Verdict functions in testing with a fault domain or test hypotheses

In state based testing it is common to include verdicts within test cases, the result of the test case being the verdict reached by the test run. In addition, approaches that reason about test effectiveness or produce tests that are guaranteed to find certain classes of faults are often based on either a fault domain or a set of test hypotheses. This paper considers how the presence of a fault domain or test hypotheses affects our notion of a test verdict. The analysis reveals the need for new verdicts that provide more information than the current verdicts and for verdict functions that return a verdict based on a set of test runs rather than a single test run. The concepts are illustrated in the contexts of testing from a non-deterministic finite state machine and the testing of a datatype specified using an algebraic specification language but are potentially relevant whenever fault domains or test hypotheses are used

Using formal methods to support testing

Formal methods and testing are two important approaches that assist in the development of high quality software. While traditionally these approaches have been seen as rivals, in recent years a new consensus has developed in which they are seen as complementary. This article reviews the state of the art regarding ways in which the presence of a formal specification can be used to assist testing

Formal Methods in Conformance Testing: A Probabilistic Refinement

This paper refines the framework of ‘Formal Methods in Conformance Testing’ by introducing probabilities for concepts which have a stochastic nature. Test execution is refined into test runs, where each test run is considered as a stochastic process that returns a possible observa- tion with a certain probability. This implies that not every possible observation that could be made, will actually be made. The development process of an implementation from a specifica- tion is also viewed as a stochastic process that may result in a specific implementation with a certain probability. Together with a weight assignment on implementations this introduces a valuation measure on implementations. The test run probabilities and the valuation measures are integrated in generalized definitions of soundness and exhaustiveness, which can be used to compare test suites with respect to their ability to accept correct, and to reject erroneous implementations

Learning by Arguing About Evidence and Explanations

Collaborative learning with cases characteristically involves discussing and developing shared explanations. We investigated the argumentation scheme which learners use in constructing shared explanations over evidence. We observed medical students attempting to explain how a judge had arrived at his verdict in a case of medical negligence. The students were learning within a virtual learning environment and their communication was computer mediated. We identify the dialogue type that these learners construct and show that their argumentation conforms with an abductive form of argumentation scheme ('inference to the best explanation'). We also assessed the students' learning and propose that it is related to particular features of this argumentation scheme

Testing data types implementations from algebraic specifications

Algebraic specifications of data types provide a natural basis for testing data types implementations. In this framework, the conformance relation is based on the satisfaction of axioms. This makes it possible to formally state the fundamental concepts of testing: exhaustive test set, testability hypotheses, oracle. Various criteria for selecting finite test sets have been proposed. They depend on the form of the axioms, and on the possibilities of observation of the implementation under test. This last point is related to the well-known oracle problem. As the main interest of algebraic specifications is data type abstraction, testing a concrete implementation raises the issue of the gap between the abstract description and the concrete representation. The observational semantics of algebraic specifications bring solutions on the basis of the so-called observable contexts. After a description of testing methods based on algebraic specifications, the chapter gives a brief presentation of some tools and case studies, and presents some applications to other formal methods involving datatypes

The Integration of Machine Learning into Automated Test Generation: A Systematic Mapping Study

Context: Machine learning (ML) may enable effective automated test generation. Objective: We characterize emerging research, examining testing practices, researcher goals, ML techniques applied, evaluation, and challenges. Methods: We perform a systematic mapping on a sample of 102 publications. Results: ML generates input for system, GUI, unit, performance, and combinatorial testing or improves the performance of existing generation methods. ML is also used to generate test verdicts, property-based, and expected output oracles. Supervised learning - often based on neural networks - and reinforcement learning - often based on Q-learning - are common, and some publications also employ unsupervised or semi-supervised learning. (Semi-/Un-)Supervised approaches are evaluated using both traditional testing metrics and ML-related metrics (e.g., accuracy), while reinforcement learning is often evaluated using testing metrics tied to the reward function. Conclusion: Work-to-date shows great promise, but there are open challenges regarding training data, retraining, scalability, evaluation complexity, ML algorithms employed - and how they are applied - benchmarks, and replicability. Our findings can serve as a roadmap and inspiration for researchers in this field.Comment: Under submission to Software Testing, Verification, and Reliability journal. (arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2107.00906 - This is an earlier study that this study extends

Simulation-based testing of highly configurable cyber-physical systems: automation, optimization and debugging

Sistema Ziber-Fisikoek sistema ziber digitalak sistema fisikoekin uztartzen dituzte. Sistema hauen aldakortasuna handitzen ari da erabiltzaileen hainbat behar betetzeko. Ondorioz, sistema ziber-fisikoa aldakorrak edota produktu lerroak ari dira garatzen eta sistema hauek milaka edo milioika konfiguraziotan konfiguratu daitezke. Sistema ziber-fisiko aldakorren test eta balidazioa prozesua garestia da, batez ere probatu beharreko konfigurazio kopuruaren ondorioz. Konfigurazio kopuru altuak sistemaren prototipo bat erabiltzea ezinezkoa egiten du. Horregatik, sistema ziber-fisiko aldagarriak simulazio modeloak erabilita probatzen dira. Hala ere, simulazio bidez sistema ziber-fisikoak probatzea erronka izaten jarraitzen du. Hasteko, simulazio denbora altua izaten da normalki, software-az aparte, sistema fisikoa simulatu behar delako. Sistema fisiko hau normalean modelo matematiko konplexuen bitartez modelatzen da, konputazionalki garestia delarik. Jarraitzeko, sistema ziber-fisikoek ingeniaritzaren domeinu ezberdinak dituzte tartean, adibidez mekanika edo elektronika. Domeinu bakoitzak bere simulazio erremienta erabiltzen du, eta erremienta guzti hauek interkonektatzeko ko-simulazioa erabiltzen da. Nahiz eta ko-simulazioa abantaila bat izan ematen duen flexibilitateagatik, simulagailu ezberdinen erabilerak simulazio denbora handiagotzen du. Azkenik, sistema ziber-fisikoak simulaziopean probatzean, probak maila ezberdinetan egin behar dira (adb., Model, Software eta Hardware-in-the-Loop mailak), eta honek, proba-kasuak exekutatzeko denbora handitzen du. Tesi honen helburua sistema ziber-fisiko aldakorren test jardunbideak hobetzea da, horretarako automatizazio, optimizazio eta arazketa metodoak proposatzen ditu. Automatizazioari dagokionez, lehenengo, erremienta-bidezko metodologia bat proposatzen da. Metodologia hau test sistema instantziak automatikoki sortzeko gai da, test sistema hauek sistema ziber-fisiko aldagarrien konfigurazioak automatikoki probatzeko gai dira (adb., test orakuluen bitartez). Bigarren, test frogak automatikoki sortzeko planteamendu bat proposatzen da helburu anitzeko bilaketa algoritmoak erabilita. Optimizazioari dagokionez, test frogen aukeraketarako planteamendu bat eta test frogen priorizaziorako beste planteamendu bat proposatzen dira, biak bilaketa alix goritmoak erabiliz, sistema ziber-fisiko aldakorrak test maila ezberdinetan probatzeko helburuarekin. Arazketari dagokionez, “espektroan oinarritutako falten lokalizazioa” izeneko teknika bat produktu lerroen testuingurura adaptatu da, eta faltak isolatzeko metodo bat proposatzen da. Honek, falta ezberdinak lokalizatzea errezten du ez bakarrik sistema ziber-fisiko aldakorretan, baizik eta edozein produktu lerrotan non “feature model” delako modeloak erabiltzen diren aldakortasuna kudeatzeko.Los sistemas cyber-físicos (CPSs) integran tecnologías digitales con procesos físicos. La variabilidad de estos sistemas está creciendo para responder a la demanda de diferentes clientes. Como consecuencia de ello, los CPSs están volviéndose configurables e incluso líneas de producto, lo que significa que pueden ser configurados en miles y millones de configuraciones. El testeo de sistemas cyber-físicos configurables es un proceso costoso, en general debido a la cantidad de configuraciones que han de ser testeadas. El número de configuraciones a testear hace imposible el uso de un prototipo del sistema. Por ello, los sistemas CPSs configurables están siendo testeadas utilizando modelos de simulación. Sin embargo, el testeo de sistemas cyber-físicos bajo simulación sigue siendo un reto. Primero, el tiempo de simulación es normalmente largo, ya que, además del software, la capa física del CPS ha de ser testeada. Esta capa física es típicamente modelada con modelos matemáticos complejos, lo cual es computacionalmente caro. Segundo, los sistemas cyber-físicos implican el uso de diferentes dominios de la ingeniería, como por ejemplo la mecánica o la electrónica. Por ello, para interconectar diferentes herramientas de modelado y simulación hace falta el uso de la co-simulación. A pesar de que la co-simulación es una ventaja en términos de flexibilidad para los ingenieros, el uso de diferentes simuladores hace que el tiempo de simulación sea más largo. Por último, al testear sistemas cyberfísicos haciendo uso de simulación, existen diferentes niveles (p.ej., Model, Software y Hardware-in-the-Loop), lo cual incrementa el tiempo para ejecutar casos de test. Esta tesis tiene como objetivo avanzar en la práctica actual del testeo de sistemas cyber-físicos configurables, proponiendo métodos para la automatización, optimización y depuración. En cuanto a la automatización, primero, se propone una metodología soportada por una herramienta para generar automáticamente instancias de sistemas de test que permiten testear automáticamente configuraciones del sistema CPS configurable (p.ej., haciendo uso de oráculos de test). Segundo, se propone un enfoque para generación de casos de test basado en algoritmos de búsqueda multiobjetivo, los cuales generan un conjunto de casos de test. En cuanto a la optimización, se propone un enfoque para selección y otro para priorización de casos de test, ambos basados en algoritmos de búsqueda, de cara a testear eficientemente sistemas cyberfísicos configurables en diferentes niveles de test. En cuanto a la depuración, se adapta una técnica llamada “Localización de Fallos Basada en Espectro” al contexto de líneas de productos y proponemos un método de aislamiento de fallos. Esto permite localizar bugs no solo en sistemas cyber-físicos configurables sino también en cualquier línea de producto donde se utilicen modelos de características para gestionar la variabilidad.Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) integrate digital cyber technologies with physical processes. The variability of these systems is increasing in order to give solution to the different customers demands. As a result, CPSs are becoming configurable or even product lines, which means that they can be set into thousands or millions of configurations. Testing configurable CPSs is a time consuming process, mainly due to the large amount of configurations that need to be tested. The large amount of configurations that need to be tested makes it infeasible to use a prototype of the system. As a result, configurable CPSs are being tested using simulation. However, testing CPSs under simulation is still challenging. First, the simulation time is usually long, since apart of the software, the physical layer needs to be simulated. This physical layer is typically modeled with complex mathematical models, which is computationally very costly. Second, CPSs involve different domains, such as, mechanical and electrical. Engineers of different domains typically employ different tools for modeling their subsystems. As a result, co-simulation is being employed to interconnect different modeling and simulation tools. Despite co-simulation being an advantage in terms of engineers flexibility, the use of different simulation tools makes the simulation time longer. Lastly, when testing CPSs employing simulation, different test levels exist (i.e., Model, Software and Hardware-in-the-Loop), what increases the time for executing test cases. This thesis aims at advancing the current practice on testing configurable CPSs by proposing methods for automation, optimization and debugging. Regarding automation, first, we propose a tool supported methodology to automatically generate test system instances that permit automatically testing configurations of the configurable CPS (e.g., by employing test oracles). Second, we propose a test case generation approach based on multi-objective search algorithms that generate cost-effective test suites. As for optimization, we propose a test case selection and a test case prioritization approach, both of them based on search algorithms, to cost-effectively test configurable CPSs at different test levels. Regarding debugging, we adapt a technique named Spectrum-Based Fault Localization to the product line engineering context and propose a fault isolation method. This permits localizing bugs not only in configurable CPSs but also in any product line where feature models are employed to model variability

Learning to Encode and Classify Test Executions

The challenge of automatically determining the correctness of test executions is referred to as the test oracle problem and is one of the key remaining issues for automated testing. The goal in this paper is to solve the test oracle problem in a way that is general, scalable and accurate. To achieve this, we use supervised learning over test execution traces. We label a small fraction of the execution traces with their verdict of pass or fail. We use the labelled traces to train a neural network (NN) model to learn to distinguish runtime patterns for passing versus failing executions for a given program. Our approach for building this NN model involves the following steps, 1. Instrument the program to record execution traces as sequences of method invocations and global state, 2. Label a small fraction of the execution traces with their verdicts, 3. Designing a NN component that embeds information in execution traces to fixed length vectors, 4. Design a NN model that uses the trace information for classification, 5. Evaluate the inferred classification model on unseen execution traces from the program. We evaluate our approach using case studies from different application domains: 1. Module from Ethereum Blockchain, 2. Module from PyTorch deep learning framework, 3. Microsoft SEAL encryption library components, 4. Sed stream editor, 5. Value pointer library and 6. Nine network protocols from Linux packet identifier, L7-Filter. We found the classification models for all subject programs resulted in high precision, recall and specificity, over 95%, while only training with an average 9% of the total traces. Our experiments show that the proposed neural network model is highly effective as a test oracle and is able to learn runtime patterns to distinguish passing and failing test executions for systems and tests from different application domains