions. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with CKDs, including Stages 3-5 CKD, HD and RT, have significantly higher mortality than patients without kidney disease. Stages 3-5 CKD patients have an in-hospital mortality rate as much as HD patients, which may be in part because of similar age and comorbidity burden. We were unable to assess if RT patients were or were not at increased risk for in-hospital mortality because of the relatively small sample size of the RT patients in this study

    Characteristics and outcomes of acute kidney injury in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A multicenter study by the Turkish society of nephrology

    Get PDF
    Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and the severity of AKI is linked to adverse outcomes. In this study, we investigated the factors associated with in-hospital outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and AKI. Methods In this multicenter retrospective observational study, we evaluated the characteristics and in-hospital renal and patient outcomes of 578 patients with confirmed COVID-19 and AKI. Data were collected from 34 hospitals in Turkey from March 11 to June 30, 2020. AKI definition and staging were based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Patients with end-stage kidney disease or with a kidney transplant were excluded. Renal outcomes were identified only in discharged patients. Results The median age of the patients was 69 years, and 60.9% were males. The most frequent comorbid conditions were hypertension (70.5%), diabetes mellitus (43.8%), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (37.6%). The proportions of AKI stages 1, 2, and 3 were 54.0%, 24.7%, and 21.3%, respectively. 291 patients (50.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Renal improvement was complete in 81.7% and partial in 17.2% of the patients who were discharged. Renal outcomes were worse in patients with AKI stage 3 or baseline CKD. The overall in-hospital mortality in patients with AKI was 38.9%. In-hospital mortality rate was not different in patients with preexisting non-dialysis CKD compared to patients without CKD (34.4 versus 34.0%, p = 0.924). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (95%CI)]: 1.01 [1.0-1.03], p = 0.035], male gender (HR [95%CI]: 1.47 [1.04-2.09], p = 0.029), diabetes mellitus (HR [95%CI]: 1.51 [1.06-2.17], p = 0.022) and cerebrovascular disease (HR [95%CI]: 1.82 [1.08-3.07], p = 0.023), serum lactate dehydrogenase (greater than two-fold increase) (HR [95%CI]: 1.55 [1.05-2.30], p = 0.027) and AKI stage 2 (HR [95%CI]: 1.98 [1.25-3.14], p = 0.003) and stage 3 (HR [95%CI]: 2.25 [1.44-3.51], p = 0.0001) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusions Advanced-stage AKI is associated with extremely high mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Age, male gender, comorbidities, which are risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 in the general population, are also related to in-hospital mortality in patients with AKI. However, preexisting non-dialysis CKD did not increase in-hospital mortality rate among AKI patients. Renal problems continue in a significant portion of the patients who were discharged

    ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 PATIENTS: A MULTICENTRE STUDY BY TURKISH SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY

    No full text
    BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is common in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and theseverity of AKI is linked to adverse outcomes. In this study, we investigated the factors asso-ciated with in-hospital outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and AKI.MethodsIn this multicenter retrospective observational study, we evaluated the characteristics andin-hospital renal and patient outcomes of 578 patients with confirmed COVID-19 and AKI.Data were collected from 34 hospitals in Turkey from March 11 to June 30, 2020. AKI defini-tion and staging were based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria.Patients with end-stage kidney disease or with a kidney transplant were excluded. Renaloutcomes were identified only in discharged patients.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 69 years, and 60.9% were males. The most frequentcomorbid conditions were hypertension (70.5%), diabetes mellitus (43.8%), and chronic kid-ney disease (CKD) (37.6%). The proportions of AKI stages 1, 2, and 3 were 54.0%, 24.7%,and 21.3%, respectively. 291 patients (50.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit.Renal improvement was complete in 81.7% and partial in 17.2% of the patients who weredischarged. Renal outcomes were worse in patients with AKI stage 3 or baseline CKD. Theoverall in-hospital mortality in patients with AKI was 38.9%. In-hospital mortality rate was notdifferent in patients with preexisting non-dialysis CKD compared to patients without CKD(34.4 versus 34.0%, p = 0.924). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio[HR] [95% confidence interval (95%CI)]: 1.01 [1.0–1.03], p = 0.035], male gender (HR [95%CI]: 1.47 [1.04–2.09], p = 0.029), diabetes mellitus (HR [95%CI]: 1.51 [1.06–2.17], p =0.022) and cerebrovascular disease (HR [95%CI]: 1.82 [1.08–3.07], p = 0.023), serum lac-tate dehydrogenase (greater than two-fold increase) (HR [95%CI]: 1.55 [1.05–2.30], p =0.027) and AKI stage 2 (HR [95%CI]: 1.98 [1.25–3.14], p = 0.003) and stage 3 (HR [95%CI]:2.25 [1.44–3.51], p = 0.0001) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.ConclusionsAdvanced-stage AKI is associated with extremely high mortality among hospitalizedCOVID-19 patients. Age, male gender, comorbidities, which are risk factors for mortality inpatients with COVID-19 in the general population, are also related to in-hospital mortality inpatients with AKI. However, preexisting non-dialysis CKD did not increase in-hospital mor-tality rate among AKI patients. Renal problems continue in a significant portion of thepatients who were discharged.&nbsp;</div
    corecore