Linear and Range Counting under Metric-based Local Differential Privacy

Local differential privacy (LDP) enables private data sharing and analytics without the need for a trusted data collector. Error-optimal primitives (for, e.g., estimating means and item frequencies) under LDP have been well studied. For analytical tasks such as range queries, however, the best known error bound is dependent on the domain size of private data, which is potentially prohibitive. This deficiency is inherent as LDP protects the same level of indistinguishability between any pair of private data values for each data downer. In this paper, we utilize an extension of $\epsilon$-LDP called Metric-LDP or $E$-LDP, where a metric $E$ defines heterogeneous privacy guarantees for different pairs of private data values and thus provides a more flexible knob than $\epsilon$ does to relax LDP and tune utility-privacy trade-offs. We show that, under such privacy relaxations, for analytical workloads such as linear counting, multi-dimensional range counting queries, and quantile queries, we can achieve significant gains in utility. In particular, for range queries under $E$-LDP where the metric $E$ is the $L^1$-distance function scaled by $\epsilon$, we design mechanisms with errors independent on the domain sizes; instead, their errors depend on the metric $E$, which specifies in what granularity the private data is protected. We believe that the primitives we design for $E$-LDP will be useful in developing mechanisms for other analytical tasks, and encourage the adoption of LDP in practice

A Unifying Privacy Analysis Framework for Unknown Domain Algorithms in Differential Privacy

There are many existing differentially private algorithms for releasing histograms, i.e. counts with corresponding labels, in various settings. Our focus in this survey is to revisit some of the existing differentially private algorithms for releasing histograms over unknown domains, i.e. the labels of the counts that are to be released are not known beforehand. The main practical advantage of releasing histograms over an unknown domain is that the algorithm does not need to fill in missing labels because they are not present in the original histogram but in a hypothetical neighboring dataset could appear in the histogram. However, the challenge in designing differentially private algorithms for releasing histograms over an unknown domain is that some outcomes can clearly show which input was used, clearly violating privacy. The goal then is to show that the differentiating outcomes occur with very low probability. We present a unified framework for the privacy analyses of several existing algorithms. Furthermore, our analysis uses approximate concentrated differential privacy from Bun and Steinke'16, which can improve the privacy loss parameters rather than using differential privacy directly, especially when composing many of these algorithms together in an overall system

Graph-based Security and Privacy Analytics via Collective Classification with Joint Weight Learning and Propagation

Many security and privacy problems can be modeled as a graph classification problem, where nodes in the graph are classified by collective classification simultaneously. State-of-the-art collective classification methods for such graph-based security and privacy analytics follow the following paradigm: assign weights to edges of the graph, iteratively propagate reputation scores of nodes among the weighted graph, and use the final reputation scores to classify nodes in the graph. The key challenge is to assign edge weights such that an edge has a large weight if the two corresponding nodes have the same label, and a small weight otherwise. Although collective classification has been studied and applied for security and privacy problems for more than a decade, how to address this challenge is still an open question. In this work, we propose a novel collective classification framework to address this long-standing challenge. We first formulate learning edge weights as an optimization problem, which quantifies the goals about the final reputation scores that we aim to achieve. However, it is computationally hard to solve the optimization problem because the final reputation scores depend on the edge weights in a very complex way. To address the computational challenge, we propose to jointly learn the edge weights and propagate the reputation scores, which is essentially an approximate solution to the optimization problem. We compare our framework with state-of-the-art methods for graph-based security and privacy analytics using four large-scale real-world datasets from various application scenarios such as Sybil detection in social networks, fake review detection in Yelp, and attribute inference attacks. Our results demonstrate that our framework achieves higher accuracies than state-of-the-art methods with an acceptable computational overhead.Comment: Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), 2019. Dataset link: http://gonglab.pratt.duke.edu/code-dat

Game Theory Based Correlated Privacy Preserving Analysis in Big Data

Privacy preservation is one of the greatest concerns in big data. As one of extensive applications in big data, privacy preserving data publication (PPDP) has been an important research field. One of the fundamental challenges in PPDP is the trade-off problem between privacy and utility of the single and independent data set. However, recent research has shown that the advanced privacy mechanism, i.e., differential privacy, is vulnerable when multiple data sets are correlated. In this case, the trade-off problem between privacy and utility is evolved into a game problem, in which payoff of each player is dependent on his and his neighbors’ privacy parameters. In this paper, we firstly present the definition of correlated differential privacy to evaluate the real privacy level of a single data set influenced by the other data sets. Then, we construct a game model of multiple players, in which each publishes data set sanitized by differential privacy. Next, we analyze the existence and uniqueness of the pure Nash Equilibrium. We refer to a notion, i.e., the price of anarchy, to evaluate efficiency of the pure Nash Equilibrium. Finally, we show the correctness of our game analysis via simulation experiments

Privacy Preservation and Analytical Utility of E-Learning Data Mashups in the Web of Data

Virtual learning environments contain valuable data about students that can be correlated and analyzed to optimize learning. Modern learning environments based on data mashups that collect and integrate data from multiple sources are relevant for learning analytics systems because they provide insights into students' learning. However, data sets involved in mashups may contain personal information of sensitive nature that raises legitimate privacy concerns. Average privacy preservation methods are based on preemptive approaches that limit the published data in a mashup based on access control and authentication schemes. Such limitations may reduce the analytical utility of the data exposed to gain students' learning insights. In order to reconcile utility and privacy preservation of published data, this research proposes a new data mashup protocol capable of merging and k-anonymizing data sets in cloud-based learning environments without jeopardizing the analytical utility of the information. The implementation of the protocol is based on linked data so that data sets involved in the mashups are semantically described, thereby enabling their combination with relevant educational data sources. The k-anonymized data sets returned by the protocol still retain essential information for supporting general data exploration and statistical analysis tasks. The analytical and empirical evaluation shows that the proposed protocol prevents individuals' sensitive information from re-identifying.The Spanish National Research Agency (AEI) funded this research through the project CREPES (ref. PID2020-115844RB-I00) with ERDF funds

A quest for efficacy in data protection: a legal and behavioural analysis

[eng] The article questions the role of consent to the processing of personal data, especially in the technological context, as a tool of self-determination or protection of the data subject. The work draws on some results from behavioural studies and some Italian judgements regarding other private actions in data protection law (liability for damages). Some suggestions towards an alternative scenario are finally suggested.[spa] El artículo cuestiona el rol del consentimiento en el tratamiento de datos personales, particularmente en el contexto tecnológico como herramienta de la autodeterminación o protección del interesado. Este trabajo analiza algunas conclusiones de estudios comportamentales y determinadas resoluciones judiciales del ordenamiento italiano respecto del ejercicio de acciones privadas en el derecho de protección de datos (responsabilidad por daños). Finalmente se exponen algunas recomendaciones de un escenario alternativ