1,894 research outputs found
Teacher competence development – a European perspective
This chapter provides an European perspectives on teacher competence development
Community-based mentoring and innovating through Web 2.0
The rise of social software, often termed Web 2.0, has resulted in heightened awareness of the opportunities for creative and innovative approaches to learning that are afforded by network technologies. Social software platforms and social networking technologies have become part of the learning landscape both for those who learn formally within institutions, and for those who learn informally via emergent web-based learning communities. As collaborative online learning becomes a reality, new skills in communication and collaboration are required in order to use new technologies effectively, develop real digital literacy and other 21st century skills
Harnessing technology: local authorities
The report presents and analyses the findings from the 2007-08 survey of local authorities covering their provision and support for ICT in schools. The accompanying file contains the technical analysis and copies of the research instrument used in the survey
Review of codes of conduct, voluntary guidelines and principles relevant for farm data sharing
Codes of conduct, voluntary guidelines, sets of principles on how to transparently govern farm data are a recent thing. While laws and regulations that govern personal data are becoming more and more common, legislation still does not cover data flows in many industries where different actors in the value chain need to share data and at the same time protect all involved from the risks of data sharing. Data in these value chains is currently governed through private data contracts or licensing agreements, which are normally very complex and on which data producers have very little negotiating power. Codes of conduct have started to emerge to fill the legislative void and to set common standards for data sharing contracts: codes provide principles that the signatories/subscribers/members agree to apply in their contracts
The Crescent Student Newspaper, February 10, 2006
Student newspaper of George Fox University.https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/the_crescent/2296/thumbnail.jp
A post-Brexit agreement for research and innovation Outcomes from a simulated negotiation process. Bruegel Special Report 28 January 2020
The UK will leave the European Union on 31 January 2020.
Negotiators and commentators have spent more than three
years discussing the terms on which the UK will withdraw,
but comparatively little attention has been paid to the future
relationship between the UK and the EU after Brexit at a
sectoral level. Withdrawing is merely the first stage of the
process, and the UK and the EU will soon begin to think
about negotiating a new relationship and decide which
issues to prioritise.
Research and innovation is one of the key areas in which
the UK and the EU will need to establish a post-Brexit
relationship. Over the past two decades, the UK and the
EU have been at the forefront of that enterprise through
the development of the European Research Area (ERA).
Together, European nations have created a world-leading
research base. Six of the world’s top twenty universities are
in the ERA, and Europe produces a third of the world’s
scientific publications with just 7% of the global population.
A new post-Brexit relationship on research and innovation
will need to be negotiated to ensure we sustain and
grow this valuable and mutually beneficial partnership.
Research and innovation are critical to achieving lasting
competitiveness and economic development, especially
with the dominance of the USA and the rising challenge
of China in this field. An early agreement providing for
cooperation on research and innovation would reflect the
economic and social importance of research and innovation
to the people of the UK and the EU.
This report sets out what the Wellcome Trust and Bruegel
have learned from a project to simulate a negotiation
process between the UK and EU to create a post-Brexit
research and innovation agreement. Our negotiating
scenario assumed that the UK had left the EU with a
withdrawal agreement, and that the negotiation was
taking place during a ‘standstill’ transition period.
Our exercise demonstrated that it is possible to reach
agreement among experts on the terms of an EU-UK
research and innovation deal. However, the project also
revealed that some elements of an agreement may be
harder to negotiate than expected. A shared purpose and
belief in the importance of research and innovation is not
enough to see a deal come to fruition. It is also necessary
to overcome a number of political and technical challenges
that are spelled out in this report. The process must
start now to ensure an agreement is reached as soon as
possible. We hope that this report will provide inspiration
and guidance for that process
The Crescent Student Newspaper, March 17, 2010
Student newspaper of George Fox University.https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/the_crescent/2334/thumbnail.jp
Urban food strategies in Central and Eastern Europe: what's specific and what's at stake?
Integrating a larger set of instruments into
Rural Development Programmes implied an increasing
focus on monitoring and evaluation. Against the highly
diversified experience with regard to implementation
of policy instruments the Common Monitoring
and Evaluation Framework has been set up by the EU
Commission as a strategic and streamlined method of
evaluating programmes’ impacts. Its indicator-based
approach mainly reflects the concept of a linear,
measure-based intervention logic that falls short of
the true nature of RDP operation and impact capacity
on rural changes. Besides the different phases of the
policy process, i.e. policy design, delivery and evaluation,
the regional context with its specific set of challenges
and opportunities seems critical to the understanding
and improvement of programme performance.
In particular the role of local actors can hardly
be grasped by quantitative indicators alone, but has
to be addressed by assessing processes of social
innovation. This shift in the evaluation focus underpins
the need to take account of regional implementation
specificities and processes of social innovation as
decisive elements for programme performance.
Going Rogue: Mobile Research Applications and the Right to Privacy
This Article investigates whether nonsectoral state laws may serve as a viable source of privacy and security standards for mobile health research participants and other health data subjects until new federal laws are created or enforced. In particular, this Article (1) catalogues and analyzes the nonsectoral data privacy, security, and breach notification statutes of all fifty states and the District of Columbia; (2) applies these statutes to mobile-app-mediated health research conducted by independent scientists, citizen scientists, and patient researchers; and (3) proposes substantive amendments to state law that could help protect the privacy and security of all health data subjects, including mobile-app-mediated health research participants
- …