Evaluation Measures for Relevance and Credibility in Ranked Lists

Recent discussions on alternative facts, fake news, and post truth politics have motivated research on creating technologies that allow people not only to access information, but also to assess the credibility of the information presented to them by information retrieval systems. Whereas technology is in place for filtering information according to relevance and/or credibility, no single measure currently exists for evaluating the accuracy or precision (and more generally effectiveness) of both the relevance and the credibility of retrieved results. One obvious way of doing so is to measure relevance and credibility effectiveness separately, and then consolidate the two measures into one. There at least two problems with such an approach: (I) it is not certain that the same criteria are applied to the evaluation of both relevance and credibility (and applying different criteria introduces bias to the evaluation); (II) many more and richer measures exist for assessing relevance effectiveness than for assessing credibility effectiveness (hence risking further bias). Motivated by the above, we present two novel types of evaluation measures that are designed to measure the effectiveness of both relevance and credibility in ranked lists of retrieval results. Experimental evaluation on a small human-annotated dataset (that we make freely available to the research community) shows that our measures are expressive and intuitive in their interpretation

HAGRID: A Human-LLM Collaborative Dataset for Generative Information-Seeking with Attribution

The rise of large language models (LLMs) had a transformative impact on search, ushering in a new era of search engines that are capable of generating search results in natural language text, imbued with citations for supporting sources. Building generative information-seeking models demands openly accessible datasets, which currently remain lacking. In this paper, we introduce a new dataset, HAGRID (Human-in-the-loop Attributable Generative Retrieval for Information-seeking Dataset) for building end-to-end generative information-seeking models that are capable of retrieving candidate quotes and generating attributed explanations. Unlike recent efforts that focus on human evaluation of black-box proprietary search engines, we built our dataset atop the English subset of MIRACL, a publicly available information retrieval dataset. HAGRID is constructed based on human and LLM collaboration. We first automatically collect attributed explanations that follow an in-context citation style using an LLM, i.e. GPT-3.5. Next, we ask human annotators to evaluate the LLM explanations based on two criteria: informativeness and attributability. HAGRID serves as a catalyst for the development of information-seeking models with better attribution capabilities.Comment: Data released at https://github.com/project-miracl/hagri

PMIndiaSum: Multilingual and Cross-lingual Headline Summarization for Languages in India

This paper introduces PMIndiaSum, a multilingual and massively parallel summarization corpus focused on languages in India. Our corpus provides a training and testing ground for four language families, 14 languages, and the largest to date with 196 language pairs. We detail our construction workflow including data acquisition, processing, and quality assurance. Furthermore, we publish benchmarks for monolingual, cross-lingual, and multilingual summarization by fine-tuning, prompting, as well as translate-and-summarize. Experimental results confirm the crucial role of our data in aiding summarization between Indian languages. Our dataset is publicly available and can be freely modified and re-distributed

Sentiment analysis and real-time microblog search

This thesis sets out to examine the role played by sentiment in real-time microblog search. The recent prominence of the real-time web is proving both challenging and disruptive for a number of areas of research, notably information retrieval and web data mining. User-generated content on the real-time web is perhaps best epitomised by content on microblogging platforms, such as Twitter. Given the substantial quantity of microblog posts that may be relevant to a user query at a given point in time, automated methods are required to enable users to sift through this information. As an area of research reaching maturity, sentiment analysis offers a promising direction for modelling the text content in microblog streams. In this thesis we review the real-time web as a new area of focus for sentiment analysis, with a specific focus on microblogging. We propose a system and method for evaluating the effect of sentiment on perceived search quality in real-time microblog search scenarios. Initially we provide an evaluation of sentiment analysis using supervised learning for classi- fying the short, informal content in microblog posts. We then evaluate our sentiment-based filtering system for microblog search in a user study with simulated real-time scenarios. Lastly, we conduct real-time user studies for the live broadcast of the popular television programme, the X Factor, and for the Leaders Debate during the Irish General Election. We find that we are able to satisfactorily classify positive, negative and neutral sentiment in microblog posts. We also find a significant role played by sentiment in many microblog search scenarios, observing some detrimental effects in filtering out certain sentiment types. We make a series of observations regarding associations between document-level sentiment and user feedback, including associations with user profile attributes, and users’ prior topic sentiment

The role of knowledge in determining identity of long-tail entities

The NIL entities do not have an accessible representation, which means that their identity cannot be established through traditional disambiguation. Consequently, they have received little attention in entity linking systems and tasks so far. Given the non-redundancy of knowledge on NIL entities, the lack of frequency priors, their potentially extreme ambiguity, and numerousness, they form an extreme class of long-tail entities and pose a great challenge for state-of-the-art systems. In this paper, we investigate the role of knowledge when establishing the identity of NIL entities mentioned in text. What kind of knowledge can be applied to establish the identity of NILs? Can we potentially link to them at a later point? How to capture implicit knowledge and fill knowledge gaps in communication? We formulate and test hypotheses to provide insights to these questions. Due to the unavailability of instance-level knowledge, we propose to enrich the locally extracted information with profiling models that rely on background knowledge in Wikidata. We describe and implement two profiling machines based on state-of-the-art neural models. We evaluate their intrinsic behavior and their impact on the task of determining identity of NIL entities

Semantics-driven Abstractive Document Summarization

The evolution of the Web over the last three decades has led to a deluge of scientific and news articles on the Internet. Harnessing these publications in different fields of study is critical to effective end user information consumption. Similarly, in the domain of healthcare, one of the key challenges with the adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) for clinical practice has been the tremendous amount of clinical notes generated that can be summarized without which clinical decision making and communication will be inefficient and costly. In spite of the rapid advances in information retrieval and deep learning techniques towards abstractive document summarization, the results of these efforts continue to resemble extractive summaries, achieving promising results predominantly on lexical metrics but performing poorly on semantic metrics. Thus, abstractive summarization that is driven by intrinsic and extrinsic semantics of documents is not adequately explored. Resources that can be used for generating semantics-driven abstractive summaries include: • Abstracts of multiple scientific articles published in a given technical field of study to generate an abstractive summary for topically-related abstracts within the field, thus reducing the load of having to read semantically duplicate abstracts on a given topic. • Citation contexts from different authoritative papers citing a reference paper can be used to generate utility-oriented abstractive summary for a scientific article. • Biomedical articles and the named entities characterizing the biomedical articles along with background knowledge bases to generate entity and fact-aware abstractive summaries. • Clinical notes of patients and clinical knowledge bases for abstractive clinical text summarization using knowledge-driven multi-objective optimization. In this dissertation, we develop semantics-driven abstractive models based on intra- document and inter-document semantic analyses along with facts of named entities retrieved from domain-specific knowledge bases to produce summaries. Concretely, we propose a sequence of frameworks leveraging semantics at various granularity (e.g., word, sentence, document, topic, citations, and named entities) levels, by utilizing external resources. The proposed frameworks have been applied to a range of tasks including 1. Abstractive summarization of topic-centric multi-document scientific articles and news articles. 2. Abstractive summarization of scientific articles using crowd-sourced citation contexts. 3. Abstractive summarization of biomedical articles clustered based on entity-relatedness. 4. Abstractive summarization of clinical notes of patients with heart failure and Chest X-Rays recordings. The proposed approaches achieve impressive performance in terms of preserving semantics in abstractive summarization while paraphrasing. For summarization of topic-centric multiple scientific/news articles, we propose a three-stage approach where abstracts of scientific articles or news articles are clustered based on their topical similarity determined from topics generated using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), followed by extractive phase and abstractive phase. Then, in the next stage, we focus on abstractive summarization of biomedical literature where we leverage named entities in biomedical articles to 1) cluster related articles; and 2) leverage the named entities towards guiding abstractive summarization. Finally, in the last stage, we turn to external resources such as citation contexts pointing to a scientific article to generate a comprehensive and utility-centric abstractive summary of a scientific article, domain-specific knowledge bases to fill gaps in information about entities in a biomedical article to summarize and clinical notes to guide abstractive summarization of clinical text. Thus, the bottom-up progression of exploring semantics towards abstractive summarization in this dissertation starts with (i) Semantic Analysis of Latent Topics; builds on (ii) Internal and External Knowledge-I (gleaned from abstracts and Citation Contexts); and extends it to make it comprehensive using (iii) Internal and External Knowledge-II (Named Entities and Knowledge Bases)

Enhancing extractive summarization with automatic post-processing

Tese de doutoramento, Informática (Ciência da Computação), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, 2015Any solution or device that may help people to optimize their time in doing productive work is of a great help. The steadily increasing amount of information that must be handled by each person everyday, either in their professional tasks or in their personal life, is becoming harder to be processed. By reducing the texts to be handled, automatic text summarization is a very useful procedure that can help to reduce significantly the amount of time people spend in many of their reading tasks. In the context of handling several texts, dealing with redundancy and focusing on relevant information the major problems to be addressed in automatic multi-document summarization. The most common approach to this task is to build a summary with sentences retrieved from the input texts. This approach is named extractive summarization. The main focus of current research on extractive summarization has been algorithm optimization, striving to enhance the selection of content. However, gains related to the increasing of algorithms complexity have not yet been proved, as the summaries remain difficult to be processed by humans in a satisfactory way. A text built fromdifferent documents by extracting sentences fromthemtends to form a textually fragile sequence of sentences, whose elements tend to be weakly related. In the present work, tasks that modify and relate the summary sentences are combined in a post-processing procedure. These tasks include sentence reduction, paragraph creation and insertion of discourse connectives, seeking to improve the textual quality of the final summary to be delivered to human users. Thus, this dissertation addresses automatic text summarization in a different perspective, by exploring the impact of the postprocessing of extraction-based summaries in order to build fluent and cohesive texts and improved summaries for human usage.Qualquer solução ou dispositivo que possa ajudar as pessoas a optimizar o seu tempo, de forma a realizar tarefas produtivas, é uma grande ajuda. A quantidade de informação que cada pessoa temque manipular, todos os dias, seja no trabalho ou na sua vida pessoal, é difícil de ser processada. Ao comprimir os textos a serem processados, a sumarização automática é uma tarefa muito útil, que pode reduzir significativamente a quantidade de tempo que as pessoas despendem em tarefas de leitura. Lidar com a redundância e focar na informação relevante num conjunto de textos são os principais objectivos da sumarização automática de vários documentos. A abordagem mais comum para esta tarefa consiste em construirse o resumo com frases obtidas a partir dos textos originais. Esta abordagem é conhecida como sumarização extractiva. O principal foco da investigação mais recente sobre sumarização extrativa é a optimização de algoritmos que visam obter o conteúdo relevante expresso nos textos originais. Porém, os ganhos relacionados com o aumento da complexidade destes algoritmos não foram ainda comprovados, já que os sumários continuam a ser difíceis de ler. É expectável que um texto, cujas frases foram extraídas de diferentes fontes, forme uma sequência frágil, sobretudo pela falta de interligação dos seus elementos. No contexto deste trabalho, tarefas que modificam e relacionam frases são combinadas numprocedimento denominado pós-processamento. Estas tarefas incluem a simplificação de frases, a criação de parágrafos e a inserção de conectores de discurso, que juntas procurammelhorar a qualidade do sumário final. Assim, esta dissertação aborda a sumarização automática numa perspectiva diferente, estudando o impacto do pós-processamento de um sumário extractivo, a fim de produzir um texto final fluente e coeso e em vista de se obter uma melhor qualidade textual.Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), SFRH/BD/45133/200

Extracting information from informal communication

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2007.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 89-93).This thesis focuses on the problem of extracting information from informal communication. Textual informal communication, such as e-mail, bulletin boards and blogs, has become a vast information resource. However, such information is poorly organized and difficult for a computer to understand due to lack of editing and structure. Thus, techniques which work well for formal text, such as newspaper articles, may be considered insufficient on informal text. One focus of ours is to attempt to advance the state-of-the-art for sub-problems of the information extraction task. We make contributions to the problems of named entity extraction, co-reference resolution and context tracking. We channel our efforts toward methods which are particularly applicable to informal communication. We also consider a type of information which is somewhat unique to informal communication: preferences and opinions. Individuals often expression their opinions on products and services in such communication. Others' may read these "reviews" to try to predict their own experiences. However, humans do a poor job of aggregating and generalizing large sets of data. We develop techniques that can perform the job of predicting unobserved opinions.(cont.) We address both the single-user case where information about the items is known, and the multi-user case where we can generalize opinions without external information. Experiments on large-scale rating data sets validate our approach.by Jason D.M. Rennie.Ph.D