Addressing the need for improved land cover map products for policy support

The continued increase of anthropogenic pressure on the Earth’s ecosystems is degrading the natural environment and then decreasing the services it provides to humans. The type, quantity, and quality of many of those services are directly connected to land cover, yet competing demands for land continue to drive rapid land cover change, affecting ecosystem services. Accurate and updated land cover information is thus more important than ever, however, despite its importance, the needs of many users remain only partially attended. A key underlying reason for this is that user needs vary widely, since most current products – and there are many available – are produced for a specific type of end user, for example the climate modelling community. With this in mind we focus on the need for flexible, automated processing approaches that support on-demand, customized land cover products at various scales. Although land cover processing systems are gradually evolving in this direction there is much more to do and several important challenges must be addressed, including high quality reference data for training and validation and even better access to satellite data. Here, we 1) present a generic system architecture that we suggest land cover production systems evolve towards, 2) discuss the challenges involved, and 3) propose a step forward. Flexible systems that can generate on-demand products that match users’ specific needs would fundamentally change the relationship between users and land cover products – requiring more government support to make these systems a reality

VALIDATION OF THE GLOBAL HIGH-RESOLUTION GLOBELAND30 LAND COVER MAP IN EUROPE USING LAND COVER FIELD SURVEY DATABASE - LUCAS

High-resolution land cover maps are one of the technological innovations driving improvements in many fields influenced by Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sensing. In particular, the GlobeLand30 (GL30), global LC map with spatial resolution of 30 m, is thought to be one of the highest quality high-resolution products. However, these LC maps require validation to determine their suitability for a particular purpose. One of the best ways to provide useful validation reference data is to do a high-level accuracy field survey, but this is time consuming and expensive. Another option is to exploit already available datasets. This study assesses thematic accuracy of GL30 in Europe using LUCAS as a validation reference, because it is a free and open field survey database. The results were generally not good, and very bad for some classes. Analysis was then restricted to a small region (Lombardy, Italy) where LC data of higher resolution than those of GL30 were available. LUCAS was also found to be incoherent with this product. Further comparisons of LUCAS with other independent sources confirmed that the LC attributes of LUCAS are inconsistent with expectations. Although these findings may not be generalized to other regions, the results warn against the suitability of LUCAS as ground truth for LC validation. The paper discusses the process of thematic accuracy assessment of the GL30 and the applicability of LUCAS for high-resolution global LC validation

Use of LUCAS LC Point Database for Validating Country-Scale Land Cover Maps

In this study, the Land Use/Cover Area frame statistical Survey (LUCAS) of 2009 was used as a reference dataset for validating a Land Cover Map of Greece for 2007, produced with remote sensing by the Greek Office of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF Hellas). First, all class definitions were decomposed in terms of four vegetation parameters (type, height, density, and composition), considered as critical in indicating unconformities between LUCAS and the WWF Hellas map; their inter-class relations were described in a table of correspondence. Then, a two-tier methodology was applied: an “automated” process, where thematic agreement was based exclusively on the main land cover attribute of LUCAS (LC1); and a “supervised” process, where thematic agreement was based on the reinterpretation of LUCAS ground photos and use of ancillary earth observation imagery; non-square error matrix was deployed in both processes. For the supervised process specifically, a decision-tree was designed, using the critical vegetation parameters (mentioned above) as quantified criteria, thus allowing objective labelling of testing points in both systems. The results show that only a small proportion of the reassessed points verified the WWF Hellas map predictions and that the overall accuracy of the supervised process was reduced compared to that of the automated process. In conclusion, the LUCAS point database was found to be supportive, but not fully efficient, for identifying the various sources of error in country-scale land cover maps derived with remote sensing. Synergy with very high resolution satellite images and air photos, or a dedicated ground truth campaign, seems to be inevitable in order to validate their thematic accuracy, especially in highly heterogeneous environments. In this direction, LUCAS could be used as a verification, rather than a validation, dataset

Land cover mapping with random forest using intra-annual sentinel 2 data in central Portugal : a comparative analysis

Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geospatial TechnologiesIn recent years, data mining algorithms are increasingly applied to optimise the classification process of remotely sensed imagery. Random Forest algorithms have shown high potential for land cover mapping problems yet have not been sufficiently tested on their ability to process and classify multi-temporal data within one classification process. Additionally, a growing amount of geospatial data is freely available online without having their usability assessed, such as EUROSTAT´s LUCAS land use land cover dataset. This study provides a comparative analysis of two land cover classification approaches using Random Forest on open-access multi-spectral, multi-temporal Sentinel-2A/B data. A classification system composed of six classes (sealed surfaces, non-vegetated unsealed surfaces, water, woody, herbaceous permanent, herbaceous periodic) was designed for this study. Ten images of ten bands plus NDVI each, taken between November 2016 and October 2017 in Central Portugal, were processed in R using a pixel-based approach. Ten maps based on single month data were produced. These were then used as input data for the classifier to create a final map. This map was compared with a map using all 100 bands at once as training for the classifier. This study concluded that the approach using all bands produced maps with 11% higher, yet overall low accuracy of 58%. It was also less time-consuming with about 5 hours to over 15 hours of work for the multi-temporal predictions. The main causes for the low accuracy identified by this thesis are uncertainties with EUROSTAT´s Land Use/Cover Area Statistical Survey (LUCAS) training data and issues with the accompanying nomenclature definition. Additional to the comparison of the classification approaches, the usability of LUCAS (2015) is tested by comparing four different variations of it as training data for the classification based on 100 bands. This research indicates high potential of using Sentinel-2 imagery and multi-temporal stacks of bands to achieve an averaged land cover classification of the investigated time span. Moreover, the research points out lower potential of the multi-map approach and issues regarding the suitability of using LUCAS open-access data as sole input for training a classifier for this study. Issues include inaccurate surveying and a partially long distance between the marked point and the actual observation point reached by the surveyors of up to 1.5 km. Review of the database, additional sampling and ancillary data appears to be necessary for achieving accurate results